“How Could I Live Here and Not Be a Member?”: Economic Versus Social Drivers of Participation in Namibian Conservation Programs
- 489 Downloads
Economic goals form a critical component of community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) programs, but many studies question whether these initiatives actually deliver economic benefits to local communities. This presents a puzzle regarding why rural residents remain in CBNRM programs, and raises the possibility that non-economic incentives also influence participation. We address this question in a study of two Namibian communal conservancies, analyzing survey and interview data collected between 2009 and 2011. We find that economic incentives explain participation in one conservancy, whereas social motivations take precedence in the other. Our findings indicate that strong attachment to place and preferences for social cohesion can motivate people to comply with CBNRM even when economic incentives fail to materialize.
KeywordsCBNRM Economic incentives Traditional authority Social motivations Namibia
The authors thank Stewart Duncan, Martha Geores, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. We also thank Nicole Motzer, Michael Strong, and Zan Dodson for their research assistance, as well as the residents of the case study communities for their willingness to participate in this study. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number BCS 1042888. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors accepts all responsibility for any errors.
- Ashley, C. (1998). Intangibles Matter: The Non-Financial Dividends of Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Namibia. WWF Living in a Finite Environment Program, Windhoek.Google Scholar
- Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research Methods in Anthropolgy: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. AltaMira Press, London.Google Scholar
- Brockington, D., Duffy, R., and Igoe, J. (2008). Nature Unbound: Conservation, Capitalism, and the Future of Protected Areas. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
- Campbell, B., and Shackleton, S. (2001). The Organizational Structures for Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Southern Africa. African Studies Quarterly 5(3): 87–111.Google Scholar
- CDSS (2011). Quarterly Report: October to December 2011. Conservancy Development Support Services, Windhoek.Google Scholar
- Child, B. (2004). Parks in transition: Biodiversity, development, and the bottom line. In Child, B. (ed.), Parks in Transition: Biodiversity, Rural Development, and the Bottom Line. Earthscan, London, pp. 233–256.Google Scholar
- Constantino, P. A. L., Carlos, H. S. A., Ramalho, E. E., Rostant, L., Marinelli, C., Teles, D., Fonseca-Junior, S. F., Fernandes, R. B., and Valsecchi, J. (2012). Empowering Local People Through Community-Based Resource Monitoring: A Comparison Between Brazil and Namibia. Ecology and Society 17(4): 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cundill, G., and Fabricius, C. (2010). Monitoring the Governance Dimension of Natural Resource Co-Management. Ecology and Society 15(1): 15.Google Scholar
- Emerton, L. (2001). The nature of benefits and the benefits of nature: Why wildlife conservation has not economically benefited communities in Africa. In Hulme, D., and Murphree, M. (eds.), African Wildlife and Livelihoods. Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH, pp. 208–226.Google Scholar
- Fabricius, C., Koch, E., Turner, S., and Magome, H. (eds.) (2004). Rights, Resources, and Rural Development: Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Southern Africa. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
- GRN. (1996a). Nature Conservation Amendment Act, 1333. Government of the Republic of Namibia.Google Scholar
- GRN. (1996b). Nature Conservation Amendment Act, 1446. Government of the Republic of Namibia.Google Scholar
- Hinz, M.O. (1998a). Communal land, natural resources and traditional authorities. In d’Engelbronner, F.M. (ed.), Traditional Authority and Democracy in Southern Africa, M.O, Hinz, and J.L. Sindano, pp. 183–227. Centre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia: New Namibia Books.Google Scholar
- Hinz, M.O. (1998b). Without Chiefs There Would Be No Game. Centre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia: New Namibia Books.Google Scholar
- Hughes, D. M. (2006). From Enslavement to Environmentalism. Politics on a Southern African Frontier. University of Washington Press, Seattle.Google Scholar
- Hulme, D., and Murphree, M. (eds.) (2001). African Wildlife and Livelihoods: The Promise and Performance of Community Conservation. James Currey, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Igoe, J., and Brockington, D. (2007). Neoliberal Conservation: A Brief Introduction. Conservation and Society 5(4): 432–449.Google Scholar
- Igoe, J., and Croucher, B. (2007). Conservation, Commerce, and Communities: The Story of Community-Based Wildlife Management Areas in Tanzania’s Northern Tourist Circuit. Conservation and Society 5(4): 534–561.Google Scholar
- IRAS. (2013a). Elephant: numbers in eastern Namibia. Information System for Rare Species Management. Available at http://www.nnf.org.na/RARESPECIES/InfoSys/elephant/numbers/La_East.htm.
- IRAS. (2013b). Hippopotamus: Present numbers and distribution in Caprivi. Information System for Rare Species Management Available at http://www.nnf.org.na/RARESPECIES/InfoSys/Hippo/Numbers&distribution/NamPresent.htm.
- IRDNC (2007). WWF/SDC project technical progress report – Caprivi. Integrated Rural Development and Nature Conservation. Windhoek, Namibia.Google Scholar
- IRDNC (2011). Project/Programme Technical Progress Report: IRDNC Caprivi. Integrated Rural Development and Nature Conservation, Windhoek.Google Scholar
- Jones, B. T. B., and Mosimane, A. W. (2000). Empowering communities to manage natural resources: Where does the new power lie? Case studies from Namibia. In Shackelton, S., and Campbell, B. (eds.), Empowering Communities to Manage Natural Resources: Case Studies from Southern Africa. SADC Wildlife Sector Natural Resource Management Program, Harare, pp. 72–110.Google Scholar
- Jones, B. T. B., Davis, A., Diez, L., and Diggle, R. W. (2013). Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) and reducing poverty in Namibia. In Roe, D., Elliott, J., Sandbrook, C., and Walpole, M. (eds.), Biodiversity, Conservation, and Poverty Alleviation: Exploring the Evidence for a Link. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, pp. 191–205.Google Scholar
- Mendelsohn, J. (2008). Customary and Legislative Aspects of Land Registration and Management on Communal Land in Namibia. Report Prepared for the Ministry of Lands and Resettlement. Government of the Republic of Namibia. Windhoek, Namibia.Google Scholar
- Mendelsohn, J., Jarvis, A., Roberts, C., and Robertson, T. (2002). Atlas of Namibia. David Phillip, Cape Town.Google Scholar
- MET. (1995). Promotion of Community-based Tourism, Ministry of Environment and Tourism. Windhoek, Namibia. URL http://www.met.gov.na/Documents/Community%20Based%20Tourism%20Policy.pdf.
- Mosimane, A. (2012). Collective Identity and Collective Action in the Management of Common Pool Resources: A Case Study of Doro !Nawas Conservancy in Namibia. PhD dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg.Google Scholar
- NACSO (2010). Namibia’s Communal Conservancies: A Review of Progress 2009. Namibian Association of CBNRM Support Organizations, Windhoek.Google Scholar
- NACSO (2011). Namibia’s Communal Conservancies: A Review of Progress 2010. Namibian Association of CBNRM Support Organizations, Windhoek.Google Scholar
- NACSO. (2012a). Summary of conservancies. Namibian Association of CBNRM Support Organizations, Windhoek, Namibia. URL http://www.nacso.org.na/SOC_profiles/conservancysummary.php.
- NACSO. (2012b). Map showing communal conservancies, community forests, national parks and tourism concessions. Namibian Association of CBNRM Support Organizations, Windhoek, Namibia. URL http://www.nacso.org.na/SOC_profiles/conservancies_A1.jpg.
- PCLG. (2012). Namibian insurance scheme—Hacsis. PCLG Case Study—No3. Poverty and Conservation Learning Group. Available at http://povertyandconservation.info/sites/default/files/Namibian%20Insurance%20Scheme%20-%20HACSIS.pdf.
- Piek, J. (1998). The role of traditional authorities in natural resource management. In: Traditional Authority and Democracy in Southern Africa, ed. F.M. d’Engelbronner, M.O, Hinz, and J.L. Sindano, pp. 228–246. Centre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia: New Namibia Books.Google Scholar
- Renzi, M. 1999. Using Tourism to Sustain Community-Based Conservation: Experience from Namibia. Paper presented at RAISE (Rural and Agricultural Incomes with a Sustainable Environment), USAID Global Bureau, Washington, DC (4 November).Google Scholar
- Shapi, M. (2003). Mayuni Conservancy Socio-Economic and Livelihood Approaches with Respect to Contemporary Natural Resources Conservation. University of Namibia, Multidisciplinary Research and Consultancy Centre, Windhoek.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage, London.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, S. (2003). Protest, conflict and litigation: Dissent or libel in resistance to a conservancy in North-West Namibia. In Anderson, D., and Berglund, E. (eds.), Ethnographies of Conservation. Berghahn Books, Oxford, pp. 69–86.Google Scholar
- Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
- Uiseb, K., and Mosimane, A. (2004). Livelihood and Tourism Enterprises in Uibasen Conservancy. Community Based Natural Research Management Programme, Multidisciplinary Research and Consultancy Centre, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia, Windhoek.Google Scholar
- Walpole, M. J., and Thouless, C. R. (2005). Increasing the value of wildlife through non-consumptive use? Deconstructing the myths of ecotourism and community-based tourism in the tropics. In Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S., and Rabinowitz, A. (eds.), People and Wildlife, Conflict or Co-Existence? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 122–139.Google Scholar