Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 27–41 | Cite as

Smallholder Livelihoods, Wealth and Deforestation in the Eastern Amazon

  • Pablo PachecoEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this paper, I examine patterns of wealth accumulation and their influence on deforestation among smallholders at Uruará and Redenção, in the state of Pará in the Brazilian Eastern Amazon. I argue that the development of the smallholder economy has not been a linear process, and the diversity of smallholder farming systems and their patterns of wealth accumulation have varied implications for the rate and magnitude of deforestation. However, whilst there are differential impacts of farming practices on deforestation—cattle ranching has a greater impact than cash cropping or subsistence agriculture—the stronger correlate of deforestation is the wealth of the farmers. Wealthier farmers not only tend to deforest more in absolute terms, but also show a slightly greater propensity to deforest whatever their production system. Though cattle production is a key driver of wealth accumulation and thus deforestation, a significant number of smallholders adopt diversified production systems. The main factors explaining the relationship between the farming systems and deforestation were years of residence on the lot, distance of the lot to main market and the amount of day labor hired—and not variables describing household structure.

Keywords

Livelihoods Farming systems Wealth Cattle production Deforestation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I gratefully acknowledge the receipt of research funding from the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia, and the support of the Institute of Environmental Research for Amazônia (IPAM), Belem, Brazil. I thank Billie Turner, Dianne Rocheleau, Robert G. Pontius, and Sven Wunder for their comments on a previous version of this paper. I also wish to thank Jean F. Tourrand, Marie G. Piketty, and Benoit Mertens from whom I benefited from discussions during my field work. Finally, I acknowledge the comments from two anonymous reviewers who contributed improvements to a previous version. Remaining errors are the author’s.

References

  1. Barham, B. L., Coomes, O. T., and Takasaki, Y. (1999). Rain forest livelihoods: income generation, household wealth and forest use. Unasylva 50(198): 34–42.Google Scholar
  2. Brondizio, E., McCracken, S. D., Moran, E. F., Siqueira, A. D., Nelson, D. R., and Pedraza, C. R. (2002). The Colonist Footprint: Towards a Conceptual Framework of Frontier Land-Use Intensification and Deforestation Trajectories among Small Farmers in the Brazilian Amazon. In Wood, C., and Porro, R. (eds.), Deforestation and Land Use in the Amazon. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
  3. Browder, J. O., Pedlowski, M., and Summers, P. M. (2004). Land use patterns in the Brazilian Amazon: Comparative farm-level evidence from Rondônia. Human Ecology 3(2): 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caldas, M., Walker, R., and Perz, S. (2002). Small Producer Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: Integrating Household Structure and Economic Circumstance in Behavioral Explanation. Center for International Development at Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, B. M., Jeffrey, S., Kozanayi, W., Luckert, M., Mutamba, M., and Zindi, C. (2002). Household Livelihoods in Semi-Arid Regions: Options and Constraints. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.Google Scholar
  6. Castellanet, C., Simões, A., and Filho, P. C. (1998). Diagnóstico Preliminar da Agricultura Familiar na Transamazônica: Indicações para pesquisa e desenvolvimento. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Belém.Google Scholar
  7. da Veiga, J. B., Negreiros, A. M., Poccard-Chapuis, R., Cordeiro, M., Costa, P. A. D., Grijalva, J., Valencia, T., Machado, R., Piketty, M. G., and Tourrand, J. F. (2001a). Cattle Ranching, Land Use and Deforestation in Brazil, Peru and Ecuador. Relatorio de Pesquisa—Equipe Amazonia Oriental. AI-NSF, Belem, Brasil.Google Scholar
  8. da Veiga, J. B., Poccard-Chapuis, R., Alves, A. M., Piketty, M. B., Thales, M. C., Grijalva, J., Valencia, F., Rios, J., and Tourrand, J. F. (2001b). A Amazônia pode virar uma grande região de pecuária bovina sustentável? Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (unpublished draft), Belem, Brasil.Google Scholar
  9. da Veiga, J. B., Tourrand, J. F., and Quanz, D. (1996). A Pecuária na Fronteira Agrícola da Amazônia: O caso de Município de Uruará, PA, na região da Transamazônica. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Belém.Google Scholar
  10. Faminow, M. D. (1998). Cattle, Deforestation, and Development in the Amazon: An Economic, Agronomic, and Environmental Perspective. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK; New York, NY.Google Scholar
  11. Faminow, M. D., Dahl, C., Vosti, S., Witcover, J., and Oliveira, S. (1999). Smallholder Risk, Cattle and Deforestation in the Western Brazilian Amazon. International Development Research Center, International Food Policy Research Institute, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. Ferreira, L. A. (2001). Le rôle de l’élevage bovin dans la viabilité agro-écologique et socio-économique des systemes de production agricoles familiaux en Amazonia brésilienne—Le cas d’Uruará (Pará, Brésil), Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, Paris.Google Scholar
  13. Geoghegan, J., Villar, S. C., Klepeis, P., Mendoza, P. M., Ogneva-Himmelberger, Y., Chowdhury, R. R., II, B. L. T., and Vance, C. (2001). Modeling tropical deforestation in the southern Yucatán peninsular region: comparing survey and satellite data. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 85(1–3): 1–22.Google Scholar
  14. Hecht, S. (1985). Environment, development and politics: Capital accumulation and the livestock sector in Eastern Amazonia. World Development 13(6): 663–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hecht, S., and Cockburn A. (1989). The fate of the forest: developers, destroyers and defenders of the Amazon. Verso, London.Google Scholar
  16. IBGE. (2004). Censo Demográfico. Sistema IBGE de Recuperação Automática 2004 [cited February 24, 2004]. Available from http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/.
  17. Kaimowitz, D., and Angelsen, A. (1998). Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation: A Review. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.Google Scholar
  18. Margulis, S. (2004). Causes of deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Report No. 22, 107. World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  19. McCracken, S., Siqueira, A. D., Moran, E. F., and Brondizio, E. S. (2002a). Deforestation and Land Use in the Amazon. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
  20. McCracken, S. D., Boucek, B., and Moran, E. F. (2002b). Deforestation trajectories in a frontier region of the Brazilian Amazon. In Walsh, S. J., and Crews-Meyer, K. A. (eds.), Linking people, place and policy. A GIScience approach. Kluwer, Norwell, Massachusetts, pp. 215–234.Google Scholar
  21. Merry, F., Amacher, G., and Lima, E. (2008). Land values in frontier settlements of the Brazilian Amazon. World Development 36(11): 2390–2401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moran, E. (1981). Developing the Amazon. University of Indiana Press. Bloomington.Google Scholar
  23. Moran, E. F., Brondizio, E., Mausel, P., and Wu, Y. (1994). Integrating Amazonian Vegetation, Land Use and Satellite Data. BioScience 44(5): 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Muchagata, M., and Brown, K. (2003). Cows, colonists and trees: rethinking cattle and environmental degradation in Brazilian Amazonia. Agricultural Systems 76(3): 797–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Netting, R. M. (1993). Smallholders, Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive, Sustainable Agriculture. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
  26. Pacheco, P. (2005). Populist and capitalist frontiers in the Amazon: dynamics of agrarian and land-use change. PhD dissertation, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, MA.Google Scholar
  27. Pacheco, P. (forthcoming). Agrarian change, cattle ranching and deforestation: Assessing their linkages in southern Pará. Environment and History.Google Scholar
  28. Perz, S. G., and Walker, R. (2002). Household life cycles and secondary forest cover among small farm colonists in the Amazon. World Development 30(6): 1009–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pichón, F., Marquette, C., Murphy, L., and Bilsborrow, R. (2003). Choice and constraints in the making of the Amazon frontier: settler, land-use decisions and environmental change in Ecuador. In Wood, C., and Porro, R. (eds.), Patterns and Processes of Land Use and Forest Change in the Amazon. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
  30. Poccard-Chapuis, R. (2004). Les reseaux de la conquete filiere bovine et structuration de l’espace sur les fronts pionniers d’Amazonie Oriental Bresilienne, Department de Geographie, Universite de Paris X—Nanterre, Paris.Google Scholar
  31. Roy Chowdhury, R. (2003). Livelihoods in the balance: The institutional and ecological conditions of smallholder land use in the Calakmul-southern Yucatán Region, Mexico, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester.Google Scholar
  32. Sherbinin, A. D., VanWey, L. K., McSweeney, K., Aggarwal, R., Barbieri, A., Henry, S., Hunter, L. M., Twine, W., and Walker, R. (2008). Rural household demographics, livelihoods and the environment. Global Environmental Change 18(1): 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Takasaki, Y., Barham, B. L., and Coomes, O. T. (2000). Wealth accumulation and activity choice evolution among Amazonian forest peasant households. Staff Paper Series 434. Wisconsin, USA: University of Wisconsin—Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.Google Scholar
  34. Tourrand, J. F., Veiga, J. B., Guia, A. P. O. M., Carvalho, S. A., and Pessoa, R. O. (1995). Stratégies et Pratiques d'elevage en Amazonie Brésilienne: Dynamisme e Diversité Dans l'agriculture Familiale: Fertilité du Milieu et Sratégies Paysannes sus les Tropiques Humides. CIRAD, Montpellier.Google Scholar
  35. Turner, B. L., and Brush, S. B. (1987). The nature of farming systems and views of their change. In Turner, B. L., and Brush, S. B. (eds.), Comparative Farming Systems. The Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Vosti, S., Witcover, J., and Carpentier, C. L. (2003). Agricultural intensification by smallholders in the western Brazilian Amazon: from deforestation to sustainable land use. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  37. Walker, R., Homma, A. K., Conto, A. J. D., Carvalho, R. D. A., Ferreira, C. A., Santos, A. M. D., Rocha, A. C. D., Oliveira, P. M. D., and Peraza, C. D. (1995). Dinâmica dos Sistemas de Produção na Transamazônica. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Florida State University, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, Belém.Google Scholar
  38. Walker, R., Perz, R., Caldas, M., and Silva, L. T. (2002). Land-use and land-cover change in forest frontiers: The role of household life cycles. International Regional Science Review 25(2): 169–199.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)Bogor BaratIndonesia

Personalised recommendations