Human Ecology

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 643–651 | Cite as

Genetic Feedback and Human Population Regulation

Article

Abstract

Human population growth has been identified as a primary cause of ecologically destructive phenomena and, if left unchecked, will threaten the survivability of the human species. It has been demonstrated that genetic feedback is the mechanism by which species achieve ecological balance. The present analysis shows the applicability of this mechanism to human population regulation. In this model, the traits of behavior and culture are explained as following a four step process, similar to, and nested within genetic evolution. As species extinction is part and parcel of evolution, and environmental circumstances are changing rapidly, the population regulatory change that would take place on the genetic level of integration would be human extinction. However, the change on the cultural level, requiring a revision of the social contingency from “food production must be increased to feed a growing population” to “food production increases cause population increases,” would lead to human sustainability.

Keywords

Agriculture Ecology Evolution Extinction Food availability Food production 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank David Pimentel for his foundational work and discussion which precipitated and enhanced this paper. I also thank Steven Salmony for his encouragement, Cole and Emily Hopfenberg for their patience and inspiration, and Edie Hopfenberg for her tireless support and review of all drafts.

References

  1. Alessi, G. (1992). Models of Proximate and Ultimate Causation in Psychology. American Psychologist 47: 1359–1370 doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.47.11.1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baum, W. M. (2003). Behavior and the General Evolutionary Process. Available from http://cogprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00001051/00/Behavior_and_the_General_Evolutionary_Process.htm (Accessed 12 December 2003).
  3. Cakmak, I. (2002). Plant Nutrition Research: Priorities to Meet Human Needs for Food in Sustainable Ways. Plant and Soil 247: 3–24 doi: 10.1023/A:1021194511492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carr, D. L. (2004). Proximate Population Factors and Deforestation in Tropical Agricultural Frontiers. Population and Environment 25: 585–612 doi: 10.1023/B:POEN.0000039066.05666.8d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. E. (1995). How Many People Can the Earth Support? Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Daily, G. C. (1995). Restoring Value to the World’s Degraded Lands. Science 269: 350–354 doi: 10.1126/science.269.5222.350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection, Random House, New York, USA, (Modern Library edn., 1998).Google Scholar
  8. Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, New Ed.Google Scholar
  9. Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How Societies Choose To Fail or Succeed. Viking, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Elton, C. S. (1927). Animal Ecology. Sidgwick and Jackson, Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  11. Farb, P. (1978). Humankind. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  12. Fenner, F., and Myers, K. (1978). Myxoma virus and myxomatosis in retrospect: the first quarter century of a new disease. In Kurstak, E., and Maramorosch, K., (eds.). Viruses and Environment. 3rd International Conference on Comparative Virology, Mont Gabriel, Quebec, pp. 539–570.Google Scholar
  13. FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2004). FAOSTAT. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org.
  14. Ford, E. B. (1931). Mendelism and Evolution. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  15. Ford, H. D., and Ford, E. B. (1930). Fluctuations in Numbers and Its Influence on Variation in Meliteaaurinia. Rott (Lepidoptera). Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 78: 345–351.Google Scholar
  16. Gilland, B. (2002). World Population and Food Supply Can Food Production Keep Pace with Population Growth in the Next Half-Century? Food Policy 27: 47–63 doi: 10.1016/S0306-9192(02)00002-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gladwell, M. (2005). The Vanishing. The New Yorker 80: 4170–73.Google Scholar
  18. Hinrichsen, D. (1997). Winning the food race. Population. Reports. Series M (13). Available from http://www.jhuccp.org/pr/m13edsum.stm (accessed March 2003).
  19. Hopfenberg, R. (2003). Human Carrying Capacity is Determined by Food Availability. Population and Environment 25: 109–117 doi: 10.1023/B:POEN.0000015560.69479.c1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hopfenberg, R., and Pimentel, D. (2001). Human Population Numbers as a Function of Food Supply. Environment, Development and Sustainability 3: 1–15 doi: 10.1023/A:1011463231976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jenkins, M. (2003). Prospects for Biodiversity. Science 302: 1175–1177 doi: 10.1126/science.1088666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, V. (1988). Beyond Behaviorism. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  23. Levin, S. A., and Pimentel, D. (1981). Selection of Intermediate Rates of Increase in Parasite-Host Systems. The American Naturalist 117: 413–421 doi: 10.1086/283708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu, J. H., Bonzon-Liu, B., and Pierce-Guarino, M. (1997). Common Fate Between Humans and Animals? The Dynamical Systems Theory of Groups and Environmental Attitudes in the Florida Keys. Environment and Behavior 29: 87–123 doi: 10.1177/001391659702900104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McKee, J. K. (2004). Brother, Can You Spare A Species? The Reporter Spring:6–9.Google Scholar
  26. McKee, J. K., Sciulli, P. W., Fooce, C. D., and Waite, T. A. (2003). Forecasting Biodiversity Threats Due to Human Population Growth. Biological Conservation 115: 161–164 doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00099-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McQueen, R. E. (2000). World Population Growth, Distribution and Demographics and Their Implications on Food Production. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80: 229–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meritt, M. S. (2001). The unsustainability and origins of socioeconomic increase. Unpublished master’s thesis, The City University of New York, New York. Available from http://www.potluck.com/offerings/increase.pdf (accessed November 2004).
  29. Meritt, M. S. (2002). The Case Against Growth. Scientific American 286: 12.Google Scholar
  30. Myers, N. (1996). Environmental Services of Biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93: 2764–2769 doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.7.2764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olson, D., and Pimentel, D. (1974). Evolution of Resistance in A Host Population to An Attacking Parasite. Environmental Entomology 3: 621–624.Google Scholar
  32. Palumbi, S. R. (2001). Humans as The World’s Greatest Evolutionary Force. Science 293: 1786–1790 doi: 10.1126/science.293.5536.1786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pimentel, D. (1961). Animal Population Regulation by the Genetic Feed-Back Mechanism. The American Naturalist 95: 65–79 doi: 10.1086/282160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pimentel, D. (1966). Complexity of ecological systems and problems in their study and management. In Watt, K. (ed.), Systems Analysis in Ecology. Academic, New York, pp. 15–35.Google Scholar
  35. Pimentel, D. (1988). Herbivore Population Feeding Pressure on Plant Hosts: Feedback Evolution and Host Conservation. Oikos 53: 289–302 doi: 10.2307/3565527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pimentel, D. (2001). The Limitations of Biomass Energy. Encyclopedia on Physical Science and Technology. Academic, San Diego, 159–171.Google Scholar
  37. Pimentel, D., and Pimentel, M. (1996). Food, Energy and Society, rev. edn. University Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  38. Pimentel, D., and Soans, A. B. (1970). Animal Populations regulated to carrying capacity of plant host by genetic feedback. In denBoer, P. J., and Gradwell, G. R. (eds.), Dynamics of Populations. Proceedings of the Advanced Study Institute on Dynamics of Numbers in Populations, Oosterbeek, The Netherlands, pp. 313–326.Google Scholar
  39. Pimentel, D., Levin, S. A., and Olson, D. (1978). Coevolution and the Stability of Exploiter-Victim Systems. The American Naturalist 112: 119–125 doi: 10.1086/283256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pimentel, D., Levin, S. A., and Soans, A. B. (1975). On the Evolution of Energy Balance in some Exploiter-Victim Systems. Ecology 56: 381–390 doi: 10.2307/1934968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pimentel, D., Giampietro, M., and Bukkens, S. G. F. (1998). An Optimum Population for North and Latin America. Population and Environment 20: 125–148 doi: 10.1023/A:1023367211000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pimm, S. L., Russell, G. J., Gittleman, J. L., and Brooks, T. L. (1995). The Future of Biodiversity. Science 269: 347–350 doi: 10.1126/science.269.5222.347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pulliam, H. R., and Haddad, N. M. (1994). Human Population Growth and The Carrying Capacity Concept. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 75: 141–157.Google Scholar
  44. Quinn, D. (1992). Ishmael. Bantam/Turner, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Quinn, D. (1996). The Story of B. Bantam/Turner, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Rosset, P, Collins, J, and Lappé, FM (2000). Lessons from the Green Revolution. Tikkun 15(2):52.Google Scholar
  47. Skinner, B. F. (1938). Behavior of Organisms. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by Consequences. Science 213: 501–504 doi: 10.1126/science.7244649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D’Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., Schindler, D., Schlesinger, W. H., Simberloff, D., and Swackhamer, D. (2001). Forecasting Agriculturally Driven Global Environmental Change. Science 292: 281–284 doi: 10.1126/science.1057544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilson, E. O., and Bossert, W. H. (1971). A Primer of Population Biology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  51. Young, A. (1999). Is There Really Spare Land? A Critique of Estimates of Available Cultivable Land in Developing Countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability 1: 3–18 doi: 10.1023/A:1010055012699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Chapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations