Human Ecology

, Volume 34, Issue 6, pp 785–807 | Cite as

Urban Sheep Keeping in West Africa: Can Socioeconomic Household Profiles Explain Management and Productivity?

  • Barbara Rischkowsky
  • Marianna Siegmund-Schultze
  • Katrin Bednarz
  • Simon Killanga
Article

Abstract

Rapid urbanization in Africa leads to a spatial concentration of people with different cultural origins and socioeconomic backgrounds resulting in a great diversity of life styles and livelihood strategies. One common strategy in Maroua/Cameroon and Bobo-Dioulasso/Burkina Faso is urban sheep keeping. Cluster analyses identified distinct socioeconomic groups with similarities between the towns: traditional livestock keepers, households headed by well educated government employees or traders, and more vulnerable groups formed of households headed by females, retired people or people with limited formal education. The household types in Bobo varied in their perception of the importance and the development of urban sheep keeping and their future plans. Those in Maroua differed in management intensity and in the potential to adapt their practices to the urban environment. Development interventions to reduce environmental pollution and risks for human health associated with urban sheep keeping need to account for these differences in the target group.

Keywords

urban sheep keeping typology management practices cluster analysis 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This paper results from the collaboration between IRZV (Institut de Recherche Zootechnique et Vétérinaire) in Cameroon, CIRDES (Centre International de Recherche-Développement sur l’Élevage en zone Subhumide) in Burkina Faso and the Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Göttingen in Germany. The study was part of the EU-funded project SECOVILLE (Socio-économie de l'élevage ovin péri-urbain). We are grateful to the above named institutions and especially to Mrs. Diara Kocty-Thiombiano from CIRDES for supporting this work.

REFERENCES

  1. Dennery, P. (1996). Urban agriculture in informal settlements: how can it contribute to poverty alleviation? Entwicklung + Ländlicher Raum 6: 5–7.Google Scholar
  2. Delgado, C., Rosegrant, M., Steinfeld, H., Ehui, S., and Courbois, C. (1999). Livestock to 2020: the next food revolution, Food, Agriculture, and the Environment Discussion Paper 28, IFPRI, Washington.Google Scholar
  3. Egziabher, A. G. (1994). Ethiopia: urban farming, cooperatives, and the urban poor in Addis Ababa. In Egziabher, A. G., Lee-Smith, D., Maxwell, D. G., Memon, P. A., Mougeot, L. J. A., and Sawio, C. J. (eds.), Cities Feeding People: An Examination of Urban Agriculture in East Africa, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, pp. 85–104.Google Scholar
  4. Ellis, F., and Sumberg, J. (1998). Food production, urban areas and policy responses. World Development 26(2): 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freeman, D. (1991). A City of Farmers: Informal Urban Agriculture in the Open Spaces of Nairobi, Kenya, McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal, Kingston.Google Scholar
  6. Guendel, S. (2002). Peri-urban and urban livestock keeping in East Africa—a coping strategy for the poor? Proc. Int. Conf. on Responding to the Increasing Global Demand for Animal Products, British Society of Animal Science, American Society of Animal Science, Mexican Society of Animal Production, Merida, 12–15 November 2002, pp. 149–150.Google Scholar
  7. Guendel, S., and Richards, W. (2003). Peri-urban and urban livestock keeping in East Africa—a coping strategy for the poor? Proc. Deutscher Tropentag on Technological and Institutional Innovations for Sustainable Rural Development, Göttingen, 8–10 October 2003, p. 146.Google Scholar
  8. Jahn, G., Rischkowsky, B., King, J. M., Killanga, S., and Kleemann, G. (1996). Peri-urban sheep production in Cameroon: performance of upstream sector. In Zessin. K.-H. (ed.), Livestock Production and Diseases in the Tropics, Proc. VIII Int. Conf. of Institutions of Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Berlin, vol. 1, pp. 202–207.Google Scholar
  9. Killanga, S., Faye, B., and Obounou, Z. L. (2004). Evaluation of the productivity of the peri-urban sheep at Maroua in the Far North of Cameroon (Evaluation de la productivité des ovins périurbains à Maroua dans l’extrême-nord du Cameroun). Tropicultura 22: 64–70.Google Scholar
  10. Kocty-Thiombiano, D. (1999). Rapport scientifique final, April 1994 to December 1998, Projet Socio-économie de l’élevage ovin péri-urbain (SECOVILLE), Tome I, Unpublished Report, CIRAD-EMVT, Montpellier.Google Scholar
  11. Lee, M. (1993). Avoir un jardin à Addis Abeba. Le CRDI Explore 21(3): 12–13.Google Scholar
  12. Manshard, W. (1992). Agricultural change: market gardens in West African urban communities—the case of Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). In Raza, M. (ed.), Development and Ecology, Essays in Honour of Professor Mohammad Shafi, Rawat Publications, Jaipur, pp. 347–356.Google Scholar
  13. Mantovani, A. (2000). Veterinary urban hygiene in developing countries. Urban Agriculture Magazine 1(2): 32–33. available at http://www.ruaf.org/1--2/32--33.pdf.Google Scholar
  14. Maxwell, D. G. (1995). Alternative food security strategy: a household analysis of urban agriculture in Kampala. World Development 23(10): 1669–1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maxwell, D. G. (1996). Highest and best use? Access to urban land for semi-subsistence food production. Land Use Policy 13(3): 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ministère de l’Equipement (1990). Schéma de développement et d’aménagement urbain de Bobo-Dioulasso. Rapport de présentation. Secrétariat d’Etat à l’Habitat et à l’Urbanisme, Coopération française, Bobo-Dioulasso, Mayenne.Google Scholar
  17. Mougeot, L. J. A. (1994). Urban food production: a survey of evolution, official support and significance (with special reference to Africa). Presentation to Habitat 94, Edmonton, 20 September, 1994, 1–42.Google Scholar
  18. Richardson, G. M., and Whitney, J. B. R. (1995). Goats and garbage in Khartoum: a study of the urban ecology of animal keeping. Human Ecology 23(4): 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ruel, M. T., Haddad, L., and Garrett, J. L. (1999). Some urban facts of life: implications for research and policy. World Development 27(11): 1917–1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schiere, H., Tegegne, A., and van Veenhuizen, R. (2000). Livestock in and around cities. Urban Agriculture Magazine 1(2): 1–4. Available at http://www.ruaf.org/1--2/01--04.pdf.Google Scholar
  21. Siegmund-Schultze, M., Rischkowsky, B., and Kocty-Thiombiano, D. (1997). Urbane Schafhaltung in Bobo-Dioulasso: Politischer Rahmen und Realität. Tropentag 1996, Ressourcenknappheit und Erhaltung der Lebensgrundlage—die Herausforderung für die Zukunft, Berlin, 12–13 December 1996: 422–427.Google Scholar
  22. Siegmund-Schultze, M., and Rischkowsky, B. (2001). Relating household characteristics to urban sheep keeping in West Africa. Agricultural Systems 67: 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smit, J. (1994). Urban agriculture prospects in Africa, Latin America and Asia: The role of food production within urban areas in the tropics and subtropics for food security, income generation and quality of life. Paper presented at the Expert Consultation on Vegetable production in peri-urban areas in the tropics and subtropics—food, income and quality of life, November 14, 1994, Zschortau.Google Scholar
  24. Tiffen, M. (2003). Transition in Sub-Saharan Africa: agriculture, urbanization and income growth. World Development 31(8): 1343–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1996). Urban agriculture, food, jobs and sustainable cities, Publication series for Habitat II. UNDP, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Waters-Bayer, A. (1996). Living with livestock in town: urban animal husbandry and human welfare. In Zessin, K.-H. (ed.), Livestock Production and Disease in the tropics: Livestock Production and Human Welfare, Proc. VIII International Conference of Institutions of Tropical Veterinary Medicine, vol. 1, Berlin, Germany, pp. 121–132.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Rischkowsky
    • 1
    • 3
  • Marianna Siegmund-Schultze
    • 1
  • Katrin Bednarz
    • 1
  • Simon Killanga
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Tropical Animal ProductionUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Institut de Recherche Zootechnique et Vétérinaire (IRZV)MarouaCameroon
  3. 3.Animal Production and Health DivisionFood and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations