Human Ecology

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 65–80 | Cite as

An Event History Analysis of Parcel Extensification and Household Abandonment in Pays Basque, French Pyrenees, 1830–1958 AD

Article
First Online:

Abstract

This paper examines local processes of agricultural abandonment, socioeconomic changes, and associated landscape transition in a Pyrenean mountain village. We analyze the effects of socioeconomic and demographic factors contributing to changes in parcel level land use and ownership from 1830 to 1958. We use an event-history analysis to examine how individual etxe (Basque households) influenced the pace and character of landscape transition through their internal composition and their mediation of market pressures. Contrary to conventional narratives of agricultural transitions, our analysis suggests that more rapid “abandonment” of the landscape was prevented by etxe that were able to both engage in markets and maintain higher fertility rates. We conclude that the capacity of agropastoral landscapes to absorb broad-scale change is directly tied to local institutions, such as the etxe, which ultimately mediate socioeconomic drivers of change.

Keywords

Land use Basques Pyrenees Southern France Small-holders Cox regression Historical ecology Mountain agropastoralism 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is truly the result of collaborative effort. We are grateful to residents of Larrau for their assistance and hospitality. We extend a special thank you to Mme Maryse Accoceberry (Secrétaire de Mairie de Larrau) and professors Dolorès De Bortoli and Pascal Palu who provided crucial guidance, support, and access to data. We thank Dominique Cunchinabe, Sara De La Torre Berón and John Chamblee for data collection, entry, and management respectively.

This paper was developed under STAR Fellowship Assistance Agreement no. FP917243 awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It has not been formally reviewed by EPA. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors. Partial support was provided by a FACE-Partner University Fund award to the University of Georgia and to the Université de Pau et du Pays de l’Adour, the National Science Foundation through an award to the Coweeta LTER Program (DEB-0823293), the Laboratoire ITEM, Université de Pau et du Pays de l’Adour, and the Laboratoire GEODE, Université de Toulouse - Jean Jaurès.

References

  1. Agnoletti, M. (2007). The degradation of traditional landscape in a mountain area of tuscany during the 19th and 20th centuries: implications for biodiversity and sustainable management. Forest Ecology and Management 249(1–2):5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, Paul D. (1984). Event history analysis: regression for longitudinal event data. SAGE publications, Incorporated.Google Scholar
  3. Arrizabalaga, Marie-Pierre. (1997). The stem family in the French Basque Country: Sare in the nineteenth century. Journal of Family History 22(1):50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrizabalaga, Marie-Pierre. (2005). Succession strategies in the pyrenees in the 19th century: the basque case. The History of the Family 10(3):271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, Kathleen P., and Irwin, Elena G. (2002). Spatially explicit micro-level modelling of land use change at the rural–urban interface. Agricultural Economics 27(3):217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benayas, Jose M. Rey, et al. (2007). Abandonment of agricultural land: an overview of drivers and consquences. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Verterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 2(57):1–14.Google Scholar
  7. Bender, O., et al. (2005). Using GIS to analyse long-term cultural landscape change in southern Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning 70(1–2):111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bentley, Jeffery W., and Netting, Robert McC. (1993). Making ends meet with scattered fields. American Anthropologist 95(4):1003–1005.Google Scholar
  9. Berkner, Lutz K. (1972). The stem family and the developmental cycle of the peasant household: an eighteenth-century Austrian example. The American Historical Review 77(2):398–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blossfeld, Hans-Peter. and Drobnič, Sonja. (2001). Careers of couples in contemporary societies: from male breadwinner to dual-earner families. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, and Hakim, Catherine. (1997). Between equalization and marginalization. Part-time working women in Europe and the United States of America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, Golsch, Katrin and Rohwer, Götz. (2007). Event history analysis with stata. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  13. Boserup, Ester. (1966). The conditions of agricultural growth; the economics of agrarian change under population pressure. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  14. Caldwell, John C. (1980). Mass education as a determinant of the timing of fertility decline. Population and Development Review 6(2):225–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cerdà, Artemi, and Lasanta, Teodoro. (2005). Long-term erosional responses after fire in the central spanish pyrenees: 1. Water and sediment yield. Catena 60(1):59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Champagne, Patrick. (2002). L’héritage refusé: la crise de la reproduction sociale de la paysannerie française, 1950–2000. Volume 478: Seuil.Google Scholar
  17. Chayanov, A. V. (1986). The theory of peasant economy. In Thorner, D., Kerblay, B., and Smith, R.E.F. (eds.), A.V. Chayanov on The Theory of Peasant Economy. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
  18. Chibnik, Michael. (1984). A cross-cultural examination of chayanov’s theory. Current Anthropology 25(3):335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark, James S., Gelfand, Allan E., Woodall, Christopher W., and Zhu, Kehe. (2014). More than the sum of the parts: forest climate response from joint species distribution models. Ecological Applications 24(5):990–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coleman, James S. (1968). The mathematical study of change. In Blalock, H. M., and Blalock, A. (eds.) Methodology in social research, pp. 428–478. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Coleman, James S. (1981). Longitudinal data analysis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 34(2):187–220.Google Scholar
  23. Cunchinabe, Dominique. (2011). Histoire de l’écosystème cultivé et de la biodiversité à larrau: analyse de l’impact agropastoral dans la gestion du milieu. ITEM (Equipe d’Accueil n° 3002), Université de Pau et du Pays de l’Adour.Google Scholar
  24. Davies, Elwyn. 1941. The patterns of transhumance in europe. Geography 26(4):155–168.Google Scholar
  25. Davis, Kingsley. (1945). The World Demographic Transition. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 237:1–11.Google Scholar
  26. de Bortoli, Dolores, and Palu, Pascal. (2009). Le système maison comme déterminant de la pérennité organisationnelle. Revue Française de Gestion 192:141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Douglass, William A. (1971). Rural exodus in two spanish basque villages: a cultural explanation. American Anthropologist 73(5):1100–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Durrenberger, E. Paul. (1980). Chayanov’s economic analysis in anthropology. Journal of Anthropological Research 36(2):133–148.Google Scholar
  29. Fisher, Lloyd D, and Lin, DY. (1999). Time-dependent covariates in the Cox proportional-hazards regression model. Annual Review of Public Health 20(1):145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Foster, Brian L. (1978). Domestic development cycles as a link between population processes and other social processes. Journal of Anthropological Research 34(3):415–441.Google Scholar
  31. Foster, David, et al. (2003). The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. BioScience 53(1):77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gellrich, Mario, and Zimmermann, Niklaus E. (2007). Investigating the regional-scale pattern of agricultural land abandonment in the Swiss mountains: a spatial statistical modelling approach. Landscape and Urban Planning 79(1):65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gibon, Annick, et al. (2010). Modelling and simulating change in reforesting mountain landscapes using a social-ecological framework. Landscape Ecology 25(2):267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Giere, Ronald N. (1999). Science without laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Gómez-Ibáñez, Daniel Alexander. (1975). The western pyrenees: differential evolution of the French and spanish borderland. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hammel, E. A. (2005). Chayanov revisited: a model for the economics of complex kin units. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102(19):7043–7046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hedican, Edward J. (2009). Ways of knowing in anthropology: alexandre chayanov and the perils of “dutiful empiricism”. History and Anthropology 20(4):419–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Holland, Paul W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81(396): 945–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Irwin, Elena G., and Bockstael, Nancy E. (2002). Interacting agents, spatial externalities and the evolution of residential land use patterns. Journal of Economic Geography 2(1):31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jones, Eric E., and Wood, James W. (2012). Using event-history analysis to examine the causes of semi-sedentism among shifting cultivators: a case study of the haudenosaunee, AD 1500–1700. Journal of Archaeological Science 39(8):2593–2603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kelley, Janice R. and McGrath, Joseph E. (1988). On time and method. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  42. Lambin, Eric F., and Meyfroidt, Patrick. (2010). Land use transitions: socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy 27(2):108–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lefèbvre, Theodore. (1933). Les modes de vie dans les pyrénées atlantiques orientales. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  44. Lefèbvre, Henri. (1963). La vallée de campan: étude de sociologie rurale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  45. MacDonald, D., et al. (2000). Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of europe: environmental consequences and policy response. Journal of Environmental Management 59(1):47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Malthus, T. (1798). An essay on the principle of population, as it affects the future improvement of society with remarks on the speculations of Mr. Goodwin, M. Condorcet, and other writers. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
  47. March, James G., Sproull, Lee S., and Tamuz, Michal. (1991). Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organization Science 2:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mather, A. S., and Needle, C. L. (2000). The relationships of population and forest trends. The Geographical Journal 166(1):2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Métailié, Jean-Paul. (2006). Mountain Landscape, Pastoral Management and Traditional Practices in the Northern Pyrenees (France). In Agnoletti, M. (ed.), The Conservation of Cultural Landscapes. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
  50. Moreira, F., and Russo, D. (2007). Modelling the impact of agricultural abandonment and wildfires on vertebrate diversity in Mediterranean europe. Landscape Ecology 22(10):1461–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mottet, Anne, et al. (2006). Agricultural land-use change and its drivers in mountain landscapes: a case study in the pyrenees. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 114(2–4):296–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Murphy, Patrick E. and Staples, William A. (1979). A modernized family life cycle. Journal of Consumer Research 6(1):12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Netting, Robert McC. (1972). Of men and meadows: strategies of alpine land use. Anthropological Quarterly 45(3):132–144.Google Scholar
  54. Netting, Robert McC. (1981). Balancing on an Alp: ecological change and continuity in a Swiss mountain community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Ninot, J. M., et al. (2007). Altitude zonation in the pyrenees. A geobotanic interpretation. Phytocoenologia 37(3–5):371–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ott, Sandra. (1993). The circle of mountains: a basque shepherding community. Reno: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
  57. Palu, Pascal. (1992). Rapports entre organisation sociale et écosytème dans la société pastorale souletine. Sociétés Contemporaines 11(1):239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pasche, F., et al. (2004). Are meadows with high ecological and patrimonial value endangered by heathland invasion in the French central pyrenees? Biological Conservation 118(1):101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Peaucelle, Denis. (1977). Analyse d’une communauté rurale basque, Larrau en Haute Soule, Département d’Etudes Rurales, Université de Paris 7.Google Scholar
  60. Perz, Stephen G. (2001). Household demographic factors as life cycle determinants of land use in the amazon. Population Research and Policy Review 20(3):159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Perz, Stephen G., Walker, Robert T., and Caldas, Marcellus M. (2006). Beyond population and environment: household demographic life cycles and land use allocation among small farms in the amazon. Human Ecology 34(6):829–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Plieninger, Tobias, and Bieling, Claudia. (2013). Resilience-based perspectives to guiding high-nature-value farmland through socioeconomic change. Ecology and Society 18(4).Google Scholar
  63. Polanyi, Karl. (1957). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  64. Prishchepov, Alexander V., et al. (2013). Determinants of agricultural land abandonment in post-soviet European Russia. Land Use Policy 30(1):873–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rhoades, Robert E., and Thompson, Stephen I. (1975). Adaptive strategies in alpine environments: beyond ecological particularism. American Ethnologist 2(3):535–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ricardo, David. (1891). Principles of political economy and taxation. London: G. Bell and sons.Google Scholar
  67. Rudel, Thomas K. (1998). Is there a forest transition? Deforestation, reforestation, and development. Rural Sociology 63(4):533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Scargill, Ian. (1994). Crisis in rural France. Geography 79(2):168–171.Google Scholar
  69. Schultz, T. Paul. (1985). Changing world prices, women’s wages, and the fertility transition: Sweden, 1860-1910. Journal of Political Economy 93(6):1126–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shorter, Edward. (1973). Female emancipation, birth control, and fertility in European history. The American Historical Review 78(3):605–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. van Vliet, Jasper, de Groot, Henri L.F., Rietveld, Piet, and Verburg, Peter H. (2015). Manifestations and underlying drivers of agricultural land use change in europe. Landscape and Urban Planning 133(2015):24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. von Thünen, Johann Heinrich. (1966). Von thunen’s isolated state: an English edition of Der isolierte staat. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  73. Zomeni, Maria, Tzanopoulos, Joseph, and Pantis, John D. (2008). Historical analysis of landscape change using remote sensing techniques: an explanatory tool for agricultural transformation in Greek rural areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 86(1):38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Laboratoire TRACES - UMR 5608Université de Toulouse - Jean JaurèsToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations