Does Market Integration Buffer Risk, Erode Traditional Sharing Practices and Increase Inequality? A Test among Bolivian Forager-Farmers
- 560 Downloads
Sharing and exchange are common practices for minimizing food insecurity in rural populations. The advent of markets and monetization in egalitarian indigenous populations presents an alternative means of managing risk, with the potential impact of eroding traditional networks. We test whether market involvement buffers several types of risk and reduces traditional sharing behavior among Tsimane Amerindians of the Bolivian Amazon. Results vary based on type of market integration and scale of analysis (household vs. village), consistent with the notion that local culture and ecology shape risk management strategies. Greater wealth and income were unassociated with the reliance on others for food, or on reciprocity, but wealth was associated with a greater proportion of food given to others (i.e., giving intensity) and a greater number of sharing partners (i.e., sharing breadth). Across villages, greater mean income was negatively associated with reciprocity, but economic inequality was positively associated with giving intensity and sharing breadth. Incipient market integration does not necessarily replace traditional buffering strategies but instead can often enhance social capital.
KeywordsCooperation Sharing Risk management Food security Tsimane Bolivian Amazon Market integration
We thank the Tsimane who participated in this study and Tsimane Health and Life History Project personnel. We also thank Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Sam Bowles, and the participants of the Santa Fe Institute Workgroup on Dynamics of Inequality in Small-scale Societies for stimulating discussions.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The study and all methods were approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRB) of the University of California, Santa Barbara, and the University of New Mexico. In Bolivia, all procedures were approved by the Tsimane Government (Gran Consejo Tsimane), by village leaders and by study participants. Because many Tsimane do not read or write, participant permission was verbal and it was obtained twice: an initial affirmation to participate and a second confirmation once all procedures had been explained.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding was provided by grants from the National Science Foundation (BCS-0136274, BCS-0422690) and National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging (R01AG024119, R56AG02411). Adrian Jaeggi was supported by postdoctoral fellowships from the Swiss NSF (PBZHP3-133443) and the SAGE Center for the Study of the Mind.
- Añez, J. (1992). The Chimane experience in selling jatata. In Plotkin, M., and Famolare, L. (eds.), Sustainable Harvest and Marketing of Rain Forest Products. Island Press, Washington D.C, pp. 197–198.Google Scholar
- Camera, G., Casari, M., and Bigoni, M. (2013). Money and Trust Among Strangers. Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesGoogle Scholar
- Comision Economica para America Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). (2005). Los pueblos indígenas de Bolivia: diagnóstico sociodemográfico a partir del censo del 2001. Santiago, Chile, United Nations.Google Scholar
- Chicchón, A. (1992). Chimane Resource Use and Market Involvement in the Beni Biosphere Reserve. University of Florida, Bolivia.Google Scholar
- Ellis R. (1996). A taste for movement: an exploration of the social ethics of the Tsimane of lowland Bolivia [Ph.D. Thesis]. Scotland: University of St. Andrews.Google Scholar
- Ensminger, J. (1992). Making a Market: The Institutional Transformation of an African Society. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Erasmus, C. J. (1956). Culture, Structure and Process: the Appearance and Disappearance of Reciprocal Farm Labor. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 12(4): 444–469.Google Scholar
- Godoy, R., Reyes-García, V., Huanca, T., Leonard, W. R., Vadez, V., Valdés-Galicia, C., and Zhao, D. (2005). Why Do Subsistence-Level People Join the Market Economy? Testing Hypotheses of Push and Pull Determinants in Bolivian Amazonia. Journal of Anthropological Research 61(2): 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Godoy, R., Reyes-García, V., Huanca, T., Tanner, S., and Seyfried, C. (2007b). On the Measure of Income and the Economic Unimportance of Social Capital: Evidence from A Native Amazonian Society of Farmers and Foragers. Journal of Anthropological Research 239–260.Google Scholar
- Gurven, M., Hill, K., and Kaplan, H. (2002). From Forest to Reservation: Transitions in Food Sharing Behavior Among the Ache of Paraguay. Journal of Anthropological Research 58(1): 93–120.Google Scholar
- Gurven, M., and von Rueden, C. (2006). Hunting, Social Status and Biological Fitness. Social Biology 53: 81–99.Google Scholar
- Hadfield, J. D. (2010). MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalised Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package. Journal of Statistical Software 33(2): 1–22.Google Scholar
- Handcock. (2013). Reldist: relative distribution methods.Google Scholar
- Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., et al. (2005). ‘Economic Man’ in Cross-Cultural Perspective: Economic Experiments in 15 Small Scale Societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(6): 795–838.Google Scholar
- Hooper, P. L. (2011). The Structure of Energy Production and Redistribution Among Tsimane’ Forager-Horticulturalists. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
- Hooper, P. L., Gurven, M., Winking, J., and Kaplan, H. S. (2015). Inclusive Fitness and Differential Productivity Across the Life Course Determine Intergenerational Transfers in A Small-Scale Human Society. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 282(1803): 20142808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jevons, W. S. (1885). Money and the Mechanism of Exchange.Google Scholar
- Kranton, R. E. (1996). Reciprocal Exchange: A Self-Sustaining System. The American Economic Review 830–851.Google Scholar
- Leonard, W. R., and Thomas, R. B. (1989). Biosocial Responses to Seasonal Food Stress in Highland Peru. Human Biology 65–85.Google Scholar
- Martin, M. A., Lassek, W. D., Gaulin, S. J. C., Evans, R. W., Woo, J. G., Geraghty, S. R., Davidson, B. S., Morrow, A. L., Kaplan, H. S., and Gurven, M. D. (2012). Fatty acid Composition in the Mature Milk of Bolivian Forager-Horticulturalists: Controlled Comparisons with A US Sample. Maternal and Child Health 8(3): 404–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1998). . The Communist Manifesto. Penguin, New York.Google Scholar
- Polyani, K. (1944). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time. Rinehart, New York.Google Scholar
- Seabright, P. (2010). The Company of Strangers: A Natural History of Economic Life (Revised Edition): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, E. A. (1988). Risk and Uncertainty in the ‘Original Affluent Society’: Evolutionary Ecology of Resource-Sharing and Land Tenure. In Ingold, T., Riches, D., and Woodburn, J. (eds.), Hunter-Gatherers, Volume 1: History, Evolution and Social Change. Berg, New York, pp. 222–251.Google Scholar
- Stieglitz, J., Blackwell, A., Quispe Gutierrez, R., Cortez Linares, E., Kaplan, H., and Gurven, M. (2012). Modernization, Sexual risk-Taking and Gynecological Morbidity Among Bolivian Forager-Horticulturalists. PLoS ONE.Google Scholar
- Team, R. D. C. (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
- Undurraga, E. A., Zycherman, A., Yiu, J., Bolivia Study Team T, and Godoy, R. A. (2013). Savings at the Periphery of Markets: Evidence from Forager-Farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. The Journal of Development Studies 1–14.Google Scholar
- Zuur, A., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A., and Smith, G. M. (2009). Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology With R: Springer.Google Scholar