Exploring Diversity in Forest Management Outlooks of African American Family Forest Landowners for Ensuring Sustainability of Forestry Resources in the Southern United States
African American forest landowners in the southern United States (US) are typically considered a homogenous group in current studies. Our research challenges this assumption by identifying four distinct forest management outlooks among African American forest landowners using Q Method. Sustainable Harvesters focus on balanced land use with a long-term outlook; Back 40ers appreciate the presence of forests on their property but focus on alternative land use; Land Use Pragmatists are also interested in alternative land use and primarily view forest as an economic resource; Recreationalists value their forestland not for economic value but as a place for personal use. Finally, Indecisive landowners are not sure about how to best manage their forestland. We argue that an understanding of different forest management outlooks will improve sustainable forest management by better targeting extension and outreach efforts for African American forest landowners.
KeywordsAfrican American Forest management Q Method Rural extension and outreach Southern United States
Authors would like to express their gratitude to the 34 landowners who participated in our survey and especially to the six who welcomed us into their homes and the three landowners who provided expert opinions in designing the survey. We would also like to acknowledge the members of the University of Georgia and Fort Valley State University Cooperative Extension who invited us to conduct the pile sorting exercise at the workshops.
NG collected and analyzed the data and wrote the paper. PD conceptualized the idea, wrote the paper, and supervised the overall research. SH and JS conceptualized the research and conducted qualitative interviews. MT conceptualized the research and supervised data collection.
This research was supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award number 2016–38640-25382 through the Southern Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program under sub-award number LS17–281.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Human Subject Research
Approved by the University of Georgia’s Internal Review Board (# STUDY00005338).
Conflict of Interest
The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no competing interests between the work presented in this manuscript and any other work in which they are engaged.
- Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
- Butler, B. J., Hewes, J. H., Dickinson, B. J., Andrejczyk, K., Butler, S. M., and Markowski-Lindsay, M. (2016). National Woodland Owner Survey Summary Tables Family Forest and Woodland Ownerships (10 + acres) United States, 2011–2013. USDA Forest Service Resource Bulletin NRS-99. Newton Square, PA.Google Scholar
- Christian, C., Fraser, R., and Diop, A. (2013). African-American Land Loss and Sustainable Forestry in the Southeast: An Analysis of the Issues, Opportunities, and Gaps. Journal of Extension 51(6): 1–14.Google Scholar
- Gan, J., and Kolison, S. H. (1999). Minority Forest Landowners in Southeastern Alabama. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 23(3): 175–178.Google Scholar
- Gan, J., Kolison, S. H. Jr., and Tackie, N. O. (2003). African-American Forestland Owners in Alabama’s Black Belt. Journal of Forestry 101(3): 38–43.Google Scholar
- Georgia Institute of Technology. (2016). Economic benefits of the Forest industry in Georgia: 2016.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, J., Sharp, G., and Sindy Felin, M. (2002). The Loss and Persistence of Black-Owned Farms and Farmland: A Review of the Research Literature and its Implications. Southern Rural Sociology 18(2): 1–30.Google Scholar
- Guffey, C., Heitzman, E., Williams, R., Walkingstick, T., and Williams, P. S. (2009). In their own words: Perceptions of forestry among African-American forest landowners in Arkansas Delta. In Ashton, S. E., Hubbard, W. G., and Rauscher, H. M. (eds.), A Southern Region Conference on Technology Transfer and Extension, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Ashville, pp. 45–50.Google Scholar
- Hitchner, S., Schelhas, J., and Gaither, C. J. (2017). “A Privilege and a Challenge”: Valuation of Heirs’ Property by African American Landowners and Implications for Forest Management in the Southeastern U.S. Small-scale Forestry 16(3): 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-017-9362-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hitchner, S., Dwivedi, P., Schelhas, J., and Jagadish, A. (2019). Gatekeepers, Shareholders, and Evangelists: Expanding Communication Networks of African American Forest Landowners in North Carolina. Society & Natural Resources, (Available Online). https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2018.1560521.
- Johnson-Gaither, C. (2016). “Have Not Our Weary Feet Come to the Place for Which our Father’s Sighed”: Heir’s Property in the Southern United States. USDA Forest Service Technical Report SRS-216. Asheville, NC.Google Scholar
- Merem, E. (2006). The Loss of Agricultural Land Among Black Farmers. Western Journal of Black Studies 30(2): 89–102. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=35435686&site=ehost-live. Accessed 09 Dec 2018.
- Reid, D. A., and Bennett, E. P. (eds.) (2012). Beyond 40 Acres and a Mule (Reprint.), University Press of Florida, Gainsville.Google Scholar
- Riall, B. W. (2010). Economic Benefits of the Forestry Industry in Georgia: 2010, Georgia Forestry Commission, Macon.Google Scholar
- Schelhas, J., Zabawa, R., and Molnar, J. J. (2003). New Opportunities for Social Research on Forest Landowners in the South. Southern Rural Sociology 19(2): 60–69. http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/ja/ja_schelhas007.pdf?. Accessed 09 Dec 2018.
- Schelhas, J., Zhang, Y., Zabawa, R., and Zheng, B. (2012). Exploring Family Forest Landowner Diversity: Place, Race, and Gender in Alabama, United States. International Journal of Social Forestry 5(1): 1–21.Google Scholar
- Schelhas, J., Hitchner, S., Johnson Gaither, C., and Jennings, V. (2017b). “Sunshine, Sweat, and Tears”: African American Ties to Land and Forests in the South, USDA Forest Service Technical Report SRS-220, Asheville, NC.Google Scholar
- Stephenson, W. (1953). The Study of BEHAVIOR. Q-Technique and Its Methodology, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Stutzman, E., Jo, R., Wayde, B., Dale, M., and Teeter, L. (2019). Targeting Educational Needs Based on Natural Resource Professionals’ Familiarity, Learning, and Perceptions of Silvopasture in the Southeastern U. S. Agroforestry Systems 93(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0260-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Winkler, R., Johnson, K. M., Cheng, C., Beaudoin, J., Voss, P. R., and Curtis, K. J. (2013). Age-specific net migration estimates for US counties, 1950–2010. Applied Population Laboratory, University of Wisconsin Madion. http://netmigration.wisc.edu. Accessed 31 July 2017.