Human Ecology

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 15–28 | Cite as

Skunkworks in the Embers of the Cedar Fire: Enhancing Resilience in the Aftermath of Disaster

Article

Abstract

A coalition of environmental activists and professionals created the San Diego Fire Recovery Network (SDFRN) while the largest wildfire in California history was still burning at the city’s edge in October 2003. Acting quickly while the citizenry questioned governmental ability to protect their rapidly growing region, SDFRN proposed to reduce fire risk in a way that altered residential knowledge practices and identity while reshaping governance relationships. While this effort stalled after governmental agencies restored public confidence through massive fire prevention initiatives, SDFRN’s efforts may not have been in vain. Retained within collective memory, SDFRN contributed to community resilience by diversifying possible responses to environmental change and uncertainty. In this way, flexible, informal learning organizations such as SDFRN may serve as “skunkworks,” seizing on disaster in order to incubate social–ecological relationships that might avert greater tragedies to come.

Keywords

Resilience Disaster Co-production Adaptive learning Networks Environmentality 

References

  1. Adger, W. N., Hughes, T. P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., and Rockstrom, J. (2005). Social-ecological Resilience to Coastal Disasters. Science 309: 1036–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agranoff, R., and McGuire, M. (2001). Big Questions in Public Network Management Research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11, no. 3: 295–326.Google Scholar
  3. Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  4. Argyris, C., and Schon, D. A. (1974). Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity Sage, London.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, A. A. (1996). Li'l Abner: A Study in American SatireUniversity Press of Mississippi, Jackson, MS.Google Scholar
  7. Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (1998). Linking Social and Ecological Systems Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  8. Berkes, F., and Turner, N. J. (2006). Knowledge, Learning and the Evolution of Conservation Practice for Social–ecological System Resilience. Human Ecology 34(4): 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyne, W. J. (1991). Beyond the Horizons: The Lockheed Story, St. Martin’s, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Castells, M. (1989). The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring and the Urban-Regional Process Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Cocks, M. (2006). Biocultural Diversity: Moving Beyond the Realm of “Indigenous’ and ‘Local’ Peoples. Human Ecology 34(2): 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cole, M., Hill, D., and Rikowski, G. (1997). Between Postmodernism and Nowhere: The predicament of the postmodernist. British Journal of Educational Studies 45(2): 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Creech, H., and Willard, T. (2001). Strategic Intentions: Managing Knowledge Networks For Sustainable Development. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Manitoba, Canada.Google Scholar
  14. Cussins, C. M. (1997). Elephants, Biodiversity and Complexity Amboseli National Park, Kenya. Cornell University, Dept. of Science and Technology Studies, Ithaca, NY (unpublished).Google Scholar
  15. Diamond, J. (2004). Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail and Succeed, Viking, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Doubleday, R. (2007). Organizing Accountability: Co-production of Technoscientific and Social Worlds in a Nanoscience Laboratory. Area 39(2):166–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Epstein, S. (1996). Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  18. Folke, C., Pritchard, L. Jr., Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Svedin, U. (1998). The Problem Of Fit Between Ecosystems and Institutions, International Human dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, Bonn.Google Scholar
  19. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1986). Of Other Spaces. Diacritics 16(1): 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (1991). Politics and the study of discourse. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (ed.) G. Buchell, and Gordon C. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  22. Garde, A. M. (2004). New Urbanism as Sustainable Growth? Journal of Planning Education and Research 24: 154–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geertz, C. (2005). Very Bad News. The New York Review of Books 52: 51–9.Google Scholar
  24. Goldstein, B. E. (2007). The Futility of Reason: Incommensurable Differences between Sustainability Narratives in the Aftermath of the 2003 San Diego Cedar Fire. Environmental Planning and Policy. (in press).Google Scholar
  25. Goldstein, B. E., and Hull, R. B. (2007). Socially Explicit Fire Regimes. Society and Natural Resources. (in press).Google Scholar
  26. Gregg, C. E., and Houghton, B. F. (2006). Natural hazards. Disaster Resilience: An Integrated Approach (ed.) D. Paton, and Johnston, D. Charles C. Thomas Publisher Ltd., Springfield, IL, pp. 19–39.Google Scholar
  27. Gunderson, L. (1999). Resilience, Flexibility and Adaptive Management: Antidotes for Spurious Certitude? Conservation Ecology 3(1): 7.Google Scholar
  28. Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., and Light, S., eds. (1995). Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions., Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Folke, C., and Johansson, K. (2006). Trust-building, Knowledge Generation and Organizational Innovations: The Role of a Bridging Organization for Adaptive Co-management of a Wetland Landscape Around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecology 34(4): 573–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haraway, D. J. (1996). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of a Partial Perspective. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: the Reinvention of NatureRoutledge, London, pp. 183–202.Google Scholar
  31. Hoffman, S. M (1999). The worst of times, the best of times: Toward a model of cultural response to disaster. Catastrophe and Culture: The Anthropology of Disaster eds. Hoffman, S. M., and Oliver-Smith, A. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, NM, pp. 134–155.Google Scholar
  32. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological and Social Systems. Ecosystems 4: 390–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literature. Organization Science 2(1): 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hull, R. B. (2006). Infinite Nature, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  37. Ingalsbee, T. (1996). Earth First! Activism: Ecological Postmodern Praxis in Radical Environmentalist Identities. Sociological Perspectives 39(2): 263–276.Google Scholar
  38. Jasanoff, S. (2004). Ordering knowledge, ordering society. Chapter 2. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order Ed. S. Jasanoff. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  39. Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs On Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  40. Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H., and Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997). Managing Complex Networks: Strategies For the Public Sector Sage, London.Google Scholar
  41. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies Little, Brown and Co., Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  42. Larana, Johnston, E.H., and Gusfield, J. R. (1994). New Social Movements: From Ideology To Critique.Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  43. Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  44. Latour, B. (1995). ARAMIS or the Love of Technology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  45. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  46. Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  47. Lemke, T. (2001). ‘The birth of bio-politics’: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the College de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society 30(2): 190–207.Google Scholar
  48. Light, S, and Blann K. 2003. Key principles for Adaptive Management: Enhancing Scientific Inquiry and Policy Formulation for CERP. Everglades Restoration Adaptive Management Strategy Workshop 6/03.Google Scholar
  49. Lopez, B. (2001). The Naturalist. Orion 20(3): 39–43.Google Scholar
  50. Lovejoy, P. E., and Baier, S. (1975). The Desert-side Economy of the Central Sudan. The International Journal of African Historical Studies 8(4): 551–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mandell, M. P (2001). Getting Results through Collaboration: Networks and Network Structures for Public Policy and Management, Quorum, London.Google Scholar
  52. Marshall, B. K., Picou, J. S., and Bevc, C. A. (2005). Ecological Disaster as Contextual Transformation: Environmental Values in a Renewable Resource. Community. Environment and Behavior 37(5): 706–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McIntosh, R., Tainter, J., and McIntosh, S. (2000). The Way the Wind Blows: Climate, History, and Human Action, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  55. Mendizabal, E. (2006). Understanding Networks: The Functions of Research Policy Networks. Working Paper 271. Overseas Development Institute, London.Google Scholar
  56. Miller, C. (2004). Climate science and the making of global political order. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order Ed. S. Jasonoff. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  57. Morgen, S. (2002). Into Our Own Hands: The Women’s Health Movement In the United States, 1969–1990, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  58. Nielsen, R. P. (1993). Woolman’s “I am we” Triple-loop Action-learning: Origin and Application in Organizational Ethics. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 29(1): 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Oliver-Smith, A., and Hoffman, S. (eds.) (1999). The Angry Earth. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  60. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, UK.Google Scholar
  61. Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of VerificationOxford U. Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  62. Pyne, S. J. (2004). Tending Fire: Coping With America’s Wildland Fires, Island Press/Shearwater Books, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  63. San Diego County Wildland Task Force. (2003). Mitigation Strategies For Reducing Wildland Fire Risks. County of San Diego, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  64. Slovic, P. (1991). Beyond numbers: A broader perspective on risk perception and communication. Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Communication eds. D.G.H.R. Mayo. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 48–65.Google Scholar
  65. Soto, O. R. (2005). Cedar Fire Starter Given Probation, No Prison Time (November 18). San Diego Union-Tribune (Online Edition).Google Scholar
  66. Star, S. L. (1991). Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: on being allergic to onions. A Sociology of Monsters: Power, Technology and the Modern World eds. J. Law, Basil Blackwood, Oxford, pp. 27–57.Google Scholar
  67. Turner, N. J., and Berkes, F. (2006). Coming to Understanding: Developing Conservation through Incremental Learning in the Pacific Northwest. Human Ecology 34(4): 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. United States Forest Service and California Department of Forestry. (2003). The 2003 San Diego County Fire Siege Fire Safety Review, United States Forest Service and California Department of Forestry, http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/cleveland/documents/documents/sandiegocountyfinal.pdf.
  69. U.S. Forest Service. (2004). California Fire Siege 2003: The Story, Government Document A 13.2:C 12/8. U.S. Forest Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  70. VanDeveer, S. D. (2004). Ordering environments: Regions in European international environmental cooperation. Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance Eds. S. Jasanoff, and Martello, M.L. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 309–334.Google Scholar
  71. Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., and Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Socialecological systems. Ecology and Society 9(2): 5.Google Scholar
  72. Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory, 2nd edn., Blackwell, New York.Google Scholar
  73. Wisner, B. (2002). “The wind blew and the earth shook, but nothing changed: Disasters, elites, and civil society in El Salvador.” Draft seminar discussion paper, Crisis States Programme (CSP), Development Studies Institute (DESTIN), London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  74. Wondolleck, J. M., and Yaffee, S. L. (2000). Making Collaboration Work: Lessons From Innovation in Natural Resource Management Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urban Affairs and Planning ProgramSchool of Public and International Affairs, Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations