Human Ecology

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 189–203 | Cite as

Evolutionary “Bet-Hedgers” under Cultivation: Investigating the Domestication of Erect Knotweed (Polygonum erectum L.) using Growth Experiments

Article

Abstract

Evolutionary “bet-hedging” refers to situations in which organisms sacrifice mean fitness for a reduction in fitness variance over time. Germination heteromorphism is the quintessential and most well understood bet-hedging strategy. It has evolved in many different plants, including the wild progenitors of some crops. Erect knotweed (Polygonum erectum L.), an annual seed crop, was cultivated in Eastern North America between c. 3000–600 BP. By c. 900 BP, cultivation had produced a domesticated subspecies with greatly reduced germination heteromorphism. Field observations and greenhouse experiments suggest that cultivation eliminated the selective pressures that maintain the bet-hedging strategy in erect knotweed, while humans also directly selected for seeds that germinated reliably and for seedlings with rapid early growth. The protection provided to erect knotweed under cultivation explains the domestication syndrome that has been observed in some archaeological assemblages. Dormancy provides seeds a means of escaping adverse conditions in time, while dispersal provides an escape in space. Farmers relaxed selective pressures that maintained dormancy in erect knotweed by acting as seed dispersers, spreading disturbance-adapted plants to predictable and protected environments, and by saving and exchanging seed stock. Experimental data also indicate that adaptive transgenerational plasticity may have been working against the expression of domestication syndrome in this case.

Keywords

Domestication Evolutionary bet-hedging Erect knotweed Experimental archaeology Eastern agricultural complex North America 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge and thank the many people who contributed to this project by helping me access collections or populations under their care: Alan Brant, Paul and Nancy Krautman, Michelle Berg Vogel, Jim Solomon, George Yatskievych, Rusty Russell, Bruce Smith, Mary Suter, Mary Simon, George Crothers, David Pollack, Jack Rosen, Jane Buikstra, Jason King, Kris Gremillion, Wayna Adams, Neal Lopinot, Michael Meinkoth, Dee Ann Watt, John Kelly, Bill Green, Caitlin Rankin; and by sharing their knowledge with me and discussing these ideas: Michael Dyer, Gayle Fritz, Logan Kistler, Liz Horton, Kelsey Nordine, and Andrew Flachs. I would also like to acknowledge Nancy Asch Sidell, David Asch, and Sonia Sultan, three researchers whom I have never met but whose meticulous research inspired and greatly improved this project, and Marti Mueller for her careful editing and thoughtful questions. Support for this project was provided by the National Science Foundation, the Wenner-Gren Foundation, and the Lynne Cooper Harvey Fellowship in American Culture Studies at Washington University.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

This research was funded by US National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant #58292.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she had no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abbo S., Rachamim E., Zehavi Y., Zezak I., Lev-Yadun S., and Gopher A. (2011). Experimental growing of wild pea in Israel and its bearing on near eastern plant domestication. Annals of Botany 107(8): 1399–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams K. R. (2014). Little barley grass (Hordeum pusillum Nutt.): a Prehispanic new world domesticate lost to history. In New Lives for Ancient and Extinct Crops. P.E. Minnis, The University of Arizona Press, Tuscon, pp. 139–179.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson E. (1952). Plants, Man and Life, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  4. Asch, David L., and Nancy B. Asch. 1985a Archaeobotany. In The Hill Creek Homestead and the Late Mississippian Settlement in the Lower Illinois River Valley. M.D. Conner (ed.), Kampsville Archaeological Center, Vol. 1. Kampsville, The Center for American Archaeology, pp. 115–170.Google Scholar
  5. Asch, D. L., and Asch, N. B. (1985b). Prehistoric Plant Cultivation in West Central Illinois. In Prehistoric Food Production in North America. Ford, R.I. (ed.), pp. 149–203, Vol. 75. Ann Arbor, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  6. Brenkle J. F. (1946). Notes on avicularia II. Phytologia 2(5): 169–171.Google Scholar
  7. Childs D. Z., Metcalf C. J. E., and Rees M. (2010). Evolutionary bet-hedging in the real world: empirical evidence and challenges revealed by plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences rspb20100707: 1–10.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen D. (1966). Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. Journal of Theoretical Biology 12(1): 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costea M., and Tardif F. J. (2004). The biology of Canadian weeds: Polygonum aviculare L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 131: 481–506.Google Scholar
  10. Costea, M., Tardif, F. J., and Hinds, H. H. (2005). Polygonum L. In Flor of North America North of Mexico. F.o.N.A.E. Committee, (ed.), Vol. 5. New York and Oxford, eFloras.org.
  11. Courtney A. D. (1968). Seed dormancy and field emergence in Polygonum aviculare. Journal of Applied Ecology 5(3): 675–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delcourt, Paul A, et al. (1986). Holocene ethnobotanical and Paleoecological record of human impact on vegetation in the little Tennessee River valley, Tennessee. Quaternary Research 25(3):330–349.Google Scholar
  13. Delcourt, P. A, et al. (1998). Prehistoric human use of fire, the eastern agricultural complex, and Appalachian oak-chestnut forests: paleoecology of cliff palace pond, Kentucky. American Antiquity 63(3):263–278.Google Scholar
  14. Ford, R. I., ed. (1985). Prehistoric food production in North America. Volume 75. Ann Arbor, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  15. Fritz, G. J. (1986). Prehistoric ozark agriculture: The University of Arkansas Rockshelter Collections. Dissertation, University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  16. Fritz G. J. (1993). Early and middle woodland period Paleoehtnobotany. In Scarry C. M. (ed.), Foraging and farming in the eastern woodlands, University Press of Florida, Gainesville, pp. 39–56.Google Scholar
  17. Fritz G. J. (2014). Maygrass: its role and significance in native Easern North American. In Minnis P. E. (ed.), New lives for ancient and extinct crop, Universtiy of Arizona Press, Tuscon, pp. 12–43.Google Scholar
  18. Fritz G. J., and Smith B. D. (1988). Old collections and new technology: documenting the domestication of Chenopodium in Eastern North America. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 13(1): 3–27.Google Scholar
  19. Gremillion K. J. (1993a). Crop and weed in prehistoric Eastern North America: the Chenopodium example. American Antiquity 58(3): 496–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gremillion K. J. (1993b). The evolution of seed morphology in domesticated Chenopodium: an archaeological case study. Journal of Ethnobiology 13: 149–169.Google Scholar
  21. Gremillion K. J. (1993c). Plant husbandry at the archaic/woodland transition: evidence from the cold oak shelter, Kentucky. Midcontinental Journal ofArchaeology 18: 161–189.Google Scholar
  22. Gremillion K. J. (1998). Changing roles of wild and cultivated plant resources among early farmers of Eastern Kentucky. Southeastern Archaeology 17(2): 140–157.Google Scholar
  23. Gremillion K. J., Windingstad J., and Sherwood S. C. (2008). Forest opening, habitat use and food production on the Cumberland plateau, Kentucky: adaptive flexibility in marginal settings. American Antiquity 73(3): 387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harlan J. R., De Wet J. M. J., and Glen Price E. (1973). Comparative evolution of cereals. Evolution 27(2): 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herman J. J., and Sultan S. E. (2011). Adaptive transgenerational plasticity in plants: case studies, mechanisms, and implications for natural populations. Frontiers in Plant Science 2: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hunter, A. A. (1992). Utilization of Hordeum pusillum (Little Barley) in the Midwest United States: Applying Rindos' Co-evolutionary Model of Domestication. Dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia.Google Scholar
  27. Imbert E. (2002). Ecological consequences and ontogeny of seed heteromorphism. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 5(1): 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Metzger J. D. (1992). Physiological basis of achene dormancy in Polygonum convovulus (Polygonaceae). American Journal of Botany 79(8): 882–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mueller, N. G. (2017a). An extinct domesticated subspecies of erect knotweed in Eastern North America: Polygonum erectum L. ssp. watsoniae (POLYGONACEAE). Novon 25(2).Google Scholar
  30. Mueller, N.G. (2017b). Documenting domestication in a lost crop (Polygonum erectum L.): Evolutionary bet-hedgers under cultivation. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 26(1).Google Scholar
  31. Mueller N. G (2017c). Seeds as artifacts of communities of practice: the domestication of erect knotweed in Eastern North America. Dissertation, Washington University in St. Louis.Google Scholar
  32. Murray P. M., and Sheehan, M. C. (1984). Pehistoric polygonum use in the Midwestern United States. In Experiments and Observations on Aboriginal Wild Plant Food Utilization in Eastern North America. Munson, P.J. (ed.), Prehistory Research Series, Vol. VI. Indianapolis, Indian Historical Society.Google Scholar
  33. Sauer C. O. (1952). Seeds, spades, hearths, and herds: the domestication of animals and foodstuffs, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  34. Silvertown J. W. (1984). Phenotypic variety in seed germination behavior: the ontogeny and evolution of somatic polymorphism in seeds. American Naturalist 124(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simon M. L., and Parker K. E. (2006). Prehistoric plant use in the American bottom: new thoughts and interpretations. Southeastern Archaeology 25(2): 212–257.Google Scholar
  36. Slatkin M. (1974). Hedging one's evolutionary bets. Nature 250: 704–705.Google Scholar
  37. Smith B. D. (1992). The floodplain weed theory of plant domestication in eastern North America. In Smith B. D. (ed.), Rivers of change: essays on early agriculture in North America, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
  38. Smith B. D. (2006). Eastern North America as an independent Center of Plant Domestication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(33): 12223–12228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith B. D., and Yarnell R. A. (2009). Initial formation of an indigenous crop complex in Eastern North America at 3800 B.P. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(16): 6561–6566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Struever S., and Vickery K. D. (1973). The beginnings of cultivation in the Midwest-riverine area of the United States. American Anthropologist 75(5): 1197–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sultan S. E. (1996). Phenotypic plasticity for offspring traits in Polygonum persicaria. Ecology 77(6): 1791–1807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Venable D. L. (1985). The evolutionary ecology of seed heteromorphism. American Naturalist 126(5): 577–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wymer D. A. (1993). Cultural change and subsistence: the middle woodland and late woodland transition in the Mid-Ohio Valley. In Scarry C. M. (ed.), Foraging and farming in the eastern woodlands, University Press of Florida, Gainesville, pp. 138–156.Google Scholar
  44. Yarnell, R. A. (1978). Domestication of sunflower and sumpweed in Eastern North America. In The Nature and Status of Ethnobotany. Ford, R.A. (ed.), Anthropological Papers No. 67. Ann Arbor, Museum of Anthropology, Univerity of Michigan, pp. 289–299.Google Scholar
  45. Yarnell R. A. (1993). The importance of native crops during the late archaic and woodland periods. In Scarry C. M. (ed.), Foraging and farming in the eastern woodlands, University Press of Florida, Gainesville, pp. 13–26.Google Scholar
  46. Yurtseva O. V. (2001). Ultrasculpture of achene surface in Polygonum section Polygonum (Polygonaceae) in Russia. Nordic Journal of Botany 21(4): 513–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations