Church Affiliation and Meat Taboos in Indigenous Communities of Guyanese Amazonia
- 443 Downloads
Using data from a three-year study of socioeconomic factors influencing hunting in 23 indigenous communities, we assess the influence of indigenous and Christian beliefs and practices on dietary taboos among Makushi and Wapishana peoples in the Guyanese Amazon. We found that members of Evangelical and established (Anglican and Catholic) churches do not differ significantly in terms of their adherence to dietary restrictions and members of Sabbatarian churches show a stronger tendency to adhere to dietary taboos than Evangelicals or members of established churches. Counter to expectations, we found no significant difference in avoidance of meat between households belonging to established and Evangelical churches. Furthermore, members of all church groups deviated in terms of dietary restrictions from indigenous norms as exemplified in dietary advice given by shamans. We conclude that, despite doctrinal opposition to shamanistic practices associated with indigenous taboos, there is continuity in terms of dietary practice among Makushi and Wapishana households that have converted to Evangelical and, to some degree, Sabbatarian forms of Christianity.
KeywordsDietary taboos Indigenous lands Amazonia Shamanism Christianity
We would like to thank the Guyana Environmental Protection Agency, especially Indarjit Ramdass and Damian Fernandes and the Ministry of Amerindian Affairs for authorizing the study and for their attentiveness to permit extensions. The Iwokrama International Centre for Rainforest Conservation and Development and the North Rupununi District Development Board acted as in-country partners and provided important logistic support. We thank the Makushi and Wapishana technicians whose hard work and dedication made the research possible, as well as the leaders and members of all our partner communities for their innumerable contributions to the project. The National Science Foundation (BE/CNH 05 08094) provided funding for this project. We thank the program officers and division leaders at the NSF who understood the complexities of working with politically charged socio-ecological systems and multiple academic institutions and provided excellent guidance throughout the project. Oskar Burger contributed to the statistical analysis components of the paper. We thank the graduate students, post docs, data transcribers, and volunteers who are not authors on this paper but who contributed essential work and ideas to the project, as well as Lisa Curran, Peter Vitousek, Rodolfo Dirzo for their logistical support at Stanford University. Dominique (Nickie) Irvine, Oskar Burger and Sean Giery provided insightful comments. Finally, we thank three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on a draft of this paper.
- Bacchiddu, G. (2009). ‘Before we were all Catholics’: Changing religion in Apiao, Southern Chile. In Vilaça, A., and Wright, R. M. (eds.), Native Christians: Modes and Effects of Christianity among Indigenous Peoples of the Americas. Ashgate, Burlington, VT, pp. 53–70.Google Scholar
- Colding, J., and Folke, C. (2001). Social Taboos: “Invisible” Systems of Local Resource Management and Biological Conservation. Ecological Applications 11(2): 584–600.Google Scholar
- Farage, N. (1986). As Muralhas dos Sertões: Os Povos Indigenas do Rio Branco e a Colonização (Dissertation). Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
- Farage, N. (2003). Rebellious memories: The Wapishana in the Rupununi uprising, Guyana, 1969. In Whitehead, N. (ed.), Histories and Historicities in Amazonia. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, pp. 107–122.Google Scholar
- Forte, J. (ed.) (1996). Makusipe Komanto Iseru: A Makushi Way of Life, North Rupununi District Development Board. Annai, Guyana.Google Scholar
- Fragoso, J.M.V. (1991). The effect of hunting on Tapirs in Belize. In Robinson, J., and Redford, K. (eds.), Neotropical Wildlife Use and Conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 154–162.Google Scholar
- Fragoso, J. M. V., Silvius, K. M., Read, J. M., Gibbs, J. P., Martins, L. L., and Chave, J. (2005). Biodiversity Dynamics and Land-Use Changes in the Amazon: Multi-Scale Interactions between Ecological Systems and Resource-Use Decisions by Indigenous Peoples. Unpublished proposal, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
- Godoy, R., Reyes-García, V., Vadez, V., Leonard, W. R., Tanner, S., Huanca, T., and Wilkie, D. (2009). The Relation between Forest Clearance and Household Income among Native Amazonians: Results from the Tsimane’ Amazonian Panel Study, Bolivia. Ecological Economics 68: 1864–1871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grotti, V. E. (2009). Protestant evangelism and the transformability of indigenous bodies in Northeastern Amazonia. In Vilaça, A., and Wright, R. M. (eds.), Native Christians: Modes and Effects of Christianity among Indigenous Peoples of the Americas. Ashgate, Burlington, VT, pp. 109–126.Google Scholar
- Hames, R. (1991). Wildlife conservation in tribal societies. In Oldfield, M. L., and Alcorn, J. B. (eds.), Biodiversity, Culture, Conservation and Eco-development, Westview, Boulder, Colorado, and San Francisco, California, pp. 172–199.Google Scholar
- Hemming, J. (1978). Red Gold: The Conquest of the Brazilian Indians, 1500–1760. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Henfrey, T. (2002). Ethnoecology, Resource Use, Conservation and Development in a Wapishana Community in the South Rupununi, Guyana (Dissertation). University of Kent at Canterbury, UK.Google Scholar
- Hill, K., and Hawkes, K. (1983). Neotropical hunting among the Aché of Eastern Paraguay. In Hames, R., and Vickers, W. (eds.), Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians. Academic, New York, pp. 223–267.Google Scholar
- Hugh-Jones, S. (1994). Shamans, prophets, priests and pastors. In Thomas, N., and Humphrey, C. (eds.), Shamanism, History and the State. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 32–75.Google Scholar
- Instituto Socio-Ambiental. (2012). [online] URL: www.socioambiental.org.
- Laugrand, F. B., and Oosten, J. G. (2009). Shamans and missionaries: Transitions and transformations in the kivalliq coastal area. In Vilaça, A., and Wright, R. M. (eds.), Native Christians: Modes and Effects of Christianity among Indigenous Peoples of the Americas. Ashgate, Burlington, VT, pp. 167–186.Google Scholar
- Luzar, J. B., and Fragoso, J. M. V. (2012). Shamanism, Christianity and Culture Change in Amazonia. Human Ecology. doi: 10.1007/s10745-012-9515-2.
- McDonald, D. R. (1977). Food Taboos: A Primitive Environmental Protection Agency (South America). Anthropos 72: 734–748.Google Scholar
- Moran, E. F. (1974). The adaptive system of the Amazonian Caboclo. In Wagley, C. (ed.), Man in the Amazon, University of Florida Press. Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
- Rappaport, R. A. (1968). Pigs for the Ancestors. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
- Read, J. M., Fragoso, J. M. V., Luzar, J. B., and Overman, H. (2011). Wowetta Village, Rupununi, Guyana. Unpublished Report, Geography Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, Project Fauna Community Atlas.Google Scholar
- Ricketts, T. H., Soares-Filho, B., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Nepstad, D., Pfaff, A., Petsonk, A., Anderson, A., Boucher, D., Cattaneo, A., Conte, M., Creighton, K., Linden, L., Maretti, C., Moutinho, P., Ullman, R., and Victurine, R. (2010). Indigenous Lands, Protected Areas, and Slowing Climate Change. PLoS Biology 8(3).Google Scholar
- Smith, N. J. H. (1981). Man, Fishes, and the Amazon. Columbia University Press, NY.Google Scholar
- Ulloa, A., Rubio-Torgler, H., and Campos-Rozo, C. (2004). Conceptual basis for the selection of wildlife management strategies by the Embera People in Utria National Park, Choco, Colombia. In Silvius, K. M., Bodmer, R. E., and Fragoso, J. M. V. (eds.), People in Nature: Wildlife Conservation in South and Central America. Columbia University Press, NY, pp. 11–36.Google Scholar
- Vilaça, A. (2009). Conversion, predation and perspective. In Vilaça, A., and Wright, R. M. (eds.), Native Christians: Modes and Effects of Christianity among Indigenous Peoples of the Americas. Ashgate, Burlington, VT, pp. 147–166.Google Scholar
- Vilaça, A., and Wright, R. M. (2009). Introduction. In Vilaça, A., and Wright, R. M. (eds.), Native Christians: Modes and Effects of Christianity among Indigenous Peoples of the Americas. Ashgate, Burlington, VT, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
- Yost, J., and Kelley, P. (1983). Shotguns, blowguns, and spears: An analysis of technological efficiency. In Hames, R., and Vickers, W. (eds.), Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians. Academic, New York, pp. 189–224.Google Scholar