Advertisement

Human Ecology

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 249–273 | Cite as

Examining the Role of Collective Action in an Informal Seed System: A Case Study from the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico

  • Lone B. Badstue
  • Mauricio R. Bellon
  • Julien Berthaud
  • Xóchitl Juárez
  • Irma Manuel Rosas
  • Ana María Solano
  • Alejandro Ramírez
Article

This paper explores social arrangements associated with seed transactions among small-scale maize farmers in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico, where no formal seed supply system exists. We test the hypothesis that individual farmers have strong incentives to participate in some form of collective action to ensure their access to seed. Six communities were studied, three of them in detail, using in-depth, semistructured interviews with key informants; focus group discussions; and a tracer study that followed seed flows among farmers. Farmers mostly saved seed and only occasionally acquired seed from outside sources. We found no evidence of a specialized social organization based on collective action to mediate seed flows. Seed transactions are infrequent, bilateral, and ad hoc, although trust is an important component, as it ensures reliable information about the seed is provided. Implications of these findings are discussed, especially for genetic diversity if the current supply system breaks down.

KEY WORDS

maize small-scale farmers informal seed supply collective action Mexico 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was carried out with a grant from the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) Systemwide Initiative on Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRi). We thank Ruth Meinzen-Dick, Monica Di Gregorio, Amanda King, and three anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper, as well as the farmers who participated in this research for the information they provided and for their kindness and patience. We also want to thank Kelly Cassaday for much-appreciated editorial assistance

REFERENCES

  1. Almekinders, C., and Louwaars, N. (2000). Farmers’ Seed Production: New Approaches and Practices. Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd., London, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Almekinders, C., Louwaars, N., and de Bruijn, G. H. (1994). Local seed systems and their importance for an improved seed supply in developing countries. Euphytica 78:207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badstue, L. B., Bellon, M., Berthaud, J., Ramirez, A., Flores, D., and Juarez, X. (2003). The dynamics of seed flow among small-scale maize farmers in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Property Rights Collective Action and Local Conservation of Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy, September 29–October 2, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. Bellon, M. (2004). Conceptualizing interventions to support on-farm genetic resource conservation. World Development 32(1):159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellon, M., Berthaud, J., Smale, M., Aguirre, J. A., Taba, S., Aragón, F., Díaz, J., and Castro, H. (2003). Participatory landrace selection for on farm conservation: An example from the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 50:401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellon, M. R., and Brush, S. B. (1994). Keepers of maize in Chiapas, Mexico. Economic Botany 48:196–209.Google Scholar
  7. Bellon, M., Pham, J. L., and Jackson, M. T. (1997). Genetic conservation: A role for rice farmers. In Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B. V., and Hawkes, J. G. (eds.), Plant Conservation: The In Situ Approach, London, Chapman and Hall, pp. 263–289.Google Scholar
  8. Bellon, M. R., and Taylor, J. E. (1993). “Folk” soil taxonomy and the partial adoption of new seed varieties. Economic Development and Cultural Change 41(4):763–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berthaud, J., Clement, J. C., Emperaire, L., Louette, D., Pinton, F., Sanou, J., and Second, G. (2001). The role of local-level geneflow in enhancing and maintaining genetic diversity. In Cooper, H. D., Spillane, C., and Hodgkin, T. (eds.), Broadening the Genetic Base of Crop Production, IPGRI/FAO, pp. 81–103.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (2001). The forms of capital. In Granovetter, M. and Swedberg, R. (eds.), The Sociology of Economic Life, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 96–111.Google Scholar
  11. Cordero Avendaño de Durand, C. (1997). La Vara de Mando. Costumbre Jurídica en la Transmisión de Poderes. Biblioteca del 465 Aniversario, Oaxaca de Juárez, México.Google Scholar
  12. Cromwell, E. (ed.) (1990). Seed Diffusion Mechanisms in Small Farmer Communities. Lessons from Asia, Africa, and Latin America. ODI Network Paper 21. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Feyissa, R. (2000). Community seed banks and seed exchange in Ethiopia: A farmer-led approach. In Friis-Hansen, E. and Sthapit, B. (eds.), Participatory Approaches to the Conservation and Use of Plant Genetic Resources, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, pp. 142–148.Google Scholar
  14. Friis-Hansen, E. (1999). The socioeconomic dynamics of farmers’ management of local plant genetic resources—A framework for analysis with examples from a Tanzanian case study. CDR Working paper 99.3. Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  15. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91:481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162:1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hernandez, E. (1985). Maize and the greater Southwest. Economic Botany 39:416–430.Google Scholar
  18. INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática) (2001a). Aspectos Geográficos de Oaxaca. Mapa de Temperatura Media Anual. http://oax.inegi.gob.mx/ territorio/espanol/temperat.html, last update: 29/03/2001, 13:04.Google Scholar
  19. INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática) (2001b). XII Censo General de Poblacion y Vivienda. Http://www.inegi.gob.mx/difusion/espanol/poblacion/ definitivos/oax/tabulados/ocot/25le01.pdf, last update 02/12/2002, 16:00.Google Scholar
  20. Jarvis, D.I., Myer, L., Klemick, H., Guarino, L., Smale, M., Brown, A. H. D., Sadiki, M., Sthapit, B., and Hodgkin, T. (2000). A Training Guide for In Situ Conservation On Farm. Version 1. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  21. Kimber R. (1981). Collective action and the fallacy of the liberal fallacy. World Politics 33(2):178–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knox, A., Meinzen-Dick, R., and Hazell, P. (1998). Property rights, collective action and technologies for natural resource management: a conceptual framework. CAPRi Working Paper No. 1. http://www.capri.cgiar.org/pdf/capriwp01.pdfGoogle Scholar
  23. Lewis, V., and Mulvany, P. M. (1997). A Typology of Community Seed Banks. Natural Resources Institute and Intermediate Development Group. Chatham and Rugby, UK. www.ukabc.org/communityseedbanks.pdfGoogle Scholar
  24. Long, N. (2001). Development Sociology. Actor perspectives. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  25. Louette, D., Charrier, A., and Berthaud, J. (1997). In situ conservation of maize in Mexico: Genetic diversity and maize seed management in a traditional community. Economic Botany 51:20–38.Google Scholar
  26. Louette, D., and Smale, M. (2000). Farmers’ seed selection practices and traditional maize varieties in Cuzalapa, Mexico. Euphytica 113:25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matsuoka, Y., Vigouroux, Y., Goodman, M. M., Sanchez, J., Buckler, G. E., and Doebley, J. (2002). A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99:6080–6084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maxted, N., Guarino, L., Myer, L., and Chiwona, E. A. (2002). Towards a methodology for on-farm conservation of plant genetic resources. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 49:31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mazhar, F. (2000). Seed conservation and management: participatory approaches of Nayahrishi Seed Network in Bangladesh. In Friis-Hansen, E. and Sthapit, B. (eds.), Participatory Approaches to the Conservation and Use of Plant Genetic Resources, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, pp. 149–153.Google Scholar
  30. Meinzen-Dick, R., and Di Gregorio, M. (2004). Overview. In Meinzen-Dick, R. and Di Gregorio, M. (eds.), Collective Action and Property Rights for Sustainable Development, IFPRI 2020 Vision, IFPRI.Google Scholar
  31. Meinzen-Dick, R., Di Gregorio, M., and McCarthy, N. (2004). Methods for studying collective action in rural development. Agricultural Systems 82(3):197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Montes Vasquez, J. (1985). Función de la gozona en el sistema económico y social entre los Zapotecos Cajonos de la Sierra Norte de Oaxaca. Etnias 2:23–28. Oaxaca: Centro de Educacion Continua Oaxaca (CECOAX).Google Scholar
  33. Morris, M. L. (2002). Impacts of International Maize Breeding Research in Developing Countries, 1966--98. Mexico, D.F., CIMMYT.Google Scholar
  34. Morris, M., and Lopez-Pereira, M. A. (1999). Impacts of Maize Breeding Research in Latin America 1966–1997. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
  35. Morris, M., Rusike, J., and Smale, M. (1998). Maize seed industries: A conceptual framework. In Morris, M. L. (ed.), Maize Seed Industries in Developing Countries, Lynne Rienner, Colorado, pp. 35–54.Google Scholar
  36. Nordvig Rasmussen, L., and Meinzen-Dick, R. (1995). Local Organizations for Natural Resource Management: Lessons from Theoretical and Empirical Literature. IFPRI Environment and Production Technology Discussion Paper 11. IFPRI.Google Scholar
  37. Olson, M. (1971). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press, Revised edition.Google Scholar
  38. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA.Google Scholar
  39. Ostrom, E. (2004). Understanding collective action. In Meinzen-Dick, R. and Di Gregorio, M. (eds.), Collective Action and Property Rights for Sustainable Development, IFPRI 2020 Vision, IFPRI.Google Scholar
  40. Perales-Rivera, H. R., Brush, S. B., and Qualset, C. (2003). Dynamic management of maize landraces in central Mexico. Economic Botany 57:21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Piperno, D. R., and Flannery, K. V. (2001). The earliest archaeological maize (Zea mays L.) from highland Mexico: new accelerator mass spectrometry dates and their implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98:2101–2103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Polanyi, K. (2001/1957). The economy as instituted process. In Granovetter, M. and Swedberg, R. (eds.), The Sociology of Economic Life, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 31–50.Google Scholar
  43. Portes, A., and Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology 98:1320–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Poteete, A., and Ostrom, E. (2004). In pursuit of comparable concepts and data about collective action. Agricultural Systems 82(3):215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ravnborg, H. M., de la Cruz, A. M., Guerrero, M. P., and Westermann, O. (2002). Collective action in ant control. In Meinzen-Dick, R., Knox, A., Place, F., and Swallow, B. (eds.), Innovation in Natural Resource Management. The Role of Property Rights and Collective Action in Developing Countries, Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 257–271.Google Scholar
  46. Sahlins, M. D. (1972). Stone Age Economics. Aldine, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  47. Seboka, B., and Deressa, A. (2000). Validating farmers’ indigenous social networks for local seed supply in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 6:245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smale, M., Aguirre, A., Bellon, M., Mendoza, J., and Rosas, I. M. (1999). Farmer management of maize diversity in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico: CIMMYT/INIFAP. 1998 Baseline socioeconomic survey. CIMMYT Economics Working Paper 99--09. CIMMYT, Mexico D.F.Google Scholar
  49. Smale, M., and Bellon, M. R. (1999). A conceptual framework for valuing on-farm genetic resources. In Wood, D. and Lenné, J. M. (eds.), Agrobiodiversity: Characterization, Utilization and Management, Wallingford, CABI Publishing, pp. 387–408.Google Scholar
  50. Smale, M., Bellon, M., Aguirre, A., Rosas, I. M., Mendoza, J., Solano, A. M., Martinez, R., Ramirez, A., and Berthaud, J. (2003). The economic costs and benefits of a participatory project to conserve maize landraces on farms in Oaxaca, Mexico. Agricultural Economics 29:265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sperling, L., Heidegger, U., and Buruchara, R., (1995). Enhancing small farm seed systems: Principles derived from bean research in The Great Lakes Region. Network on Bean Research in Africa, Occasional Publications Series, No. 15, CIAT, Cali, Colombia.Google Scholar
  52. Steins, N. A. (1999). All Hands on Deck. Doctoral thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  53. Swedberg, R., and Granovetter, M. (2001). Introduction to the second edition. In Granovetter, M. and Swedberg, R. (eds.), The Sociology of Economic Life, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  54. Thiele, G. (1999). Informal potato seed systems in the Andes: Why are they important and what should we do with them? World Development 27:83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tripp, R. (2001). Seed Provision and Agricultural Development. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK.Google Scholar
  56. Van Dusen, M. E. (2000). In Situ Conservation of Crop Genetic Resources in the Mexican Milpa System. Ph D. dissertation. University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
  57. Vermillion, D. L. (2001). Property rights and collective action in the devolution of irrigation system management. In, Meinzen-Dick, R., Knox, A., and Di Gregorio, M. (eds.), Collective Action, Property Rights and Devolution of Natural Resource Management: Exchange of Knowledge and Implications for Policy, DSE/ZEL, Germany, pp. 183–220.Google Scholar
  58. Wierema, H., Keune, L., Vermeer, R., and Almekinders, C. (1994). Small-scale Agriculture in Costa Rica, Nicaragua and Honduras. The Rationality of Local Systems of Seed Supply. IVO Research report no. 43, Tilburg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lone B. Badstue
    • 1
  • Mauricio R. Bellon
    • 1
  • Julien Berthaud
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xóchitl Juárez
    • 3
  • Irma Manuel Rosas
    • 1
  • Ana María Solano
    • 1
  • Alejandro Ramírez
    • 1
  1. 1.International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)MexicoMexico
  2. 2.Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)Centre de Montpellier BP 64501 Ave. Agropolis 911Montpellier, Cedex 5France
  3. 3.Sistema de Centros RegionalesUniversidad Autónoma de Chapingo (UACH)Edo de MéxicoMéxico

Personalised recommendations