Human Ecology

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 533–545

Local Knowledge, Subsistence Harvests, and Social–Ecological Complexity in James Bay

Article

Abstract

Ecosystems are complex and difficult to predict and control. Western science-based societies have tended to simplify ecosystems to manage them. Some indigenous and other rural groups who interact closely with a given resource system seem to have developed practices that are adapted to live with complexity. This paper examines how indigenous Cree hunters in James Bay, subarctic Canada, understand and deal with ecological complexity and dynamics, and how their understanding of uncertainty and variability shape subsistence activities. The focus is the Canada goose (Branta canadensis) hunt which is adaptive to shifts and changes in local and regional conditions. Ecological understandings of Cree hunters allow them to account for and deal with a very large number of variables at multiples scales. The Cree deal with these variables qualitatively, an approach consistent with some scientific ways of dealing with complexity, such as adaptive management and fuzzy logic.

Keywords

Indigenous knowledge Traditional ecological knowledge Cree people Complexity Fuzzy logic Adaptive management Canada goose James Bay Subarctic Hunting 

References

  1. Bateson, G., and Bateson, M. C. (1987). Angels Fear: Towards an Epistemology of the Sacred. Bantham, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Berkes, F. (1977). Fishery Resource Use in a Subarctic Indian Community. Human Ecology 5: 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkes, F. (1998). Indigenous knowledge and resource management systems in the Canadian subarctic. In Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (eds.), Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 98–128.Google Scholar
  4. Berkes, F. (2008). Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Management Systems, 2nd edn., Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  5. Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (eds.) (1998). Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Berkes, F., and Kislalioglu Berkes, M. (2009). Ecological Complexity, Fuzzy Logic and Holism in Indigenous Knowledge. Futures 41: 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecological Applications 10: 1251–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkes, F., Kislalioglu Berkes, M., and Fast, H. (2007). Collaborative Integrated Management in Canada’s North: The Role of Local and Traditional Knowledge and Community-based Monitoring. Coastal Management 35: 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bird-David, N. (1990). The Giving Environment: Another Perspective on the Economic System of Gatherer-hunters. Current Anthropology 31: 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlson, H. M. (2008). Home is the Hunter: The James Bay Cree and their Land. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  11. CRA (Cree Regional Authority) (2005). Workshop on Migratory Birds Data Collection in Eeyou Istchee: Sharing Knowledge, Proceedings of workshop held in Wemindji, February 8–9 2005. http://www.envcree.ca/communities/documents/WorkshopReport.pdf.
  12. Davidson-Hunt, I. J. (2006). Adaptive Learning Networks: Developing Resource Management Knowledge through Social Learning Forums. Human Ecology 34: 593–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davidson-Hunt, I., and Berkes, F. (2003). Learning as you Journey: Anishinaabe Perception of Social–ecological Environments and Adaptive Learning. Ecology and Society 8(1): 5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol8/iss1/art5.Google Scholar
  14. Demeritt, D. (1998). Constructivism and nature. In Braun, B., and Castree, N. (eds.), Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium. London, Routledge, pp. 173–193.Google Scholar
  15. Dove, M. R. (1985). Swidden Agriculture in Indonesia: The Subsistence Strategies of the Kalimantan Kantu'. Mouton, Berlin.Google Scholar
  16. Feit, H. A. (1987). Waswanipi Cree management of land and wildlife: Cree cultural ecology revisited. In Cox, B. (ed.), Native People, Native Lands: Canadian Indians, Inuit and Métis. Carleton University Press, Ottawa, pp. 75–91.Google Scholar
  17. Flannery, K. V., Marcus, J., and Reynolds, R. G. (1989). The Flocks of the Wamani. A Study of Llama Herders on the Punas of Ayacucho, Peru. Academic, San Diego.Google Scholar
  18. Folke, C., Colding, J., and Berkes, F. (2003). Building resilience and adaptive capacity in social–ecological systems. In Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (eds.), Navigating Social–Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 325–387.Google Scholar
  19. Gadgil, M., Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (1993). Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 22 : 151–156.Google Scholar
  20. Grant, S., and Berkes, F. (2007). Fisher Knowledge as Expert System: A Case from the Longline Fishery of Grenada, the Eastern Carribean. Fisheries Research 84: 162–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gudeman, S. (1986). Economics as Culture: Models and Metaphors of Livelihood. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  22. Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press, Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hallowell, A. I. (1960). Ojibwa ontology, behavior, and world view. In Diamond, S. (ed.), Culture in History: Essays in Honour of Paul Radin. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 19–52.Google Scholar
  24. Harvey, W. F., and Rodrigue, J. (2006). A Breeding Pair Survey of Canada Geese in Northern Québec – 2006. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  25. Holling, C. S., and Meffe, G. K. (1996). Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resource Management. Conservation Biology 10: 328–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hornig, J. F. (1999). Social and Environmental Impacts of the James Bay Hydroelectric Project. McGill–Queen’s University Press, Montreal.Google Scholar
  27. Hunn, E. S., Johnson, D., Russell, P., and Thornton, T. F. (2003). Huna Tlingit Traditional Environmental Knowledge, Conservation, and the Management of a “Wilderness” Park. Current Anthropology 44: S79–S104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  29. Lansing, J. S. (2006). Perfect Order: Recognizing Complexity in Bali. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  30. Levin, S. A. (1999). Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons. Perseus, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  31. Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., Pell, A. N., Deadman, P., Kratz, T., Lubchenco, J., Ostrom, E., Ouyang, Z., Provencher, W., Redman, C. L., Schneider, S. H., and Taylor, W. W. (2007). Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems. Science 317: 1513–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mackinson, S. (2001). Integrating Local and Scientific Knowledge: An Example in Fisheries science. Environmental Management 27: 533–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McDonald, M., Arragutainaq, L., and Novalinga, Z. J. (1997). Voices from the Bay: Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Inuit and Cree in the Hudson Bay Bioregion. Canadian Arctic Resources Committee, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  34. Moller, H., Berkes, F., Lyver, P. O., and Kislalioglu, M. (2004). Combining Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Monitoring Populations for Co-management. Ecology and Society 9 (3): 2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art2/.Google Scholar
  35. Olsson, P., and Folke, C. (2001). Local Ecological Knowledge and Institutional Dynamics for Ecosystem Management: A Study of Lake Racken Watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems 4: 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007). The Implications of Complexity for Integrated Resources Management. Environmental Modelling & Software 22: 561–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parlee, B., Berkes, F., and Teetl’it Gwich’in Renewable Resource Council (2006). Indigenous Knowledge of Ecological Variability and Commons Management: A Case Study on Berry Harvesting from Northern Canada. Human Ecology 34: 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peloquin, C. (2007). Variability, Change and Continuity in Social–Ecological Systems: Insights from James Bay Cree Cultural Ecology. Thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg. http://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/dspace/handle/1993/3019.
  39. Peloquin, C., and Berkes, F. (in press). Beyond conservation: Customary land stewardship in a complex and changing world. In Mulrennan, M., Scot C., and Scott, K. (eds.), The Science and Politics of Protected Area Creation: Striking the Balance Vancouver, University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  40. Prato, T. (2005). A Fuzzy Logic Approach for Evaluating Ecosystem Sustainability. Ecological Modelling 187: 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Preston, R. J. (1978). La relation sacrée entre les Cris et les oies. Recherches Amérindiennes au Québec 8: 147–152.Google Scholar
  42. Preston, R. J. (2002). Cree Narrative: Expressing the Personal Meanings of Events, 2nd edn., McGill–Queen's University Press, Montreal.Google Scholar
  43. Quinn, N., and Holland, D. (1987). Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  44. Rappaport, R. A. (1984). Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People, 2nd edn., Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  45. Reed, A., Benoit, R., Lalumière, R., and Julien, M. (1996). Goose Use of the Coastal Habitats of Northeastern James Bay. Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  46. Ridington, R. (1982). Technology, World View, and Adaptive Strategy in a Northern Hunting Society. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 19: 469–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rosenberg, D. M., Berkes, F., Bodaly, R. A., Hecky, R. E., Kelly, C. A., and Rudd, J. W. M. (1997). Large-scale Impacts of Hydroelectric Development. Environmental Reviews 5: 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sardar, Z. (1994). Conquests, Chaos and Complexity: The Other in Modern and Postmodern Science. Futures 26: 665–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scott, C. (1986). Hunting Territories, Hunting Bosses and Communal Production among Coastal James Bay Cree. Anthropologica 28: 163–173.Google Scholar
  50. Scott, C. (1996). Science for the west, myth for the rest? The case of James Bay Cree knowledge construction. In Nader, L. (ed.), Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power and Knowledge. Routledge, London, pp. 69–86.Google Scholar
  51. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  52. Short, F.T. (2007). The Status of Eelgrass in James Bay. Report to The Cree Nation of Chisasibi, Durham, NH, University of New Hampshire.Google Scholar
  53. Silvert, W. (1997). Ecological Impact Classification with Fuzzy Sets. Ecological Modelling 96: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Toledo, V. M., Ortiz-Espejel, B., Cortés, L., Moguel, P., and Ordoñez, M. D. J. (2003). The Multiple Use of Tropical Forests by Indigenous Peoples in Mexico: A Case of Adaptive Management. Conservation Ecology 7(3): 9. http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art9/.Google Scholar
  55. Vayda, A. P., and McCay, B. J. (1975). New Directions in Ecology and Ecological Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 4: 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zadeh, L. A. (1973). Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Process. Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-3: 28–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural Resources Institute, University of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations