Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 377–387 | Cite as

Hunting with Polar Bears: Problems with the Passive Properties of the Commons

  • Jeremy J. Schmidt
  • Martha Dowsley
Article

Abstract

Inuit in Canada’s Arctic conceptualize both human hunters and their polar bear prey as active participants in the hunt and as part of a larger socio-economic system requiring the involvement of both humans and animals. Although often treated through the lens of common-pool resource theory, the Inuit viewpoint conflicts with Western wildlife management systems that typically treat animals, and nature in general, as passive. When polar bears are understood as active participants in the hunt, the rights associated with common property regimes and assumptions about collective-choice decisions in common-pool resource management require significant revision. In this paper we argue that common-pool resource theories which assume natural resources are inherently passive cannot adequately account for the system of active relationships operating among Inuit in Arctic Canada. The co-management system of Nunavut Territory, Canada, uses a flexible quota approach, which, while following conservation guidelines, allows some space for the traditional Inuit-polar bear system to operate. This example shows how common-pool resources may be managed sustainably without the attendant assumption that natural resources exist passively outside of common-pool resource regimes.

Keywords

Common-pool resources Property Management Polar bears Indigenous Hunting Inuit 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support for research and writing from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Eben Hopson Fellowship in Arctic Studies at McGill University, the Government of Nunavut, the Northern Scientific Training Program, Arctic Net, and the Pierre Elliot Trudeau Foundation. The author’s also acknowledge the thoughtful insights of the anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Agrawal, A. (2003). Sustainable Governance of Common-pool Resources: Context, Methods and Politics. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, T. (1999). The Great Work: Our Way into the Future. Bell Tower, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bird-David, N. (1990). The Giving Environment: Another Perspective on the Economic System of Hunter-gatherers. Current Anthropology 31: 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bodenhorn, B. (1990). “I’m Not the Great Hunter, My Wife Is”: Inupiat and Anthropological Models of Gender. Études/Inuit/Studies 14(1–2): 55–74.Google Scholar
  6. Brightman, R. (1993). Grateful Prey: Rock Cree Human–animal Relationships. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  7. Bromley, D. (1991). Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Basil Blackwell Inc., Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, P. G. (2004). Are There Any Natural Resources? Politics and the life sciences 23(1): 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, P. G. (2008). The Commonwealth of Life: Economics for a Flourishing Earth, 2nd ed. Blackrose Books, Montreal.Google Scholar
  10. Condon, R., Collings, P., and Wenzel, G. (1995). The Best Part of Life: Subsistence Hunting, Ethnicity, and Economic Adaptation Among Young Adult Inuit Males. Arctic 48(1): 31–46.Google Scholar
  11. Damas, D. (1968). The diversity of Eskimo societies. In Lee, R. B., and Devore, I. (eds.), Man the Hunter. Adline Publishing Company, Chicago, pp. 111–117.Google Scholar
  12. Damas, D. (1972). Central Eskimo Systems of Food Sharing. Ethnology 11(3): 220–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dowsley, M. (2007). Inuit Perspectives on Polar Bears (Ursus maritimus) and Climate Change in Baffin Bay, Nunavut, Canada. Research and Practice 2(2): 53–74.Google Scholar
  14. Dowsley, M. (2008). The development of multi-level governance for the management of Polar Bears in Nunavut Territory, Canada. Ph.D. McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
  15. Dowsley, M. (2010). The Value of a Polar Bear: Evaluating the Role of a Multiple Use Resource in the Nunavut Mixed Economy. Arctic Anthropology 47(1).Google Scholar
  16. Dowsley, M., and Taylor, M. K. (2006a). Community Consultations with Qikiqtarjuaq, Clyde River and Pond Inlet on Management Concerns for the Baffin Bay (BB) Polar Bear Population: A Summary of Inuit Knowledge and Community Consultations (Final Wildlife Report). Government of Nunavut, Department of Environment, Iqaluit.Google Scholar
  17. Dowsley, M., and Taylor, M. K. (2006b). Management Consultations for the Western Hudson Bay (WH) Polar Bear Population (01-02 December 2005) (Final Wildlife Report). Government of Nunavut, Department of Environment, Iqaluit.Google Scholar
  18. Dowsley, M., and Wenzel, G. (2008). “Time of the Most Polar Bears”: A Co-management Conflict in Nunavut. Arctic 61(2): 77–89.Google Scholar
  19. Dressler, W. H., Berkes, F., and Mathias, J. (2001). Beluga Hunters in a Mixed Economy: Managing the Impacts of Nature-based Tourism in the Canadian Western Arctic. Polar Record 37(200): 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., Hays, J., Huntington, H., Andrew, R., and Goodwin, W. (2008). Ambivalence Toward Formalizing Customary Resource Management Norms Among Alaska Native Beluga Whale Hunters and Tohono O’odham Livestock Owners. Human Organization 67(2): 137–150.Google Scholar
  21. Fienup-Riordan, A. (1988). Eye of the dance: spiritual life of Bering Sea Eskimo. In Fitzhugh, W. W., and Crowell, A. (eds.), Crossroads of Continents: Cultures of Siberia and Alaska. Smithsonian Institute, Washington, pp. 256–270.Google Scholar
  22. Fienup-Riordan, A. (1990). Eskimo Essays: Yupik Lives and How We See Them. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  23. Fienup-Riordan, A. (1999). Yaqulget Gaillun Pilartat (What the Birds Do): Yup’ik Eskimo Understanding of Geese and Those Who Study Them. Arctic 52(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
  24. Freeman, M. M. R. (1976). Inuit Land Use and Occupancy Project (1). Department of Indian and Northern Affairs, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  25. Freeman, M. M. R. (1989). Graphs and gaffs: a cautionary tale in the common-property resources debate. In Berkes, F. (ed.), Common Property Resources: Ecology and Community-based Sustainable Development. Belhaven, Great Britain, pp. 92–109.Google Scholar
  26. George, J. (2008). New Bowhead Numbers Show Inuit are Right. Nunatsiaq News.Google Scholar
  27. Giffen, N. M. (1930). The Roles of Men and Women in Eskimo Culture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  28. Glenn, H. P. (2007). Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Hallowell, I. (1926). Bear Ceremonialism in the Northern Hemisphere. American Anthropologist 28(1): 1–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hallowell, I. (1960). Ojibwa ontology, behavior, and worldview. In Diamond, S. (ed.), Culture in History: Essays in Honor of Paul Radin. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 19–52.Google Scholar
  31. Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162(13): 1243–1248.Google Scholar
  32. Hess, C., and Meinzen-Dick, R. (2006). The Name Change; or, What Happened to the “P”? The Commons Digest 2: 1–4.Google Scholar
  33. Ingold, T. (1994). From trust to domination. In Manning, A., and Serpell, J. (eds.), Animals and Human Societies: Changing Perspectives. Routledge, New York, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  34. Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kemp, W. B., Wenzel, G., Jensen, N., and Val, E. (1977). The Communities of Resolute and Kuvinaluk: A Social and Economic Baseline Study. McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
  36. Locke, J. (1963). Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Metayer, M. (1972). Tales from the Igloo. Hurtig Publishers, Edmonton.Google Scholar
  38. Nadasdy, P. (1999). The Politics of TEK: Power and “Integration” of Knowledge. Arctic Anthropology 36(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
  39. Nadasdy, P. (2003). Hunters and Bureaucrats: Power, Knowledge, and Aboriginal-state Relations in the Southwest Yukon. UBC, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  40. Nadasdy, P. (2007). The Gift in the Animal: The Ontology of Hunting and Human–animal Sociality. American Ethnologist 34(1): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. NTI (2000). Nunavut Land Claims Agreement. Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated (NTI), Iqaluit.Google Scholar
  42. Nutarakittuq, E. (1990). The Story of Papik and Ailaaq. Inuktitut 72: 42–45.Google Scholar
  43. Nuttall, M. (1992). Arctic Homeland: Kinship, Community and Development in Northwest Greenland. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
  44. Nuttall, M. (2000). Becoming a Hunter in Greenland. Études/Inuit/Studies 24(2): 33–45.Google Scholar
  45. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Ostrom, E. (2003). How Types of Goods and Property Rights Jointly Affect Collective Action. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(3): 239–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  48. Ostrom, E. (2007). A Diagnostic Approach for Going Beyond Panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(39): 15181–15187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peloquin, C., and Berkes, F. (2009). Local Knowledge, Subsistence Harvests, and Socio-ecological Complexity in James Bay. Human Ecology 37: 533–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peters, E. J. (2003). Views of Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Co-managment Bodies in Nunavik, Quebec. Polar Record 39(208): 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pinchot, G. (1998). Breaking New Ground. Island, Washington.Google Scholar
  52. Randa, V. (1986). Au croisement des espaces et des destins: Nanuq, «marginal exemplaire» Un cas de médiation animale dans l’Arctique central canadien. Études/Inuit/Studies 10(1): 159–169.Google Scholar
  53. Rasing, W. C. E. (1994). “Too Many People”, Order and Nonconformity in Iglulingmiut Social Process. Katholieke Universiteit, Faculteit der Rechsgeleerdheid, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  54. Riewe, R., and Gamble, L. (1988). The Inuit and Wildlife Management Today. IUCN Commission on Ecology and the Boreal Institute for Northern Studies, Edmonton.Google Scholar
  55. Robbe, P. (1994). Les Inuit d’Ammassalik, chasseurs de l’Arctique. Mémoires du Muséum National D’Histoire Naturelle (Tome 159). Paris: Editions du Museum Paris.Google Scholar
  56. Salmón, E. (2000). Kincentric Ecology: Indigenous Perceptions of the Human-nature Relationship. Ecological Applications 10(5): 1327–1332.Google Scholar
  57. Sandberg, A. (2007). Property Rights and Ecosystem Properties. Land Use Policy 24: 613–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sandell, J., and Sandell, B. (1996). Polar Bear Hunting and Hunters in Ittoqqortoormiit/Scoresbysund, NE Greenland. Arctic Anthropology 33(2): 77–93.Google Scholar
  59. Schlager, E., and Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis. Land Economics 68(3): 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schledermann, P. (1990). Crossroads to Greenland: 3000 Years of Prehistory in the Eastern High Arctic. The Arctic Institute of North Americ, University of Calgary, Calgary.Google Scholar
  61. Schweinsburg, R. E. (1981). A Brief History of Polar Bear Management in the N.W.T. Northwest Territories Wildlife Notes 2: 1–5.Google Scholar
  62. Scott, C. (1996). Science for the West, myth for the rest? The case of James Bay Cree knowledge production. In Nader, L. (ed.), Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power and Knowledge. Routledge, New York, pp. 69–86.Google Scholar
  63. Scott, C. (2006). Spirit and Practical Knowledge in the Person of the Bear Among Wemindji Cree Hunters. Ethnos 71(1): 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sejerson, F. (2001). Hunting and Management of Beluga Whales (Delphinapterus leucas) in Greenland: Changing Strategies to Cope with New National and Local Interests. Arctic 54(4): 431–443.Google Scholar
  65. Stairs, A., and Wenzel, G. (1992). “I am I and the Environment”: Inuit Hunting, Community, and Identity. Journal of Indigenous Studies 3(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
  66. Stoffle, R. W., and Arnold, R. (2003). Confronting the Angry Rock: American Indians’ Situated Risks from Radioactivity. Ethnos 68(2): 230–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stone, C. (1974). Should Trees Have Standing? Towards Legal Rights for Natural Objects. Avon, New York.Google Scholar
  68. Tanner, A. (1979). Bringing Home Animals: Religious Ideology and Mode of Productions of the Mistassini Cree Hunters. St. Martin’s Press, New York.Google Scholar
  69. Trott, C. G. (2006). The Gender of the Bear. Études/Inuit/Studies 30(1): 89–109.Google Scholar
  70. Tyrell, M. (2008). Nunavik Inuit Perspectives on Beluga Whale Management in the Canadian Arctic. Human Organization 67(3): 322–334.Google Scholar
  71. Tyrrell, M. (2006). More Bears, Less Bears: Inuit and Scientific Perceptions of Polar Bear Populations on the West Coast of Hudson Bay. Études/Inuit/Studies 39(2): 191–208.Google Scholar
  72. Usher, P. J., and Bankes, N. D. (1986). Property, the Basis of Inuit Hunting Rights—A New Approach. Inuit Committee on National Issues, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  73. Wenzel, G. (1983). Inuit and Polar Bears: Cultural Observations from a Hunt Near Resolute Bay, NWT. Arctic 36(1): 90–94.Google Scholar
  74. Wenzel, G. (1991). Animal Rights, Human Rights: Ecology, Economy and Ideology in the Canadian Arctic. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
  75. Wenzel, G. (1995). ‘Ningiqtuq’: Resource Sharing and Generalized Reciprocity in Clyde River, Nunavut. Arctic Anthropology 32(2): 43–60.Google Scholar
  76. Wenzel, G. (2004). From TEK to IQ: Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit and Inuit Cultural Ecology. Arctic Anthropology 41(2): 238–250.Google Scholar
  77. Wenzel, G. (2005). Nunavut Inuit and polar bear: the cultural politics of the sport hunt. In Kishigami, N., and Savelle, J. M. (eds.), Indigenous Use and Management of Marine Resources. National Museum of Ethnology, Osaka, pp. 363–388.Google Scholar
  78. Wenzel, G. (2008). Sometimes Hunting Can Seem Like Business: Polar Bear Sport Hunting in Nunavut. CCI, Edmonton.Google Scholar
  79. White, G. (2006). Cultures in Collision: Traditional Knowledge and Euro-Canadian Governance Processes in Northern Land-claim Boards. Arctic 59(4): 401–414.Google Scholar
  80. Zavaleta, E. (1999). The Emergence of Waterfowl Conservation Among Yup’ik Hunters in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska. Human Ecology 27(2): 231–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zimmerman, E. (1933). World Resources and Industries: A Functional Appraisal of the Availability of Agricultural and Industrial Materials. Harper & Brothers, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  2. 2.Lakehead UniversityThunder BayCanada

Personalised recommendations