Human Ecology

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 573–592

Trust-building, Knowledge Generation and Organizational Innovations: The Role of a Bridging Organization for Adaptive Comanagement of a Wetland Landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden

  • Thomas Hahn
  • Per Olsson
  • Carl Folke
  • Kristin Johansson
Article

Abstract

The literature on ecosystem management and assessment is increasingly focusing on social capacity to enhance ecosystem resilience. Organizational flexibility, participatory approaches to learning, and knowledge generation for responding adequately to environmental change have been highlighted but not critically assessed. The small, flexible municipal organization, Ecomuseum Kristianstads Vattenrike (EKV) in southern Sweden, has identified win-win situations and gained broad support and legitimacy for ecosystem management among a diversity of actors in the region. Navigating the existing legal-political framework, EKV has built a loose social network of local stewards and key persons from organizations at municipal and higher societal levels. As a ‘bridging organization’, EKV has created arenas for trust-building, knowledge generation, collaborative learning, preference formation, and conflicts solving among actors in relation to specific environmental issues. Ad hoc projects are developed as issues arise by mobilizing individuals from the social network. Our results suggest that the EKV approach to adaptive comanagement has enhanced the social capacity to respond to unpredictable change and developed a trajectory towards resilience of a desirable social-ecological system.

Key words

Social-ecological systems resilience adaptive comanagement collaborative learning organizational innovation ecosystem management. 

References

  1. Adams, W. M., Brockington, D., Dyson, J., and Vira, B. (2003). Managing Tragedies: Understanding Conflict over Common Pool Resources. Science 302: 1915–1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A., and Gibson, A. (1999). Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation. World Development 27: 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barth, S. (2000). The Organic Approach to the Organization: A Conversation with KM Practitioner David Snowden. Knowledge Management 3(10): 22–25.Google Scholar
  4. Berkes, F. (2002). Cross-scale institutional linkages: perspectives from the bottom up. In Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P., Stonich S., and Weber, E. U. (eds.), The Drama of the Commons, National Academy, Washington, District of Columbia.Google Scholar
  5. Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (1992). A Systems Perspective on the Interrelations between Natural, Human-made and Cultural Capital. Ecological Economics 5: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (eds.) (1998). Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Berkes, F., Folke, C., and Colding, J. (eds.) (2003). Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bernard, H. R. (1994). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Sage, Newbury Park (California).Google Scholar
  9. Boyle, M., Kay, J., and Pond, B. (2001). Monitoring in support of policy: an adaptive ecosystem approach. In Munn, T. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change, 4, Wiley and Son pp. 116–137.Google Scholar
  10. Bromley, D. W. (1989). Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundation of Public Policy, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, K. (2003). Integrating Conservation and Development: A Case of Institutional Misfit. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 1(9): 479–487.Google Scholar
  12. Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., and Abel, N. (2001). From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What? Ecosystems 4: 765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cronert, H. (2001). Naturvård i Kristianstads Vattenrike: Handlingsprogram 2001–2003 [Policy Program for Nature Conservation], Municipality of Kristianstad.Google Scholar
  14. Dale, V. H., Brown, S., Haeuber, R. A., Hobbs, N. T., Huntly, N., Naiman, R. J., Riebsame, W. E., Turner, M. G., and Valone, T. J. (2000). Ecological Principles and Guidelines for Managing the Use of Land. Ecological Applications 10: 639–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Danter, K. J., Griest, D. L., Mullins, G. W., and Norland, E. (2000). Organizational Change as a Component of Ecosystem Management. Society and Natural Resource 13: 537–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Desveaux, J. A., Lindquist, E. A., and Toner, G. (1994). Organizing for Policy Innovation in Public Bureaucracy—Aids, Energy and Environmental Policy in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science 27(3): 493–528.Google Scholar
  17. Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., and Stern, P. L. (2003). The Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science 302: 1907–1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dukes, E. (1996). Resolving Public Conflicts: Transforming Community and Governance, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Eckerberg, K., and Joas, M. (2004). Multi-level Environmental Governance: A Concept under Stress? Local Environment 9(5): 405–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., and Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations. Ambio 31(5): 437–440.Google Scholar
  21. Folke, C., Colding, J., and Berkes, F. (2003). Synthesis: Building resilience and adaptive capacity in social–ecological systems. In Berkes, F., Folke, C., and Colding, J. (eds.), Navigating Social–ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 352–387.Google Scholar
  22. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., and Holling, C. S. (2004). Regime Shifts, Resilience, and Biodiversity in Ecosystem Management. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 35: 557–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., and Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive Governance of Social–ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, in press (will be published in October 2005).Google Scholar
  24. Gaddis, J. L. (2002). The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gadgil, M., Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (1993). Indigenous Knowledge for Biodiversity Conservation. Ambio 22: 151–156.Google Scholar
  26. Gunderson, L. (1999). Resilience, Flexibility and Adaptive Management: Antidotes for Spurious Certitude? Conservation Ecology, 3: 7. http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art7.
  27. Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S. (eds.) (2002). Panarchy; Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Island, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  28. Hahn, T. (2000). Property Rights, Ethics, And Conflict Resolution: Foundations of the Sami Economy in Sweden, Doctoral dissertation, Agraria 258, SLU, Dept of Economics, Uppsala.Google Scholar
  29. Hoff, M. (ed.). (1998). Sustainable Community Development: Studies in Economic, Environmental, and Cultural Revitalization, Lewis, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  30. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Imperial, M. T. (1999). Institutional Analysis and Ecosystem-based Management: The Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Environmental Management 24: 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kettl, D. F. (2000). The Transformation of Governance: Globalization, Devolution, and the Role of Government. Public Administration Review 60: 488–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (CA).Google Scholar
  34. Ljung, M. (2001). Collaborative Learning for Sustainable Development of Agri-food Systems, Doctoral dissertation, Agraria 303, SLU, Uppsala.Google Scholar
  35. Magnusson, S-E. (2002). Presentation 2002-03-20 for the Swedish Environmental Advisory Board, available at http://www.vattenriket.kristianstad.se/presentation/020320.htm.
  36. Magnusson, S-E., and Magntorn, K. (2002). Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosfärskandidat. Verksamheten år 2002. Unpublished report. http://www.vattenriket.kristianstad.se/verksamhet/.
  37. Magnusson, S-E., Magntorn, K., Wallsten, E., Cronert, H., and Thelaus, M. (2004). [Biosphere Reserve Kristianstads Vattenrike. Application to UNESCO, Draft March 2004]. Kristianstads kommun. http://www.vattenriket.kristianstad.se/verksamhet/.
  38. Malayang III, B. S., Hahn, T., and Kumar, P. (2005). Responses to ecosystem change and to their impacts on human well-being. In Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Findings of the Sub-global Assessments Working Group, chapter 9. Island, http://www.maweb.org, In press.
  39. Malhotra, Y. (1999). Toward a Knowledge Ecology for Organizational White-waters. Knowledge Management March 1999, pp. 18–21.Google Scholar
  40. McAllister, J. W. (2002). Historical and Structural Approaches in the Natural and Human Sciences. In Tindemans, P., Verrijn-Stuart, A., and Visser, R. (eds.), The Future of the Sciences and Humanities: Four Analytical Essays and A Critical Debate on the Future of Scholastic Endeavour.Google Scholar
  41. McCay, B. J. (2002). Emergence of institutions for the commons: Contexts, situations, and events. In Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P., Stonich, S., and Weber, E. U. (eds.), The Drama of the Commons, National Academy, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  42. McIntosh, R., Tainter, J., and McIntosh, S. (2000). The Way the Wind Blows: Climate, History, and Human Action, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research, The Theory of Management Policy Series, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  44. North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Olsson P., and Folke, C. (2001). Local Ecological Knowledge and Institutional Dynamics for Ecosystem Management: A Study of Lake Racken Watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems 4: 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Olsson P., Folke, C., and Berkes, F. (2004a). Adaptive Comanagement for Building Resilience in Social-ecological Systems. Environmental Management 34(1): 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Olsson, P., Folke, C., and Hahn, T. (2004b). Social-ecological Transformation for Ecosystem Management: The Development of Adaptive Comanagement of a Wetland Landscape in Southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9(4): 2. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2/print.pdf.
  48. Ostrom, E. (1998). Scales, polycentricity, and incentives: designing complexity to govern complexity. In Guruswamy, L. D., and McNeely, J. A. (eds.), Protection of Global Biodiversity: Converging Strategies, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 149–167.Google Scholar
  49. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton University Press, Princeton New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  50. Ovesson, P. (2003). Markhävdkartering 2002, Hävdtillståndet på betesmarker och slåtterängar inom Nedre Helgeåns våtmarksområde i Kristianstads Vattenrike. Länsstyrelsen i Skåne län, Kristianstads kommun, Högskolan i Kristianstad.Google Scholar
  51. Pinkerton, E. (1989). Cooperative Management of Local Fisheries: New Directions for Improved Management and Community Development, University of British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  52. Pretty, J. (1995). Participatory Learning for Sustainable Agriculture. World Development 23: 1247–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pretty, J. (2003). Social Capital and The Collective Management of Resources. Science 302: 1912–1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Röling, N., and Wagemakers, M. (eds.) (1998). Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  55. Schultz, L., Olsson, P., Johannessen, Å., and Folke, C. (2004). Ecosystem management by local steward associations: A case study from “Kristianstads Vattenrike”, the Swedish MA. Paper presented at the MA conference “Bridging Scales and Epistemologies” March 17–20 2004 http:// www.millenniumassess ment.org/documents/bridging/papers/schultz.lisen.pdf.
  56. Shannon, M. A. (1998). Social organizations and institutions. In Naiman, R. J., and Bilby, R. E. (eds.), River Ecology and Management: Lessons from The Pacific Coastal Ecoregion, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 529–552.Google Scholar
  57. Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., and Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-ecological Systems. Ecology and Society 9(2): 5. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/.
  58. Westley, F. (1995). Governing design: The management of social systems and ecosystems management. In Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S. (eds.), Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  59. Westley, F. (2002). The devil in the dynamics: Adaptive management on the front lines. In Gunderson, L., and Holling, C. S. (eds.), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Island, Washington, District of Columbia, pp 333–360.Google Scholar
  60. Wondolleck, J. M., and Yaffee, S. L. (2000). Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management, Island, Washington District of Columbia.Google Scholar
  61. Young, O. R. (2002). Institutional interplay: the environmental consequences of cross-scale interactions. In Ostrom, E. et al. (eds.), The Drama of the Commons, National Research Council, National Academy, Washington, District of Columbia.Google Scholar

Personal communication

  1. HC, Coordinator of the nature conservation section of KV. Employed by Kristianstad Municipality (50%) and the County Administration Board (50%). Hans.Cronert@kristianstad.seGoogle Scholar
  2. KM, Information secretary at the Man and Biosphere (MAB) Candidate Office. Karin.Magntorn@kristianstad.seGoogle Scholar
  3. SEM, Director of EKV since the beginning 1989. Sven-Erik.Magnusson@kristianstad.seGoogle Scholar
  4. Landowners A, B, and CGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Hahn
    • 1
  • Per Olsson
    • 2
  • Carl Folke
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kristin Johansson
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Transdisciplinary Environmental Research (CTM)Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of Systems EcologyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations