Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 751–780 | Cite as

Animals for the Gods: Magical and Religious Faunal Use and Trade in Brazil

  • Rômulo R. N. Alves
  • Ierecê L. Rosa
  • Nivaldo A. Léo Neto
  • Robert Voeks
Article

Abstract

Religious beliefs and practices have long influenced human perceptions and uses of nature. Animals in particular play a prominent role in magico-religious practices and given the historical and cultural depth of these relationships, understanding human-faunal relations is often fundamental to the cause of meaningful wildlife conservation. This study investigates the domestic and wild harvested species used for spiritual and religious purposes by adherents of the Afro-Brazilian religion Candomblé. Introduced by enslaved Africans, this belief system combines animal and plant traditions derived from Africa with many others assimilated from Amerindians. We identified a total of 129 species of animals (or animal derived products) used and/or sold for magico-religious purposes; of these, 34. 8 % (n = 45) are included in some list of threatened species. Most animals reported were mammals (n = 29), followed by mollusks (20), fishes (19), birds (18) and reptiles (16); the majority (78 %) of reported species were wild-caught from terrestrial habitats (62 %), followed by marine and estuarine (24 %), and freshwater (14 %). We identified an extensive commercial network of collectors, middlemen/distributors, shop owners, and consumers. Rarity of a given species was often positively associated with economic value. Considering the ubiquity and underground nature of these practices, future conservation strategists are encouraged to work with Candomblé practitioners.

Keywords

Animal conservation Candomblé Ethnozoology Wildlife trade 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank PROBIO/MMA/IBRD/GEF/CNPq and PADI Foundation for financial support and CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) for providing a research fellowship to the first and second authors. Special thanks are due to all interviewees who kindly shared their knowledge with us.

References

  1. Adeola, M. O. (1992). Importance of Wild Animals and Their Parts in the Culture, Religious Festivals, and Traditional Medicine, of Nigeria. Environmental Conservation 19(2): 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albuquerque, U. P., Monteiro, J. M., Ramos, M. A., and Amorim, E. L. C. (2007). Medicinal and Magic Plants from a Public Market in Northeastern Brazil. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 110: 76–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albuquerque, U. P., and Paiva, R. F. (2004). Métodos e Técnicas na Pesquisa Etnobotânica. Editora Livro Rápido/NUPEEA, Recife.Google Scholar
  4. Allaby, M. (2010). Animals: From Mythology to Zoology. Facts On File, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  5. Alves, R. R. N. (2008). Commercialization of Uranoscodon superciliosus Linnaeus, 1758 (Tropiduridae) for Magical-Religious Purposes in North and Northeastern of Brazil. Sitientibus Série Ciências Biológicas 8(2): 257–258.Google Scholar
  6. Alves, R. R. N. (2009). Fauna Used in Popular Medicine in Northeast Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 5(1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alves, R. R. N., Léo Neto, N. A., Santana, G. G., Vieira, W. L. S., and Almeida, W. O. (2009a). Reptiles Used for Medicinal and Magic Religious Purposes in Brazil. Applied Herpetology 6(3): 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Alves, R. R. N., Mendonça, L. E. T., Confessor, M. V. A., Vieira, W. L. S., and Lopez, L. C. S. (2009b). Hunting Strategies Used in the Semi-Arid Region of Northeastern Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 5(12): 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Alves, R. R. N., Neto, N. A. L., Brooks, S. E., and Albuquerque, U. P. (2009c). Commercialization of Animal-Derived Remedies as Complementary Medicine in the Semi-Arid Region of Northeastern Brazil. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 124(3): 600–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Alves, R. R. N., and Pereira Filho, G. A. (2007). Commercialization and use of Snakes in North and Northeastern Brazil: Implications for Conservation and Management. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 969–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Alves, R. R. N., Souto, W. M. S., and Mourão, J. S. (2010a). A Etnozoologia no Brasil: Importância, Status Atual e Perspectivas. NUPEEA, Recife, PE, Brazil.Google Scholar
  12. Alves, R. R. N., Souto, W. M. S., and Barboza, R. R. D. (2010b). Primates in Traditional Folk Medicine: A World Overview. Mammal Review 40(2): 155–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Alves, R. R. N., Alves, H. N., Barboza, R. R. D., and Souto, W. M. S. (2010c). The Influence of Religiosity on Health. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 15: 2105–2111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Alves, R. R. N., and Rosa, I. L. (2006). From Cnidarians to Mammals: The use of Animals as Remedies in Fishing Communities in NE Brazil. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 107: 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Alves, R. R. N., and Rosa, I. L. (2007a). Biodiversity, Traditional Medicine and Public Health: Where do They Meet? Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 3(14): 9.Google Scholar
  16. Alves, R. R. N., and Rosa, I. L. (2007b). Zootherapy Goes to Town: The use of Animal-Based Remedies in Urban Areas of NE and N Brazil. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 113: 541–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Alves, R. R. N., and Rosa, I. L. (2008). Use of Tucuxi Dolphin Sotalia fluviatilis for Medicinal and Magic/Religious Purposes in North of Brazil. Human Ecology 36: 443–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Alves, R. R. N., and Rosa, I. L. (2010). Trade of Animals Used in Brazilian Traditional Medicine: Trends and Implications for Conservation. Human Ecology 38(5): 691–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Alves, R. R. N., Rosa, I. L., and Santana, G. G. (2007). The Role of Animal-Derived Remedies as Complementary Medicine in Brazil. BioScience 57(11): 949–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Alves, R. R. N., Vieira, W. L. S., and Santana, G. G. (2008). Reptiles Used in Traditional Folk Medicine: Conservation Implications. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 2037–2049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Alves, R. R. N., and Souto, W. M. S. (2010). Etnozoologia: conceitos, considerações históricas e importância. In Alves, R. R. N., Souto, W. M. S., and Mourão, J. S. (eds.), A Etnozoologia no Brasil: Importância, Status Atual e Perspectivas. NUPEEA, Recife, PE, Brazil, pp. 19–40.Google Scholar
  22. Anane, M. (1997). Religion and conservation in Ghana. In Alyanak, L., and Cruz, A. (eds.), Implementing Agenda 21: NGO Experiences from Around the World, New York, pp. 99–107.Google Scholar
  23. Angulo, E., Deves, A. L., Saint Jalmes, M., and Courchamp, F. (2009). Fatal Attraction: Rare Species in the Spotlight. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276(1660): 1331–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bailey, K. (1994). Methods of Social Research. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Balée, W. L. (1999). Footprints of the Forest: Ka’apor Ethnobotany-the Historical Ecology of Plant Utilization by an Amazonian People. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Barbosa, J. A. A., Nobrega, V. A., and Alves, R. R. N. (2011). Hunting Practices in the Semiarid Region of Brazil. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 10(3): 486–490.Google Scholar
  27. Barrera-Bassols, N., and Toledo, V. M. (2005). Ethnoecology of the Yucatec Maya: Symbolism, Knowledge and Management of Natural Resources. Journal of Latin American Geography 4(1): 9–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Berkes, F. (2001). Religious Traditions and Biodiversity. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity 5: 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Berkes, F. (2007). Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (39): 15188–15193.Google Scholar
  31. Bernard, R. (1994). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  32. Cohen, E. (2007). The Mind Possessed: The Cognition of Spirit Possession in an Afro-Brazilian Religious Tradition. Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
  33. Cohn, J. P. (1988). Culture and Conservation: A Greater Sensitivity to Local Culture Could Increase the Success of Both Conservation and Development Projects. BioScience 38(7): 450–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Courchamp, F., Angulo, E., Rivalan, P., Hall, R. J., Signoret, L., Bull, L., and Meinard, Y. (2006). Rarity Value and Species Extinction: The Anthropogenic Allee Effect. PLoS Biology 4(12): e415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. De Pater, C., and Dankelman, I. (2010). Religion and Sustainable Development: Opportunities and Challenges for Higher Education Nijmegen Studies in Development and Cultural Change (NICCOS).Google Scholar
  36. Fachín-Terán, A. (2008). Participação Comunitárias na Preservação de Praias Para Reprodução de Quelônios na Reserva de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, Amazonas, Brasil. UAKARI 1(1): 9–18.Google Scholar
  37. Ferretti, M. (2003). Religiões Afro-Brasileiras e Saúde: Diversidade e Semelhanças. Boletim da Comissão Maranhense de Folclore (25): 10–15.Google Scholar
  38. Ferretti, S. (2001). Diversidade Religiosa e Cultural do Maranhão. . ed., Universidade Federal do Maranhão.Google Scholar
  39. Fraser, D. J., Coon, T., Prince, M. R., Dion, R., and Bernatchez, L. (2006). Integrating Traditional and Evolutionary Knowledge in Biodiversity Conservation: A Population Level Case Study. Ecology and Society 11(2): 4.Google Scholar
  40. Freire, F. C. (1996). Répteis Utilizados na Medicina Popular no Estado de Alagoas, Universidade Federal de Alagias.Google Scholar
  41. Gadgil, M., Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (1993). Indigenous Knowledge for Biodiversity Conservation. Ambio 22(2): 151–156.Google Scholar
  42. Hall, R. J., Milner Gulland, E. J., and Courchamp, F. (2008). Endangering the Endangered: The Effects of Perceived Rarity on Species Exploitation. Conservation Letters 1(2): 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hanazaki, N., Alves, R. R. N., and Begossi, A. (2009). Hunting and use of Terrestrial Fauna Used by Caicaras from the Atlantic Forest Coast (Brazil). Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 5(1): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Huntington, H. P. (2000). Using Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Science: Methods and Applications. Ecological Applications 10(5): 1270–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. IUCN. (2010). [www.iucnredlist.org].
  46. Jepson, P., and Ladle, R. J. (2005). Bird-Keeping in Indonesia: Conservation Impacts and the Potential for Substitution-Based Conservation Responses. Oryx 39(04): 442–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kassam, K. A. S. (2010). Pluralism, Resilience, and the Ecology of Survival: Case Studies from the Pamir Mountains of Afghanistan. Ecology and Society 15: 8.Google Scholar
  48. Kellert, S. R., and Farnham, T. J. (2002). The Good in Nature and Humanity: Connecting Science, Religion, and Spirituality with the Natural World. Island Press, Washington (DC).Google Scholar
  49. Kideghesho, J. R. (2009). The Potentials of Traditional African Cultural Practices in Mitigating Overexploitation of Wildlife Species and Habitat Loss: Experience of Tanzania. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystems Services & Management 5(2): 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kurien, J. (1998). Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Ecosystem Sustainability: New Meaning to Asian Coastal Proverbs. Ecological Applications 8 (1 (Supplement Ecosystem Management for Sustainable Marine Fisheries)): S2–S5.Google Scholar
  51. Leacock, S., Leacock, R., and American Museum of Natural, H. (1972). Spirits of the Deep: A Study of an Afro-Brazilian Cult, American Museum of Natural History by Doubleday Natural History Press.Google Scholar
  52. Lee, S. K. H. (1999). Trade in Traditional Medicine Using Endangered Species: An International Context. Proceedings of the Second Australian Symposium on Traditional Medicine and Wildlife Conservation, Melbourne Australia.Google Scholar
  53. Leo Neto, N. A., and Alves, R. R. N. (2010). A Natureza Sagrada do Candomblé: Análise da Construção Mística Acerca da Natureza em Terreiros de Candomblé no Nordeste de Brasil. Interciencia 35(8): 568–574.Google Scholar
  54. Léo Neto, N. A., Brooks, S. E., and Alves, R. R. N. (2009). From Eshu to Obatala: Animals Used in Sacrificial Rituals at Candomble “Terreiros” in Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 5(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Leo Neto, N. A., Mourão, J. S., and Alves, R. R. N. (2011). “It all Begins with the Head”: Initiation Rituals and the Symbolic Conceptions of Animals in Candomblé. Journal of Ethnobiology 31(2): 244–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Leo Neto, N. A., Voeks, R. A., Dias, T. L. P., and Alves, R. R. N. (2012). Mollusks of Candomble: Symbolic and Ritualistic Importance. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 8(1): 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lody, R. G. M. (1987). Candomblé: Religião e Resistência Cultural. Editora Atica, São Paulo.Google Scholar
  58. Lugira, A. M. (2009). African Traditional Religion. Chelsea House Pub, New York.Google Scholar
  59. Luz, M. A. (1983). Cultura Negra e Ideologia do Recalque, Achiamé.Google Scholar
  60. Luz, M. A. (1993). Do Tronco ao Opa Exin: Memória e Dinâmica da Tradição Africana-Brasileira, Edições SECNEB.Google Scholar
  61. Machado, A. B. M., Drummond, G. M., and Paglia, A. P. (2008). Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção. MMA, Fundação Biodiversitas, Brasília, DF.Google Scholar
  62. Maffi, L. (2001). On Biocultural Diversity: Linking Language, Knowledge, and the Environment. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  63. Maffi, L., and Woodley, E. (2010). Biocultural Diversity Conservation: A Global Sourcebook, Earthscan/James & James.Google Scholar
  64. McDonagh, S. (1986). To Care for the Earth: A Call to a New Theology. Geoffrey Chapman, London.Google Scholar
  65. McNeely, J. A. (2001). Religions, Traditions and Biodiversity. COMPAS Magazine: 20–22.Google Scholar
  66. MEA (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  67. MMA, Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2004). Lista Nacional das Espécies de Invertebrados Aquáticos e Peixes Sobreexplotadas ou Ameaçadas de Sobreexplotação. Instrução Normativa 5, de 21 de Maio de 2004. Diário Oficial da União 102: 136–142.Google Scholar
  68. Moazami, M. (2005). Evil Animals in the Zoroastrian Religion. History of Religions 44(4): 300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Moura, C. (1988). Sociologia do Negro Brasileiro, Editora Ática.Google Scholar
  70. Negi, C. S. (2005). Religion and Biodiversity Conservation: Not a Mere Analogy. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystems Services & Management 1(2): 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nikoloudis, S. (2001). Animal Sacrifice in the Mycenaean World. Journal of Prehistoric Religion 15: 32–38.Google Scholar
  72. Oliveira, E. S., Torres, D. F., Brooks, S. E., and Alves, R. R. N. (2010). The Medicinal Animal Markets in the Metropolitan Region of Natal City, Northeastern Brazil. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 130(1): 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Oliveira, F. (2003). Saúde da População Negra, Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde.Google Scholar
  74. Oro, A. P. (2005). The Sacrifice of Animals in Afro-Brasilian Religions: Analysis of a Recent Controversy in the Brazilian State of Rio Grande do Sul. Religião & Sociedade 25(2): 1–14.Google Scholar
  75. Peloquin, C., and Berkes, F. (2009). Local Knowledge, Subsistence Harvests, and Social–Ecological Complexity in James Bay. Human Ecology 37(5): 533–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pezzuti, J. C. B., Barboza, R. S. L., Nunes, I., Miorando, P., and Fernandes, L. (2010). Etnoecologia e conservação de quelônios amazônicos: um estudo de caso. In Alves, R. R. N., Souto, W. M. S., and Mourão, J. S. (eds.), A Etnozoologia no Brasil: Importância, Status Atual e Perspectivas. NUPEEA, Recife, PE, Brazil, pp. 447–470.Google Scholar
  77. Pretty, J., et al. (2009). The Intersections of Biological Diversity and Cultural Diversity: Towards Integration. Conservation and Society 7(2): 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rabelo, M. C. (1993). Religion and Cure: Some Thoughts on the Religious Experience of Urban Popular Classes. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 9: 316–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Robson, J. P., and Berkes, F. (2010). Sacred nature and community conserved areas. In Pilgrim, S., and Pretty, J. (eds.), Nature and Culture: Rebuilding Lost Connections, Earthscan/James & James, pp. 197–216.Google Scholar
  80. Rosa, I. L., Oliveira, T. P. R., Osório, F. M., Moraes, L. E., Castro, A. L. C., Barros, G. M. L., and Alves, R. R. N. (2011). Fisheries and Trade of Seahorses in Brazil: Historical Perspective, Current Trends, and Future Directions. Biodiversity and Conservation 20(9): 1951–1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rosa, I. M. L., Oliveira, T. P. R., and Alves, R. R. N. (2010). Entre o corpo e o espírito: uso medicinal e mágico-religioso de cavalos-marinhos no Brasil. In Alves, R. R. N., Souto, W. M. S., and Mourão, J. S. (eds.), A Etnozoologia no Brasil: Importância, Status Atual e Perspectivas. NUPEEA, Recife, PE, Brazil, pp. 323–346.Google Scholar
  82. Sanderson, E. W. (2006). How Many Animals do we Want to Save? The Many Ways of Setting Population Target Levels for Conservation. BioScience 56(11): 911–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Santos, J. E. (1993). Os Nagô e a Morte. Editora Vozes, Petrópolis.Google Scholar
  84. Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is Beautiful. Economics as if People Mattered. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  85. Silva, J. P. (2009). Práticas Religiosas e Consciência Ecológica nas Religiões Afro-Pessoenses. CAOS–Revista Eletrônica de Ciências Sociais (14): 174–190.Google Scholar
  86. Sodeinde, O. A., and Soewu, D. A. (1999). Pilot Study of the Traditional Medicine Trade in Nigeria. Traffic Bulletin 18(1): 35–40.Google Scholar
  87. Souza, L. M. (1995). O diabo ea Terra de Santa Cruz: Feitiçaria e Religiosidade Popular no Brasil Colonial, Cia das Letras.Google Scholar
  88. Sponsel, L. E., Ruttanadakul, N., and Natadecha-Sponsel, P. (2002). Monkey business? the conservation implications of macaque ethnoprimatology in southern Thailand. In Fuentes, A., and Wolfe, L. (eds.), Primates Face to Face: Conservation Implications of Human-Nonhuman Primate Interconnections. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 288–309.Google Scholar
  89. Straker, G. (1994). Integrating African and Western Healing Practices in South Africa. American Journal of Psychotherapy 48(3): 455–467.Google Scholar
  90. Tadvald, M. (2007). Direito Litúrgico, Direito Legal: A Polêmica em Torno do Sacrifício Ritual de Animais nas Religiões Afro-Gaúchas. Caminhos 5(1): 129–147.Google Scholar
  91. Tengö, M., Johansson, K., Rakotondrasoa, F., Lundberg, J., Andriamaherilala, J. A., Rakotoarisoa, J. A., and Elmqvist, T. (2007). Taboos and Forest Governance: Informal Protection of Hot Spot dry Forest in Southern Madagascar. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 36(8): 683–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Toledo, V. M. (2001). Biodiversity and Indigenous Peoples. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity 3: 330–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tomalin, E. (2004). Bio-Divinity and Biodiversity: Perspectives on Religion and Environmental Conservation in India. Numen 51(3): 265–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Turner, N. J., and Clifton, H. (2009). “It’s so Different Today”: Climate Change and Indigenous Lifeways in British Columbia, Canada. Global Environmental Change 19(2): 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Valente, W. (1977). Sincretismo Religioso Afro-Brasileiro. Nacional, São Paulo.Google Scholar
  96. Verger, P. F. (1992). Orixás: Deuses Iorubás na África e no Novo Mundo. Corrupio, Salvador.Google Scholar
  97. Verger, P. F. (1997). Lendas Africanas dos Orixás, Corrupio.Google Scholar
  98. Verschuuren, B. (2006). An overview of cultural and spiritual values in ecosystem management and conservation strategies. In Endogenous Development and Biocultural Diversity, pp.Google Scholar
  99. Voeks, R. A. (1997). Sacred Leaves of Candomblé: African Magic, Medicine, and Religion in Brazil. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  100. Voeks, R. A. (2009). Traditions in transition: African diaspora ethnobotany in lowland South America. In Alexiades, M. (ed.), Mobility and Migration in Indigenous Amazonia: Contemporary Ethnoecological Perspectives. Berghahn, London, pp. 275–294.Google Scholar
  101. Vogel, A., Mello, M. A. S., and Barros, J. F. P. (1993). A Galinha-d’angola. Eduff, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  102. Wadley, R. L., and Colfer, C. J. P. (2004). Sacred Forest, Hunting, and Conservation in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Human Ecology 32(3): 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rômulo R. N. Alves
    • 1
  • Ierecê L. Rosa
    • 2
  • Nivaldo A. Léo Neto
    • 2
  • Robert Voeks
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de BiologiaUniversidade Estadual da ParaíbaCampina GrandeBrasil
  2. 2.Departamento de Sistemática e EcologiaUniversidade Federal da ParaíbaJoão PessoaBrasil
  3. 3.Department of GeographyCalifornia State UniversityFullertonUSA

Personalised recommendations