Cairns, Dorion: The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl

Cairns, D. (1973). Guide for translating Husserl. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cairns, D. (1976). Conversations with Husserl and Fink. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cairns, D. (2005). Syntactical acts and syntactical objects. In G. Banham (Ed.), Husserl and the logic of experience (pp. 104–130). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Embree, L. (2012a). The way from the ideal of science: The other motivation for the transcendental phenomenological reduction in the doctoral dissertation of Dorion Cairns. Human Studies, 35, 555–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Embree, L. (2012b). Animism, adumbration, willing, and wisdom: Studies in the phenomenology of Dorion Cairns. Bucharest: Zeta Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hua I. Husserl, E. (1950). Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. S. Strasser (Ed.), Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1931). Méditations cartésiennes: introduction à la phénoménologie. G. Peiffer and E. Levinas (Trans.). Paris: Librairie Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. D. Cairns (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1969). Formal and transcendental logic. D. Cairns (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Spiegelberg, H. (1973). Husserl’s way into phenomenology for Americans: A letter and its sequel. In F. Kersten & R. Zaner (Eds.), Phenomenology: Continuation and criticism—essays in memory of Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar