Advertisement

Exploring Diversity in Forest Management Outlooks of African American Family Forest Landowners for Ensuring Sustainability of Forestry Resources in the Southern United States

  • Noah GoykeEmail author
  • Puneet Dwivedi
  • Sarah Hitchner
  • John Schelhas
  • Marc Thomas
Article

Abstract

African American forest landowners in the southern United States (US) are typically considered a homogenous group in current studies. Our research challenges this assumption by identifying four distinct forest management outlooks among African American forest landowners using Q Method. Sustainable Harvesters focus on balanced land use with a long-term outlook; Back 40ers appreciate the presence of forests on their property but focus on alternative land use; Land Use Pragmatists are also interested in alternative land use and primarily view forest as an economic resource; Recreationalists value their forestland not for economic value but as a place for personal use. Finally, Indecisive landowners are not sure about how to best manage their forestland. We argue that an understanding of different forest management outlooks will improve sustainable forest management by better targeting extension and outreach efforts for African American forest landowners.

Keywords

African American Forest management Q Method Rural extension and outreach Southern United States 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to express their gratitude to the 34 landowners who participated in our survey and especially to the six who welcomed us into their homes and the three landowners who provided expert opinions in designing the survey. We would also like to acknowledge the members of the University of Georgia and Fort Valley State University Cooperative Extension who invited us to conduct the pile sorting exercise at the workshops.

Author Contributions

NG collected and analyzed the data and wrote the paper. PD conceptualized the idea, wrote the paper, and supervised the overall research. SH and JS conceptualized the research and conducted qualitative interviews. MT conceptualized the research and supervised data collection.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award number 2016–38640-25382 through the Southern Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program under sub-award number LS17–281.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Human Subject Research

Approved by the University of Georgia’s Internal Review Board (# STUDY00005338).

Conflict of Interest

The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no competing interests between the work presented in this manuscript and any other work in which they are engaged.

References

  1. Blanco, V., Brown, C., and Rounsevell, M. (2015). Characterising Forest Owners Through Their Objectives, Attributes and Management Strategies. European Journal of Forest Research 134(6): 1027–1041.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-015-0907-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bliss, J. C., Sisock, M. L., and Birch, T. W. (1998). Ownership Matters: Forestland Concentration in Rural Alabama. Society and Natural Resources 11(4): 401–410.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929809381090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, B. J., Hewes, J. H., Dickinson, B. J., Andrejczyk, K., Butler, S. M., and Markowski-Lindsay, M. (2016). National Woodland Owner Survey Summary Tables Family Forest and Woodland Ownerships (10 + acres) United States, 2011–2013. USDA Forest Service Resource Bulletin NRS-99. Newton Square, PA.Google Scholar
  5. Christian, C., Fraser, R., and Diop, A. (2013). African-American Land Loss and Sustainable Forestry in the Southeast: An Analysis of the Issues, Opportunities, and Gaps. Journal of Extension 51(6): 1–14.Google Scholar
  6. Deaton, B. J., Baxter, J., and Bratt, C. S. (2009). Examining the Consequences and Character of “Heir Property”. Ecological Economics 68(8–9): 2344–2353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickens, E. D., Moorhead, D. J., Ogden, L. A., and Mcelvany, B. C. (2012). A Summary of Pine Straw Yields and Economic Benefits in Loblolly, Longleaf and Slash Pine Stands. Agroforestry Systems 86: 315–321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9542-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dwivedi, P., Jagadish, A., and Schelhas, J. (2016). Perceptions of Stakeholder Groups About the Participation of African American Family Forest Landowners in Federal Landowner Assistance Programs. Journal of Forestry 114(2): 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dyer, J. F., and Bailey, C. (2008). A Place to Call Home: Cultural Understandings of Heir Property Among Rural African Americans. Rural Sociology 73(3): 317–338.  https://doi.org/10.1526/003601108785766598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eyvindson, K., Kangas, A., and Hujala, T. (2015). Likert Versus Q-Approaches in Survey Methodologies: Discrepancies in Results with Same Respondents. Quality and Quantity 7(49): 509–522.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0006-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ficko, A., Lidestav, G., Ní Dhubháin, Á., Karppinen, H., Zivojinovic, I., and Westin, K. (2019). European Private Forest Owner Typologies: A Review of Methods and Use. Forest Policy and Economics 99(1): 21–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gan, J., and Kolison, S. H. (1999). Minority Forest Landowners in Southeastern Alabama. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 23(3): 175–178.Google Scholar
  13. Gan, J., Kolison, S. H. Jr., and Tackie, N. O. (2003). African-American Forestland Owners in Alabama’s Black Belt. Journal of Forestry 101(3): 38–43.Google Scholar
  14. Gan, J., Onianwa, O. O., Schelhas, J., Wheelock, G. C., and Dubois, M. R. (2005). Does Race Matter in Landowners’ Participation in Conservation Incentive Programs? Society & Natural Resources 18(5): 431–445.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920590924792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Georgia Institute of Technology. (2016). Economic benefits of the Forest industry in Georgia: 2016.Google Scholar
  16. Gilbert, J., Sharp, G., and Sindy Felin, M. (2002). The Loss and Persistence of Black-Owned Farms and Farmland: A Review of the Research Literature and its Implications. Southern Rural Sociology 18(2): 1–30.Google Scholar
  17. Gordon, J. S., Barton, A., and Adams, K. (2013). An Exploration of African American Forest Landowners in Mississippi. Rural Sociology 78(4): 473–497.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guffey, C., Heitzman, E., Williams, R., Walkingstick, T., and Williams, P. S. (2009). In their own words: Perceptions of forestry among African-American forest landowners in Arkansas Delta. In Ashton, S. E., Hubbard, W. G., and Rauscher, H. M. (eds.), A Southern Region Conference on Technology Transfer and Extension, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Ashville, pp. 45–50.Google Scholar
  19. Hitchner, S., Schelhas, J., and Gaither, C. J. (2017). “A Privilege and a Challenge”: Valuation of Heirs’ Property by African American Landowners and Implications for Forest Management in the Southeastern U.S. Small-scale Forestry 16(3): 395–417.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-017-9362-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hitchner, S., Dwivedi, P., Schelhas, J., and Jagadish, A. (2019). Gatekeepers, Shareholders, and Evangelists: Expanding Communication Networks of African American Forest Landowners in North Carolina. Society & Natural Resources, (Available Online).  https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2018.1560521.
  21. Johnson-Gaither, C. (2016). “Have Not Our Weary Feet Come to the Place for Which our Father’s Sighed”: Heir’s Property in the Southern United States. USDA Forest Service Technical Report SRS-216. Asheville, NC.Google Scholar
  22. McKeown, B., and Thomas, D. (1988). In Sullican, J. L., and Niemi, R. G. (eds.), Q Methodology, Sage Publications, Inc, Newbury Park.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Merem, E. (2006). The Loss of Agricultural Land Among Black Farmers. Western Journal of Black Studies 30(2): 89–102. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=35435686&site=ehost-live. Accessed 09 Dec 2018.
  24. Mitchell, T. W. (2014). Reforming Property Law to Address Devastating Land Loss. Alabama Law Review 66(2): 1–61.  https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2011.0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reid, D. A., and Bennett, E. P. (eds.) (2012). Beyond 40 Acres and a Mule (Reprint.), University Press of Florida, Gainsville.Google Scholar
  26. Riall, B. W. (2010). Economic Benefits of the Forestry Industry in Georgia: 2010, Georgia Forestry Commission, Macon.Google Scholar
  27. Schelhas, J., Zabawa, R., and Molnar, J. J. (2003). New Opportunities for Social Research on Forest Landowners in the South. Southern Rural Sociology 19(2): 60–69. http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/ja/ja_schelhas007.pdf?. Accessed 09 Dec 2018.
  28. Schelhas, J., Zhang, Y., Zabawa, R., and Zheng, B. (2012). Exploring Family Forest Landowner Diversity: Place, Race, and Gender in Alabama, United States. International Journal of Social Forestry 5(1): 1–21.Google Scholar
  29. Schelhas, J., Hitchner, S., Johnson Gaither, C., Fraser, R., Jennings, V., and Diop, A. (2017a). Engaging African American Landowners in Sustainable Forest Management. Journal of Forestry 115(1): 26–33.  https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.15-116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schelhas, J., Hitchner, S., Johnson Gaither, C., and Jennings, V. (2017b). “Sunshine, Sweat, and Tears”: African American Ties to Land and Forests in the South, USDA Forest Service Technical Report SRS-220, Asheville, NC.Google Scholar
  31. Schelhas, J., Hitchner, S., and Dwivedi, P. (2018). Strategies for Successful Engagement of African American Landowners in Forestry. Journal of Forestry 6(3): 581–588.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvy044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Silver, E. J., Leahy, J. E., Weiskittel, A. R., Noblet, C. L., and Kittredge, D. B. (2015). An Evidence-Based Review of Timber Harvesting Behavior Among Private Woodland Owners. Journal of Forestry 113(5): 490–499.  https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.14-089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stephenson, W. (1953). The Study of BEHAVIOR. Q-Technique and Its Methodology, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  34. Stutzman, E., Jo, R., Wayde, B., Dale, M., and Teeter, L. (2019). Targeting Educational Needs Based on Natural Resource Professionals’ Familiarity, Learning, and Perceptions of Silvopasture in the Southeastern U. S. Agroforestry Systems 93(1).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0260-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Takala, T., Hujala, T., Tanskanen, M., and Tikkanen, J. (2017). The Order of Forest Owners’ Discourses: Hegemonic and Marginalised Truths About the Forest and Forest Ownership. Journal of Rural Studies 55: 33–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Urquhart, J., Courtney, P., and Slee, B. (2012). Private Woodland Owners’ Perspectives on Multifunctionality in English Woodlands. Journal of Rural Studies 28(1): 95–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Watts, S., and Stenner, P. (2005). Doing Q Methodology: Theory, Method and Interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2(1): 67–91.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088705qp022oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Winkler, R., Johnson, K. M., Cheng, C., Beaudoin, J., Voss, P. R., and Curtis, K. J. (2013). Age-specific net migration estimates for US counties, 1950–2010. Applied Population Laboratory, University of Wisconsin Madion. http://netmigration.wisc.edu. Accessed 31 July 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Warnell School of Forestry and Natural ResourcesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Center for Integrative Conservation ResearchUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  3. 3.Southern Research Station, USDA Forest ServiceAthensUSA
  4. 4.Cooperative ExtensionFort Valley State UniversityFort ValleyUSA

Personalised recommendations