Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 797–801 | Cite as

Perception, Interaction, and Extinction: A Reply to Premo

  • C. Michael BartonEmail author
  • Julien Riel-Salvatore
Article

We respond here to L. Premo’s commentary on our recent paper in Human Ecology (Barton et al.2011; see also Barton and Riel-Salvatore 2012). His cavalier, one line dismissal of the archaeological evidence presented in the paper as “unconvincing” (Premo 2012, p. 647) indicates that he is unfamiliar with the many published supporting studies; we encourage him to give them a thorough read (e.g., Barton 1998; Clark 2008; Kuhn 2004; Meignen et al.2006; Riel-Salvatore 2007, 2010; Riel-Salvatore et al.2008; Riel-Salvatore and Barton 2004, 2007; Sandgathe 2006; Surovell 2009; Villaverde et al.1998). In the remainder of his commentary, he uses a model of forager interaction as a basis for critiquing the computational modeling in our paper, and we turn to that work here.

Premo creates a simple agent-based model to examine interrelationships between resource density, length of stay at residential camps, distance foraged, and the interaction rates between two forager bands. He reports that this...

Keywords

Virtual World Interaction Rate Residential Move Base Camp Correlate Random Walk 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bankes, S. C. (2002). Agent-based modeling: A revolution? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 7199–7200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes N (2010) Publish your computer code: it is good enough. Nature 467:753. doi: 10.1038/467753a.
  3. Barton, C. M. (1998). Looking back from the world’s end: Paleolithic settlement and mobility at Gibraltar. In Sanchidrián Torti, J. L., and Simón Vallejo, M. D. (eds.), Las culturas del Pleistoceno superior en Andalucía. Patronato de la Cueva de Nerja, Nerja, pp. 13–23.Google Scholar
  4. Barton, C. M., and Riel-Salvatore, J. (2012). Agents of Change: Modeling Biocultural Evolution in Upper Pleistocene Western Eurasia. Advances in Complex Systems doi: 10.1142/S0219525911003359.
  5. Barton, C. M., Riel-Salvatore, J., Anderies, J. M., and Popescu, G. (2011). Modeling Human Ecodynamics and Biocultural Interactions in the Late Pleistocene of Western Eurasia. Human Ecology doi: 10.1007/s10745-011-9433-8.
  6. Clark A. E. (2008). Changes in Occupation Intensity during the Lower and Middle Paleolithic at Tabun Cave, Israel. Master’s Paper, University of ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  7. Janssen, M. A. (2007). Coordination in Irrigation Systems: An Analysis of the Lansing-Kremer Model of Bali. Agricultural Systems 93: 170–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kelly, R. L. (1995). The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  9. Kuhn, S. L. (1992). On Planning and Curated Technologies in the Middle Paleolithic. Journal of Anthropological Research 48: 185–214.Google Scholar
  10. Kuhn SL (2004) Middle Paleolithic Assemblage Formation at Riparo Mochi. In: Johnson AL (ed) Processual Archaeology: Exploring Analytical Strategies, Frames of Reference and Culture Process. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, CT, pp. 31–60.Google Scholar
  11. Meignen L., Bar-Yosef O., Speth J. D., Stiner M. C. (2006). Middle Paleolithic Settlement Patterns in the Levant. In: Hovers E., Kuhn S. L., Eerkens J. (eds.), Transitions Before the Transition. Springer US, pp 149–169Google Scholar
  12. Premo, L. S. (2012). The Shift to a Predominantly Logistical Mobility Strategy can Inhibit Rather than Enhance Forager Interaction. Human Ecology doi: 10.1007/s10745-012-9511-6.
  13. Riel-Salvatore J. (2007). The Uluzzian and the Middle-Upper Paleolithic transition in southern Italy. PhD Dissertation, Arizona State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  14. Riel-Salvatore, J. (2010). A Niche Construction Perspective on the Middle–Upper Paleolithic Transition in Italy. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 17: 323–355 doi: 10.1007/s10816-010-9093-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Riel-Salvatore, J., and Barton, C. M. (2004). Late Pleistocene Technology, Economic Behavior, and Land-use Dynamics in Southern Italy. American Antiquity 69: 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Riel-Salvatore J., Barton C. M. (2007). New quantitative perspectives on the Middle-Upper Paleolithic transition: the view from the northern Mediterranean. Early Upper Paleolithic “Transitional” Industries: New Questions, New MethodsGoogle Scholar
  17. Riel-Salvatore, J., Popescu, G., and Barton, C. M. (2008). Standing at the Gates of Europe: Human Behavior and Biogeography in the Southern Carpathians during the Late Pleistocene. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 27: 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sandgathe, D. M. (2006). Examining the Levallois Reduction Strategy from a Design Theory Point of View. Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Surovell TA (2009) Toward a Behavioral Ecology of Lithic Technology: Cases from Paleoindian Archaeology. University of Arizona PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Villaverde, V., Aura Tortosa, J. E., and Barton, C. M. (1998). The Upper Paleolithic in Mediterranean Spain: A Review of Current Evidence. Journal of World Prehistory 12: 121–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Whallon, R. (2006). Social Networks and Information: Non-“utilitarian” Mobility among Hunter-gatherers. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 25: 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wiessner, P. (1983). Style and Social Information in Kalahari San Projectile Points. American Antiquity 48: 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Colorado DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations