Advertisement

Human Studies

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 447–465 | Cite as

Humanizing the Understanding of the Acculturation Experience with Phenomenology

  • Jennifer A. Skuza
Research Paper

Abstract

Multiple disciplines have contributed to acculturation research with aims to measure, conceptualize, and theorize this complex phenomenon. Few studies, however, have attempted to find meaning in how acculturation is lived and, this lack may have contributed to acculturation being understood as a construct removed from human experience. The purpose of this article is to show how a research methodology based on phenomenological epistemology can humanize the understanding of the acculturation experience. This contribution is demonstrated in a study that used a phenomenological approach to describe and elucidate acculturation as a lived experience in the context of Latina adolescents who emigrated from Mexico to the US. Thus, this article illustrates how the phenomenological approach used in this study allows new meanings of acculturation to be experientially revealed.

Keywords

Acculturation Adolescents Assimilation Epistemology Immigrants Latina adolescents Phenomenology Youth 

References

  1. Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 5–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cuéllar, I., Arnold, B., & Maldonado, R. (1995). Acculturation rating scale for Mexican Americas-II: A revision of the original ARSMA Scale. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 17(3), 275–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dahlberg, K., & Drew, N. (1997). The lifeworld paradigm for nursing research. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 15(3), 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dahlberg, K., Drew, N., & Nyström, M. (2001). Reflective lifeworld research. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  5. Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28(2), 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heidegger, M. (1927/1962). Being and time (trans: J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  7. Hernandez, M. (1996). Central American families. In M. McGoldrick, J. Giordano, & J. K. Pearce (Eds.), Ethnicity and family therapy (2nd ed., pp. 214–224). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Husserl, E. (1936/1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (trans: D. Carr). Evanston: North Western University Press.Google Scholar
  9. LaFromboise, T., Coleman, H. L. K., & Gerton, J. (1993). Psychological impact of biculturalism: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marcel, G. (1960). The mystery of being (Vol. 1) (trans: G. S. Fraser). London: The Harvill Press, Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Mendoza, R. H. (1984). Acculturation and sociocultural variability. In J. L. Martinez Jr. & R. H. Mendoza (Eds.), Chicano psychology (2nd ed.). Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1962). The phenomenology of perception (trans: C. Smith). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  13. Northover, M. (1988). Bilingual or “dual linguistic identities”?. In J. Berry & R. Annis (Eds.), Ethnic psychology: Research and practice with immigrants, refugees, native peoples, ethnic groups and sojourners (pp. 207–216). Berwyn: Swets North America.Google Scholar
  14. Oetting, E. R., Swaim, R. C., & Chiarella, M. C. (1998). Factor structure and invariance of the orthogonal cultural identification scale among American Indian and Mexican American youth. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 20(2), 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Olmedo, E. L., Martinez, J. L., & Martinez, S. R. (1978). Measure of acculturation for Chicano adolescents. Psychological Reports, 42, 159–170.Google Scholar
  16. Padilla, A. M., Cervantes, R. C., Maldonado, M., & Garcia, R. E. (1988). Coping responses to psychological stressors among Mexican and Central America immigrants. Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 418–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ramirez, M. (1991). Psychotherapy and counseling with minorities: A cognitive approach to individual and cultural differences. Elmsford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  18. Redfield, R., Linton, R., & Herskovits, M. (1936). Memorandum for the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38, 149–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rotheram-Borus, M. J. (1990). Adolescents’ reference-group choices, self-esteem, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1075–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sabogal, F., Marín, G., Otero-Sabogal, R., Marín, B. V., & Perez-Stable, E. J. (1987). Hispanic familism and acculturation: What changes and what doesn’t? Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9(4), 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schutz, A. (1944). The stranger: An essay in social psychology. American Journal of Sociology, 49(6), 499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schutz, A. (1964). Collected papers volume II: Studies in social theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  23. Skuza, J. A. (2003). The experience of acculturation for Latina adolescents from Mexico: A phenomenological study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  24. Szapocznik, J., Scopetta, M., Kurtines, W., & Aranalde, B. (1978) Theory and measurement of acculturation. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 12, 113–130.Google Scholar
  25. van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  26. Von Knorring-Giorgi, B. (1998). A phenomenological analysis of the experience of pivotal moments in therapy as defined by clients. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Quebec, Montreal.Google Scholar
  27. Vigil, J. D. (1998). From Indians to Chicanos: The dynamics of Mexican-American culture (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights: Waveland Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Young, M. C., & Gardner, R. C. (1990). Modes of acculturation and second language proficiency. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Youth DevelopmentUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations