Human Ecology

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 653–683 | Cite as

Ecological Praxis and Blackwater Ecosystems: A Case Study From the Brazilian Amazon

  • Laura A. GermanEmail author


This article explores how anthropogenic modifications of soil condition human adaptive processes on the Amazonian uplands. The occurrence of black earth (a nutrient-rich anthrosol) in nutrient-poor blackwater environments and its cultivation by contemporary residents provide a unique opportunity for understanding the ecological praxis of Amazonian groups. Two years of ethnographic, ethnoscientific, and agronomic research among caboclo residents of the Lower Rio Negro and Rio Urubú confirm that unique cognitive and behavioral orientations characterize black earth and adjacent environments. When compared with cognitive and behavioral orientations to these two environments in distant blackwater regions, data suggest that political-economic, technological, cultural, and ecological factors have had~a strong influence on the trajectory of human-environmental interactions. Data in large part illustrate the utility of historical ecological models, yet point to an interactive role of diverse histories in shaping the range of human responses.

human ecology black earth Rio Negro anthrosol swidden agriculture 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adewole Osunade, M. A. (1992). Identification of crop soils by small farmers of South-western Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Management 35: 193–203.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, A. B., and Posey, D. B. (1989). Management of a tropical scrub Savanna by the Gorotire Kayapó of Brazil. Advances in Economic Botany 7: 159–173.Google Scholar
  3. Ayres, D. M. (1992). History, Social Organization, Identity and Outsiders’ Social Classification of the Rural Population of Amazonian Region, PhD Thesis, King’s College, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Balée, W. (1989). The culture of Amazonian forests. Advances in Economic Botany 7: 1–21.Google Scholar
  5. Balée, W. (1992). People of the Fallow: A historical ecology of foraging in Lowland South America. In Redford, K. H., and Padoch, C. (eds.), Conservation of Neotropical Forests: Working From Traditional Resource Use, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 34–57.Google Scholar
  6. Balée, W. (ed.)(1998). Advances in Historical Ecology, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Berhrens, C. A. (1989). The scientific basis for Shipibo soil classification and land use: Changes in soil-plant associations with cash cropping. American Anthropologist 91: 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  9. Brondizio, E. S., and Siqueira, A. D. (1997). From extractivists to forest farmers: Changing concepts of Caboclo agroforestry in the Amazon estuary. Research in Economic Anthropology 18: 233–279.Google Scholar
  10. Chibnik, M. (1991). Quasi-Ethnic groups in Amazonia. Ethnology 30: 167–182.Google Scholar
  11. Conklin, H. C. (1957). Hanunóo Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
  12. Crumley, C. L. (ed.)(1994). Historical Ecology: Cultural Knowledge and Changing Landscapes, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, NM.Google Scholar
  13. Davidescu, D., and Davidescu, V. (1982). Evaluation of Fertility by Plant and Soil Analysis, Abacus, Turnbridge Wells, Kent, England.Google Scholar
  14. Denevan, W. M. (1998). Comments on Prehistoric agriculture in Amazonia. Culture and Agriculture 20(2/3): 54–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denevan, W. M., and Padoch, C. (eds.) (1987). Swidden-Fallow Agroforestry in the Peruvian Amazon, Advances in Economic Botany, Vol. 5, New York Botanical Garden, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Eidt, R. C. (1977). Detection and examination of anthrosols by phosphate analysis. Science 197(4311): 1327–1333.Google Scholar
  17. German, L. A. (2001). The Dynamics of Terra Preta: An Integrated Study of Human-Environmental Interaction in a Nutrient-Poor Amazonian Ecosystem, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
  18. German, L. A. (2003a). Historical contingencies in the coevolution of environment and livelihood: Contributions to the debate on Amazonian black earth. Geoderma 111: 307–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. German, L. A. (2003b). Ethnoscientific understandings of Amazonian dark earth. In Lehmann, J., Kern, D. C., Glaser, B., and Woods, W. (eds.), Amazonian Dark Earths–Origins, Properties and Management, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 179–201.Google Scholar
  20. Glaser, B., Haumaier, L., Guggenberger, G., and Zech, W. (2001). The Terra Preta Phenomenon: A Model for Sustainable Agriculture in the Humid Tropics. Naturwissenschaften 88: 37–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Good, K. R. (1987). Limiting Factors in Amazonian Ecology. In Harris, M., and Ross (eds.), Food and Evolution. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, p. 407–421.Google Scholar
  22. Goulding, M., Carvalho, M. L., and Ferreira, E. G. (1988). Rio Negro, Rich Life in Poor Water, SPB Academic, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  23. Graham, E. (1998). Metaphor and metamorphism: Some thoughts on environmental metahistory. In Balée, W. (ed.), Advances in Historical Ecology, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 119–140.Google Scholar
  24. Harris, M. (1998). “What it Mean to be Caboclo”: Some critical notes on the construction of Amazonian Caboclo society as an anthropological object. Critique of Anthropology 18(1): 83–95.Google Scholar
  25. Hecht, S. B., and Posey, D. A. (1989). Preliminary results on soil management techniques of the Kayapó Indians. Advances in Economic Botany 7: 174–188.Google Scholar
  26. Heckenberger, M. J., Petersen, J. B., and Neves, E. G. (1999). Village size and permanence in Amazonia: Two archaeological examples from Brazil. Latin American Antiquity 10(4): 353–376.Google Scholar
  27. Herrera, R. (1985). Nutrient cycling in Amazonian forests. In Prance, G. T., and Lovejoy, T. E. (eds.), Amazonia, Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 95–105.Google Scholar
  28. Herrera, L. F., Cavelier, I., Rodriquez, C., and Mora, S. (1992). The technical transformation of an agricultural system in the Columbian Amazon. World Archaeology 24(1): 98–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hill, J., and Moran, E. F. (1983). Adaptive strategies of Wakuénai people to the Oligotrophic rain forest of the Rio Negro Basin. In Hames, R. B., and Vickers, W. T. (eds.), Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians, Academic, New York, pp. 113–135.Google Scholar
  30. Irvine, D. (1989). Succession management and resource distribution in an Amazonian rain forest. Advances in Economic Botany 7: 223–237.Google Scholar
  31. Jackson, J. (1983). The Fish People: Linguistic Exogamy and Tukanoan identity in Northwest Amazonia, Studies in Social Anthroplogy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. Jordan, C. F. (1985). Soils of the Amazon rainforest. In Prance, G. T., and Lovejoy, T. E. (eds.), Amazonia, Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 83–94.Google Scholar
  33. Jordan, C. F. (1989). An Amazonian Rainforest: The Structure and Function of a Nutrient Stressed Ecosystem and the Impact of Slash and Burn Agriculture, Man and the Biosphere Series, Vol. 2, UNESCO, Paris, and Parthenon, Carnforth.Google Scholar
  34. Kass, D. C. L., and Somarriba, E. (1999). Traditional fallow in Latin America. Agroforestry Systems 47: 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kern, D. C., and Kämpf, N. (1989). O Efeito de Antigos Assentamentos Indígenas na Formação de Solos com Terra Preta Arqueológica na Região de Oriximiná-Pa. Rev. Bras. Ci. Solo 13: 219–225.Google Scholar
  36. Lehmann, J., Kern, D. C., Glaser, B., and Woods, W. (eds.) (2003). Amazonian Dark Earths—Origins, Properties and Management, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  37. Major, J., DiTommaso, A., German, L. A., and McCann, J. M. (2003). Weed population dynamics and management on Amazonian dark earth soils. In Lehmann, J., Kern, D. C., Glaser, B., and Woods, W. (eds.), Amazonian Dark Earths—Origin, Properties, and Management, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  38. McCann, J. M., Woods, W. I., and Meyer, D. W. (2001). Organic matter and anthrosols in Amazonia: Interpreting the Amerindian legacy. In Rees, R. M., Ball, B. C., Campbell, C. D., and Watson, C. A. (eds.), Sustainable Management of Soil Organic Matter, CAB International, Nairobi, Kenya, pp. 180–189.Google Scholar
  39. Meggers, B. (1971). Amazonia: Man and Culture in a Counterfeit Paradise, Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  40. Mora, C. S., Herrera, L. F., Cavelier, I., and Rodriguez, C. (1991). Cultivars, Anthropic Soils and Stability: A Preliminary Report of Archaeological Research in Araracuara, Colombian Amazonia, Latin American Archaeology Report No. 2, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  41. Moran, E. (1989). Models of native and folk adaptation in the Amazon. Advances in Economic Botany 7: 22–29.Google Scholar
  42. Moran, E. (1974). The adaptive system of the Amazonian Caboclo. In Wagley, C. (ed.), Man in the Amazon, University of Florida Press, Gainesville, pp. 136–159.Google Scholar
  43. Moran, E. (1991). Human adaptive strategies in Amazonian blackwater ecosystems. American Anthropologist 93: 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Norman, M. J. T. (1979). Annual Cropping Systems in the Tropics, University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  45. Nugent, S. (1993). Amazonian Caboclo Society: An Essay on Invisibility and Peasant Economy, Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
  46. Pabst, E. (1991). Critérios de Distinção entre Terra Preta e Latossolo na Região de Belterra e os Seus Significados para a Discussão Pedogenética. Boletim do Museu Paraense de História Natural e Etnografia 7(1): 5–19.Google Scholar
  47. Parker, E. (1985). Caboclization: The transformation of the Amerindian in Amazonia, 1615–1800. Studies in Third World Societies 32: 1–49.Google Scholar
  48. Posey, D. A. (1982). Nomadic agriculture of the Amazon. Garden 6(1): 18–24.Google Scholar
  49. Redman, C. L. (1999). Human Impact on Ancient Environments, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  50. Ribeiro, B. (1995). Os índios das águas Pretas, Companhia das Letras, São Paulo.Google Scholar
  51. Ruthenberg, H. (1980). Farming Systems in the Tropics, Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  52. Salgado Vieira, L. (1988). Manual da Ciência do Solo, 2nd ed., Editora Agronômica Ceres Ltda., São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
  53. Salgado Vieira, L., and Oliveira Filho, J. P. S. (1962). As Caatingas do Rio Negro. Boletím Técnico IAN 42: 1–32.Google Scholar
  54. Sioli, H. (1984). The Amazon: Limnology and Landscape Ecology of a Mighty Tropical River Basin, Junk, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, N. (1980). Anthrosols and human carrying capacity inAmazonia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70: 553–566.Google Scholar
  56. Sombroek, W. (1966). Amazon Soils: A Reconnaissance of the Soils of the Brazilian Amazon Region, Center for Agricultural Publications and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  57. Sorensen, A. (1967). Multilingualism in the Northwest Amazon. American Anthropologist 69: 670–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stocks, A. (1983). Cocamilla fishing: Patch modification and environmental buffering in the Amazon. In Hames, R. B., and Vickers, W. T. (eds.), Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians, Academic, New York, pp. 239–267.Google Scholar
  59. Uhl, C., Jordan, C., Clark, K., Clark, H., and Herrera, R. (1982). Ecosystem recovery in Amazon Caatinga forest after cutting, cutting and burning, and bulldozer clearing treatments. Oikos 38: 313–320.Google Scholar
  60. van Raij, B. (1991). Fertilidade doSolo e Adubação, Editora Agronômica Ceres Ltda., São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
  61. Whitehead, N. (1998). Ecological history and historical ecology: Diachronic modeling versus historical explanation. In Balée, W. (ed.), Advances in Historical Ecology, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 30–41.Google Scholar
  62. Woods, W. I. (1995). Comments on the black earths of Amazonia. In Schoolmaster, F. A. (ed.), Papers and Proceedings of the Applied Geography Conferences, Vol. 18, Denton, Texas, pp. 159–165.Google Scholar
  63. Woods, W. I., and McCann, J. M. (1999). The Anthropogenic origin and persistence of Amazonian dark earths. The Yearbook of the Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers 25: 7–14.Google Scholar
  64. Wright, R. M. (1992). História Indígena do Noroeste da Amazônia: Hipótesis, Questões e Perspetivas. In Carneiro da Cunha, M. (ed.), História dos índios no Brasil, Companhia das Letras, Sao Paulo, pp. 253–266.Google Scholar
  65. Zech, W., Haumaier, L., and Hempfling, R. (1990). Ecological aspects of soil organic matter in tropical land use. In MacCarthy, P., Clapp, C. E., Malcolm, R. L., and Bloom, P. R. (eds.), Humic Substances in Soil and Crop Sciences: Selected Readings, American Society of Agronomy and the Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 187–202.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AHI/ICRAFKampala

Personalised recommendations