Human Ecology

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 11–20 | Cite as

Sustainable Agricultural Development in Bali: Is the Subak an Obstacle, an Agent or Subject?

Article

Abstract

Detailed ethnographic studies of individual subaks indicate that subaks are neither as homogeneous nor as harmonious as some other studies have suggested. Their internal workings are complex and often contradictory and contested. Processes of continuity and change co-exist in delicate dynamic equilibrium. These studies signal a need for wariness about generalization and a need for close study of specific cases. This paper is just such a study, not of a subak as such, but of an innovative and (to date) extraordinarily successful localized project to develop rice-cultivation in a more sustainable direction through a shift away from petrochemical-based agriculture toward a more organic approach based on locally produced compost. We use this case also to address questions about the relevance and role of the subak in such developments.

Keywords

Rice Agriculture Irrigation Indonesia Bali Organic Compost 

References

  1. Arifin, B. (2003). From remarkable success stories to troubling present: The case of BULOG in Indonesia, paper prepared for the workshop, Agribusiness: From parastatals to private trade—Why, when, and how? New Delhi, December 15–16, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. Arthawiguna, W. A. (2006). ‘Transformasi Inovasi Teknologi Pertanian dengan Pendekatan Ecofarming pada Ekosistem Subak di Bali’, Makalah Seminar Hasil Pengkajian Ekofarming, Tahun Anggaran 2006.Google Scholar
  3. Arthawiguna, W. A. (2007). Modifikasi SRI dengan Optimalisasi Potensi Setempat. SALAM 18: 6–9.Google Scholar
  4. Arthawiguna, W. A., Lorenzen, R. P., and Lorenzen, S. (2005). Past, Present and Future—perspectives of Balinese Rice Farming. Paper presented at International Rice Conference, Tabanan, 12–14 September 2005.Google Scholar
  5. Birkelbach, A. W. (1973). The Subak Association. Indonesia 16: 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (n.d.)‘ Fermented Straws as Alternative Feed for Cattle during Dry Season (Central Lombok—West Nusa Tenggara)’ Publication of Special Programme for Food Security: Asia: Indonesia (web-based document no longer available).Google Scholar
  7. Geertz, C. (1979). From the Native’s Point of View: on the nature of anthropological understanding. In Rabinow, P., and Sullivan, W. (eds.), Interpretive Social Science: A Reader. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  8. Hobart, M. (1980). The Search for Sustenance: The Peasant Economy of a Balinese Village and Its Cultural Implications. Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Udayana, Denpasar.Google Scholar
  9. Jha, N. (2002). Barriers to the diffusion of agricultural knowledge: a Balinese case study. In Cohen, J. H., and Dannhaeuser, N. (eds.), Economic Development: An Anthropological Approach. Walnut Creek, AltaMira.Google Scholar
  10. Lansing, J. S. (1991). Priests and Programmers: Technologies of Power in the Engineered Landscape of Bali. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  11. Lansing, J. S. (2006). Perfect Order: Recognising Complexity in Bali. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  12. Lorenzen, S. (2006). I am just borrowing water, but I will return it in an hour: The interdependence of formal and informal institutions in Balinese irrigation management. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons, Ubud, Bali, 19–23 June 2006.Google Scholar
  13. MacRae, G. S. (2005a). Growing Rice After the Bomb: Where is Balinese Agriculture Going?’. Critical Asian Studies 37(2): 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MacRae, G. S. (2005b). But I’m Just an Anthropologist—what can I do about farmer’s problems? In Minnegal, M. (ed.), Sustainable Environments, Sustainable Communities: Potential Dialogues Between Anthropologists, Scientists and Managers. SAGES Research paper No.21, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  15. Maya DNK, W. (2007). Subak, Organisasi Berkekuatan Ekonomi. SALAM 19: 31–34.Google Scholar
  16. Poffenberger, M., and Zurbuchen, M. S. (1980). The Economics of Village Bali: Three Perspectives. Economic Development and Cultural Change 29(1): 91–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pretty, J. (2002). Agri-Culture: Reconnecting People, Land and Nature. Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  18. Spiertz, H. L. J. (1991). The Transformation of Traditional Law: A Tale of People’s Participation in Irrigation Management. Landscape and Urban Planning 20: 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wikan, U. (1990). Managing Turbulent Hearts: A Balinese Formula for Living. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Massey UniversityAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian BaliDenpasarIndonesia

Personalised recommendations