Human Ecology

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 463–478 | Cite as

Ecosystem Services and Disservices for a Vulnerable Population: Findings from Urban Waterways and Wetlands in an American Desert City

  • Monica Palta
  • Margaret V. du Bray
  • Rhian Stotts
  • Amanda Wolf
  • Amber Wutich
Article

Abstract

Vulnerable human populations are exposed to social and biophysical stressors, but have limited capacity to mitigate them, and thus may access ecosystem services in unconventional ways. As a result of this access, they may also experience disservices (i.e., functions of ecosystems harmful to human wellbeing) in ways that are not well understood. We use a mixed-method socio-ecological approach to examine how persons experiencing homelessness in Phoenix, Arizona, access ecosystem services and encounter disservices in urban waterways. We find that urban waterways provide users with drinking and bathing water, and cooler, shaded areas, but potentially expose them to pathogens and legal persecution. The wetlands provide cultural services by affording a sense of place and safety; however, these locations can also be associated with restrictive ordinances and aggressive law enforcement. This study explores the role of ecosystem services and disservices in bridging the gap between biophysical and social vulnerability.

Keywords

Ecosystem services and disservices Vulnerability Urban waterways Urban marginality Phoenix Arizona USA 

References

  1. Adger W. N. (2000). Social and Ecological Resilience: Are They Related? Progress in Human Geography 24(3): 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16(3): 268–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ango T. G., Börjeson L., Senbeta F., and Hylander K. (2014). Balancing Ecosystem Services and Disservices: Smallholder Farmers’ Use and Management of Forest and Trees in an Agricultural Landscape in Southwestern Ethiopia. Ecology and Society 19(1): 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arizona Department of Economic Security (ADES). (2013). Homelessness in Arizona 2013 Annual Report. Homeless Coordination Office, Department of Economic Security, Division of Aging and Adult Services.Google Scholar
  5. Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS). (2014). Heat Safety - Heat-Related Illness. http://www.azdhs.gov/phs/oeh/extreme/heat/illness.php (Accessed 25 November, 2014).
  6. Baker L. A., Brazel A. J., Selover N., Martin C., McIntyre N., Steiner F. R., Nelson A., and Musacchio L. (2002). Urbanization and Warming of Phoenix (Arizona, USA): Impacts, Feedbacks, and Mitigation. Urban Ecosystems 6(3): 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baró F., Chaparro L., Gómez-Baggethun E., Langemeyer J., Nowak D. J., and Terradas J. (2014). Contribution of Ecosystem Services to Air Quality and Climate Change Mitigation Policies: The Case of Urban Forests in Barcelona, Spain. Ambio 43(4): 466–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernard H. R. (2011). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Altamira Press, Rowman.Google Scholar
  9. Bockstael N. E., Freeman A. M. III, Kopp R. J., Portney P. R., and Smith V. K. (2000). On Measuring Economic Values for Nature. Environmental Science and Technology 34(8): 1384–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolund P., and Hunhammar S. (1999). Ecosystem Services in Urban Areas. Ecological Economics 29: 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boone C. G., Buckley G. L., Morgan Grove J., and Sister C. (2009). Parks and People: An Environmental Justice Inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 99(4): 767–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyd J., and Banzhaf S. (2007). What are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting Units. Ecological Economics 63(2–3): 616–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brauman K. A. (2015). Hydrologic Ecosystem Services: Linking Ecohydrologic Processes to Human Well-Being in Water Research and Watershed Management. WIREs Water 2: 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brazel A., Selover N., Vose R., and Heisler G. (2000). The Tale of Two Climates-Baltimore and Phoenix Urban LTER Sites. Climate Research 15(2): 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brinegar S. (2003). The Social Construction of Homeless Shelters in the Phoenix Area. Urban Geography 24(1): 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burgin A. J., Lazar J. G., Groffman P. M., Gold A. J., and Kellogg D. Q. (2013). Balancing Nitrogen Retention Ecosystem Services and Greenhouse Gas Disservices at the Landscape Scale. Ecological Engineering 56: 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chan K. M. A., Satterfield T., and Goldstein J. (2012). Rethinking Ecosystem Services to Better Address and Navigate Cultural Values. Ecological Economics 74: 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chuang W. C., and Gober P. (2015). Predicting hospitalization for heat-related illness at the census-tract level: accuracy of a generic heat vulnerability index in Phoenix, Arizona (USA). Environmental Health Perspectives 123(6): 606–612.Google Scholar
  19. Continuum of Care Regional Committee on Homelessness. (2014). Point in Time Homeless Report. https://www.azmag.gov/Documents/CoC_2014-05-21_2014-Point-in-Time-Homeless-Report-for-Maricopa-County-Presentation.pdf.
  20. Costanza R., and Folke C. (1997). Valuing ecosystem services with efficiency, fairness, and sustainability as goals. In Daily G. C. (ed.), Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 40–70.Google Scholar
  21. Costanza R., d’Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O’Neill R. V., Paruelo J., Raskin R. G., Sutton P., and van den Belt M. (1997). The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature 387(15): 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cutter S. L., Mitchell J. T., and Scott M. S. (2000). Assessing the Vulnerability of People and Places: A Case Study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90(4): 713–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cutter S. L., Boruff B. J., and Lynn Shirley W. (2003). Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Social Science Quarterly 84(2): 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cutts B. B., Darby K. J., Boone C. G., and Brewis A. (2009). City Structure, Obesity, and Environmental Justice: An Integrated Analysis of Physical and Social Barriers to Walkable Streets and Park Access. Social Science and Medicine 69(9): 1314–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. de Groot R. S., Wilson M. A., and Boumans R. M. J. (2002). A Typology for the Classification, Description and Valuation of Ecosystem Functions, Goods and Services. Ecological Economics 41: 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eakin H., and Luers A. L. (2006). Assessing the Vulnerability of Social-Environmental Systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 31: 365–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ellis A. W., Hawkins T. W., Balling R. C., and Gober P. (2008). Estimating Future Runoff Levels for a Semi-Arid Fluvial System in Central Arizona, USA. Climate Research 35(3): 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1986). Ambient Water Quality for Bacteria. EPA440/5-84-002, Office of Water Regulations and Standards Division, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  29. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2001). Total Coliform Rule: A Quick Reference Guide. EPA 816-F-01-035.Google Scholar
  30. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2003). Bacterial Water Quality Standards for Recreational Waters (Freshwater and Marine Waters) Status Report. EPA-823-R-03-008, Office of Water (4305T), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  31. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2012). Recreational Water Quality Criteria. EPA-820-F-12-061, Office of Water (4305T), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  32. Feng H., Yu Q., Gallagher F. J., Wu M., Zhang W., Yu L., Zhu Q., Zhang K., Liu C.-J., and Tappero R. (2013). Lead accumulation and association with Fe on Typha latifolia root from an urban brownfield site. Environmental Science and Policy Research 20(6): 3743–3750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fisher B., Kerry Turner R., and Morling P. (2009). Defining and Classifying Ecosystem Services for Decision Making. Ecological Economics 68: 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fraser E. D. G. (2003). Social Vulnerability and Ecological Fragility: Building Bridges Between Social and Natural Sciences Using the Irish Potato Famine as a Case Study. Conservation Ecology 7(2): 9–17.Google Scholar
  35. Gallagher F. J., Pechmann I., Bogden J. D., Grabosky J., and Weis P. (2008). Soil Metal Concentrations and Vegetative Assemblage Structure in an Urban Brownfield. Environmental Pollution 153(2): 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Godoy R., Wilkie D., Overman H., Cubas A., Cubas G., Demmer J., McSweeney K., and Brokaw N. (2000). Valuation of Consumption and Sale of Forest Goods from a Central American Rain Forest. Nature 406: 62–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gómez-Baggethun E., and Ruiz-Pérez M. (2011). Economic Valuation and the Commodification of Ecosystem Services. Progress in Physical Geography 35(5): 613–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Grimm N. B., and Redman C. L. (2004). Approaches to the Study of Urban Ecosystems: The Case of Central Arizona – Phoenix. Urban Ecosystems 7(3): 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grimm N. B., Sheibley R. W., Crenshaw C. L., Dahm C. N., John Roach W., and Zeglin L. H. (2005). Nutrient Retention and Transformation in Urban Streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24(3): 626–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Grimm N. B., Faeth S. H., Golubiewski N. E., Redman C. R., Wu J., Bai X., and Briggs J. M. (2008). Global Change and the Ecology of Cities. Science 319: 756–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Guest G., Bunce A., and Johnson L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods 18(1): 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Handmer J. W., Dovers S., and Downing T. E. (1999). Societal Vulnerability to Climate Change and Variability. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4: 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harlan S. L., Brazel A. J., Prashad L., Stefanov W. L., and Larsen L. (2006). Neighborhood Microclimates and Vulnerability to Heat Stress. Social Science & Medicine 63: 2847–2863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Harlan S. L., Declet-Barreto J. H., Stefanov W. L., and Petitti D. B. (2013). Neighborhood Effect on Heat Deaths: Social and Environmental Vulnerability in Maricopa County, Arizona. Environmental Health Perspectives 121(2): 197–204.Google Scholar
  45. Hedberg, E. C., and Hart B. (2013). A New Look: A Survey of Arizona’s Homeless Population. Morrison Institute for Public Policy. Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar
  46. Hofer C., Gallagher F. J., and Holzapfel C. (2010). Metal Accumulation and Performance of Nestlings of Passerine Bird Species at an Urban Brownfield Site. Environmental Pollution 158(5): 1207–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hughes W. W. (1984). The Method to Our Madness: The Garbage Project Methodology. American Behavioral Scientist 28(1): 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change. (2007). Synthesis Report. https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf.
  49. Jenerette G. D., Harlan S. L., Brazel A., Jones N., Larsen L., and Stefanov W. L. (2007). Regional Relationships between Vegetation, Surface Temperature, and Human Settlement in a Rapidly Urbanizing Ecosystem. Landscape Ecology 22(3): 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jenerette G. D., Harlan S. L., Stefanov W. L., and Martin C. A. (2011). Ecosystem Services and Urban Heat Riskscape Moderation: Water, Green Spaces, and Social Inequality in Phoenix, USA. Ecological Society of America 21(7): 2637–2651.Google Scholar
  51. Keller T. (2014). Destruction of the ecosystem. 1914-1918-Online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War.Google Scholar
  52. Klinenberg E. (2003). Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  53. Kosoy N., and Corbera E. (2010). Payments for Ecosystem Services as Commodity Fetishism. Ecological Economics 69(6): 1228–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kumar M., and Kumar P. (2008). Valuation of the Ecosystem Services: A Psycho-Cultural Perspective. Ecological Economics 64(4): 808–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Liverman D. M. (1990). Vulnerability to global change. In Kasperson R. E., Dow K., Golding D., and Kasperson J. X. (eds.), Understanding Global Environmental Change: The Contributions of Risk Analysis and Management, The Earth Transformed Programme. Clark University, Worcester, MA, pp. 27–44.Google Scholar
  56. Loomis D. K., Ortner P. B., Kelble C. R., and Paterson S. K. (2014). Developing integrated ecosystem indices. Ecological Indicators 44: 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Luers A. L. (2005). The Surface of Vulnerability: An Analytical Framework for Examining Environmental Change. Global Environmental Change 15: 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lyytimäki J. (2013). Nature’s Nocturnal Services: Light Pollution as a Non-Recognised Challenge for Ecosystem Services Research and Management. Ecosystem Services 3: e44–e48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lyytimäki J., and Sipilä M. (2009). Hopping on One Leg–The Challenge of Ecosystem Disservices for Urban Green Management. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 8(4): 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lyytimäki J., Petersen L. K., Normander B., and Bezák P. (2008). Nature as a Nuisance? Ecosystem Services and Disservices to Urban Lifestyle. Environmental Sciences 5(3): 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Martin L. J., Blossey B., and Ellis E. (2012). Mapping Where Ecologists Work: Biases in the Global Distribution of Terrestrial Ecological Observations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(4): 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis, World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800907001462#bib39 Google Scholar
  63. National Research Council (NRC) (2005). National Research Council (NCR) Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  64. Norgaard R. B. (2010). Ecosystem Services: From Eye-Opening Metaphor to Complexity Blinder. Ecological Economics 69: 1219–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. O’Brien K., Eriksen S., Nygaard L. P., and Schjolden A. (2007). Why Different Interpretations of Vulnerability Matter in Climate Change Discourses. Climate Policy 7(1): 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Oliver-Smith A. (2002). Theorizing disasters: nature, power, and culture. In Hoffman S. M., and Oliver-Smith A. (eds.), Catastrophe and Culture: The Anthropology of Disaster, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, pp. 23–47.Google Scholar
  67. Palta M. M., Ehrenfeld J. G., and Groffman P. M. (2013). Denitrification and Potential Nitrous Oxide and Carbon Dioxide Production in Brownfield Wetland Soils. Journal of Environmental Quality 42(5): 1507–1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Palta M. M., Ehrenfeld J. G., and Groffman P. M. (2014). “Hotspots” and “Hot Moments” of Denitrification in Urban Brownfield Wetlands. Ecosystems 17(7): 1121–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Peterson M. J., Hall D. A., Feldpausch-Parker A. M., and Peterson T. R. (2009). Obscuring Ecosystem Function with Application of the Ecosystem Services Concept. Conservation Biology 24(1): 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Phoenix Homeless Rising. Report 2011 Holding Shelters and Service Providers Accountable.Google Scholar
  71. Qian Y., Gallagher F. J., Feng H., and Wu M. (2012). A Geochemical Study of Toxic Metal Translocation in an Urban Brownfield Wetland. Environmental Pollution 166: 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Redman C. L., Morgan Grove J., and Kuby L. H. (2004). Integrating Social Science into the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network: Social Dimensions of Ecological Change and Ecological Dimensions of Social Change. Ecosystems 7(2): 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ribot J. C. (1995). The Causal Structure of Vulnerability: Its Application to Climate Impact Analysis. GeoJournal 35(2): 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Roach W. J., and Grimm N. B. (2009). Nutrient Variation in an Urban Lake Chain and its Consequences for Phytoplankton Production. Journal of Environmental Quality 38: 2439–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Roach W. J., Heffernan J. B., Grimm N. B., Ramón Arrowsmith J., Eisinger C., and Rychener T. (2008). Unintended Consequences of Urbanization for Aquatic Ecosystems: A Case Study from the Arizona Desert. BioScience 58(8): 715–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ruddell D. M., Harlan S. L., Grossman-Clarke S., and Buyantuyev A. (2010). Risk and exposure to extreme heat in microclimates of Phoenix, AZ. In Showalter P. S., and Yongmei L. (eds.), Geospatial Techniques in Urban Hazard and Disaster Analysis..., Springer, New York City, pp. 179–202.Google Scholar
  77. Ryan G. W., and Bernard H. R. (2003). Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods 15(1): 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sanchez, C. (2011). Tricks of the Shade: Heat Related Coping Strategies of Urban Homeless Persons in Phoenix, Arizona. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.Google Scholar
  79. Schröter D., Cramer W., Rik L., Colin Prentice I., Araújo M. B., Arnell N. W., Bondeau A., Bugmann H., Carter T. R., Gracia C. A., de la Vega-Leinert A. C., Erhard M., Ewert F., Glendining M., House J. I., Kankaanpää S., Klein R. J. T., Lavorel S., Lindner M., Metzger M. J., Meyer J., Mitchell T. D., Reginster I., Rounsevell M., Sabaté S., Sitch S., Smith B., Smith J., Smith P., Sykes M. T., Thonicke K., Thuiller W., Tuck G., Zaehle S., and Zierl B. (2005). Ecosystem Service Supply and Vulnerability to Global Change in Europe. Science 310(5752): 1333–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sen A. (1995). Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  81. Sermons, M. W. and White P. (2011). State of Homelessness in America. http://www.endhomelessness.org/page/-/files/4361_file_Appendix_One.pdf, accessed, Feb. 3, 2016.
  82. Smit B., and Wandel J. (2006). Adaptation, Adaptive Capacity and Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16: 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Susman P., O’Keefe P., and Wisner B. (1984). Global disasters: a radical interpretation. In Hewitt K. (ed.), Interpretations of Calamity from the Viewpoint of Human Ecology, Allen & Unwin, Boston, pp. 263–283.Google Scholar
  84. Turner B. L. II (2010). Vulnerability and Resilience: Coalescing or Paralleling Approaches for Sustainability Science? Global Environmental Change 20: 570–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. United Nations Finance Initiative. (2008). Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Bloom or Bust? http://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/documents/bloom_or_bust_report.pdf .
  86. United States Council of Mayors (2013). Hunger and Homelessness Survey: A Status Report on Hunger and Homelessness in America’s Cities, City Policy Associates, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  87. Watts M. J., and Bohle H. G. (1993). Hunger, Famine, and the Space of Vulnerability. GeoJournal 30(2): 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wegner G., and Pascual U. (2011). Cost-benefit Analysis in the Context of Ecosystem Services for Human Well-being: A Multidisciplinary Critique. Global Environmental Change 21: 492–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wisner B., Blaikie P., Cannon T., and Davis I. (2004). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters, 2nd edn., Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  90. World Bank (2009). Convenient Solutions to an Inconvenient Truth: Ecosystem-Based Approaches to Climate Change, Environmental Department, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Yip F., Dana Flanders W., Wolkin A., Engethaler D., Humble W., Neri A., Lewis L., Backer L., and Rubin C. (2008). The Impact of Excess Heat Events in Maricopa County, Arizona: 2000–2005. International Journal of Biometeorology 52(8): 765–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zedler J. B., and Kercher S. (2005). Wetland resources: Status, ecosystem services, degradation, and restorability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 39–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monica Palta
    • 1
  • Margaret V. du Bray
    • 2
  • Rhian Stotts
    • 2
  • Amanda Wolf
    • 3
  • Amber Wutich
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Earth and Space ExplorationArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.School of Human Evolution and Social ChangeArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  3. 3.School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations