Human Ecology

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 123–135

On the Role of Ideas of Human Nature in Shaping Attitudes Towards Environmental Governance

Article

Abstract

Attitudes towards the management of the natural environment have been described mainly as building on individuals’ images of nature and the human–nature relationship. However, in previous qualitative research I found strong evidence that in order to understand public views on environmental policies we also need to understand individuals’ beliefs about their fellow humans. The present study tested the hypothesis that beliefs about human nature and preferences for certain governance approaches—such as regulations and collective action—are related to individuals’ attitudes towards concrete management measures. Survey results (n = 155), analysed by means of structural equation modelling, suggest that effects of beliefs about human nature are discernible, but not significant. I could, however, identify generic preferences for particular approaches to environmental governance. These significantly explained variation in attitudes towards environmental governance in an applied context, suggesting a strong need for further research in this politically highly relevant field.

Keywords

Attitudes Environmental governance Images of humankind Natural environment 

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
  2. ANES (American National Election Studies) (2008). The ANES Guide to Public Opinion and Electoral Behavior. Available at: http://www.electionstudies.org/nesguide/toptable/tab5b_4.htm [April 2008].
  3. Banducci, S. A., Donovan, T., and Karp, J. A. (1999). Proportional Representation and Attitudes about Politics: Results from New Zealand. Electoral Studies 18: 533–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes, S., Kaase, M. et al. (1979). Political Action. Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  5. Bjerke, T., and Kaltenborn, B. P. (1999). The Relationship of Ecocentric and Anthropocentric Motives to Attitudes Toward Large Carnivores. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19: 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, K. M. (2007). Reconciling Moral and Legal Collective Entitlement: Implications for Community-Based Land Reform. Land Use Policy 24: 633–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buijs, A. E. (2009). Lay People’s Images of Nature. Frameworks of Values, Beliefs and Value Orientations. Society and Natural Resources 22: 417–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buijs, A. E., Fischer, A., Rink, D., and Young, J. (2008). Looking Beyond Superficial Knowledge Gaps: Understanding Public Representations of Biodiversity. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management 4: 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrus, G., Bonaiuto, M., and Bonnes, M. (2005). Environmental Concern, Regional Identity, and Support for Protected Areas in Italy. Environment and Behavior 37: 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., and Eagly, A. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In Uleman, J., and Bargh, J. (eds.), Unintended Thought. Guilford, New York, pp. 212–252.Google Scholar
  11. Clayton, S., and Opotow, S. (2003). Identity and the Natural Environment—The Psychological Significance of Nature. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. CNPA (Cairngorms National Park Authority) (2003). Cairngorms National Park—Key Facts. Available at http://www.cairngorms.co.uk/park/keyfacts/index.php [May 2008].
  13. De Groot, W. T., and Van den Born, R. J. G. (2003). Visions of Nature and Landscape Type Preferences: An Exploration in The Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning 63: 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De St. Aubin, E. (1996). Personal Ideology Polarity: Its Emotional Foundation and its Manifestation in Individual Value Systems, Religiosity, Political Orientation, and Assumptions Concerning Human Nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 152–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., and Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues 56: 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elands, B. H. M., and Wiersum, K. F. (2001). Forestry and Rural Development in Europe: An Exploration of Socio-political Discourses. Forest Policy and Economics 3: 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Enticott, G. (2003). Risking the Rural: Nature, Morality and the Consumption of Unpasteurised Milk. Journal of Rural Studies 19: 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farah, B. G., Barnes, S., and Heunks, F. (1979). Political dissatisfaction. In Barnes, S., Kaase, M. et al. (eds.), Political Action. Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 409–448.Google Scholar
  19. Fahrenberg, J. (2004). Annahmen über den Menschen. Menschenbilder aus psychologischer, biologischer, religiöser und interkultureller Sicht. Asanger-Verlag, Heidelberg-Kröning.Google Scholar
  20. Fahrenberg, J. (2006). Annahmen über den Menschen. Eine Fragebogenstudie mit 800 Studierenden der Psychologie, Philosophie, Theologie und Naturwissenschaften. Forschungsbericht Nr. 164. University of Freiburg im Breisgau, Department of Psychology. Available at: http://www.psychologie.uni-freiburg.de/forschung/index.html/fobe90.html [April 2008].
  21. Fischer, A., and Van der Wal, R. (2007). Invasive Plant Suppresses Charismatic Seabird: The Construction of Attitudes Towards Biodiversity Management Options. Biological Conservation 135: 256–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fischer, A., and Young, J. (2007). Understanding Mental Constructs of Biodiversity: Implications for Biodiversity Management. Biological Conservation 136: 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fischer, A., Petersen, L., Feldkötter, C., and Huppert, W. (2007). Sustainable Governance of Natural Resources and Institutional Change—An Analytical Framework. Public Administration and Development 27: 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fulton, D. C., Manfredo, M. J., and Limpscomb, J. (1996). Wildlife Value Orientations: A Conceptual and Measurement Approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1: 24–47.Google Scholar
  25. General Register Office for Scotland (2002). Census 2001. Available at: http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/files1/the-census/01poprep.pdf [April 2008].
  26. Halfacree, K. H. (1993). Locality and Social Representation: Space, Discourse and Alternative Definitions of the Rural. Journal of Rural Studies 9: 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hobbes, T. (1651/1998). Leviathan. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Homer, P. M., and Kahle, L. R. (1988). A Structural Equation Test of the Value–Attitude–Behavior Hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 638–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6: 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jost, J. T. (2006). The End of the End of Ideology. American Psychologist 61: 651–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mayer, F. S., and Frantz, C. M. (2004). The Connectedness to Nature Scale: A Measure of Individuals’ Feeling in Community with Nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 503–515.Google Scholar
  32. Milton, K. (2002). Loving Nature—Towards an Ecology of Emotion. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  33. Ojea, E., and Loureiro, M. L. (2007). Altruistic, Egoistic and Biospheric Values in Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Wildlife. Ecological Economics 63: 807–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C., Norgaard, R., and Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the Commons: Local Lessons, Global Challenges. Science 284: 278–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Petty, R., and Cacioppo, J. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Rousseau, J. J. (1762/1971). Emil oder über die Erziehung. Ferdinand Schöningh Verlag, Paderborn.Google Scholar
  37. Schultz, P. W. (2001). The Structure of Environmental Concern: Concern for Self, Other People, and the Biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skogen, K., and Thrane, C. (2008). Wolves in Context. Using Survey Data to Situate Attitudes Within a Wider Cultural Framework. Society and Natural Resources, 21: 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. SNH Scottish Natural Heritage. (2005). Scottish Outdoor Access Code. Available at: http://www.outdooraccess-scotland.com/upload/Full%20Access%20Code.pdf [July 2009].
  40. SNH Scottish Natural Heritage. (2008). The Report on the proposal to extend the southern boundary of the Cairngorms National Park into Perth and Kinross. Available at: http://www.snh.org.uk/pdfs/strategy/B329402.pdf. [July 2009].
  41. Stolle, D. (1998). Bowling Together, Bowling Alone: The Development of Generalized Trust in Voluntary Associations. Political Psychology 19: 497–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2001). Barriers to Nature Conservation in Germany: A Model Explaining Opposition to Protected Areas. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stone, W. F., and Schaffner, P. E. (1988). The Psychology of Politics. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Thøgersen, J., and Ölander, F. (2006). To What Degree are Environmentally Beneficial Choices Reflective of a General Conservation Stance. Environment and Behaviour 38: 550–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thompson, S. C. G., and Barton, M. A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 14: 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tomkins, S. S. (1963). Affect and the psychology of knowledge. In Tomkins, S. S., and Izard, C. (eds.), Affect, Cognition, and Personality. Springer, New York, pp. 72–97.Google Scholar
  47. Van den Born, R. J. G., Lenders, R. H. J., de Groot, W. T., and Huijsman, E. (2001). The New Biophilia: An Exploration of Visions of Nature in Western Countries. Environmental Conservation 28: 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van der Windt, H. J., Swart, J. A. A., and Keulartz, J. (2007). Nature and Landscape Planning: Exploring the Dynamics of Valuation. The Case of the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning 79: 218–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Lange, P. A. M., Van Vugt, M., Meertens, R. M., and Ruiter, R. A. C. (1998). A Social Dilemma Analysis of Commuting Preferences: The Roles of Social Value Orientation and Trust. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28: 796–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Williamson, O. (1996). The Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  51. Wrightsman, L. S. (1992). Assumptions about Human Nature. Sage, Newbury Park.Google Scholar
  52. World Value Survey (2006). World Values Survey—The World’s Most Comprehensive Investigation of Political and Sociocultural Change—2005, 4th wave. Available at: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/ [May 2008].

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Socio-Economic Research GroupMacaulay Land Use Research Institute, CraigiebucklerAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations