Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 27–40 | Cite as

Moving Territories: Strategic Selection of Boundary Concepts by Indigenous People in the Bolivian Amazon - an Element of Constitutionality?

  • Helen GambonEmail author
  • Stephan Rist
Article
  • 304 Downloads

Abstract

In this case study, we analyse to what extent the establishment of the Pilón Lajas Indigenous Territory and Biosphere Reserve in the Bolivian Amazon reflects the six elements of the concept of constitutionality. Our analysis elucidates what happened during the second phase of establishment, in which land rights of lowland indigenous peoples were extended to collective territorial rights including highland indigenous peoples and peasants. The case adds a dynamic perspective on the constitutionality framework by providing a longitudinal analysis of a bottom-up institution building process for natural resource governance.

Keywords

Bolivian Amazon Conservation Protected areas Indigenous rights Collective property rights 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jill Belsky and four anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the draft of the article, and Darcy Alexandra and Tina Hirschbuehl for language editing.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All actors involved in this research were informed about the aims of the study in a comprehensible manner; their decision to participate or not was respected throughout the research period.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Agenda Patriótica 2025. (2013). Government of the Plurinational State of Bolivia. http://comunicacion.presidencia.gob.bo/docprensa/pdf/20130123-11-36-55.pdf.
  2. Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality. Technologies of Government and the making of subjects. Edited by Rocheleau Arturo Escobar, Dianne, New Ecologies for the Twenty-First Century. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alcoba, J. R. (2004). Marco institucional y estratégico del Sistema Nacional de Áreas Protegidas de Bolivia (SNAP). In Freddy Delgado B., Mariscal C., Juan Carlos, ed., Gobernabilidad social de las áreas protegidas y biodiversidad en Bolivia y Latinoamérica, 163–77. La Paz: Plural editores.Google Scholar
  4. Anthias, P., and S. A. Radcliffe. (2015). The ethno-environmental fix and its limits: Indigenous land titling and the production of not-quite-liberal natures in Bolivia. Geoforum 64:257–69.Google Scholar
  5. Artaraz, K., and M. Calestani. (2015). Suma qamaña in Bolivia. Indigenous understandings of well-being and their contribution to a post-neoliberal paradigm. Latin American Perspectives 42 (204):216–33.Google Scholar
  6. Assies, W. (2006). Land tenure legislation in a pluri-cultural and multi-ethnic society: The case of Bolivia. Journal of Peasant Studies 33 (4):569–611.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, D. E., and R. Sierra. (2014). Multi-scale dimensions of indigenous land tenure in the Amazon. Human Ecology 42 (4):551–63.Google Scholar
  8. Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Lanham: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blaser, M. (2009). The threat of the Yrmo: The political ontology of a sustainable hunting program. American Anthropologist 111:10–20.Google Scholar
  10. Boillat, S., J. Alca Castillo, A. Álvarez, Bottazzi P., D. Ponce Camacho, E. Serrano, V. Biffi, S. L. Mathez-Stiefel, P. B. Larsen, and S. Rist. (2010). Protected areas and indigenous peoples in Bolivia and Peru: Dilemmas, conflicts, and ways out. In H. Hurni, U. Wiesmann and (with an international group of co-editors), eds., Global Change and Sustainable Development: A Synthesis of Regional Experiences from Research Partnerships, 501–15. Berne: Geographica Bernensia. University of Bern. Switzerland.Google Scholar
  11. Bollig, M., and D. A. Menestrey Schwieger. (2014). Fragmentation, cooperation and power: Institutional dynamics in natural resource governance in north-western Namibia. Human Ecology 42:167–81.Google Scholar
  12. Bottazzi, P. (2008). Linking "socio-" and "bio-"diversity: The stakes of indigenous and non-indigenous co-management in the Bolivian lowlands. In Tobias Haller and Marc Galvin, eds., People, protected areas and global change. Participatory conservation in Latin America, Africa, Asia and Europe, 81–109. Bern: Geographica Bernensia.Google Scholar
  13. Bottazzi, P. (2009). Aux frontières des «ordres» institutionnels territoriaux Peuples autochtones, aires protégées et colonisation agricole en Amazonie bolivienne.Google Scholar
  14. Bottazzi, P., and H. Dao. (2013). On the road through the Bolivian Amazon: A multi-level land governance analysis of deforestation. Land Use Policy 30 (1):137–46.Google Scholar
  15. Bottazzi, P., and S. Rist. (2012). Changing land rights means changing society: The sociopolitical effects of agrarian reforms under the government of Evo Morales. Journal of Agrarian Change 12 (4):528–51.Google Scholar
  16. Canessa, A. (2014). Conflict, claim and contradiction in the new "indigenous" state of Bolivia. Critique Of Anthropology 34 (2):153–73.Google Scholar
  17. Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development 22 (9):1253–68.Google Scholar
  18. Cleaver, F., and J. de Koning. (2016). Furthering critical insititutionalism. International Journal of the Commons 9 (1):1–18.Google Scholar
  19. CRTM, Concejo Regional Tsimane Mosetene. (2011-2013). Libro de Actas 2. Rurrenabaque: unpublished.Google Scholar
  20. CRTM, Concejo Regional Tsimane Mosetene. (2013). Libro de Actas 3. Rurrenabaque: unpublished.Google Scholar
  21. Decree Law 3464. (1953). Government of the Republic of Bolivia. http://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-DL-19530802.xhtml.
  22. Decree Law No. 12301. (1975). Government of the Republic of Bolivia. http://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/en/?details=LEX-FAOC026683.
  23. DeWalt, K. M., and B. R. DeWalt. (2011). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers. Lanhman and Plymouth: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  24. Espinoza T., Carlos W. (2012). La Participación Social en la Gestión de las Áreas Protegidas. Experiencias de la Cooperación Alemana. La Paz: SERNAP, Cooperación Alemana.Google Scholar
  25. Fontana, L. (2013a). Evo Morales at the crossroads: Problematizing the relationship between the state and indigenous movements in Bolivia. Iberoamericana. Nordic Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 18 (1–2):19–45.Google Scholar
  26. Fontana, L. (2013b). On the perils and potentialities of revolution. Conflict and collective action in contemporary Bolivia. Latin American Perspectives 40 (190):26–42.Google Scholar
  27. Fontana, L. (2014). The ‘indigenous native peasant’ trinity: Imagining a plurinational community in Evo Morales’s Bolivia. Environment And Planning D-Society & Space 32:518–34.Google Scholar
  28. Fundación, T. (2010). Reconfigurando territorios. Reforma agraria, control territorial y gobiernos indígenas en Bolivia. La Paz: Fundacion Tierra.Google Scholar
  29. Fundación, T. (2011). Territorios Indígena Originario Campesinos en Bolivia. Entre la Loma Santa y la Pachamama. La Paz.Google Scholar
  30. Garcés, F. (2011). The domestication of indigenous autonomy in Bolivia. From the pact of Unity to the new constitution. In Nicole fabricant and Bret Gustafson, eds., remapping of Bolivia. Resources, territory, and indigeneity in a Plurinational state. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research press.Google Scholar
  31. Geodata. (2016). Ficha Ambiental. Estudio de identificación proyecto hidroeléctrico El Bala "Componente 2 Angosto El Bala 220". Cochabamba: ENDE.Google Scholar
  32. Gombay, N. (2014). ‘Poaching’ – What’s in a name? Debates about law, property, and protection in the context of settler colonialism. Geoforum 55:1–12.Google Scholar
  33. González, M. (2010). Autonomías Territoriales Indígenas Y Regímenes Autonómicos (Desde El Estado) En América Latina. In Miguel González, Araceli Burguete Cal y Mayor and Pablo Ortiz-T., eds., La Autonomía a Debate. Autogobierno Indígena Y Estado Plurinacional En América Latina. Quito, Ecuador: FLACSO, GTZ, IWGIA, CIESAS, UNICH.Google Scholar
  34. Haller, T. (2010). Disputing the floodplains: Institutional change and the politics of resource Management in African Wetlands (with a foreword by Elinor Ostrom), African Social Studies Series. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  35. Haller, T., G. Acciaioli, and S. Rist. (2016). Constitutionality: Conditions for crafting local ownership of institution-building processes. Society & Natural Resources 29 (1):68–87.Google Scholar
  36. Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Hirsch, S. M. (2003). The emergence of political organizations among the Guaraní Indians of Bolivia and Argentina: A comparative perspective. In Erick D. Langer and Elena Muñoz, eds., Contemporary indigenous movements in Latin America. Wilmington, Delaware: Scholarly Resources Inc.Google Scholar
  38. Imaña, G. (2015). "Petroleras Ingresarán a 7 Áreas Protegidas Hasta 2016." La Razón, June 14. http://www.la-razon.com/suplementos/financiero/Petroleras-ingresaran-areas-protegidas-financiero_0_2288171307.html.
  39. INE. (2013). Principales Resultados del Censo Nacional de Poblacion y Vivienda 2012 Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia.Google Scholar
  40. INRA. (2015). Anuario 2015. La Paz: Instituto Nacional de Reforma Agraria.Google Scholar
  41. Laats, H., M. L. Inturias, and C. Caymani. (2012). Megaobras En Madidi Y Pilón Lajas. Hacia Una Transformación de Los Conflictos. La Paz: Embajada Real de Dinamarca, Fundación PIEB.Google Scholar
  42. Law No. 300. (2012). Government of the Plurinational State of Bolivia. http://comunicacion.presidencia.gob.bo/docprensa/pdf/20121015-11-53-28.pdf.
  43. Law No. 1333. (1992). Government of the Republic of Bolivia. http://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-L-1333.xhtml.
  44. Law No. 1715. (1996). Government of the Republic of Bolivia. https://bolivia.infoleyes.com/norma/1274/ley-del-servicio-nacional-de-reforma-agraria-1715.
  45. Law No. 3545. (2006). Government of the Plurinational State of Bolivia. http://www.inra.gob.bo/InraPb/upload/DBL-51-88-95999.pdf;jsessionid=AAEA224B0C78CB8B3753C51BB347E84F.
  46. Márquez G., J. Francisco. (2015). L'agency de la route Yucumo-Rurrenabaque entre développement, conservation et autonomie indigène: une étude de cas dans l'Amazonie Bolivienne. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 33:177–91.Google Scholar
  47. Martinez-Rodriguez, M-R. (2009). "Ethnobotanical knowledge acquisition among Tsimane' children in the Bolivian Amazon." PhD, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  48. McLaughlin, C. M. (2011). "People Living in Protected Areas. A Comparative Study of the Social Impacts of Conservation in Latin America's Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve and Ría Celestún Biosphere Reserve." Unpuplished Master's dissertation, American University United Nations' University for Peace.Google Scholar
  49. Minter, T., J. van der Ploaeg, M. Pedrablanca, T. Sunderland, and G. A. Persoon. (2014). Limits to indigenous participation: The Agta and the northern sierra Madre Natural Park, the Philippines. Human Ecology 42:769–78.Google Scholar
  50. Muller, S. (2014). Co-motion: Making space to care for country. Geoforum 54:132–41.Google Scholar
  51. Nadasdy, P. (2005). The anti-politics of TEK: The institutionalization if co-management discourse and practice. Anthropologica 47 (2):215–32.Google Scholar
  52. Pauquet, S. (2005). Diagnosis of the Pilon Lajas biosphere reserve and communal lands. In ParksWatch Park Profile Series. La Paz.Google Scholar
  53. Paz Ballivián, D. (2015). "Nacionalismo O Coloniaje En El Desarrollo Agrícola." La Razón, May 24. http://la-razon.com/suplementos/animal_politico/Nacionalismo-coloniaje-desarrollo-agricola_0_2276172430.html.
  54. Pimbert, M., and J. Pretty. (1997). Parks, people and professionals. Putting "participation" into protected area management. In Pimbert Krishna Ghimire, Michel, ed., Social Change and Conservation. Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Areas, 297–330. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  55. Rathwell, K. J., D. Armitage, and F. Berkes. (2015). Bridging knowledge systems to enhance governance of the environmental commons: A typology of settings. International Journal of the Commons 9 (2):851–80.Google Scholar
  56. Reyes-García, V., J. Paneque-Gálvez, P. Bottazzi, A. C. Luz, M. Gueze, M. J. Macía, M. Orta-Martínez, and P. Pacheco. (2014). Indigenous land reconfiguration and fragmented institutions: A historical political ecology of Tsimane' lands (Bolivian Amazon). Journal of Rural Studies 34:282–91.Google Scholar
  57. Ringhofer, L. (2010). Fishing, foraging and farming in the Bolivian Amazon. On a Local Society in Transition. Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  58. Sanchez-Lopez, D. (2015). Reshaping notions of citizenship. The TIPNIS indigenous movement in Bolivia. Development Studies Research 2 (1):20–32.Google Scholar
  59. Schavelzon, S. (2012). El nacimiento del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia. Etnografía de una Asamblea Constituyente. La Paz: CLACSO, Plural Editores, CEJIS, IWGIA.Google Scholar
  60. SERNAP, Servicio Nacional de Areas Protegidas, and Concejo Regional Tsimane Mosetene CRTM. (2009). Plan de Manejo y Plan de Vida de la Reserva de la Biosfera y Tierra Comunitaria de Origen Pilón Lajas 2007–2017.Google Scholar
  61. Supreme Decree No. 727. (2010). Government of the Plurinational State of Bolivia. http://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-DS-N727.xhtml.
  62. Supreme Decree No. 23110. (1992). Government of the Republic of Bolivia. http://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-DS-23110.xhtml.
  63. Supreme Decree No. 24781. (1997). Government of the Republic of Bolivia. http://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-DS-24781.xhtml
  64. Supreme Decree No. 25158. (1998). Government of the Republic of Bolivia. http://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-DS-25158.pdf
  65. Supreme Decree No. 29191. (2007). Government of the Republic of Bolivia. http://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-DS-29191.xhtml.
  66. Surkin, J., J. C. Miranda, and E. Miro. (2010). Corresponsabilidad en la gestión de los recursos naturales en Pilón Lajas.Google Scholar
  67. Tengö, M., E. S. Brondizio, T. Elmqvist, P. Malmer, and M. Spierenburg. (2014). Connecting diverse knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The multiple evidence base approach. AMBIO 43 (5):579–91.Google Scholar
  68. Tockman, J., and J. Cameron. (2014). Indigenous autonomy and the contradictions of Plurinationalism in Bolivia. Latin American Politics and Society 56 (3):46–69.Google Scholar
  69. Umans, L., and A. Arce. (2014). Fixing rural development cooperation? Not in situations involving blurring and fluidity. Journal of Rural Studies 34:337–44.Google Scholar
  70. UNDP. (2012). Tsimané Mosetene Regional Council, Pilon Lajas, Bolivia. Equator Initiative Case Study Series. New York.Google Scholar
  71. UNESCO. (1974). Programme on man and the Biopshere (MAB) task force on: Criteria and guidelines for the choice and establishement of biosphere reserves. Final Report. Paris: UNESCO and UNEP.Google Scholar
  72. Van C., D. Lee. (2001). Explaining ethnic autonomy regimes in Latin America. Studies in Comparative International Development 35 (4):30–58.Google Scholar
  73. von Stosch, K. (2010). "Hochland- und Tieflandindigene im Konflikt: Land und Ressourcen-Nutzung in Alto Beni / Bolivien."Google Scholar
  74. West, P., J. Igoe, and D. Brockington. (2006). Parks and peoples: The social impact of protected areas. Annual Review Of Anthropology 35:251–77.Google Scholar
  75. Zimmerer, K. S. (2015). Environmental governance through "speaking like an indigenous state" and respatializing resources: Ethical livelihoods concepts in Bolivia as versatility or verisimilitude? Geoforum 64:314–24.Google Scholar
  76. Zycherman, A. (2013). The changing value of food. Localizing modernity among the Tsimané Indians of lowland Bolivia. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Development and Environment (CDE)University of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations