Human Ecology

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 271–288 | Cite as

There is No Mother Nature—There is No Balance of Nature: Culture, Ecology and Conservation

  • Dennis E. JelinskiEmail author
Brief Communication


Environmental Management Mother Nature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, T. F. H., Tainter, J. A., Pires, C., and Hoekstra, T. W. (2001). Dragnet ecology, “Just the facts Ma’am”: The privilege of science in a post-modern world. Bioscience 51: 475–485.Google Scholar
  2. Allee, W. C., Emerson, A. E., Park, O., Park, T., and Schmidt, K. P. (1949). Principles of Animal Ecology, Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous. (nd). What is organic in Village News
  4. Baker, W. L. (1989). Landscape ecology and nature reserve design in the Boundary Waters Canoe area, Minnesota. Ecology 70: 23–35.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, W. L. (1992). Effects of settlement and fire suppression on landscape structure. Ecology 73: 1879–1887.Google Scholar
  6. Botkin, D. (1990). Discordant Harmonies, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Boyd, R. (1993). Metaphor and Theory Change: What is ‘Metaphor’ a Metaphor For? In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 381–532.Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, J. M. (1997). Religion and the Enlightenment: From Descartes to Kant, Westminster John Know, Louisville, KY.Google Scholar
  9. Clements, F. E. (1916). Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation, Publication 242, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Clements, F. W. (1936). Nature and structure of the climax. Journal of Ecology 24: 252–284.Google Scholar
  11. Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection; or, The Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  12. Darwin, C. (1887). In Barlow, N. (ed.), The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809–1882, W. W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, E. (1971). The First Sex, Putnam, London.Google Scholar
  14. Descartes, R. (1637). Discourse on Method, trans. E. S. Haldane, G. T. Ross (1968), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Egerton, F. N. (1973). Changing concepts in the balance of nature. The Quarterly Review of Biology 48: 322–350.Google Scholar
  16. Elliot, W. (2002). It’s Not Nice to Fool with Mother Nature, Buffalo News, March 14.Google Scholar
  17. Elton, C. (1930). Animal Ecology and Evolution, Methuen, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Emel, J. (1995). Are you man enough, big and bad enough? Ecofeminism and wolf eradication in the USA. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13: 707–734.Google Scholar
  19. Engelsman, J. C. (1979). The Feminine Dimension of the Divine, Westminster, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  20. Ettema, J., and Glasser, T. L. (1989). Narrative form and moral force: The realization of innocence and guilt through investigative journalism. In Brock, B. L., Scott, R. L., and Chesebro, J. W. (eds.), Methods of Rhetorical Criticism: A Twentieth-Century Perspective, 3rd edn., Wayne State University Press, Detroit, pp. 256–272.Google Scholar
  21. Geary, L. H. (2002). Disaster-Proof Your Disaster Insurance: How to Protect Your Home When Mother Nature Kicks in the Door. CNNMoney, June 20,
  22. Ghiselin, M. T. (1981). Applied Ecology. In Kormondy, E. J., and McCormick, J. F. (eds.), Handbook of Contemporary Developments in World Ecology, Greenwood Press, Westport, Connral Theology, pp. 651–664.Google Scholar
  23. Glacken, C. J. (1967). Traces on the Rhodian Shore, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  24. Gleason, H. A. (1926). The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botantical Club 47: 21–33.Google Scholar
  25. Gleason, H. A. (1939). The individualistic concept of the plant association. American Midland Naturalist 21: 92–110.Google Scholar
  26. Gould, S. J. (1996). Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Hellsten, I. (2000). Dolly. Scientific breakthrough or Frankenstein’s monster? Scientific and journalistic metaphors of cloning. Metaphor and Symbol 15: 213–221.Google Scholar
  28. Hellsten, I. (2002). Selling life sciences. Promises of a better future in biotechnology advertisements. Science as Culture 11: 459–479.Google Scholar
  29. Herodotus. (1858). Histories: Translated with Notes by George Rawlinson; With an Introduction by Tom Griffith, Ware, Wordsworth Classics of World Literature.Google Scholar
  30. Herring, D. (2000). Second guessing mother nature: Forecasting the surprise snow of january 2000. NASA Earth Observatory.
  31. Holling, C. S., and Meffe, G. X. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology 10: 328–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hull, R. B., Robertson, D. P., Richert, D., Seekamp, E., and Buhyoff, G. J. (2002). Assumptions about ecological scale and nature knowing best hiding in environmental decisions. Conservation Ecology 6: 12.Google Scholar
  33. Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on Gender and Science, Yale University Press, New Haven, CN.Google Scholar
  34. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  35. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London.Google Scholar
  36. Latour, B., and Strum, S. C. (1986). Human social origins: Oh please, tell us another story. Journal of Social and Biological Structures 9: 169–187.Google Scholar
  37. Leeming, D. A. (1990). The World of Myth: An Anthology, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  38. Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac: With Essays on Conservation from Round River, Ballantine Books, New York, (1978).Google Scholar
  39. Livingston, E. A. (ed.). (2000). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church New Edition, Oxford, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Lowenthall, D. (2000). Nature and morality from George Perkins Marsh to the millennium. Journal of Historical Geography 26: 3–27.Google Scholar
  41. Lovelock, J. E. (1988). The Ages of Gaia, W. W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Lucretius (Titus Lucretius Carus). (1968). De Rerum Natura, trans. R. Humphries, Book V Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  43. Marsh, G. P. (1864). Man and Nature, Annotated Reprint of the Original 1964, Harvard Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  44. McIntosh, R. P. (1985). The Background of Ecology, Concept and Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  45. Merchant, C. (1980). The Death of Nature, Wildwood House, London.Google Scholar
  46. O’Brien, W. E. (2002). The nature of shifting cultivation: Stories of harmony, degradation, and redemption. Human Ecology 30: 483–502.Google Scholar
  47. Odum, E. P. (1959). Fundamentals of Ecology, 2nd edn., Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  48. Odum, E. P. (1992). Great ideas in ecology for the 1990s. Bioscience 42: 78–85.Google Scholar
  49. Odum, H. T. (1983). Systems Ecology: An Introduction, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  50. O’Rourke, E. (2000). The reintroduction and reinterpretation of the wild. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13: 145–165.Google Scholar
  51. O’Neill, R. V. (2001). Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept? Ecology 82: 3275–3284.Google Scholar
  52. Paley, W. (1802). Natural Theology, or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity Collected from the Appearances of Nature, 1st edn., Tegg, London.Google Scholar
  53. Pickett, S. T. A., Kolasa, J., and Jones, C. G. (1994). Ecological Understanding, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Pimm, S. (1991). The Balance of Nature: Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  55. Romme, W. H., and Despain, D. G. (1989). Historical perspective on the Yellowstone Fires of 1988. Bioscience 39: 696–699.Google Scholar
  56. Rose, H. J. (1957). Gods and Heroes of the Greeks, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  57. Serpell, J. (1996). In the Company of Animals: A Study of Human-Animal Relationships, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  58. Schäfer, P. (2002). Mirror of His Beauty: Feminine Images of God from the Bible to the Early Kabbala, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  59. Shelford, V. E. (1913). Animal Communities in Temperate America as Illustrated in the Chicago Region. No. 5 Bulletin of the Geographical Society of Chicago (1977), Arno Press, New York.Google Scholar
  60. Siggurdson, C. (1998). Indiana wheat escapes damage from late-winter storm. Purdue Ag News Roundup, April 10.
  61. Smith, H. (1989). Beyond the Post-Modern Mind, Quest, Wheaton, IL.Google Scholar
  62. Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational terms. Ecology 14: 284–307.Google Scholar
  63. Ucko, P. (1962). The interpretation of prehistoric anthropomorphic figurines. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 92: 38–54.Google Scholar
  64. United States Department of Agriculture. (1997). Mother nature stirs up the wheat market. Economic Research Service, Agricultural Outlook, Commodity Brief, June.Google Scholar
  65. White, P. S. (1979). Pattern, process and natural disturbance in vegetation. Botanical Review 45: 229–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Williams, R. (1976). Keywords, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  67. Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge, Knoph, New York.Google Scholar
  68. Wood, V. B. (1999). It’s not nice to fool Mother Nature, Austin Chronicle, Volume 18, Issue 49
  69. Worster, D. (1994). Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas, 2nd edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  70. Wu, J., and Loucks, O. L. (1995). From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: A paradigm shift in ecology. Quarterly Review of Biology 70: 439–466.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environmental StudiesQueen’s UniversityCanada
  2. 2.Bamfield Marine Sciences CentreBamfieldCanada

Personalised recommendations