Human Ecology

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 87–101 | Cite as

The Politics of Adaptation: Subsistence Livelihoods and Vulnerability to Climate Change in the Koyukon Athabascan Village of Ruby, Alaska

Article

Abstract

The concepts of vulnerability and adaptation have contributed to understanding human responses to climate change. However, analysis of the implications of the broader political context on adaptation has largely been absent. Through a case study of the subsistence livelihoods of Koyukon Athabascan people of Ruby Village, this paper examines the implications of adaptation to the social changes precipitated by colonization for the articulation of current responses to climate change. Semi-structured interviews, seasonal rounds, and land-use mapping conducted with 20 community experts indicate that subsistence livelihoods are of continued importance to the people of Ruby in spite of the dramatic social change. While adaptive responses demonstrate resilience, adaptation to one form of change can increase vulnerability to other kinds of perturbations. Research findings illustrate that a historical approach to adaptation can clarify the influence of the present political context on indigenous peoples’ responses to impacts of climate changes.

Keywords

Adaptation Climate change Equity and justice Indigenous peoples Subsistence livelihoods Vulnerability Alaska 

References

  1. (2005). Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. (2009). Biocultural diversity and indigenous ways of knowing: Human ecology in the Arctic. Calgary: University of Calgary Press/Arctic Institute of North America.Google Scholar
  3. (2009). Canadian Inuit subsistence and ecological instability—if the climate changes, must the Inuit? Polar Research 28(1): 89–99.Google Scholar
  4. (2010). Coupled socio-cultural and ecological systems at the margins: arctic and alpine cases. Frontiers of earth science in China 4(1): 89–98.Google Scholar
  5. ACIA (Arctic Climate Impact Assessment) (2004). Impacts of a warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  6. Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16(3): 268–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Adger, W. N., and Mick Kelly, P. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4(3): 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., and Tompkins, E. L. (2005). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change Part A 15(2): 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Adger, W. N., Paavola, J., Huq, S., and Mace, M. J. (eds.) (2006). Fairness in adaptation to climate change. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
  10. Agrawal, A., and Perrin, N. (2009). Climate Adaptation, Local Institutions and Rural Livelihoods. # W08I-6. IFRI Working Paper. University of Michigan: International Forestry and Resources Institution.Google Scholar
  11. Alaska, F. (1956). The Constitution of the State of Alaska. Alaska Constitutional Convention, Fairbanks.Google Scholar
  12. Alaska Fish and Wildlife Service. (2010). Unit 21/Hunting - Middle Yukon. Federal Subsistence Wildlife Regulations. http://alaska.fws.gov/asm/pdf/wildregs/unit21.pdf, accessed January 23, 2012.
  13. Berger, T., and the Alaska Native Review Commission (1985). Village journey: The report of the Alaska native review commission, 1st ed. Hill and Wang, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Berkes, F., and Jolly, D. (2001). Adapting to climate change: social-ecological resilience in a Canadian western arctic community. Conservation Ecology 5(2): 18.Google Scholar
  15. Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, C. L., Walker, R. J. and Vanek, S. B. (2004). The 2002–2003 harvest of moose, caribou, and bear in Middle Yukon and Koyukuk River Communities. Division of Subsistence, Alaska Dept. of Fish and Game. http://www.subsistence.adfg.state.ak.us/TechPap/tp280.pdf.
  17. Bryant, M. (2009) Global Climate Change and Potential Effects on Pacific Salmonids in Freshwater Ecosystems of Southeast Alaska. Climatic Change 95(1): 169–193.Google Scholar
  18. Bubenik, A. B. (1997). Behavior. In Ecology and management of the North American Moose. Washington (D.C.): Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  19. Burton, I., Kates, R. W., and White, G. F. (1993). The environment as hazard. Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Cameron, E. S. (2011). Securing indigenous politics: a critique of the vulnerability and adaptation approach to the human dimensions of climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Global Environmental. Change.Google Scholar
  21. Carey, E. (2009). Building resilience to climate change in Rural Alaska: Understanding impacts, adaptation and the role of TEK. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  22. Carpenter, S., Brian Walker, J., Anderies, M., and Abel, N. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4(8): 765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chapin III, F., Stuart, G. P., Berkes, F., et al. (2004). Resilience and vulnerability of northern regions to social and environmental change. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 33(6): 344–349.Google Scholar
  24. Congress, U. S. (1980). Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA). Public Law 96: 487.Google Scholar
  25. Crate, S. A., and Nuttall, M. (2009). Anthropology and climate change: From encounters to actions. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.Google Scholar
  26. Dombrowski, K. (2001). Against culture: development, politics, and religion in Indian Alaska. University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  27. Eakin, H., and Luers, A. L. (2006). Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 365–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Erickson, P. A., and Murphy, L. D. (1998). A history of anthropological theory. Illustrated edition. UTP Higher Education.Google Scholar
  29. Ford, J. D., and Pearce, T. (2010). What we know, do not know, and need to know about climate change vulnerability in the western Canadian arctic: a systematic literature review. Environmental Research Letters 5(1): 014008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ford, J. D., and Smit, B. (2004). A framework for assessing the vulnerability of Communities in the Canadian arctic to risks associated with climate change. Arctic: 389–400.Google Scholar
  31. Ford, J. D., Smit, B., and Wandel, J. (2006). Vulnerability to climate change in the arctic: a case study from arctic Bay, Canada. Global Environmental Change 16(2): 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ford, J. D., Pearce, T., Smit, B., et al. (2007). Reducing vulnerability to climate change in the arctic: the case of Nunavut, Canada. Arctic 60(2): 150–166.Google Scholar
  33. Greenwood, D. J., and Levin, M. (2008). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change, 2nd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
  34. Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., et al. (2006). Global temperature change. PNAS 103: 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Herman-Mercer, N., Schuster, P. F., and Maracle, K. B. (2011). Indigenous observations of climate change in the Lower Yukon River Basin, Alaska. Human Organization 70(3): 244–252.Google Scholar
  36. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. IPCC (International Protocol on Climate Change) (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Working group II Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC (Climate Change 2007). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.Google Scholar
  38. Jetté, J., and Jones, E. (2000). Koyukon athabaskan dictionary. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK.Google Scholar
  39. Kassam, K-A. S. (2009) Biocultural Diversity and Indigenous Ways of Knowing: Human Ecology in the Arctic. Calgary: University of Calgary Press/Arctic Institute of North America.Google Scholar
  40. Kassam, K-A. S. (2010) Coupled Socio-cultural and Ecological Systems at the Margins: Arctic and Alpine Cases. Frontiers of Earth Science in China 4(1): 89–98.Google Scholar
  41. Kassam, K.-A. S. (2008). Diversity as if nature and culture matter: bio-cultural diversity and indigenous peoples. The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities and Nations 8(2): 87–95.Google Scholar
  42. Kassam, K-A. S., and the Soaring Eagle Friendship Centre. (2001). “So that our voices are heard”: Forest use and changing gender roles of dene women in Hay River, Northwest Territories. CIDA-Shastri Partnership Project.Google Scholar
  43. Kassam, K-A. S., and the Wainwright Traditional Council. (2001). Passing on the Knowledge: Mapping Human Ecology in Wainwright, Alaska. Arctic Institute of North America.Google Scholar
  44. Kassam, K-A. S., Baumflek, M., Ruelle, M., and Wilson, N. (2011). Human ecology of vulnerability, resilience, and adaptation: Case studies of climate change from high latitudes and altitudes. In Climate change – socioeconomic effects. Juan Blanco and Houshang Kheradmand, eds. Pp. 217–236. Intech. http://www.intechopen.com/articles/show/title/human-ecology-of-vulnerability-resilience-and-adaptation-case-studies-of-climate-change-from-high-la, accessed April 30, 2011.
  45. Kawagley, A. O. (1999). Alaska native education: history and adaptation in the new millennium. Journal of American Indian Education 39(1): 31–51.Google Scholar
  46. Krupnik, I. I., and Jolly, D. (2002). The earth is faster now: Indigenous observations of Arctic Environmental Change. Arctic Research Consortium of the United States.Google Scholar
  47. Larson, W. (2006). Ruby Alaska a Gold Rush Town on the Yukon River. http://rubyalaska.info/, accessed July 27, 2010.
  48. McNeeley, S. M. (2011). Examining barriers and opportunities for sustainable adaptation to climate change in interior Alaska. Climatic Change: 1–23.Google Scholar
  49. McNeeley, S. M., and Shulski, M. D. (2011). Anatomy of a closing window: Vulnerability to changing seasonality in Interior Alaska. Global Environmental Change.Google Scholar
  50. Mearns, R., and Norton, A. (eds.) (2010). Social dimensions of climate change: Equity and vulnerability in a warming world. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  51. Nelson, R. K. (1986). Make prayers to the Raven: A Koyukon view of the Northern Forest. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Nichols, T., Berkes, F., Jolly, D., and Snow, N. B. (2004). Climate change and Sea Ice: local observations from the Canadian Western Arctic. Arctic: 68–79.Google Scholar
  53. Nuttall, M., Berkes, F., Forbes, B., et al. (2005). Hunting, herding, fishing and gathering: Indigenous peoples and renewable resource use in the arctic. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 649–690.Google Scholar
  54. Patton, M. Q. (2002) Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd edition. Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  55. Pretty, J., Adams, B., Berkes, F. et al. (2008). How do biodiversity and culture intersect. In Plenary Paper Presented at the Conference for Sustaining Cultural and Biological Diversity in a Rapidly Changing World: Lessons for Global Policy Pp. 2–5.Google Scholar
  56. Reid, H., Alam, M., Berger, R., et al. (2009). Community-based adaptation to climate change: an overview. Participatory Learning and Action 60(1): 11–33.Google Scholar
  57. Reidlinger, D., and Berkes, F. (2001). Contributions of traditional knowledge to understanding climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Record (203): 315–328.Google Scholar
  58. Ribot, J. C. (1995). The causal structure of vulnerability: its application to climate impact analysis. GeoJournal 35(2): 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Salinger, M. J. (2005). Climate variability and change: past, present and future – an overview. Climatic Change 70(1–2): 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schwartz, C. C. (1998). Reproduction, Natality and growth. In Ecology and management of the North American Moose. Pp. 141–171. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  61. Smit, B., and Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16(3): 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T., and Wandel J. (2000) An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Climate Change 45(223–251).Google Scholar
  63. Stout, G. W. (2008). Unit 21B moose. Wildlife moose management report, project 1.0. Moose Management Report of Survey and Inventory Activities 1 July 2005–30 June 2007. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Alaska, USA.Google Scholar
  64. Tester, F. J., and Kulchyski, P. K. (1994). Tammarniit (mistakes): Inuit Relocation in the Eastern Arctic, 1939–63. UBC Press.Google Scholar
  65. Thornton, T. F. (2001). Subsistence in northern communities: lessons from Alaska. The Northern Review 23: 82–102.Google Scholar
  66. Turner, B. L., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., et al. (2003). Illustrating the coupled human–environment system for vulnerability analysis: three case studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(14): 8080–8085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. U.S. Census (United States Census). (2010). Ruby City, Profile of General Population and Household Characteristics. Summary File (Public Law (P.L.) 94–171). http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_DP_DPDP1&prodType=table, accessed September 21, 2011.
  68. U.S. Public Law 85–508. (1958). Alaska Statehood Act. http://www.lbblawyers.com/statetoc.htm, accessed July 1, 2011.
  69. U.S. Public Law 96–487. (1980). ANILCA (Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act).Google Scholar
  70. Valdivia, C., Seth, A., Gilles, J. L., et al. (2010). Adapting to climate change in Andean ecosystems: landscapes, capitals, and perceptions shaping rural livelihood strategies and linking knowledge systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100(4): 818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Van Ballenberghe, V., and Miquelle, D. G. (1993). Mating in moose: timing, behavior, and male access patterns. Canadian Journal of Zoology 71(8): 1687–1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. VanStone, J. W. (1974). Athapaskan adaptations: Hunters and fishermen of the subarctic forests. Aldine Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  73. Wenzel, G. W. (2009) Canadian Inuit Subsistence and Ecological Instability—if the Climate Changes, Must the Inuit? Polar Research 28(1): 89–99.Google Scholar
  74. Wenzel, G. W. (1991). Animal rights, human rights: Ecology, economy and ideology in the Canadian Arctic. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  75. Wenzel, G. W., Hoevelsrud-Broda, G., Kishigami, N., and Hakubutsukan, K. M. (2000). The social economy of sharing: Resource allocation and modern hunter-gatherers. National Museum of Ethnology, Osaka.Google Scholar
  76. Wheeler, P., and Thornton, T. F. (2005). Subsistence research in Alaska: a thirty year retrospective. Alaska Journal of Anthropology 3(1): 69–103.Google Scholar
  77. White, G. F. (1973). Natural hazards research. Directions in Geography: 193.Google Scholar
  78. Wolfe, R. J. (2000). Subsistence in Alaska: a year 2000 Update. Division of Subsistence, Alaska Department of Fish and Game.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Resources, Environment and SustainabilityUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverUSA

Personalised recommendations