Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 183–197 | Cite as

“How Could I Live Here and Not Be a Member?”: Economic Versus Social Drivers of Participation in Namibian Conservation Programs

  • Julie A. SilvaEmail author
  • Alfons Mosimane
Article

Abstract

Economic goals form a critical component of community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) programs, but many studies question whether these initiatives actually deliver economic benefits to local communities. This presents a puzzle regarding why rural residents remain in CBNRM programs, and raises the possibility that non-economic incentives also influence participation. We address this question in a study of two Namibian communal conservancies, analyzing survey and interview data collected between 2009 and 2011. We find that economic incentives explain participation in one conservancy, whereas social motivations take precedence in the other. Our findings indicate that strong attachment to place and preferences for social cohesion can motivate people to comply with CBNRM even when economic incentives fail to materialize.

Keywords

CBNRM Economic incentives Traditional authority Social motivations Namibia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Stewart Duncan, Martha Geores, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. We also thank Nicole Motzer, Michael Strong, and Zan Dodson for their research assistance, as well as the residents of the case study communities for their willingness to participate in this study. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number BCS 1042888. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors accepts all responsibility for any errors.

References

  1. Ashley, C. (1998). Intangibles Matter: The Non-Financial Dividends of Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Namibia. WWF Living in a Finite Environment Program, Windhoek.Google Scholar
  2. Balint, P., and Mashinya, J. (2008). CAMPFIRE During Zimbabwe’s National Crisis: Local Impacts and Wider Implications for Community-Based Wildlife Management. Society & Natural Resources 21(9): 783–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes, J. I., MacGregor, J., and Weaver, L. C. (2002). Economic Efficiency and Incentives for Change Within Namibia’s Community Wildlife Use Initiatives. World Development 30: 667–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, H. B. (2006). ‘New Things After independence’: Gender and Traditional Authorities in Postcolonial Namibia. Journal of Southern African Studies 32(1): 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research Methods in Anthropolgy: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. AltaMira Press, London.Google Scholar
  6. Blaikie, P. (2006). Is Small Really Beautiful? Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development 34(11): 1942–1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brockington, D., Duffy, R., and Igoe, J. (2008). Nature Unbound: Conservation, Capitalism, and the Future of Protected Areas. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, B., and Shackleton, S. (2001). The Organizational Structures for Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Southern Africa. African Studies Quarterly 5(3): 87–111.Google Scholar
  9. Cardenas, J. C., Stranlund, J., and Willis, C. (2000). Local Environmental Control and Institutional Crowding-Out. World Development 28(10): 1719–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CDSS (2011). Quarterly Report: October to December 2011. Conservancy Development Support Services, Windhoek.Google Scholar
  11. Child, B. (2004). Parks in transition: Biodiversity, development, and the bottom line. In Child, B. (ed.), Parks in Transition: Biodiversity, Rural Development, and the Bottom Line. Earthscan, London, pp. 233–256.Google Scholar
  12. Cleaver, F. (2000). Moral Ecological Rationality, Institutions and the Management of Common Property Resources. Development and Change 31(2): 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Constantino, P. A. L., Carlos, H. S. A., Ramalho, E. E., Rostant, L., Marinelli, C., Teles, D., Fonseca-Junior, S. F., Fernandes, R. B., and Valsecchi, J. (2012). Empowering Local People Through Community-Based Resource Monitoring: A Comparison Between Brazil and Namibia. Ecology and Society 17(4): 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cundill, G., and Fabricius, C. (2010). Monitoring the Governance Dimension of Natural Resource Co-Management. Ecology and Society 15(1): 15.Google Scholar
  15. Dressler, W., and Büscher, B. (2008). Market Triumphalism and the So-Called CBNRM ‘Crisis’ at the South African Section of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park. Geoforum 39(1): 452–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dressler, W., and Roth, R. (2011). The Good, the Bad and the Contradictory: Neoliberal Conservation Governance in Rural Southeast Asia. World Development 39(5): 851–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Emerton, L. (2001). The nature of benefits and the benefits of nature: Why wildlife conservation has not economically benefited communities in Africa. In Hulme, D., and Murphree, M. (eds.), African Wildlife and Livelihoods. Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH, pp. 208–226.Google Scholar
  18. Fabricius, C., Koch, E., Turner, S., and Magome, H. (eds.) (2004). Rights, Resources, and Rural Development: Community-Based Natural Resource Management in Southern Africa. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  19. Forrest, R., and Kearns, A. (2001). Social Cohesion, Social Capital and the Neighborhood. Urban Studies 38(12): 2125–2143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frey, B. S., and Jegen, R. (2001). Motivation Crowding Theory. Journal of Economic Surveys 15(5): 589–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedman, J. T. (2005). Making Politics, Making History: Chiefship and the Post-Apartheid State in Namibia. Journal of Southern African Studies 31(1): 23–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. GRN. (1996a). Nature Conservation Amendment Act, 1333. Government of the Republic of Namibia.Google Scholar
  23. GRN. (1996b). Nature Conservation Amendment Act, 1446. Government of the Republic of Namibia.Google Scholar
  24. Hinz, M.O. (1998a). Communal land, natural resources and traditional authorities. In d’Engelbronner, F.M. (ed.), Traditional Authority and Democracy in Southern Africa, M.O, Hinz, and J.L. Sindano, pp. 183–227. Centre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia: New Namibia Books.Google Scholar
  25. Hinz, M.O. (1998b). Without Chiefs There Would Be No Game. Centre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia: New Namibia Books.Google Scholar
  26. Hodgson, G. (1997). The Ubiquity of Habits and Rules. Cambridge Journal of Economics 21(6): 663–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hughes, D. M. (2006). From Enslavement to Environmentalism. Politics on a Southern African Frontier. University of Washington Press, Seattle.Google Scholar
  28. Hulme, D., and Murphree, M. (eds.) (2001). African Wildlife and Livelihoods: The Promise and Performance of Community Conservation. James Currey, Oxford.Google Scholar
  29. Igoe, J., and Brockington, D. (2007). Neoliberal Conservation: A Brief Introduction. Conservation and Society 5(4): 432–449.Google Scholar
  30. Igoe, J., and Croucher, B. (2007). Conservation, Commerce, and Communities: The Story of Community-Based Wildlife Management Areas in Tanzania’s Northern Tourist Circuit. Conservation and Society 5(4): 534–561.Google Scholar
  31. IRAS. (2013a). Elephant: numbers in eastern Namibia. Information System for Rare Species Management. Available at http://www.nnf.org.na/RARESPECIES/InfoSys/elephant/numbers/La_East.htm.
  32. IRAS. (2013b). Hippopotamus: Present numbers and distribution in Caprivi. Information System for Rare Species Management Available at http://www.nnf.org.na/RARESPECIES/InfoSys/Hippo/Numbers&distribution/NamPresent.htm.
  33. IRDNC (2007). WWF/SDC project technical progress report – Caprivi. Integrated Rural Development and Nature Conservation. Windhoek, Namibia.Google Scholar
  34. IRDNC (2011). Project/Programme Technical Progress Report: IRDNC Caprivi. Integrated Rural Development and Nature Conservation, Windhoek.Google Scholar
  35. Ishihara, H., and Pascual, U. (2009). Social Capital in Community Level Environmental Governance: A Critique. Ecological Economics 68(5): 1549–1562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones, B. T. B., and Mosimane, A. W. (2000). Empowering communities to manage natural resources: Where does the new power lie? Case studies from Namibia. In Shackelton, S., and Campbell, B. (eds.), Empowering Communities to Manage Natural Resources: Case Studies from Southern Africa. SADC Wildlife Sector Natural Resource Management Program, Harare, pp. 72–110.Google Scholar
  37. Jones, B. T. B., Davis, A., Diez, L., and Diggle, R. W. (2013). Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) and reducing poverty in Namibia. In Roe, D., Elliott, J., Sandbrook, C., and Walpole, M. (eds.), Biodiversity, Conservation, and Poverty Alleviation: Exploring the Evidence for a Link. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, pp. 191–205.Google Scholar
  38. Kellert, S. R., Metha, J. N., Ebbin, S. A., and Lichtenfeld, L. L. (2000). Community Natural Resource Management: Promise, Rhetoric, and Reality. Society and Natural Resources 13(8): 705–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lapeyre, R. (2010). Community-Based Tourism as a Sustainable Solution to Maximise Impacts Locally? The Tsieb Conservancy Case, Namibia. Development Southern Africa 27(5): 757–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Logan, C. (2009). Selected Chiefs, Elected Councilors and Hybrid Democrats: Popular Perspectives on the Co-Existence of Democracy and Traditional Authority. Journal of Modern African Studies 47(1): 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mendelsohn, J. (2008). Customary and Legislative Aspects of Land Registration and Management on Communal Land in Namibia. Report Prepared for the Ministry of Lands and Resettlement. Government of the Republic of Namibia. Windhoek, Namibia.Google Scholar
  42. Mendelsohn, J., Jarvis, A., Roberts, C., and Robertson, T. (2002). Atlas of Namibia. David Phillip, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  43. MET. (1995). Promotion of Community-based Tourism, Ministry of Environment and Tourism. Windhoek, Namibia. URL http://www.met.gov.na/Documents/Community%20Based%20Tourism%20Policy.pdf.
  44. Meyfroidt, P. (2013a). Environmental Cognitions, Land Change and Social-Ecological Feedbacks: Local Case Studies of Forest Transition in Vietnam. Human Ecology 41: 367–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Meyfroidt, P. (2013b). Environmental Cognitions, Land Change, and Social-Ecological Feedbacks: An Overview. Journal of Land Use Science 8(3): 341–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moore, L. E. (2010). Conservation Heroes Versus Environmental Villains: Perceiving Elephants in Caprivi. Namibia. Human Ecology 38(1): 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mosimane, A. (2012). Collective Identity and Collective Action in the Management of Common Pool Resources: A Case Study of Doro !Nawas Conservancy in Namibia. PhD dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg.Google Scholar
  48. Murphree, M. W. (2009). The Strategic Pillars of Community Natural Resource Management: Benefits, Empowerment and Conservation. Biodiversity Conservation 18(10): 2551–2562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. NACSO (2010). Namibia’s Communal Conservancies: A Review of Progress 2009. Namibian Association of CBNRM Support Organizations, Windhoek.Google Scholar
  50. NACSO (2011). Namibia’s Communal Conservancies: A Review of Progress 2010. Namibian Association of CBNRM Support Organizations, Windhoek.Google Scholar
  51. NACSO. (2012a). Summary of conservancies. Namibian Association of CBNRM Support Organizations, Windhoek, Namibia. URL http://www.nacso.org.na/SOC_profiles/conservancysummary.php.
  52. NACSO. (2012b). Map showing communal conservancies, community forests, national parks and tourism concessions. Namibian Association of CBNRM Support Organizations, Windhoek, Namibia. URL http://www.nacso.org.na/SOC_profiles/conservancies_A1.jpg.
  53. PCLG. (2012). Namibian insurance scheme—Hacsis. PCLG Case Study—No3. Poverty and Conservation Learning Group. Available at http://povertyandconservation.info/sites/default/files/Namibian%20Insurance%20Scheme%20-%20HACSIS.pdf.
  54. Piek, J. (1998). The role of traditional authorities in natural resource management. In: Traditional Authority and Democracy in Southern Africa, ed. F.M. d’Engelbronner, M.O, Hinz, and J.L. Sindano, pp. 228–246. Centre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia: New Namibia Books.Google Scholar
  55. Pretty, J. (2003). Social Capital and Collective Management of Resources. Science 302(5652): 1912–1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pretty, J., and Ward, H. (2001). Social Capital and the Environment. World Development 29(2): 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Renzi, M. 1999. Using Tourism to Sustain Community-Based Conservation: Experience from Namibia. Paper presented at RAISE (Rural and Agricultural Incomes with a Sustainable Environment), USAID Global Bureau, Washington, DC (4 November).Google Scholar
  58. Robinson, L. W., Bennett, N., King, L. A., and Murray, G. (2012). “We Want Our Children to Grow Up to See These Animals:” Values and Protected Areas Governance in Canada, Ghana and Tanzania. Human Ecology 40(4): 570–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sen, A. (2005). Human Rights and Capabilities. Journal of Human Development 6(2): 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shapi, M. (2003). Mayuni Conservancy Socio-Economic and Livelihood Approaches with Respect to Contemporary Natural Resources Conservation. University of Namibia, Multidisciplinary Research and Consultancy Centre, Windhoek.Google Scholar
  61. Silva, J. A., and Mosimane, A. W. (2013). Conservation-Based Rural Development in Namibia: A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Economic Benefits. The Journal of Environment and Development 22(1): 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  63. Suich, H. (2010). The Livelihood Impacts of the Namibian Community Based Natural Resource Management Program: A Meta-Synthesis. Environmental Conservation 37(1): 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sullivan, S. (2003). Protest, conflict and litigation: Dissent or libel in resistance to a conservancy in North-West Namibia. In Anderson, D., and Berglund, E. (eds.), Ethnographies of Conservation. Berghahn Books, Oxford, pp. 69–86.Google Scholar
  65. Sullivan, S. (2006). Elephant in the Room? Problematising “New” (Neoliberal) Biodiversity Conservation. Forum for Development Studies 33(1): 105–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  67. Uiseb, K., and Mosimane, A. (2004). Livelihood and Tourism Enterprises in Uibasen Conservancy. Community Based Natural Research Management Programme, Multidisciplinary Research and Consultancy Centre, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia, Windhoek.Google Scholar
  68. Walpole, M. J., and Thouless, C. R. (2005). Increasing the value of wildlife through non-consumptive use? Deconstructing the myths of ecotourism and community-based tourism in the tropics. In Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S., and Rabinowitz, A. (eds.), People and Wildlife, Conflict or Co-Existence? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 122–139.Google Scholar
  69. Zulu, L. C. (2009). Politics of Scale and Community-Based Forest Management in Southern Malawi. Geoforum 40(4): 686–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.University of NamibiaWindhoekNamibia

Personalised recommendations