Structure and Composition of Historical Longleaf Pine Ecosystems in Mississippi, USA
- 140 Downloads
Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) historically was a widespread ecosystem composed of a simple tree canopy and grasslands ground layer. After widespread loss of this ecosystem due to logging and fire exclusion, little quantitative information exists about historical structure for restoration goals. We identified composition in De Soto National Forest and Pearl River County, Mississippi, USA, and density, basal area, and percent stocking in Pearl River County using General Land Office surveys and US Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis surveys. Historical longleaf ecosystems were about 85% pine, with lesser amounts of broadleaf evergreen and oak species. Densities were about 175 to 180 trees/ha, mean tree diameters were 45 cm, and stocking was around 60% to 65%, which suggested longleaf pines were closed woodlands. Current forests are 38% to 57% pine, primarily loblolly, while longleaf pine is 2% to 8% of composition. Indeed, current longleaf pine composition across the Coastal Plain averages 3% and does not reach 10% at smaller landscape scales. Fire-sensitive broadleaf species of water oak, sweetgum, yellow-poplar, and red maple increased from about 0.5% composition to 2% to 10% of composition. Forests became twice as dense, at about 280 trees/ha to 330 trees/ha, with mean tree diameters of 22 cm. These results characterize conversion from open old growth longleaf forests, resulting in part from human maintenance, to successional forests due to human disruption of the historical ecosystem. It is important to remember structure and composition of historical forests for restoration and recognize wholesale changes so that successional forests do not become the new social and cultural baseline.
KeywordsLongleaf pine (Pinus palustris) Historical ecology USA forest service Mississippi Open old growth longleaf forests
Views in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the USDA Forest Service.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
The authors approved the manuscript and are responsible for interpretation of results and for any errors contained in this paper.
- Arner, S. L., Woudenberg, S., Waters, S., Vissage, J., MacLean, C., Thompson, M., and Hansen, M. (2001). National Algorithms for Determining Stocking Class, Stand Size Class, and Forest Type for Forest Inventory and Analysis Plots, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research, Newtown Square, PA.Google Scholar
- Bechtold, W. A., and Patterson, P. L. (2005). The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program-national sampling design and estimation procedures. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-80. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC.Google Scholar
- Cleland, D., Freeouf, J., Keys, J., Nowacki, G., Carpenter, C., and McNab, W. (2007). Ecological Subregions: Sections and Subsections for the Conterminous United States, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Conner, R. C., and Hartsell, A. J. (2002). Forest area and conditions. In Wear, D.N., and Greis, J.G. (eds.), Southern Forest Resource Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-53. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, pp. 357–402.Google Scholar
- Fowler, C., and Konopik, E. (2007). The History of Fire in the Southern United States. Human Ecology Review 14: 165–176.Google Scholar
- Frost, C. C. (1993). Four centuries of changing landscape patterns in the longleaf pine ecosystem. In Hermann, S. M. (ed.), Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference, Vol. 18. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL, pp. 17–43.Google Scholar
- Haynes, R. W. (2002). Forest Management in the 21st Century: Changing Numbers, Changing Context. Journal of Forestry 100: 38–43.Google Scholar
- Lorimer, C. G. (2001). Historical and Ecological Roles of Disturbance in Eastern North American Forests: 9,000 years of Change. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: 425–439.Google Scholar
- Means, D. B. (1996). Longleaf pine forest, going, going. In Davis, M. B. (ed.), Eastern Old-Growth Forests: Prospects for Rediscovery and Recovery, Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 210–229.Google Scholar
- Mohr, C. T., and Roth, F. (1897). The Timber Pines of the Southern United States, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC.Google Scholar
- Noss, R. F., LaRoe, E. T., III, Scott, J. M. (1995). Endangered ecosystems of the United States: A preliminary assessment of loss and degradation. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Peet, R. K., and Allard, D. J. (1993). Longleaf pine vegetation of the southern Atlantic and eastern Gulf Coast regions. In Hermann, S. M. (ed.), Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference, Vol. 18. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL, pp. 45–81.Google Scholar
- Plummer, G. L. (1975). 18th Century Forests in Georgia. Bulletin of the Georgian Academy of Sciences 33: 1–19.Google Scholar
- Prestemon, J. P., and Abt, R. C. (2002). Forest area and conditions. In Wear, D. N., and Greis, J. G. (eds.), Southern Forest Resource Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-53, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, pp. 299–324.Google Scholar
- Regional Working Group for America’s Longleaf (2009). Range-wide conservation plan for longleaf pine. http://www.americaslongleaf.org/media/86/conservation_plan.pdf.
- Schultz, R. P. (1997). Loblolly Pine: The Ecology and Culture of Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.). Agriculture Handbook 713. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington DC.Google Scholar
- Wahlenberg, W. G. (1946). Longleaf Pine: Its Use, Ecology, Regeneration, Protection, Growth, and Management, C.L. Pack Forestry Foundation and USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Walker, J. (1993). Rare vascular plant taxa associated with the longleaf pine ecosystems: Patterns in taxonomy and ecology. In Hermann, S. M. (ed.), Proceedings of the Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference, Vol. 18. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL, pp. 105–126.Google Scholar
- Ware, S., Frost, C., and Doerr, P. D. (1993). Southern mixed hardwood forest: the former longleaf pine forest. In Martin, W. H., Boyce, S. G., and Echternacht, A. C. (eds.), Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States: Lowland Terrestrial Communities, Wiley, New York, NY, pp. 447–493.Google Scholar