Trust-building, Knowledge Generation and Organizational Innovations: The Role of a Bridging Organization for Adaptive Comanagement of a Wetland Landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden
- First Online:
- 1.7k Downloads
The literature on ecosystem management and assessment is increasingly focusing on social capacity to enhance ecosystem resilience. Organizational flexibility, participatory approaches to learning, and knowledge generation for responding adequately to environmental change have been highlighted but not critically assessed. The small, flexible municipal organization, Ecomuseum Kristianstads Vattenrike (EKV) in southern Sweden, has identified win-win situations and gained broad support and legitimacy for ecosystem management among a diversity of actors in the region. Navigating the existing legal-political framework, EKV has built a loose social network of local stewards and key persons from organizations at municipal and higher societal levels. As a ‘bridging organization’, EKV has created arenas for trust-building, knowledge generation, collaborative learning, preference formation, and conflicts solving among actors in relation to specific environmental issues. Ad hoc projects are developed as issues arise by mobilizing individuals from the social network. Our results suggest that the EKV approach to adaptive comanagement has enhanced the social capacity to respond to unpredictable change and developed a trajectory towards resilience of a desirable social-ecological system.
Key wordsSocial-ecological systems resilience adaptive comanagement collaborative learning organizational innovation ecosystem management.
- Barth, S. (2000). The Organic Approach to the Organization: A Conversation with KM Practitioner David Snowden. Knowledge Management 3(10): 22–25.Google Scholar
- Berkes, F. (2002). Cross-scale institutional linkages: perspectives from the bottom up. In Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P., Stonich S., and Weber, E. U. (eds.), The Drama of the Commons, National Academy, Washington, District of Columbia.Google Scholar
- Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (eds.) (1998). Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Berkes, F., Folke, C., and Colding, J. (eds.) (2003). Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bernard, H. R. (1994). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Sage, Newbury Park (California).Google Scholar
- Boyle, M., Kay, J., and Pond, B. (2001). Monitoring in support of policy: an adaptive ecosystem approach. In Munn, T. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change, 4, Wiley and Son pp. 116–137.Google Scholar
- Bromley, D. W. (1989). Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundation of Public Policy, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Brown, K. (2003). Integrating Conservation and Development: A Case of Institutional Misfit. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 1(9): 479–487.Google Scholar
- Cronert, H. (2001). Naturvård i Kristianstads Vattenrike: Handlingsprogram 2001–2003 [Policy Program for Nature Conservation], Municipality of Kristianstad.Google Scholar
- Desveaux, J. A., Lindquist, E. A., and Toner, G. (1994). Organizing for Policy Innovation in Public Bureaucracy—Aids, Energy and Environmental Policy in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science 27(3): 493–528.Google Scholar
- Dukes, E. (1996). Resolving Public Conflicts: Transforming Community and Governance, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., and Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations. Ambio 31(5): 437–440.Google Scholar
- Folke, C., Colding, J., and Berkes, F. (2003). Synthesis: Building resilience and adaptive capacity in social–ecological systems. In Berkes, F., Folke, C., and Colding, J. (eds.), Navigating Social–ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 352–387.Google Scholar
- Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive Governance of Social–ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, in press (will be published in October 2005).Google Scholar
- Gaddis, J. L. (2002). The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gadgil, M., Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (1993). Indigenous Knowledge for Biodiversity Conservation. Ambio 22: 151–156.Google Scholar
- Gunderson, L. (1999). Resilience, Flexibility and Adaptive Management: Antidotes for Spurious Certitude? Conservation Ecology, 3: 7. http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art7.
- Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S. (eds.) (2002). Panarchy; Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Island, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Hahn, T. (2000). Property Rights, Ethics, And Conflict Resolution: Foundations of the Sami Economy in Sweden, Doctoral dissertation, Agraria 258, SLU, Dept of Economics, Uppsala.Google Scholar
- Hoff, M. (ed.). (1998). Sustainable Community Development: Studies in Economic, Environmental, and Cultural Revitalization, Lewis, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
- Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (CA).Google Scholar
- Ljung, M. (2001). Collaborative Learning for Sustainable Development of Agri-food Systems, Doctoral dissertation, Agraria 303, SLU, Uppsala.Google Scholar
- Magnusson, S-E. (2002). Presentation 2002-03-20 for the Swedish Environmental Advisory Board, available at http://www.vattenriket.kristianstad.se/presentation/020320.htm.
- Magnusson, S-E., and Magntorn, K. (2002). Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosfärskandidat. Verksamheten år 2002. Unpublished report. http://www.vattenriket.kristianstad.se/verksamhet/.
- Magnusson, S-E., Magntorn, K., Wallsten, E., Cronert, H., and Thelaus, M. (2004). [Biosphere Reserve Kristianstads Vattenrike. Application to UNESCO, Draft March 2004]. Kristianstads kommun. http://www.vattenriket.kristianstad.se/verksamhet/.
- Malayang III, B. S., Hahn, T., and Kumar, P. (2005). Responses to ecosystem change and to their impacts on human well-being. In Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Findings of the Sub-global Assessments Working Group, chapter 9. Island, http://www.maweb.org, In press.
- Malhotra, Y. (1999). Toward a Knowledge Ecology for Organizational White-waters. Knowledge Management March 1999, pp. 18–21.Google Scholar
- McAllister, J. W. (2002). Historical and Structural Approaches in the Natural and Human Sciences. In Tindemans, P., Verrijn-Stuart, A., and Visser, R. (eds.), The Future of the Sciences and Humanities: Four Analytical Essays and A Critical Debate on the Future of Scholastic Endeavour.Google Scholar
- McCay, B. J. (2002). Emergence of institutions for the commons: Contexts, situations, and events. In Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P., Stonich, S., and Weber, E. U. (eds.), The Drama of the Commons, National Academy, Washington DC.Google Scholar
- McIntosh, R., Tainter, J., and McIntosh, S. (2000). The Way the Wind Blows: Climate, History, and Human Action, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research, The Theory of Management Policy Series, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
- North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Olsson, P., Folke, C., and Hahn, T. (2004b). Social-ecological Transformation for Ecosystem Management: The Development of Adaptive Comanagement of a Wetland Landscape in Southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9(4): 2. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2/print.pdf.
- Ostrom, E. (1998). Scales, polycentricity, and incentives: designing complexity to govern complexity. In Guruswamy, L. D., and McNeely, J. A. (eds.), Protection of Global Biodiversity: Converging Strategies, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 149–167.Google Scholar
- Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton University Press, Princeton New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
- Ovesson, P. (2003). Markhävdkartering 2002, Hävdtillståndet på betesmarker och slåtterängar inom Nedre Helgeåns våtmarksområde i Kristianstads Vattenrike. Länsstyrelsen i Skåne län, Kristianstads kommun, Högskolan i Kristianstad.Google Scholar
- Pinkerton, E. (1989). Cooperative Management of Local Fisheries: New Directions for Improved Management and Community Development, University of British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
- Röling, N., and Wagemakers, M. (eds.) (1998). Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Schultz, L., Olsson, P., Johannessen, Å., and Folke, C. (2004). Ecosystem management by local steward associations: A case study from “Kristianstads Vattenrike”, the Swedish MA. Paper presented at the MA conference “Bridging Scales and Epistemologies” March 17–20 2004 http:// www.millenniumassess ment.org/documents/bridging/papers/schultz.lisen.pdf.
- Shannon, M. A. (1998). Social organizations and institutions. In Naiman, R. J., and Bilby, R. E. (eds.), River Ecology and Management: Lessons from The Pacific Coastal Ecoregion, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 529–552.Google Scholar
- Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., and Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-ecological Systems. Ecology and Society 9(2): 5. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/.
- Westley, F. (1995). Governing design: The management of social systems and ecosystems management. In Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S. (eds.), Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Westley, F. (2002). The devil in the dynamics: Adaptive management on the front lines. In Gunderson, L., and Holling, C. S. (eds.), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Island, Washington, District of Columbia, pp 333–360.Google Scholar
- Wondolleck, J. M., and Yaffee, S. L. (2000). Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management, Island, Washington District of Columbia.Google Scholar
- Young, O. R. (2002). Institutional interplay: the environmental consequences of cross-scale interactions. In Ostrom, E. et al. (eds.), The Drama of the Commons, National Research Council, National Academy, Washington, District of Columbia.Google Scholar
- HC, Coordinator of the nature conservation section of KV. Employed by Kristianstad Municipality (50%) and the County Administration Board (50%). Hans.Cronert@kristianstad.seGoogle Scholar
- KM, Information secretary at the Man and Biosphere (MAB) Candidate Office. Karin.Magntorn@kristianstad.seGoogle Scholar
- SEM, Director of EKV since the beginning 1989. Sven-Erik.Magnusson@kristianstad.seGoogle Scholar
- Landowners A, B, and CGoogle Scholar