Human Studies

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 107–122 | Cite as

Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy

  • Casper Bruun Jensen
Review Essay


Political Life Modern Constitution Review Essay Political Ecology Lower House 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L. (1991). De la Justification: Les Economies de la Grandeur. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  2. Chertok, L., Stengers, I. and Gille, D. (1990). Mémoires d'un Hérétique. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  3. de Castro, E. B. V. (2004) “Exchanging Perspectives: The Transformation of Objects into Subjects in Amerindian Ontologies,” Common Knowledge 10:3, 463–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deleuze, G. (1990). Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  5. Despret, V. (1996). Naissance d'une Théorie Éthologique. Paris: Les Empécheurs de Penser en Rond.Google Scholar
  6. Fish, S. (1989). Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Geertz, C. (2000). Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gunderson, L. H. and Holling, C. S. (Eds.) (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, Covelo, and London: Island Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Latour, B. (1988a). “The Politics of Explanation: An Alternative.” In Steve Woolgar (ed.) Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Sage. 155–175.Google Scholar
  12. Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  13. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's Hope –Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Obeyesekere, G. (1997). The Apotheosis of Captain Cook. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Nathan, T. (1994). L'influence qui Guérit. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  16. Sahlins, M. (1995). How “Natives” Think: About Captain Cook, For Example. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Smith, B. H. (1988), Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory. Cambridge.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Stengers, I. (1996-7). Cosmopolitiques (Vol. 1–7). Paris: La Découverte, Les Empécheurs de Penser en Rond.Google Scholar
  19. Stengers, I. (2000). The Invention of Modern Science. Theory Out of Bounds vol. 19. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. Stengers, I. (2002). Penser avec Whitehead: UneLlibre et Sauvage Creation de Concepts. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  21. Stengers, I. and Ralet, O. (1991). Drogues, le Défi Hollandaise. Paris: Laboratoire Delagrange.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information and Media StudiesUniversity of AarhusAarhus NDenmark

Personalised recommendations