Human Ecology

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 341–353 | Cite as

Community Resilience in Southern Appalachia: A Theoretical Framework and Three Case Studies

  • Jordan W. Smith
  • Roger L. Moore
  • Dorothy H. Anderson
  • Christos Siderelis
Article

Abstract

A fundamental assumption in nearly all research on social adaptation to environmental change is that there is a concomitant and inverse relationship between human communities’ dependence upon particular natural resources affected by environmental change and those communities or societies’ resilience to disturbances. However, recent theoretical and empirical developments suggest resilience is a dynamic social process determined, in part, by the ability of communities to act collectively and solve common problems. The interactional approach to community is utilized to develop a framework whereby various patterns of social interaction define the process of social resilience. Data come from multiple mixed methods case studies of forest dependent communities within Southern Appalachia. The findings reveal varied processes of social resilience can occur in communities with similar levels of resource dependence; a community’s composition of internal social ties and their cross-scale linkages to external agencies and organizations define these processes.

Keywords

Resource dependence Social capital Adaptation 

References

  1. Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and Ecological Resilience: Are They Related? Progress in Human Geography 24: 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger, W. N. (2003). Social Capital, Collective Action, and Adaptation to Climate Change. Economic Geography 79: 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aspinall, R. (2010). Geographical Perspectives on Climate Change. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100: 715–719 doi:10.1080/00045608.2010.502408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In Richardson, J. G. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood Press, New York, pp. 241–258.Google Scholar
  5. Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., and Reinsel, G. C. (1994). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, R. B., Dorins, S. F., and Krannich, R. S. (2005). The Boom–Bust–Recovery Cycle: Dynamics of Change in Community Satisfaction and Social Integration in Delta, Utah. Rural Sociology 70: 28–49 doi:10.1526/0036011053294673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castells, M. (1977). The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman, J. S. (1990). The Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Corbin, J. M., and Strauss, A. C. (2007). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Davidson, D. J. (2010). The Applicability of the Concept of Resilience to Social Systems: Some Sources of Optimism and Nagging Doubts. Society & Natural Resources 23: 1135–1149 doi:10.1080/08941921003652940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davidson, R., and MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Dey, I. (1999). Grounding Grounded Theory: Guidelines for Qualitative Inquiry. Academic, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Dickey, D. A., and Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distributions of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 427–431.Google Scholar
  15. Durkheim, E. (1933). The Division of Labor in Society. Free Press, Glencoe, IL.Google Scholar
  16. Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J., and Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root. Econometrica 64: 813–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Field, D. R., Luloff, A. E., and Krannich, R. S. (2002). Revisiting the Origins of and Distinctions Between Natural Resource Sociology and Environmental Sociology. Society & Natural Resources 15: 213–227 doi:10.1080/089419202753445052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisher, J. (2001). Resource Dependency and Rural Poverty: Rural Areas in the United States and Japan. Rural Sociology 66: 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flora, C.B., and Flora, J.L. (2003). Social Capital. In Challenges for Rural America in the Twenty-First Century, The Pennsylvania State University Press, State College, PA. pp. 214–227.Google Scholar
  20. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., and Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 31: 437–440 doi:10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437.Google Scholar
  21. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441–473 doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Force, J. E., Machlis, G. E., Zhang, L., and Kearney, A. (1993). The Relationship Between Timber Production, Local Historical Events, and Community Social Change. Forest Science 39: 722–742.Google Scholar
  23. Freudenburg, W. R. (1992). Addictive Economies: Extractive Industries and Vulnerable Localities in a Changing World Economy. Rural Sociology 57: 305–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freudenburg, W. R., and Gramling, R. (1994). Natural Resources and Rural Poverty: A Closer Look. Society & Natural Resources 7: 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gittell, R., and Vidal, A. (1988). Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  26. Gomm, R., Hammersley, M., and Foster, P. (2000). Case Study Method: Key Issues, Key Texts. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  27. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  29. Harvey, A. C. (1989). Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  30. Hawley, A. H. (1950). Human Ecology: A Theory of Community Structure. Ronald Press, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Herriott, R. E., and Firestone, W. A. (1983). Multisite Qualitative Policy Research: Optimizing Description and Generalizabilty. Educational Researcher 12: 14–19.Google Scholar
  32. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holling, C. S., and Gunderson, L. H. (2002). Resilience and Adaptive Cycles. In Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S. (eds.), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 25–62.Google Scholar
  34. Machlis, G. E., and Force, J. E. (1988). Community Stability and Timber-Dependent Communities. Rural Sociology 53: 220–234.Google Scholar
  35. May, R. M. (1977). Thresholds and Breakpoints in Ecosystems with a Multiplicity of Stable States. Nature 269: 471–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McIntosh, R. J., Tainter, J. A., and McIntosh, S. K. (2000). The Way the Wind Blows: Climate, History, and Human Action. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  37. National Research Council (2010a). America’s Climate Choices: Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change. National Research Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  38. National Research Council (2010b). America's Climate Choices: Advancing the Science of Climate Change. National Research Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  39. Nord, M. (1994). Natural Resources and Persistent Rural Poverty: In Search of the Nexus. Society & Natural Resources 7: 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parkins, J. R., Stedman, R. C., and Beckley, T. M. (2003). Forest Sector Dependence and Community Well-Being: A Structural Equation Model for New Brunswick and British Columbia. Rural Sociology 68: 554–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Robison, L. J., and Siles, M. E. (1999). Social Capital and Household Income Distributions in the United States: 1980, 1990. Journal of Socio-Economics 28: 43–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rupasingha, A., Goetz, S. J., and Freshwater, D. (2002). Social and Institutional Factors as Determinants of Economic Growth: Evidence from the United States Counties. Papers in Regional Science 81: 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rupasingha, A., Goetz, S. J., and Freshwater, D. (2006). The Production of Social Capital in U.S. Counties. Journal of Socio-Economics 35: 83–101 doi:10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schulman, M. D., and Anderson, C. (1999). The Dark Side of the Force: A Case Study of Restructuring and Social Capital. Rural Sociology 64: 351–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith, M. D., Krannich, R. S., and Hunter, L. M. (2001). Growth, Decline, Stability, and Disruption: A Longitudinal Analysis of Social Well–Being in Four Western Rural Communities. Rural Sociology 66: 425–450 doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2001.tb00075.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. StataCorp. (2009a). [d] data management, ipolate. In Stata: Release 11, StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, pp. 339–340.Google Scholar
  47. StataCorp. (2009b). [ts] time-series, dfgls. In Stata: Release 11, StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, pp. 111–116.Google Scholar
  48. StataCorp. (2009c). [ts] time-series, corrgram. In Stata: Release 11, StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, pp. 77–83.Google Scholar
  49. StataCorp. (2009d). [r] base reference, vce_option. In Stata: Release 11, StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, pp. 2010–2014.Google Scholar
  50. Stedman, R., Parkins, C. J., and Beckley, T. (2004). Resource Dependence and Community Well Being in Rural Canada. Rural Sociology 69: 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stedman, R., Parkins, C. J., and Beckley, T. (2005). Forest Reliance and Community Well Being in Rural Canada: Variations by Forest Sector and Region. Canadian Journal of Forest Resources 35: 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stedman, R., White, W., Patriquin, M., and Watson, D. (2007). Measuring Community Forest-Sector Dependence: Does Method Matter? Society & Natural Resources 20: 629–646 doi:10.1080/08941920701329660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tschakert, P., and Dietrich, K. A. (2010). Anticipatory Learning for Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience. Ecology and Society 15: 11.Google Scholar
  54. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Spruce Pine town, North Carolina - Population Finder - American FactFinder. U.S. Census Bureau - American FactFinder. http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/SAFFPopulation?_event=Search&_name=Spruce+Pine&_state=04000US37&_county=Spruce+Pine&_cityTown=Spruce+Pine&_zip=&_sse=on&_lang=en&pctxt=fph.
  55. Wilbanks, T. J., and Kates, R. W. (2010). Beyond Adapting to Climate Change: Embedding Adaptation in Response to Multiple Threats and Stresses. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100: 719–728 doi:10.1080/00045608.2010.500200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilkinson, K. P. (1999). The Community in Rural America. Social Ecology Press, Middleton, WI.Google Scholar
  57. Woolcock, M. (1998). Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework. Theory and Society 27: 151–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wooldridge, J. M. (2008). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 4th ed. South-Western College Publishers, Australia.Google Scholar
  59. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed. Sage, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jordan W. Smith
    • 1
  • Roger L. Moore
    • 2
  • Dorothy H. Anderson
    • 2
  • Christos Siderelis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Natural ResourcesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism ManagementNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations