Husserl Studies

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 131–145 | Cite as

Phenomenological Reflections on the Possibility of First Philosophy

Article

Abstract

In this paper, I will examine the possibility of first philosophy from a phenomenological point of view. I will do this by assessing Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect. 1, I will delineate Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect. 2, I will introduce Levinas’s conception of ethics as first philosophy and sketch out his criticism of Husserl’s conception of first philosophy. In Sect. 3, I will assess Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s conception and show that from a phenomenological point of view, it is possible to develop first philosophy only in a relative sense and not in an absolute sense. The possibility of first philosophy in a relative sense implies that both Husserl’s and Levinas’s conceptions of first philosophy have some limitations and should be revised, since in a certain way, they are each conceived from an absolute point of view. In Sect. 4, I will show that the conception of first philosophy in a relative sense is a phenomenological one and sketch out some basic features of first philosophy in a relative sense.

References

  1. Aristotle. (1968). The metaphysics (H. Tredennick, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, J. (1995). Metaphysics. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Descartes R. (1978). Principes. Traduction française, IX-2, Œuvres de Descartes, publiées par C. Adam & P. Tannery. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
  4. Hua I. Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. S. Strasser (Ed.). Den Haag. Martinus Nijhoff, 1963. Cartesian meditations. An introduction to phenomenology. D. Cairns (Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. Hua III/1. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. K. Schuhman (Ed.). Den Haag, 1976. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology. F. Kersten (Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982.Google Scholar
  6. Hua VII. Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Erster Teil: Kritische Ideengeschichte. R. Boehm (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1956.Google Scholar
  7. Hua VIII. Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der Phänomenologischen Reduktionen. R. Boehm (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1959.Google Scholar
  8. Hua IX. Phänomenologische Psychologie. W. Biemel (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962.Google Scholar
  9. Hua X. Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1893–1917). R. Boehm (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966.Google Scholar
  10. Kern, I. (1975). Idee und Methode der Philosophie. Leitgedanken für eine Theorie der Vernunft. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  11. Lee, N.-I. (1993). Edmund Husserls Phänomenologie der Instinkte. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  12. Lee, N.-I. (2002). Static-phenomenological and genetic-phenomenological concept of primordiality in Husserl’s Fifth Cartesian Meditation. Husserl Studies, 18, 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Levinas E. (1969). Totality and infinity (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Levinas, E. (1981). Otherwise than being or beyond essence (A. Lingis, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  15. Levinas E. (1998). Ethics as first philosophy. In S. Hand (Ed.). The Levinas reader (pp. 75–87). Oxford: Blackwell. Originally published as “Ethique comme philosophie première.” In G. Hottois (Ed.), Justifications de l’ėthique (pp. 41–51). Bruxelles: Editions de l’Universitė de Bruxelles, 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, College of HumanitiesSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations