Human Ecology

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 81–95 | Cite as

Mutual Gains and Distributive Ideologies in South Africa: Theorizing Negotiations between Communities and Protected Areas

Article

Abstract

With the rise of joint management of protected areas, community representatives are increasingly involved in formal negotiations with state officials, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and other actors. Policy recommendations have commonly idealized “win-win” scenarios. Theoretical work on negotiation from psychology and management studies, however, points to identifiable circumstances under which the goal of a mutually beneficial “win-win” situation may limit the strategies, and ultimately the benefits, available to communities. Instead, an antagonistic, “distributive” approach to negotiations may be more compatible with the pressures on and strategies available to community representatives. The tensions between a “mutual gains” and “distributive” approach to negotiations are evident in two land claims on protected areas in South Africa: the Dwesa-Cwebe Nature Reserves, and the Pafuri Triangle, a portion of Kruger National Park. In each, NGOs that operated with a “mutual gains” strategy, espousing a “win-win” scenario, came to be perceived as collaborating with conservation agencies. Meanwhile, as negotiation theory would suggest, community representatives inclined towards a “distributive” strategy and allied with a second set of explicitly advocatory NGOs. Expecting that communities should embrace a “win-win” scenario from the outset is unrealistic and likely to reduce communities’ power in negotiations.

Key words

Negotiation protected areas conservation nongovernmental organizations land claims joint management comanagement 

References

  1. Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Duke University Press, Durham.Google Scholar
  2. Bazerman, M., Curhan, J., Moore, D., and Valley, K. (2000). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology 51: 279–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boonzaier, E. (1996). Local Responses to Conservation in the Richtersveld National Park, South Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, M., Erasmus, J., Kingwill, R., Murray, C., and Roodt, M. (1998). Land Restitution in South Africa: a Long Way Home. Institute for a Democratic South Africa, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, L. (2002). Conservation Narratives in Costa Rica: Conflict and Co-existence. Development and Change 33: 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carruthers, J. (1989). Creating a National Park, 1910 to 1926. Journal of Southern African Studies 15(2): 188–216.Google Scholar
  8. Carruthers, J. (1994). Dissecting the Myth: Paul Kruger and the Kruger National Park. Journal of Southern African Studies 20(2): 263–283.Google Scholar
  9. Carruthers, J. (1995). The Kruger National Park: A Social and Political History. University of Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg.Google Scholar
  10. Cooke, B. (2001). The social psychological limits of participation? In Cooke, B., and Kothari, U. (eds.), Participation: The New Tyranny? Zed Books, London.Google Scholar
  11. Crewe, E., and Harrison, E. (1998). Whose development?: An ethnography of Aid. Zed Books, London.Google Scholar
  12. de Villiers, B. (1999). Land Claims and National Parks: The Makuleke Experience. HSRC, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  13. Escobar, A. (1999). After Nature: Steps to an anti-essentialist Political Ecology. Current Anthropology 40(1): 1–30.Google Scholar
  14. Fairhead, J., and Leach, M. (1996). Misreading the African Landscape: Society and Ecology in a Forest-Savanna Mosaic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Fay, D. (2001). Oral and Written Evidence in South Africa’s Land Claims Process: the Case of Dwesa-Cwebe Nature Reserve. Paper presented at the Oral History Association Annual Meeting, October 2001.Google Scholar
  16. Fay, D. (2003). “The Trust is Over! We Want to Plough!”: Land, Livelihoods and Reverse Resettlement in South Africa’s Transkei. Ph.D. dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
  17. Fay, D. (2005). Kinship and Access to Land in the Eastern Cape: Implications for Land Tenure Reform. Social Dynamics 31(1): 182–207.Google Scholar
  18. Fay, D., and Palmer, R. (2002). Poverty and differentiation at Dwesa-Cwebe. In Palmer, R., Timmermans, H., and Fay, D. (eds.), From Conflict to Negotiation. Nature-based development on the South African Wild Coast, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, pp. 146–172.Google Scholar
  19. Fay, D., Timmermans, H., and Palmer, R. (2002a). Competing for the forests: annexation, demarcation and their consequences from c.1878 to 1936. In Palmer, R., Timmermans, H., and Fay, D. (eds.), From Conflict to Negotiation: Nature based development on South Africas Wild Coast. Human Science Research Council, pp. 48–77.Google Scholar
  20. Fay, D., Timmermans, H., and Palmer, R. (2002b). Closing the forests: segregation, exclusion and their consequences from 1936 to 1994. In Palmer, R.C.G., Timmermans, H., and Fay, D. (eds.), From Conflict to Negotiation: Nature-Based Development on South Africa’s Wild Coast. Human Science Research Council, Pretoria, pp. 78–110.Google Scholar
  21. Fisher, R., and Ury, W. (1981). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Houghton Mifflin, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Fortmann, L. (1995). Talking Claims: Discursive Strategies in Contesting Property. World Development 23(6): 1053–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glavovic, B. (1996). Resolving People–Park Conflicts through Negotiation: Reflections on the Richtersveld Experience. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 39(4): 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gluckman, M. (1955). The Judicial Process Among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
  25. Greenberg, J. B. and Park, T. K. (1994). Political Ecology. Journal of Political Ecology 1: 1–12.Google Scholar
  26. Harries, P. (1987). A forgotten corner of the Transvaal: reconstructing the history of a relocated community through oral testimony and song. In Bozzoli, B. (ed.), Class, Community and Conflict. Ravan Press, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  27. Isaacs, M., and Mohamed, N. (2000). Co-managing the commons in the ‘new’ South Africa: Room for manoeuvre? Paper presented at the 8th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
  28. Kepe, T. (1998). The Problem of Defining ‘Community’: Challenges for the Land Reform Programme in Rural South Africa. Paper delivered at the International Conference on Land Tenure in the Developing World, University of Cape Town, 27–29 January 1998.Google Scholar
  29. Kepe, T., Wynberg, R., and Ellis, W. (2003). Land Reform and Biodiversity Conservation in South Africa: Complementary or in Conflict? Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  30. Leach, M., and Mearns, R. (eds.). (1996). The Lie of the Land: Challenging Received Wisdom on the African Environment. James Currey, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Lentz, C. (2005). First-comers and late-comers: the role of narratives in land claims. In Evers, S., Spierenburg, M., and Wels, H. (eds.), Competing Jurisdictions: Settling Land Claims in Africa. Brill, Leiden.Google Scholar
  32. Li, T. M. (1996). Images of Community: Discourse and Strategy in Property Relations. Development and Change 27: 501–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li, T. M. (2000). Articulating Indigenous Identity in Indonesia: Resource Politics and the Tribal Slot. Comparative Studies in Society and History 42(1): 149–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lieberman, D. (1997). Ethnobotanical assessment of the Dwesa and Cwebe Nature Reserves. In Palmer, R., and Timmermans, H. (eds.), Indigenous Knowledge, Conservation Reform, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development in the Dwesa and Cwebe Nature Reserves and Neighbouring Village Settlements, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, pp. 40–87.Google Scholar
  35. Little, P. E. (1999). Environments and Environmentalisms in Anthropological Research: Facing a New Millennium. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 253–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MacDonald, T. (1997). Conflict in the Galápagos Islands: Analysis and Recommendations for Management. Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  37. Mosse, D. (2001). ‘People’s knowledge,’ participation and patronage: operations and representations in rural development. In Cooke, B., and Kothari, U. (eds.), Participation: The New Tyranny? Zed Books, London.Google Scholar
  38. Palmer, R. (2003). From Title to Entitlement: The Struggle Continues at Dwesa-Cwebe. Presentation at The Eastern Cape: Historical Legacies and New Challenges Conference. Fort Hare Institute of Social and Economic Research, East London.Google Scholar
  39. Palmer, R., Fay, D., Timmermans, H., Lewis, F., and Viljoen, J. (2002a). Regaining the forests: reform and development from 1994 to 2001. In Palmer, R.C.G., Timmermans, H. and Fay, D. (eds.), From Conflict to Negotiation: Nature-Based Development on South Africa’s Wild Coast, Human Science Research Council, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  40. Palmer, R., Timmermans, H., and Fay, D. (eds.) (2002b). From Conflict to Negotiation: Nature-Based Development on South Africa’s Wild Coast. Human Science Research Council, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  41. Palmer, R., Timmermans, H., and Fay, D. (2002c). Conclusion. In Palmer, R., Timmermans, H., and Fay, D. (eds.), From Conflict to Negotiation. Nature-based Development on the South African Wild Coast, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, pp. 306–311.Google Scholar
  42. Palmer, R., Timmermans, H., Kralo, K., Lieberman, D., Fox, R., Hughes, D., Sami, K., Motteux, N., and Van Harmelen, U. (1997). Indigenous Knowledge, Conservation Reform, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development in the Dwesa and Cwebe Nature Reserves and Neighboring Village Settlements. Rhodes University ISER, Grahamstown.Google Scholar
  43. Peters, P. (1994). Dividing the Commons: Politics, Policy and Culture in Botswana. Charlottesville University Press, Virginia.Google Scholar
  44. Reid, H. (2001). Contractual National Parks and the Makuleke Community. Human Ecology 29(2): 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reid, H., Fig, D., Magome, H., and Leader-Williams, N. (2004). Co-management of Contractual National Parks in South Africa: Lessons from Australia. Conservation and Society 2(2): 377–409.Google Scholar
  46. Robbins, P. (2004). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. Blackwell, London.Google Scholar
  47. Rose, L. (1991). The Politics of Harmony: Land Dispute Strategies in Swaziland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  48. Rubin, J. (1994). Models of Conflict Management. Journal of Social Issues 50:1: 33–46. Available online at http://infotrac.galegroup.com/itw/infomark/992/311/62093836w7/6!pdf_imm_a2.Google Scholar
  49. Sivaramakrishnan, K. (1999). Modern Forests: Statemaking and Environmental Change in Colonial Eastern India. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
  50. Sparks, A. (1996). South Africa as a Global Pathfinder in Cultural Pluralism. Address given at De Kracht van Cultuur conference, Amsterdam. Available online at http://kvc.minbuza.nl/uk/archive/amsterdam/ukverslag_sparks.html.
  51. Starr, J., and Yngvesson, B. (1975). Scarcity and Disputing: Zeroing-in on Compromise Decisions. American Ethnologist 2(3): 553–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steenkamp, C. (2001). The Makuleke Land Claim: An environmental Conflict. Ph.D. dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  53. Steenkamp, C., and Uhr, J. (2000). The Makuleke Land Claim: Power Relations and Community-Based Natural Resource Management. IIED Evaluating Eden Series discussion paper no. 18, London.Google Scholar
  54. Steenkamp, C., and Grossman, D. (2001). People and Parks: Cracks in the Paradigm. IUCN South Africa, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  55. Terblanche, A. (1997). Dwesa-Cwebe Community Perspective. Unpublished paper precirculated to attendees of workshop at the Haven Hotel, Cwebe Nature Reserve, 29 August 1997.Google Scholar
  56. Terblanche, A., and Kraai, M. (1996). Dwesa and Cwebe: Enduring, Democratic Conservation after Apartheid’s Abuses. Report commissioned by Tralso, Umtata.Google Scholar
  57. Timmermans, H. (1997). Workshops. In Palmer R., Timmermans H., and Fay D. (eds.), From Conflict to Negotation: Nature-Based Development on the South African Wild Coast, Human Sciences Reasearch Council, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  58. Timmermans, H. (2002). Natural resource use at Dwesa-Cwebe. In Palmer R., Timmermans H., and Fay D. (eds.), From Conflict to Negotation: Nature-Based Development on the South African Wild Coast, Human Sciences Reasearch Council, Pretoria, pp. 173–198.Google Scholar
  59. Timmermans, H. (2004). Rural Livelihoods at Dwesa/Cwebe: Poverty, Development and Natural Resource Use on the Wild Coast, South Africa. M.Sc. thesis. Rhodes University.Google Scholar
  60. Tropp, J. (2002). Roots and Rights in the Transkei: Colonialism, Natural Resources, and Social Change, 1880–1940. Ph.D. thesis. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  61. Turner, S. (2002). The governance of nature conservation in South Africa. In Benjaminsen, T. A., Cousins, B., and Thompson, L. (eds.), Contested Resources: Challenges to the Governance of Natural Resources in Southern Africa. UWC Programme in Land and Agrarian Studies, Bellville.Google Scholar
  62. Vaughan, A. (1997). Beyond Policies and Politics: Options for Conservation and Development in Dwesa and Cwebe. A Diagnostic Study for the Land and Agriculture Policy Centre. Report, Land and Agricultural Policy Center, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  63. Vayda, A. P., and Walters, B. B. (1999). Against Political Ecology. Human Ecology 27(1): 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vermaak, M., and Peckham, B. (1996). Towards Integrated Natural Resource Management At Dwesa-Cwebe Reserve & Adjacent Communal Land: A Preliminary Survey of the Legal History of the Reserve, Current Legislation, & the Legal Rights & Obligations of Interested Parties. Report, Rhodes University, Grahamstown.Google Scholar
  65. Wynberg, R., and Kepe, T. (1999). Land Reform and Conservation Areas in South Africa: Towards a Mutually Beneficial Approach. IUCN South Africa, Pretoria.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.S.V. Ciriacy-Wantrup Postdoctoral Fellow, School of Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management, Division of Society and EnvironmentUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations