Human Ecology

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 87–99 | Cite as

Environments of Learning: Rarámuri Children’s Plant Knowledge and Experience of Schooling, Family, and Landscapes in the Sierra Tarahumara, Mexico

  • Felice S. Wyndham


This paper investigates social-environmental factors contributing to differential ethnobotanical expertise among children in Rarámuri (Tarahumara) communities in Chihuahua, Mexico, to explore processes of indigenous ecological education and epistemologies of research. One hundred and four children from two schools (one with a Ráramuri knowledge curriculum and one without) were interviewed about their knowledge of 40 useful plants. Overall, children showed less ethnobotanical expertise than expected and a great deal of variability by age, though most shared knowledge of a core set of culturally and ecologically salient plants. No significant difference was found between girls’ and boys’ knowledge. The overall use-knowledge scores were almost twice as high as naming scores (mean of 40% vs. 24.4%). This supports the conclusion that use-context is more culturally relevant, salient or easier for children to remember than names. The social–environmental factors significant in predicting levels of plant knowledge among children were whether a child attended a Rarámuri or Spanish-instruction school, and, to a lesser extent, age. However, these effects were not strong, and individual variability in expertise is best interpreted using ethnographic knowledge of each child’s family and personal history, leading to a model of ethnobotanical education that foregrounds experiential learning and personal and family interest in useful plants. Though overall plant knowledge may be lower among children today compared to previous generations, a community knowledge structure seems to be reproduced in which a few individuals in each age cohort show great proficiency, and children make the same kinds of mistakes and share specialized names for plants.


Rarámuri Northern Mexico Ethnobotany Children’s local knowledge Cultural transmission Experiential knowledge 



In Mexico, my deep gratitude goes to the people of Basíhuare and Rejogochi for their guidance and friendship over the years. I am particularly indebted to Moreno Vatista and Margarita León, Silvino León González, Martha Sitánachi, María Elena Lirio and Martín Sanchez, Salomena Ramírez and Efigenia Ramírez, Azucena Zafiro, Roberto Morales González and Julián Morales González, Stanislaus Rascón, Marianita Morales González and Juan Rico León, Felipe Ramírez, Francisco Cardenal, Ubaldo Gardea, Martín Chavez and his family, all my comadres and compadres and ahijados and the Rejogochi and Basíhuare primary schools as well as the secondary school Cruz Rarámuri. At the Instituto Politécnico Nacional of Durango, Mexico thanks to Dra. Socorro González Elizondo for identifying and curating my plant collections. This research was funded by an American Education Research Association/Spencer Foundation Fellowship and grant BCS-0135306 from the National Science Foundation. I thank Brent Berlin, Bill Merrill, Ben Blount, Judith Preissle and Elois Ann Berlin for their comments on an earlier version of this work. The mistakes and shortfalls are all mine. Matéteraba.


  1. Agrawal, A. (1999). Ethnoscience, ‘TEK’ and Conservation. In Darrell, A. (ed.), Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity. Posey UNEP, Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp. 177–180.Google Scholar
  2. Benz, B. F., Sevallos, J., Santana, F., Rosales, J., and Graf, S. (2000). Losing knowledge about plant use in the Sierra de Manantlan Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Economic Botany 54(2): 183–191.Google Scholar
  3. Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological classification: principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  4. Berlin, B., Elois, A., Berlin, D. E., Breedlove, T., Duncan, V., Jara, R. M., Laughlin, and Velasco, T. (1990). La herbolaria médica Tzeltal-Tzotzil. Instituto Cultura Chiapaneco. Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas Mexico.Google Scholar
  5. Borgatti, S. (1992). ANTHROPAC 4.0. Analytic Technologies, Columbia.Google Scholar
  6. Boster, J. S. (1987). Introduction: Intracultural Variation. The American Behavioral Scientist 31: 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boster, J. S. (1991). The Information Economy Model Applied to Biological Similarity Judgment. In Resnick, L., Levine, J., and Teasley, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, American Psychological Association, Washington, pp. 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brambila, D. (1983). Diccionario rarámuri-castellano. Obra Nacional de la Buena Prensa, A.C., Mexico D.F.Google Scholar
  9. Brunel, G. (1974). Variation in Quechua Ethnobiology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  10. Bye, R. A. (1985). Medicinal Plants of the Tarahumara Indians of Chihuahua, Mexico. In Tyson, R., and Elerick, D. (eds.), Two Mummies from Chihuahua, Mexico. San Diego Museum of Man, San Diego.Google Scholar
  11. Bye, R. A. (1994). Prominence of the Sierra Madre Occidental in the Biological Diversity of Mexico. In Biodiversity and management of the Madrean archipelago and sky islands of SW U.S. and Northwestern Mexico, Vol. Report RM-GTR-264, pp. 19-26. USDA/FS/Rocky Mtn. Forest and Range Experimental Station, Ft. Collins.Google Scholar
  12. Bye, R. A., Don B., and Trias A. M. (1975). Ethnobotany of the Western Tarahumar of Chihuahua, Mexico, vol. 112, Harvard University, Boston, p. 24.Google Scholar
  13. Cardenal, F. (1993). Remedios y practicas curativas en la Sierra Tarahumara. Editorial Camino, Chihuahua.Google Scholar
  14. Chipenuik, R. (1995). Childhood Foraging as a Means of Acquiring Competent Human Cognition About Biodiversity. Environment and Behavior 27(4): 490–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dougherty, J. W. D. (1978). Salience and Relativity in Classification. American Ethnologist 5(1): 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garro, L. C. (1986). Intracultural Variation in Folk Medical Knowledge: A Comparison Between Curers and Noncurers. American Anthropologist 88: 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Godoy, R., Reyes-García, V., Byron, E., Leonard, W. R., and Vadez, V. (2005). The Effect of Market Economies on the Well-Being of Indigenous Peoples and on Their Use of Renewable Resources. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heckler, S. (2006). On Knowing and Not Knowing: The Many Valuations of Piaroa Local Knowledge. In Sillitoe, P. (ed.), Local Science vs. Global Science: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge in International Development. Berghahn Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Hunn, E. S. (2008). A Zapotec natural history: trees, herbs, and flowers, birds, beasts, and bugs in the life of San Juan Gbëë. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  20. Lerner, R. M., Castellino, D. R., Terry, P. A., Villarruel, F. A., and McKinney, M. H. (1995). Developmental Contextual Perspective on Parenting. In Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Handbook of Parenting, vol. 2. Biology and Ecology of Parenting. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
  21. Marchand, T. H. J. (2003). A Possible Explanation for the Lack Of Explanation; or ‘Why the Master Builder Can’t Explain What He Knows’: Introducing the Informational Atomism Against a ‘Definitional’ Definition of Concepts. In Pottier, J., Bicker, A., and Sillitoe, P. (eds.), Negotiating local knowledge, Pluto Press, London, pp. 30–50.Google Scholar
  22. Merrill, W. L. (1988). Rarámuri Souls: Knowledge and Social Process in Northern Mexico. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, J. (2002). Birthing Practices of the Rarámuri of Northern Mexico. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, A., and Valencia, B. M. (1999). Barranca Sinforosa Bird Studies: Chihuahua, Mexico (Project # 99-064), vol. 23, Chihuahua.Google Scholar
  25. Nabhan, G., and Trimble, S. (1994). The Geography of Childhood: Why Children Need Wild Places. Beacon, Boston.Google Scholar
  26. Pennington, C. W. (1963). The Tarahumar of Mexico: Their Environment and Material Culture. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
  27. Postman, N. (1994). The Disappearance of Childhood, 1st Vintage Books edn. Vintage, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Roberts, J. M. (1964). The Self-Management of Cultures. In Goodenough, W. H. (ed.), Explorations in Cultural Anthropology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 433–454.Google Scholar
  29. Romney, A. K., Weller, S. C., and Batchelder, W. H. (1986). Culture as Consensus: A Theory of Culture and Informant Accuracy. American Anthropologist 88: 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Simpson, B. M. (1994). Gender and the Social Differentiation of Knowledge. Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor 2(3).Google Scholar
  31. Stross, B. (1973). Acquisition of Botanical Terminology by Tzeltal Children. In Edmonson, M. S. (ed.), Meaning in Mayan Languages. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
  32. Valsiner, J. (1988). Ontogeny of Co-construction of Culture Within Socially Organized Environmental Settings. In Valsiner, J. (ed.), Child Development Within Culturally Structured Environments: Social Co-construction and Environmental Guidance in Development, Vol. 2. Ablex, Norwood.Google Scholar
  33. Valsiner, J., and Voss, H.-G. (editors) (1996). The Structure of Learning Processes. Ablex, Norwood.Google Scholar
  34. Weller, S. C., and Romney, A. K. (1988). Systematic Data Collection, Vol. 10. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  35. Wyndham, F. S. (2002). The Transmission of Traditional Plant Knowledge in Community Contexts: A Human Ecosystem Perspective. In Stepp, J. R., Wyndham, F. S., and Zarger, R. K. (eds.), Ethnobiology and Biocultural Diversity. University of Georgia Press, Athens, pp. 549–557.Google Scholar
  36. Wyndham, F. S. (2004a). Tarahumara. In Ember, C. R., and Ember, M. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Sex and Gender in the World’s Cultures. Vol. 2, Kluwer, New York, pp. 877–884.Google Scholar
  37. Wyndham, F. S. (2004b). Learning Ecology: Ethnobotany in the Sierra Tarahumara, Mexico. PhD dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
  38. Wyndham, F. S. (in press). Spheres of Relations, Lines of Interaction: Subtle Ecologies of the Rarámuri landscape in Northern Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology 29(2).Google Scholar
  39. Zarger, R. K. (2002). Acquisition and Transmission of Subsistence Knowledge by Q’eqchi’ Maya in Belize. In Stepp, J. R., Wyndham, F. S., and Zarger, R. K. (eds.), Ethnobiology and Biocultural Diversity. University of Georgia Press, Athens, pp. 592–603.Google Scholar
  40. Zarger, R. K., and Stepp, J. R. (2004). Persistence of Botanical Knowledge Among Tzeltal Maya Children. Current Anthropology 45(3): 413–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zent, S. (1999). The Quandary of Conserving Ethnobotanical Knowledge: A Piaroa Example. In Gragson, T., and Blount, B. (eds.), Ethnoecology: Knowledge, Resources, Rights. University of Georgia Press, Athens, pp. 90–124.Google Scholar
  42. Zent, S. (2001). Acculturation and Ethnobotanical Knowledge Loss Among the Piaroa of Venezuela. In Maffi, L. (ed.), On Biocultural Diversity: Linking Language, Knowledge, and the Environment. Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, DC, pp. 190–211.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations