Human Ecology

, Volume 41, Issue 6, pp 885–903 | Cite as

Information Networks in Amenity Transition Communities: A Comparative Case Study

Article

Abstract

Amenity transition, a major socio demographic trend in areas rich in natural resources, is characterized by economic and population growth as a result of retirement in-migration, increased rates of second home ownership, and increases in the number of industries that do not need to be proximate to a specific geographic location. Amenity transition is also characterized by increased intra-community conflict between long-term residents and in-migrants. This research analyzes whether the population growth accompanying amenity transition is associated with variations in the structure and characteristics of intra-community informational networks, as sociological theory would suggest. Methodologically, this is accomplished through a comparative analysis of the structure and characteristics of informational networks in three communities undergoing amenity transition. The analyses suggest population density is not related to either the structure of informational networks or the concentration of trust/distrust within them. When considered in conjunction with previous empirical work, these findings suggest the conflicts associated with amenity transition are more likely to arise because of conflicting value systems and ideologies as opposed to social structural changes in the communities themselves.

Keywords

Affiliation networks Bipartite networks Two-mode networks 

References

  1. Allatta, J. T. (2003). Structural analysis of communities of practice: An investigation of job title, location, and management intention. In Huysman, M., Wenger, E., and Wulf, V. (eds.), Communities and Technologies. Kluwer, Amsterdam, pp. 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaudoin, C. E., and Thorson, E. (2004). Social capital in rural and urban communities: Testing differences in media effects and models. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 81(2): 378–399 doi:10.1177/107769900408100210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beggs, J. J., Haines, V. A., and Hurlbert, J. S. (1996). Revisiting the rural–urban contrast: Personal networks in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan settings. Rural Sociology 61(2): 306–325 doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1996.tb00622.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, M. (1992). The fruit of difference: The rural–urban continuum as a system of identity. Rural Sociology 57(1): 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonacich, P. (1991). Simultaneous group and individual centralities. Social Networks 13(2): 155–168 doi:10.1016/0378-8733(91)90018-O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borgatti, S. P., and Everett, M. G. (1997). Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks 19(3): 243–269 doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00301-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borgatti, S. P., and Halgin, D. S. (2011). Analyzing affiliation networks. In Scott, J., and Carrington, P. J. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Sage, London, pp. 417–433.Google Scholar
  8. Brint, S. (2001). Gemeinschaft revisited: A critique and reconstruction of the community concept. Sociological Theory 19(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunson, M., Shindler, B., and Steel, B. S. (1997). Consensus and dissension among rural and urban publics concerning forest management in the Pacific Northwest. In Public lands management in the west. Praeger, Westport.Google Scholar
  10. Case, D., Fowler, D., Morgan, H., Schwellenbach, S., and Culbertson, K. (2008). Moving to the mountains: Amenity migration in the Sierra and Southern Appalachian mountains. In Wescoat, J. L., and Johnston, D. M. (eds.), Political economies of landscape change. Springer, Netherlands, pp. 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Relations of trust. In Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 91–116.Google Scholar
  12. Durkheim, E. (1933). The division of labor in society. (G. Simpson, Trans.). Free Press, Glencoe, IL.Google Scholar
  13. England, L., and Brown, R. B. (2003). Community and resource extraction in rural America. In Brown, D. L., and Swanson, L. E. (eds.), Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA, pp. 317–328.Google Scholar
  14. Entwisle, B., Faust, K., Rindfuss, R. R., and Kaneda, T. (2007). Networks and contexts: Variations in the structure of social ties. American Journal of Sociology 112(5): 1495–1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feld, S. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology 86(5): 1015–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Field, D. R., Luloff, A. E., and Krannich, R. S. (2002). Revisiting the origins of and distinctions between natural resource sociology and environmental sociology. Society & Natural Resources 15(3): 213–227 doi:10.1080/089419202753445052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flora, C. B., and Flora, J. L. (2008). Rural communities: Legacy and change, 3rd ed. Westview, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  18. Frank, O. (2011). Survey sampling in networks. In Scott, J. P., and Carrington, P. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Sage, London, pp. 389–403.Google Scholar
  19. Freeman, L. (2001). The effects of sprawl on neighborhood social ties: An explanatory analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association 67(1): 69–77 doi:10.1080/01944360108976356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: I. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1: 215–239 doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Empirical Press, Vancouver, British Columbia.Google Scholar
  22. Freudenburg, W. R. (1992). Addictive economies: Extractive industries and vulnerable localities in a changing world economy. Rural Sociology 57(3): 305–332 doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00467.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freudenburg, W. R., and Gramling, R. (1994). Natural resources and rural poverty: A closer look. Society & Natural Resources 7: 5–22 doi:10.1080/08941929409380841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gosnell, H., and Abrams, J. (2011). Amenity migration: Diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal 76(4): 303–322 doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9295-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greider, T., Krannich, R. S., and Berry, E. H. (1991). Local identity, solidarity, and trust in changing rural communities. Sociological Focus 24(4): 263–282 doi:10.1080/00380237.1991.10570594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanneman, R. A., and Riddle, M. (2011). Concepts and measures for basic network analysis. In The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Sage, Los Angeles, pp. 340–369.Google Scholar
  28. Hofferth, S. L., and Iceland, J. (1998). Social capital in rural and urban communities. Rural Sociology 63(4): 574–598 doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1998.tb00693.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoffman, S. L. (2008). Application of resiliency theory and adaptive cycles as a framework for evaluating change in amenity-transition communities (Unpublished master’s thesis). Utah State University.Google Scholar
  30. Holmes, J. (2002). Diversity and change in Australia’s rangelands: A post-productivist transition with a difference? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 27(3): 362–384 doi:10.1111/1475-5661.00059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holmes, J. (2006). Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies 22(2): 142–160 doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hurley, P., and Walker, P. (2004). Whose vision? Conspiracy theory and land-use planning in Nevada County, California. Environment and Planning A 36(9): 1529–1547 doi:10.1068/a36186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, K. M. (1999). The rural rebound. Population Reference Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, K. M., and Beale, C. L. (2002). Nonmetro recreation counties: Their identification and rapid growth. Rural America 17: 12–19.Google Scholar
  36. Kasarda, J. D., and Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review 39(3): 328–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kirk, R. W., Bolstad, P. V., and Manson, S. M. (2012). Spatio-temporal trend analysis of long-term development patterns (1900–2030) in a Southern Appalachian county. Landscape and Urban Planning 104(1): 47–58 doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.09.008.Google Scholar
  38. Latapy, M., Magnien, C., and Del Vecchio, N. (2008). Basic notions for the analysis of large two-mode networks. Social Networks 30: 31–48 doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Laumann, E. O., Marsden, P. V., and Prensky, D. (1989). The boundary specification problem in network analysis. In Linton C. Freeman, D. R. White, & A. K. Romney (Eds.), Research methods in social network analysis (pp. 61–87). George Mason University Press, Fairfax, VA.Google Scholar
  40. Lee, G. R., Coward, R. T., and Netzer, J. K. (1994). Residential differences in filial responsibility expectations among older persons. Rural Sociology 59(1): 100–109 doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1994.tb00524.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maier, K. (2001). Citizen participation in planning: Climbing a ladder? European Planning Studies 9(6): 707–719 doi:10.1080/713666506.Google Scholar
  42. Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review 52: 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marsden, P. V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology 16: 435–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marsden, P. V. (2011). Survey methods for network data. In Scott, J. P., and Carrington, P. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Sage, Los Angeles, pp. 370–388.Google Scholar
  45. McGranahan, D. A. (1999). Natural amenities drive rural population change (Agricultural Economic Report No. 781). USDA Economic Research Service, Food and Rural Economics Division, Washington, DC. p. 24.Google Scholar
  46. McPherson, J. M., and Smith-Lovin, L. (1986). Sex segregation in voluntary associations. American Sociological Review 51(1): 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McPherson, J. M., and Smith-Lovin, L. (1987). Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the competition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review 52(3): 370–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nelson, P. B. (2001). Rural restructuring in the American West: Land use, family and class discourses. Journal of Rural Studies 17(4): 395–407 doi:10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00002-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nord, M. (1994). Natural resources and persistent rural poverty: In search of the nexus. Society & Natural Resources 7: 205–220 doi:10.1080/08941929409380860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pahl, R. E. (1966). The rural–urban continuum. Sociologia Ruralis 6(3): 299–329 doi:10.1111/j.1467-9523.1966.tb00537.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Power, T. M., and Barrett, R. N. (2001). Post-cowboy economics: Pay and prosperity in the new American west. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  52. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  53. Salamon, S. (2003a). Newcomers to old towns: Suburbanization of the heartland. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Salamon, S. (2003b). From hometown to nontown: Rural community effects of suburbanization. Rural Sociology 68(1): 1–24 doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00126.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Salstrom, P. (1997). Appalachia’s path to dependency: Rethinking a region’s economic history, 1730–1940. The University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  56. Sampson, R. J. (1988). Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multilevel systemic model. American Sociological Review 53(5): 766–779 doi:10.2307/2095822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sanders, I. T., and Lewis, G. F. (1976). Rural community studies in the United States: A decade in review. Annual Review of Sociology 2: 35–53 doi:10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.000343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Saraceno, E. (1994). Alternative readings of spatial differentiation: The rural versus the local economy approach in Italy. European Review of Agricultural Economics 21(3–4): 451–474 doi:10.1093/erae/21.3-4.451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shultz, B. J. (2011). Emerging patterns of growth and change in the southeast. Southeastern Geographer 51(4): 550–563 doi:10.1353/sgo.2011.0042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict and the web of group affiliations. Free Press, Glencoe, IL.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, J. W., Moore, R. L., Anderson, D. H., and Siderelis, C. (2012). Community resilience in Southern Appalachia: A theoretical framework and three case studies. Human Ecology 40: 341–353 doi:10.1007/s10745-012-9470-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith, M. D., Krannich, R. S., and Hunter, L. M. (2001). Growth, decline, stability, and disruption: A longitudinal analysis of social well–being in four western rural communities. Rural Sociology 66(3): 425–450 doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2001.tb00075.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sorokin, P. A. (1979). Preface. In Toennies, F. (ed.), Community and Society. Harper, New York, pp. ix–x.Google Scholar
  64. Stedman, R., White, W., Patriquin, M., and Watson, D. (2007). Measuring community forest-sector dependence: Does method matter? Society & Natural Resources 20(7): 629–646 doi:10.1080/08941920701329660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Toennies, F. (1887). Community and society-Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft. (C. P. Loomis, Trans.). Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
  66. Travis, W. R. (2007). New geographies of the American west: Land use and the changing patterns of place. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  67. US Census Bureau. (2012a). USA Counties. Database. Retrieved September 3, 2012, from http://censtats.census.gov/usa/usa.shtml
  68. US Census Bureau, D. I. D. (2012b). Population Estimates. Retrieved September 4, 2012, from http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.html
  69. Vias, A. C., and Carruthers, J. I. (2005). Regional development and land use change in the Rocky Mountain West, 1982–1997. Growth and Change 36(4): 244–272 doi:10.1111/j.1468-2257.2005.00276.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., and Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. American Journal of Sociology 81: 730–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wilkinson, K. P. (1991). The community in rural America. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.Google Scholar
  72. Wilson, G. A. (2001). From productivism to post-productivism…and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26(1): 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wilson, G. A. (2006). Multifunctional agriculture: A transition theory perspective. CABI, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  74. Winkler, R. L. (2010). Rural destinations, uneven development, and social exclusion (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  75. Winkler, R. L., Cheng, C., & Golding, S. (2012). Boom or bust? Population dynamics in natural resource-dependent counties. In L. J. Kulcsar & K. J. Curtis (Eds.), International handbook of rural demography (pp. 349–367). Springer. Retrieved from 10.1007/978-94-007-1842-5_24
  76. Winkler, R. L., Field, D. R., Luloff, A. E., Krannich, R. S., and Williams, T. (2007). Social landscapes of the inter-mountain west: A comparison of “old west” and “new west” communities. Rural Sociology 72(3): 478–501 doi:10.1526/003601107781799281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Woods, M. (2003). Rural geography: Processes, responses, and experiences in rural restructuring. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  78. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed., Vol. 5). Sage, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations