Human Ecology

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 331–353

Farmer Choice of Sorghum Varieties in Southern Mali

  • Scott M. Lacy
  • David A. Cleveland
  • Daniela Soleri

In southern Mali and throughout the semiarid tropics, small-scale family farmers are faced with the challenge of producing adequate harvests in difficult biophysical and socioeconomic environments. Professional plant breeders have had much difficulty developing modern varieties that outperform farmers’ traditional varieties in these environments, in part because of an incomplete understanding of why farmers choose the varieties they grow. Improved understanding of farmers’ varietal choices can contribute to collaboration between farmers and formal plant breeders. Based on a 15-month field study in Dissan, Mali, we examine farmer's choices among their traditional sorghum varieties in terms of one or more than one variety, and short-cycle or long-cycle varieties, and the interaction between these two choices. Results support our general hypothesis that farmers choose varieties to optimize outputs in the face of variation in the growing environment and in human managed inputs such as labor and tools.


Africa agriculture Mali plant breeding; indigenous knowledge sorghum crop varietal choice 


  1. Abdullahi, A. A., and CGIAR (2003). Adoption and impact of dry-season dual-purpose cowpea in the Nigerian semiarid region (Online) (verified 2004 May 4).Google Scholar
  2. Adesina, A. A. (1992). Village-level studies and sorghum technology development in West Africa: Case study in Mali. In Moock, J. L., and Rhoades, R. E. (eds.), Diversity, Farmer Knowledge, and Sustainability, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 147–168.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, M. M., Sanders, J. H., and Nell, W. T. (2000). New sorghum and millet cultivar introduction in sub-Saharan Africa: impacts and research agenda. Agricultural Systems 64:55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. R., and Dillon, J. L. (1992). Risk Analysis in Dryland Farming Systems, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
  5. Ceccarelli, S., Erskine, W., Hamblin, J., and Grando, S. (1994). Genotype by environment interaction and international breeding programmes. Experimental Agriculture 30:177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ceccarelli, S., and Grando, S. (2002). Plant breeding with farmers requires testing the assumptions of conventional plant breeding: Lessons from the ICARDA barley program. In Cleveland, D. A., and Soleri, D. (eds.), Farmers, Scientists and Plant Breeding: Integrating Knowledge and Practice. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, pp. 297–332.Google Scholar
  7. Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S., Singh, M., Michael, M., Shikho, A., Al Issa, M., Al Saleh, A., Kaleonjy, G., Al Ghanen, S. M., Al Hasan, A. L., Dalla, H., Basha, S., and Basha, T. (2003). A methodological study on participatory barley breeding II. Response to selection. Euphytica 133:185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christinck, A. (2002). “This seed is like ourselves.” A case study from Rajasthan, India, on the social aspects of biodiversity and farmers’ management of pearl millet seed, Margraf Verlag, Weikersheim, Germany.Google Scholar
  9. Cleveland, D. A. (2001). Is plant breeding science objective truth or social construction? The case of yield stability. Agriculture and Human values 18(3):251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cleveland, D. A., Soleri, D., and Smith, S. E. (2000). A biological framework for understanding framers' plant breeding. Economic Botany 54:377–394.Google Scholar
  11. Dahlberg, J. A. (2000). Classification and charaterization of sorghum. In Smith, W. C. (ed.), Sorghum: Origin, History, Technology, and Production, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, pp. 99–130.Google Scholar
  12. Dembélé, I., Kater, L., Koné, D., Koné, Y., Ly, B., and Macinanke, A. (2001). Seizing new opportunities: soil-fertility management and diverse livelihoods in Mali. In Scoones, I. (ed.), Dynamics and Diversity: Soil Fertility and Farming Livelihoods in Africa, Earthscan Publications, London, pp. 78–115Google Scholar
  13. Dembélé, N. N., and Staatz, J. M. (2000). The response of cereals traders to agricultural market reform. In Bingen, R. J., Robinson, D., and Staatz, J. M. (eds.), Democracy and Development in Mali. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 145–165.Google Scholar
  14. Doggett, H. (1988). Sorghum. Longman Scientific and Technical, New York.Google Scholar
  15. FAOSTAT data (2004). Sorghum production statistics—Mali and Africa totals, 1970–2003 [Online] (verified 2004 July 17).Google Scholar
  16. Friis-Hansen, E., and Sthapit, B. (2000). Concepts and rationale of participatory approaches to conservation and use of plant genetic resources. In Friis-Hansen, E., and Sthapit, B. (eds.), Participatory Approaches to the Conservation and Use of Plant Genetic Resources. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, pp. 16–19.Google Scholar
  17. House, L., Gomez, M., R., Murty, D. S., Sun, Y., and Verma, B. N. (2000). Development of some agricultural industries in several African and Asian countries. In Smith, W. C. (ed.), Sorghum: Origin, History, Technology, and Production. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, pp. 131–190.Google Scholar
  18. House, L. R. (1985). A Guide to Sorghum Breeding, ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics), Pantancheru, India.Google Scholar
  19. Ingram, K., Roncoli, M., and Kirshen, P. (2002). Opportunities and constraints for farmers of west Africa to use seasonal precipitation forecasts with Burkina Faso as a case study. Agricultural Systems 74:331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jarvis, D., Meyer, L., Klemick, H., Guarino, L., Smale, M., Brown, A. H. D., Sadiki, M., Sthapit, B., and Hodgkin, T. (2000). Social, cultural and economic factors and crop genetic diversity. In Jarvis, D., Meyer, L., Klemick, H., Guarino, L., Smale, M., Brown, A. H. D., Sadiki, M., Sthapit, B., and Hodgkin, T. (eds.), A Training Guide for in situ Conservation. On-Farm Version 1. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, pp. 11–27.Google Scholar
  21. Lacy, S. M. (2004). One finger cannot lift a stone: family farmers and sorghum production in southern Mali. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  22. Louette, D., Charrier, A., and Berthaud, J. (1997). In situ conservation of maize in Mexico: Genetic diversity and maize seed management in a traditional community. Economic Botany 51:20–38.Google Scholar
  23. McGuire, S. J. (2002). Farmers’ views and management of sorghum diversity in western Harerghe, Ethiopia: Implications for collaboration with formal breeding. In Cleveland, D. A. and Soleri, D. (eds.), Farmers, Scientists and Plant Breeding: Integrating Knowledge and Practice. CAB International, Oxon, UK, pp. 107–135.Google Scholar
  24. Republique du Mali (1998). Recensement général de la population et de l’habitat 1998: Résultats provisoires. Ministère de l’économie, du plan et de l’intégration, Direction nationale de la statistique et de l’informatique, Bamako, Mali, p. 66.Google Scholar
  25. SAS Institute (2001). SAS System for Windows. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  26. Sasaki, K., Caldwell, J. S., Berthé, A., Mamadou, D., Kanno, H., Ozawa, K., Yorote, A., and Sakurai, T. (2002). Using small-scale on-farm weather monitoring equipment as a tool for understanding farmer rationales and risk management in response to climatic risk. International Farming Systems Association Conference, Nov 17–20, Lake Buena Vista, Florida.Google Scholar
  27. Simmonds, N. W., and Smartt, J. (1999). Principles of Crop Improvement. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  28. Smale, M. (2002). Economics perspectives on collaborative plant breeding for conservation of genetic diversity on farm. In Cleveland, D. A., and Soleri, D. (eds.), Farmers, Scientists and Plant Breeding: Integrating Knowledge and Practice, CAB International, Oxon, UK, pp. 83–105.Google Scholar
  29. Soleri, D., and Cleveland, D. A. (2004). Farmer selction and conservation of crop varieties. In Goodman, R. M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Plant & Crop Science. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 433–438.Google Scholar
  30. Soleri, D., Cleveland, D. A., Djiallo, A., Lacy, S., Sidibe, A, Toure, A., Traore, I., and Weltzien, E. (n.d.). Malian farmers' knowledge of sorghum germplasm and growing environments.Google Scholar
  31. Soleri, D., Cleveland, D. A., Smith, S. E., Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S., Rana, R. B., Rijal, D., and Rios Labrada, H. (2002). Understanding farmers' knowledge as the basis forcollaboration with plant breeders: methodological development and examples from ongoing research in Mexico, Syria, Cuba, and Nepal. In Cleveland, D. A., and Soleri, D. (eds.), Farmers, Scientists and Plant Breeding: Integrating Knowledge and Practice, CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, pp. 19–60.Google Scholar
  32. Toulmin, C. (1992). Cattle, Women, and Wells: Managing Household Survival in the Sahel. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  33. vom Brocke, K., Weltzien, E., Christinck, A., Presterl, T., and Geiger, H. H. (2003). Effects of farmers’ seed management on performance and adaptation of pearl millet in Rajasthan, India. Euphytica 130:267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weltzien, E., Smith, M. E., Meitzner, L. S., and Sperling, L. (2003). Technical and institutional issues in participatory plant breeding—from the perspective of formal plant breeding. A global analysis of issues, results, and current experience. PRGA Program Coordination Office, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Columbia.Google Scholar
  35. Weltzien, R., E., Whitaker, M. L., Rattunde, H. F. W., Dhamotharan, M., and Anders, M. M. (1998). Participatory approaches in pearl millet breeding. In Witcombe, J., Virk, D., and Farrington, J. (eds.), Seeds of Choice, Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp. 143–170.Google Scholar
  36. Yapi, A. M., Kergna A. O., Debrah, S. K., Sidibe, A., and Sanofo O. (2000). Analysis of the economic impact of sorghum and millet research in Mali, ICRISAT(International Crops Research Institute for the Semi–Arid Topics), Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott M. Lacy
    • 1
  • David A. Cleveland
    • 2
    • 4
    • 6
    • 7
  • Daniela Soleri
    • 3
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Black StudiesUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Environment Studies ProgramUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  3. 3.Environment Studies Program, and Geography DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  4. 4.Center for People Food and EnvironmentSanta BarbaraUSA
  5. 5.Center for People Food and EnvironmentSanta BarbaraUSA
  6. 6.Environment Studies ProgramUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  7. 7.Center for People Food and EnvironmentSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations