Advertisement

Husserl Studies

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 33–50 | Cite as

Mental Contents, Transparency, Realism: News from the Phenomenological Camp

  • Sonja Rinofner-KreidlEmail author
Article

In his recent book, Walter Hopp deals with two topics that are of primary philosophical importance: perception and knowledge.1At the outset the author characterizes his approach as “largely phenomenological”, thereby following Charles Siewert’s broad though workable notion of “plain phenomenology” (cf. pp. 3f). Hopp’s main topic is how a theory of perception and knowledge, seen especially with reference to their interrelation, may benefit from a phenomenologically informed theory of intentionality. Throughout, the book is written in a clear and precise style. It offers much analytic work as well as an impressive amount of argument and reflection. It is worth noting that the author, who strongly recommends picking up the thread of Husserl’s phenomenology, never does so himself in rigid scholastic terms. References to Husserl’s work are employed in a free and emphatically critical way, highlighting what the author deems important. Thus Hopp exhibits a thoroughly phenomenological...

Keywords

Perceptual Experience Mental Content Epistemic Justification Intentional Content Direct Realism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Audi, R. (2003). Reason. In Epistemology. A contemporary introduction to the theory of knowledge, Second Edition (pp. 94–130). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Audi, R. (2008). Skepticism about the a priori: Self-evidence, defeasibility, and cogito propositions. In J. Greco (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of skepticism (pp. 149–175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bonjour, L. (1998). In defense of pure reason: A rationalist account of a priori justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bonjour, L. (2004). In search of direct realism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXIX/3: 349–367.Google Scholar
  5. Crane, T. (2006). Is there a perceptual relation? In T. Szabó & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Perceptual experience (pp. 126–146). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hopp, W. (2011). Perception and knowledge. A phenomenological account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huemer, M. (2001). Skepticism and the veil of perception. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  8. Huemer, M. (2005). Ethical intuitionism. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Husserl, E. (2001). Logical investigations, vol. 1. J. N. Findlay (Trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Kennedy, M. (2009). Heirs of nothingness: The implications of transparency. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXXIX/3: 574–604.Google Scholar
  11. Mattens, F. (2010). Philosophy and “experience”. A conflict of interest? In C. Ierna, H. Jacobs, & F. Mattens (Eds.), Philosophy, phenomenology, sciences. Essays in commemoration of Edmund Husserl (pp. 405–438). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mulligan, K. (1995). Perception. In B. Smith & D. W. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Husserl (pp. 168–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rinofner-Kreidl, S. (2000). Edmund Husserl. Zeitlichkeit und Intentionalität. Freiburg/München: Verlag Karl Alber.Google Scholar
  14. Rinofner-Kreidl, S. (2011). Motive, Gründe und Entscheidungen in Husserls intentionaler Handlungstheorie. In V. Mayer, Ch. Erhard, & M. Scherini (Eds.), Die Aktualität Husserls (pp. 232–277). Freiburg/München: Verlag Karl Alber.Google Scholar
  15. Rinofner-Kreidl, S. (2013). Phenomenological intuitionism and its psychiatric impact. In Th. Breyer, Th. Fuchs, & Ch. Mundt (Eds.), Karl Jaspers: Philosophy and psychopathology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für PhilosophieUniversität GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations