Human Ecology

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 199–215 | Cite as

Reconciling Flexibility and Tenure Security for Pastoral Resources: the Geography of Transhumance Networks in Eastern Senegal

  • Matthew D. TurnerEmail author
  • John G. McPeak
  • Kramer Gillin
  • Erin Kitchell
  • Niwaeli Kimambo


The need to maintain or increase livestock mobility in arid Africa has been widely embraced by ecologists, social scientists, and more recently regional governments. These movements are seen to sustain livestock production under a highly variable and changing climate. At the same time, livestock mobility is threatened by the expansion of agriculture onto rangelands. A major conundrum raised in the pastoral development literature is the potential contradiction of the need for spatially-fixed, exclusionary forms of tenure to protect key pastoral resources with the need for socially-porous open systems of resource tenure that ensure flexible access. This has been called the “paradox of pastoral land tenure.” By adopting a transhumance corridor network approach, this paper demonstrates that there is a middle ground where flexible access can be maintained within a fixed network of corridors. A transhumance network includes not only the physical paths or corridors followed by livestock herds but also the encampment sites where livestock pass the night while moving along corridors and the water sources linked to encampment site. This study mapped and characterized 5000 km of corridors, 744 encampments, and 1010 water points in eastern Senegal. These pastoral features form a network of interconnected resources providing alternative options for travel, water, and forage as herds move along a north–south trajectory. The research analyzes spatial variation in the network’s ability to provide these services (water, quality forage, and travel) as influenced by rainfall variability, cropping pressure, and social institutions. Four distinct zones within the study area were compared with analyses showing variation among them in the importance of different factors shaping access. More broadly, the study demonstrates that extant transhumance networks accommodate the competing needs of pastoral tenure security by facilitating herd movements in response to changing resource availabilities through a series of spatially-fixed components (encampment sites, water points, and corridors) that can be recognized and protected through legislation. Thus, the demands for tenure security and flexible patterns of resource use can both be potentially accommodated.


Pastoral mobility West Africa Fulani Climate variability Resilience 


  1. Adams, A. (1996). A Claim to Land by the River: A Household in Senegal, 1720–1994. Clarendon Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adriansen, H. K. (2008). Understanding pastoral mobility: the case of Senegalese Fulani. The Geographical Journal 174: 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assemblée nationale du Burkina Faso (2002) Loi d'orientation relative au pastoralisme au Burkina Faso. In Assemblée nationale du Burkina Faso (Ed.), Loi no 034-2002/AN. Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: Assemblée nationale du Burkina Faso,.Google Scholar
  4. Bassett, T. J. (1986). Fulani herd movements. The Geographical Review 76: 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bassett, T. J., and Turner, M. D. (2007). Sudden shift or migratory drift? Fulbe herd movements to the Sudano-Guinean region of West Africa. Human Ecology 35: 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beauvilain, A. (1977). Les Peuls du Dallol Bosso. Institut de Recherche en Sciences Humaines, Niamey, Niger.Google Scholar
  7. Behnke, R. H., Scoones, I., and Kerven, C. (eds.) (1993). Range Ecology at Disequilibrium. Overseas Development Institute, London.Google Scholar
  8. Benoit, M. (1979) Le chemin des Peuls du Boobola: contribution à l'écologie du pastoralisme en Afrique des savanes. In. Paris: O.R.S.T.O.M.Google Scholar
  9. Bonfiglioli, A. M. (1988). Dudal: Histoire de famille et histoire de troupeau chez un groupe de Wodaabe du Niger. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  10. Bonnet-Dupeyron, M.F. (1951). Carte de l'Élevage pour le Sénégal et la Mauritanie. Paris, Office de la Recherche Scientifique Outre-Mer, Ministère de la France d`Outre Mer.Google Scholar
  11. Bonnet, B., and Hérault, D. (2011). Gouvernance du foncier pastorale et changement climatique au Sahel. Revue des questions foncières (Land Tenure Journal) 2: 157–187.Google Scholar
  12. Bromley, D. W. (ed.) (1992). Making the Commons Work. ICS Press, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  13. Brottem, L. (2014). Hosts, strangers and the tenure politics of livestock corridors in Mali. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 84: 638–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brottem, L., Turner, M. D., Butt, B., and Singh, A. (2014). Biophysical variability and pastoral rights to resources: West African transhumance revisited. Human Ecology doi: 10.1007/s10745-014-9640-1.Google Scholar
  15. Butt, B., Shortridge, A., and WinklerPrins, A. (2009). Pastoral herd management, drought coping strategies, and cattle mobility in southern Kenya. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 99: 309–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Camara, I. (2004). Atelier de restitution zonale des résultats de l'enquête d'opinion sur la prévention et la gestion des conflit liés à la transhumance dans les zones d'accueil (C.R. de Dialacoto, Kothiary, Missirah, Nétéboulou et Bani Israel). Dakar, Sénégal, DGL Felo pour l'ARD, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Casimir, M., and Rao, A. (eds.) (1992). Mobility and Territoriality: Social and Spatial Boundaries Among Foragers, Fishers, Pastoralists and Peripatetics. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Ciavolella, R. (2014). Culture nomade à l'épreuve du capital mobilité, les Peuls Fulaabe (Mauritanie). M@ppemonde 114Google Scholar
  19. Clark, A. F. (1994). Internal migrations and population movements in the Upper Valley (West Africa), 1890–1920. Canadian Journal of African Studies 28(3): 399–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Bruijn, M., and van Djik, H. (1995). Arid Ways: Cultural Understandings of Insecurity in Fulbe Society, Central Mali. Thela Publishers, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  21. Diop, A. T., Cesaro, J. D., Touré, A., Ickowicz, A., and Toutain, B. (2012). Évolution des transhumances. In Touré, I., Ickowicz, A., Wane, A., Garba, I., and Gerber, P. (eds.), Atlas des évolutions des systèmes pastoraux au Sahel 1970–2012. SIPSA report to FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization, ROME, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
  22. Dongmo, A.-L., E. Vall, M.A. Diallo, P. Dugué, A. Njoya and J. Lossouarn (2012). Herding territories in Northern Cameroon and Western Burkina Faso : spatial arrangements and herd management. Pastoralism: Research, Policy, and Practice 2Google Scholar
  23. Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. (2002). Spatial and social boundaries and the paradox of pastoral land tenure: a case study from post-socialist Mongolia. Human Ecology 30: 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., and LeFebre, S. (2006). Mobility in pastoral systems: dyanmic flux or downward trend? International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 13: 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gallais, J. (1967). Le Delta intérieur du Niger. IFAN, Dakar, Senegal.Google Scholar
  26. Gallais, J. (1975). Paysans et pasteurs du Gourma, La condition sahélienne. CNRS, Paris.Google Scholar
  27. Galvin, K. A. (2009). Transitions: Pastoralists living with change. Annual Review of Anthropology 38: 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Galvin, K. A., Reid, R. S., Behnke, R. H., and Hobbs, N. T. (eds.) (2008). Fragmentation in Semi-Arid and Arid Landscapes. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  29. Gilles, J. L. (1988). Slippery grazing rights: using indigenous knowledge for pastoral development. In Whitehead, E. E., Hutchinson, C. F., Timmerman, B. N., and Varady, R. G. (eds.), Arid Lands Today and Tomorrow. Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 1159–1166.Google Scholar
  30. Gomez, O.S. (1979). Contribution à l'étude de la transhumance au Sénégal: ses conséquences sur l'exploitation du cheptel et sur le développment économique et social des populations pastorales. Dakar, EISMY Thèse de doctorat vétérinaire.Google Scholar
  31. Ham, F., Sow, N. A., and Métais, T. (2012). Caractériser les transhumances. In Touré, I., Ickowicz, A., Wane, A., Garba, I., and Gerber, P. (eds.), Atlas des évolutions des systèmes pastoraux au Sahel 1970–2012. SIPSA report to FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization, ROME, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
  32. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hellemans, P., and Compere, R. (1990). Aspects techniques et socio-economiques de la transhumance des troupeaux de zebus en zone soudanienne de la Bougouriba (Burkina-Faso). Tropicultura (Belgium) 8(2): 59–63.Google Scholar
  34. Juul, K. (2001). Power, pastures, and politics: Boreholes and decentralization of local resources management in Northern Senegal. In Benjaminsen, T., and Lund, C. (eds.), Power, Politics, and Production in the West African Sahel. Elanders Gotab, Stockholm, pp. 57–74.Google Scholar
  35. Kitchell, E., Turner, M. D., and McPeak, J. (2014). Mapping of pastoral corridors: Practices and politics in eastern Senegal. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice 4: 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Magrin, G., O. Ninot and J.-D. Cesaro (2011). L'élevage pastorale au Sénégal entre pression spatiale et mutation commerciale. M@ppemonde 103 (2011/3).Google Scholar
  37. Marie, J., S. Cissé, S. Soumaré, I. Ag Youssouf and M. Haywood (1982). Carte foncière pastorale du Delta Intérieur du Niger, République du Mali. Bamako, Mali, CIPEA/ODEM.Google Scholar
  38. Martin, R., Miller, B., Linstadter, A., and Frank, K. (2014). How much climate change can pastoral livelihoods tolerate? Modelling rangeland use and evaluating risk. Global Environmental Change 24: 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moritz, M., Catherine, L. B., Drent, A. K., Kari, S., Mouhaman, A., and Scholte, P. (2013a). Rangeland governance in an open system: Protecting transhumance corridors in the far north region of Cameroon. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice 3: 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moritz, M., Scholte, P., Hamilton, I. M., and Kari, S. (2013b). Open access, open systems: pastoral management of common-pool resources in the Chad Basin. Human Ecology 41: 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mougin, E., Demarez, V., Diawara, M., Hiernaux, P., Soumaguel, N., and Berg, A. (2014). Estimation of LAI, fAPAR and fCover of Sahel rangelands (Gourma, Mali). Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 198–199: 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moutari, M., and Giraut, F. (2013). Le corridor de transhumance au Sahel: un archétype de territorie multisitué? L'Espace Géographique 42: 306–323.Google Scholar
  43. nDiaye, A. (2011). Rapport de l'atelier sur la gestion de la transhumance tenu à Bandafassi le 09 mars 2011. Dakar, Projet Regionale de Gestion Durable du Betail Ruminant Endemique (PROGEBE), Ministère de L'Élevage.Google Scholar
  44. Niamir-Fuller, M. (ed.) (1999). Managing Mobility in African Rangelands. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.Google Scholar
  45. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peters, P. (1994). Dividing the Commons: Politics, Policy and Culture in Botswana. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
  47. Rancon, A. (1894). Le Bondou: étude de géographie et d'histoire soudaniennes. Bulletin de la Société de géographie commerciale de Bordeaux 17: 433–468.Google Scholar
  48. République du Mali (2001) Charte pastorale du Mali. Loi No 01–004 du 27 Fevrier, 2001. Bamako: République du Mali.Google Scholar
  49. Santoir, C. (1979). L'espace pastoral dans la région du Fleuve sénégal. Dakar, ORSTOM.Google Scholar
  50. Santoir, C. (1990). Les Peul "refusés": Les Peul mauritaniens réfugiés au Sénégal (Département de Matam). Cahiers des Sciences Humaines 26: 577–603.Google Scholar
  51. Sayre, N. F., McAllister, R. R. J., Bestelmeyer, B., Moritz, M., and Turner, M. D. (2013). Earth stewardship on rangelands: coping with ecological, economic, and political marginality. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 348–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schmitz, J. (1986). L'État géomètre: les leydi des Peul du Fuuta Tooro (Sénégal) et du Maasina (Mali). Cahiers d'Études Africaines 26: 349–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scoones, I. (ed.) (1994). Living with Uncertainty. New Directions in Pastoral Development in Africa. Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd, London.Google Scholar
  54. Stenning, D. J. (1960). Transhumance, migratory drift, migration: Patterns of pastoral Fulani nomadism. In Ottenburg, S., and Ottenburg, P. (eds.), Cultures and Societies of Africa. Random House, New York, pp. 139–159.Google Scholar
  55. Tappan, G. G., Sall, M., Wood, E. C., and Cushing, W. M. (2004). Ecoregions and land cover trends in Senegal. Journal of Arid Environments 59: 427–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thomas, P. (1988) Migration, Household Production and Consumption Among the Agropastoral Hal Pulaar of the Boundou in Eastern Senegal. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Anthropology. American University, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  57. Touré, O. (2004) The impact of pastoral legislation on equitable and sustainable natural resource management in Guinea. Drylands Issue Paper No. 126. International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
  58. Turner, M. D. (1999). The role of social networks, indefinite boundaries and political bargaining in maintaining the ecological and economic resiliency of the transhumance systems of Sudano-Sahelian West Africa. In Niamir-Fuller, M. (ed.), Managing Mobility in African Rangelands: the Legitimization of Transhumance. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp. 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turner, M. D. (2011). The new pastoral development paradigm: Engaging the realities of property institutions and livestock mobility in dryland Africa. Society & Natural Resources 24: 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Turner, M. D., McPeak, J., and Ayantunde, A. A. (2014). The role of livestock mobility in the livelihood strategies of rural peoples in semi-arid West Africa. Human Ecology 42(2): 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Valenza, J. (1977). Étude des pâturages naturels du Ferlo Boundou (Zone Matam-Kidira-Tambacounda) (République du Sénégal). Dakar, Sénégal, Institut d'élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux; Délégation générale à la Recherche scientifique et technique, Institut sénégalais de recherches agricoles, Laboratoire national de l`élevage et de recherches vétérinaires.Google Scholar
  62. Wabnitz, H.-W. (2006) Le code pastoral de la République Islamique de la Mauritanie: Un exemple parfait de législation traditionnelle. In, Les frontières de la question foncière: Enchassement social des droits et politiques publiques. Montepellier, France: Institut de recherche pour le développement.Google Scholar
  63. Wane, A., V. Ancey and B. Grosdidier (2009). Les unités pastorales du Sahel sénégalais, outils de gestion de l’élevage et des espaces pastoraux: Projet durable ou projet du développement durable? Développement durable et territoires 8 doi: 10.4000/developpementdurable.3292.
  64. Western, D., and Dunne, T. (1979). Environmental aspects of settlement site decisions among pastoral Maasai. Human Ecology 7: 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew D. Turner
    • 1
    Email author
  • John G. McPeak
    • 2
  • Kramer Gillin
    • 1
  • Erin Kitchell
    • 1
  • Niwaeli Kimambo
    • 1
  1. 1.MadisonUSA
  2. 2.SyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations