Advertisement

Human Studies

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 233–253 | Cite as

Towards a Phenomenological Theory of Violence: Reflections Following Merleau-Ponty and Schutz

  • Michael StaudiglEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

This paper lays the groundwork for developing a thorough-going phenomenological description of different phenomena of violence such as physical, psychic and structural violence. The overall aim is to provide subject-centered approaches to violence within the social sciences and the humanities with an integrative theoretical framework. To do so, I will draw primarily on the phenomenological accounts of Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Alfred Schutz, and thereby present guiding clues for a phenomenologically grounded theory of violence.

Keywords

Phenomenology of violence Embodiment Vulnerability Maurice Merleau-Ponty Alfred Schutz 

Notes

Acknowldegments

This article is part of the project Phänomen Gewalt, funded by APART, Austrian Academy of Sciences. I would like to thank the IWM, Vienna, for offering me a Visiting Fellowship to work on it, and finally James Dodd, James Mensch, David Nichols, and Vern Walker, as well as two unknown referees, for their comments on earlier versions of this article

References

  1. Abbink, J. (2000). Preface: Violation and violence as cultural phenomena. In J. Abbink, & G. Aijmer (Eds.), Meanings of violence. A cross cultural perspective (pp. xi–xvii). Oxford & New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1970). On violence. New York: Harvest Books.Google Scholar
  3. Athens, L. (2005). Violent encounters. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34, 631–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Behnke, E. (2003). Embodiment work for the victims of violation: In solidarity with the community of the shaken. In C. F. Cheung, I. Chvatik, I. Copoeru, L. Embree, J. Iribarne, & H. R. Sepp (Eds.), Essays in celebration of the founding of phenomenological organisations (pp. 1–14). Retrieved August 28, 2004, from http://www.o-p-o.net/essays/BehnkeArticle.pdf.
  5. Bernasconi, R. (2000). The invisibility of racial minorities in the public realm of appearances. In L. Embree, & K. Thompson (Eds.), Phenomenology of the political, (pp. 169–187). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  6. Best, J. (1999). Random violence: How we talk about new crimes and new victims. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blok, A. (2000). The Enigma of Senseless Violence. In J. Abbink, & G. Aijmer (Eds.), Meanings of violence. A cross cultural perspective (pp. 23–38). Oxford & New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  8. David, A. (2001). Racisme et antisémitisme. Essai de philosophie sur l’envers des concepts. Paris: Ellipses.Google Scholar
  9. Denzin, N. K. (1984). Toward a phenomenology of domestic, family violence. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 483–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dreher, J. (2003). The symbol and the theory of the life-world. Human Studies, 26, 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Endress, M. (2004). Entgrenzung des Menschlichen. Zur Transformation der Strukturen menschlichen Weltbezuges durch Gewalt. In W. Heitmeyer, & H. G. Soeffner (Eds.), Gewalt (pp. 174–201). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  12. Etzioni, A. (1971). Violence. In: R. Merton, & R. Nisbet (Eds.), Contemporary social problems (pp. 709–741). New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  13. Freud, S. (1997). The Splitting of the Ego in the Process of Defence. In P. Rieff (Ed.), Sexuality and the psychology of love (pp. 210–213). New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  14. Galtung, J. (1975). Strukturelle Gewalt. Beiträge zur Friedens – und Konfliktforschung. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  15. Gilligan, J. (1997). Violence. Reflections on a national epidemic. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  16. Giorgi, A. (2004). A way to overcome the methodological vicissitudes involved in researching subjectivity. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 35(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heidegger, M. (1985). History of the Concept of Time (T. Kisiel, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hitzler, R. (2003). Gewalt als Intention und Widerfahrnis. Zur Differenz zwischen einer handlungs- und einer definitionstheoretischen Perspektive. In B. Menzel, & K. Ratzke (Eds.), Grenzenlose Konstruktivität, (pp. 99–108). Opladen: Leske & Budrich.Google Scholar
  19. Husserl, E. (1959). In R. Boehm (Ed.), Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  20. Husserl, E. (1970). Cartesian meditations (D. Cairns, Trans.). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  21. Husserl, E. (1971). In I. Kern (Ed.), Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlaß. Dritter Teil: 1929–1935. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  22. Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology (F. Kersten, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  23. Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Second book: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution (R. Rojczewicz & A. Schuwer, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  24. Joas, H. (2000). Kriege und Werte. Studien zur Gewaltgeschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts. Weilerswist: Velbrück.Google Scholar
  25. Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: Moral and sensual attractions of doing evil. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Kearney, R. (2003). Strangers, gods and monsters. Interpreting otherness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Leder, D. (1990). The absent body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Levinas, E. (1981). Otherwise than being or beyond essence (A. Lingis, Trans.). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  29. Luhmann, N. (1995). Die Soziologie und der Mensch. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  30. Marcel, G. (1949). Being and having (K. Farrer, Trans.). Westminster: Dacre Press.Google Scholar
  31. Marion, J.-L. (2002). Being given. Toward a phenomenology of givenness (J. L. Kosky, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mauss, M. (1990). The gift. The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Mensch, J. (2003). Ethics and selfhood. Alterity and the phenomenology of obligation. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  34. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Signs (R. C. Mc. Cleary, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968a). Résumés de cours (C. Lefort, Ed.). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  36. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968b). The visible and the invisible. Followed by working notes (A. Lingis, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Merleau-Ponty (1973). Adventures of the dialectic (J. Bien, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Merleau-Ponty (1990). Humanism and terror. An essay on the communist problem (J. O’Neill, Trans.). New York: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  39. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London et al.: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Nedelmann, B. (1997). Gewaltsoziologie am Scheideweg. Die Auseinandersetzung in der gegenwärtigen und Wege der künftigen Gewaltforschung. In T. v. Trotha (Ed.), Soziologie der Gewalt (pp. 59–85). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  41. Popitz, H. (1992). Phänomene der Macht. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  42. Rapport, N. (2000). ‘Criminals by instinct’: On the ‘tragedy’ of social structure and the ‘violence’ of individual creativity. In J. Abbink, & G. Aijmer (Eds.), Meanings of violence. A cross cultural perspective, (pp. 39–54). Oxford & New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  43. Sartre, J. P. (2004). Critique of dialectical reason. vol. 1: Theory of practical ensembles (A. Sheridan-Smith, Trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  44. Scarry, E. (1987). The body in pain. The making and unmaking of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Scheler, M. (1980). Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
  46. Scheper-Hughes, N., & Bourgois, P. (2005). Introduction: Making sense of violence. In N. Scheper-Hughes, & P. Bourgois (Eds.), Violence in war and peace (pp. 1–31). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  47. Schmidt, R., & Schroeder, I. (2001). Introduction. Violent imaginaries and violent practices. In R. Schmidt, & I. Schroeder (Eds.), Anthropology of violence and conflict (pp. 1–24). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Schroer, M. (2003). Gewalt ohne Gesicht. Zur Notwendigkeit einer umfassenden Gewaltanalyse. In W. Heitmeyer, & H.-G. Soeffner (Eds.), Gewalt (pp. 151–173). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  49. Schutz, A. (1964). Equality and the meaning-structure of the social world. In A. Brodersen (Ed.), Collected papers (Vol. 2, pp. 226–273). The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  50. Schutz, A. (1970a). On phenomenology and social relations. Selected writings (H. Wagner, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Schutz, A. (1970b). In R. M. Zaner (Ed.), Reflections on the problem of relevance. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Schutz, A. (1974). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  53. Schutz, A., & Luckmann, Th. (1994). Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Band I. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  54. Schutz A. (2003). In M. Endress & I. Srubar (Eds.), Theorie der Lebenswelt 1. Die pragmatische Schichtung der Lebenswelt. Konstanz: University Press Konstanz.Google Scholar
  55. Shaw, R. L. (2004). Making sense of violence: A study of narrative meaning. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sofsky, W. (1996). Traktat über die Gewalt. Frankfurt: Fischer.Google Scholar
  57. Sofsky, W. (1999). The order of terror. The concentration camp (W. Templer, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Srubar, I. (1988). Kosmion. Zur Genese der pragmatischen Lebenswelttheorie von Alfred Schütz und ihrem anthropologischem Hintergrund. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  59. Staudigl, M. (2005). Vorüberlegungen zu einer phänomenologischen Theorie der Gewalt. Einsatzpunkte und Perspektiven. In H. Maye, & H. R. Sepp (Eds.), Phänomenologie und Gewalt (pp. 45–63). Würzburg: Königshausen Neumann.Google Scholar
  60. Staudigl, M. (2006). Gewalt als affektive Sinngebung. Zur Möglichkeit einer Phänomenologie der Gewalt bei Husserl. In J. Trinks, & M. Staudigl (Eds.), Ereignis und Affektivität. Zur Phänomenologie sich bildenden Sinnes (pp. 293–317). Vienna: Turia & Kant.Google Scholar
  61. Trotha, T. v. (1997). Zur Soziologie der Gewalt. In T. v. Trotha (Ed.), Soziologie der Gewalt, (pp. 9–56). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  62. Wagner, H. (1970). Introduction. In A. Schutz (Eds.), On phenomenology and social relations. Selected writings, (pp. 1–50). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Waldenfels, B. (1971). Das Zwischenreich des Dialoges. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  64. Waldenfels, B. (1999). Symbolik, Kreativität und Responsivität. Grundzüge einer Phänomenologie des Handelns. In J. Straub, & H. Werbik (Eds.), Handlungstheorie. Begriff und Erklärung im interdisziplinären Diskurs (pp. 243–260). Frankfurt & New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  65. Waldenfels, B. (2000). Aporien der Gewalt. In M. Dabag, A. Kapust, & B. Waldenfels (Eds.), Gewalt. Strukturen, Formen, Repräsentationen (pp. 9–24). Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
  66. Waldenfels, B. (2002). Bruchlinien der Erfahrung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  67. Warren, N. de (2004). The apocalypse of hope. Political violence in the writings of Sartre and Fanon. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 27(1), 25–59.Google Scholar
  68. Whitehead, N. (2004). On the poetics of violence. In N. Whitehead (Ed.), Violence (pp. 55–77). Oxford: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  69. Zaner, R. (1964). The problem of embodiment. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Human SciencesViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations