Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 375–391 | Cite as

Impacts and Implications of Researcher Identity and Academic Practice: Future Directions for Public Engagement and Ecological Research

  • Amanda E. Sorensen
  • Rebecca C. Jordan
Article
  • 255 Downloads

Introduction

Citizen science has extensively been reported as a useful tool for scientists gathering large quantities of information (Silvertown et al.2011; Dickinson et al.2010; Bonney et al.2009). Citizen Science has been broadly defined in previous literature. We employ the following for purposes of this paper: partnerships between scientists and the public where data are collected, shared, and analyzed (Jordan et al. 2012). These partnerships result in projects that range in participation capacity, participation design, and project goals. On one hand, there are participatory action research projects (Cooper et al. 2007), initially defined by Caren Cooper as projects initiated by non-scientist members of the public and developed hand-in-hand with scientists or scientists hired by the project as consultants (see also Shirk et al. 2012). On the other hand there are crowdsourced or contributory citizen science projects (Bonney et al. 2009), which allow researchers to gather large...

Keywords

Citizen Science Identity Variable Academic Practice Public Outreach Citizen Science Project 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Daniel Betz and David Howe for their thoughtful review of this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All human subjects work was approved by Rutgers University IRB Protocol Approval Number E15–264.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Albert S., and Whetten D. A. (1985). Organizational Identity. Res Organ Behav. 7: 263–295.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews E, Weaver A, Hanley D, et al. 2005. Scientists and public outreach: participation, motivations, and impediments. J Geosci Educ 53: 281.Google Scholar
  3. Baker EA, Homan S, Schonhoff SR, et al. 1999. Principles of practice for academic/practice/community research partnerships. Am J Prev Med. 16: 86–93.Google Scholar
  4. Biernacki P., and Waldorf D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociol Method Res. 10: 141–163.Google Scholar
  5. Bonney R, Cooper CB, Dickinson J, et al. 2009. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience. 59: 977–984.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Phillips T, et al. 2007. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol Soc. 12: 11.Google Scholar
  7. Dresner M, Handelman C, Braun S, et al. 2014. Environmental identity, pro-environmental behaviors, and civic engagement of volunteer stewards in Portland area parks. Environ Educ Res. 21: 1–20.Google Scholar
  8. Dickinson J. L., Zuckerberg B., and Bonter D. N. (2010). Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S. 41: 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunlap R. (1992). Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues: 1965–1990. In Dunlap R., and Mertig A. (eds.), American environmentalism: the US environmental movement, Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 1970–1990.Google Scholar
  10. Evans C, Abrams E, Reitsma R, et al. 2005. The neighborhood nestwatch program: participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conserv Biol. 19: 589–594.Google Scholar
  11. Follett R., and Strezov V. (2015). An Analysis of Citizen Science Based Research: Usage and Publication Patterns. PloS One. 10: e0143687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Green L. W., and Stoto M. A. (1997). Linking research and public health practice: A vision for health promotion and disease prevention research. Am J of Prev Med. 13: 5–8.Google Scholar
  13. Guichard J. (2001). Adolescents’ scholastic fields, identity frames, and future projects. Nav Adolescences: Euro Perspec. 275-302.Google Scholar
  14. Henkel M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. High Educ. 49: 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jordan RC, Sorensen AE, Clark C. 2015. Urban/Suburban Park Use: Links to Personal Identity? Current World Environ. 10: doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.10.2.01
  16. Jordan R. C., Ballard H. L., and Phillips T. B. (2012). Key issues and new approaches for evaluating citizen-science learning outcomes. Front Ecol Environ. 10: 307–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jordan RC, Gray SA, Howe DV, et al. 2011. Knowledge gain and behavioral change in citizen-science programs. Conserv Biol. 25: 1148–1154.Google Scholar
  18. Marcinkowski T. (1993). Assessment in environmental education. In Wilke R. J. (ed.), Environmental education teacher resource handbook, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
  19. Mathews D. J., Kalfoglou A., and Hudson K. (2005). Geneticists' views on science policy formation and public outreach. Am J Med Genet A. 137: 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morrow C. A., and Dusenbery P. B. (2004). Workshops for scientists and engineers on education and public outreach. Adv Space Res. 34: 2153–2158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nerbonne J. F., and Nelson K. C. (2004). Volunteer macroinvertebrate monitoring in the United States: resource mobilization and comparative state structures. Soc Nat Resour. 17: 817–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Noy C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. Int J Soc Res Method. 11: 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pattengill-Semmens C. V., and Semmens B. X. (2003). Conservation and management applications of the reef volunteer fish monitoring program. In Melzin B. D., Engle V., McAlister M., Sandhu S., and Eads L. K. (eds.), Coastal Monitoring through Partnerships, Springer, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  24. Shirk JL, Ballard HL, Wilderman CC, et al. 2012. Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecol Soc. 17: 29.Google Scholar
  25. Silvertown J, Cook L, Cameron R, et al. 2011. Citizen science reveals unexpected continental-scale evolutionary change in a model organism. PLoS One 6: e18927.Google Scholar
  26. Smith G. 2008. Does gender influence online survey participation?: A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 501717.Google Scholar
  27. Sorensen A. E., Clark D., and Jordan R. C. (2015). Effects of alternative framing on the publics perceived importance of environmental conservation. Front Environ Sci. 3. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2015.00036.
  28. Trumbull DJ, Bonney R, Bascom D, et al. 2000. Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Sci Educ. 84: 265–275.Google Scholar
  29. Weidman J. C., Twale D. J., and Stein E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  30. Weidman J. C., and Stein E. L. (2003). Socialization of doctoral students to academic norms. Res High Educ. 44: 641–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Program in Science Learning, Rutgers UniversityThe State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations