Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 641–677 | Cite as

Systems Thinking Versus Population Thinking: Genotype Integration and Chromosomal Organization 1930s–1950s

  • Ehud Lamm


This article describes how empirical discoveries in the 1930s–1950s regarding population variation for chromosomal inversions affected Theodosius Dobzhansky and Richard Goldschmidt. A significant fraction of the empirical work I discuss was done by Dobzhansky and his coworkers; Goldschmidt was an astute interpreter, with strong and unusual commitments. I argue that both belong to a mechanistic tradition in genetics, concerned with the effects of chromosomal organization and systems on the inheritance patterns of species. Their different trajectories illustrate how scientists’ commitments affect how they interpret new evidence and adjust to it. Dobzhansky was moved to revised views about selection, while Goldschmidt moved his attention to different genetic phenomena. However different, there are significant connections between the two that enrich our understanding of their views. I focus on two: the role of developmental considerations in Dobzhansky’s thought and the role of neutrality and drift in Goldschmidt’s evolutionary account. Dobzhansky’s struggle with chromosomal variation is not solely about competing schools of thought within the selectionist camp, as insightfully articulated by John Beatty, but also a story of competition between selectionist thinking and developmental perspectives. In contraposition, Goldschmidt emphasized the role of low penetrance mutations that spread neutrally and pointed out that drift could result from developmental canalization. This account adds to the dominant story about Goldschmidt’s resistance to the splitting of development from genetics, as told by Garland Allen and Michael Dietrich. The story I tell illustrates how developmental thinking and genetic thinking conflicted and influenced researchers with different convictions about the significance of chromosomal organization.


Chromosomal inversions Coadaptation Heterosis Systemic mutations Levels of selection Evolution of Genetic Systems Neutral evolution 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beatty, John. 1987a. “Dobzhansky and Drift: Facts, Values, and Chance in Evolutionary Biology.” L. Krüger (ed.), The Probabilistic Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 271–311.Google Scholar
  2. ——. 1987b. “Weighing the Risks: Stalemate in the Classical/Balance Controversy.” Journal of the History of Biology 20: 289–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ——. 1994. “Dobzhansky and the Biology of Democracy: The Moral and Political Significance of Genetic Variation.” M. Adams (ed.), The Evolution of Theodosius Dobzhansky. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 195–218.Google Scholar
  4. Brncic, Danko. 1954. “Heterosis and the Integration of the Genotype in Geographic Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura.” Genetics 39(1): 77–88.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlson, Elof Axel. 1966. The Gene: A Critical History. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  6. Carson, Hampton L. 1980. “Cytogenetics and the Neo-Darwinian Synthesis.” Ernst Mayr and William Provine (eds.), The Evolutionary Synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chetverikov, Sergey S. 1961. “On Certain Aspects of the Evolutionary Process from the Standpoint of Modern Genetics.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 105(2): 167–195.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Crow, James. 1987. “Muller, and Overdominance.” Journal of the History of Biology 20: 351–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darlington, Cyril Dean and Mather, Kenneth. 1950. The Elements of Genetics. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, Gregory, Dietrich, Michael, and Jacobs, David. 2009. “Homeotic Mutants and the Assimilation of Developmental Genetics into the Evolutionary Synthesis.” Joe Cain and Michael Ruse (eds.), Descended from Darwin: Insights into American Evolutionary Studies, 1900–1970. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
  11. Dietrich, Michael R. 2000a. “From Gene to Genetic Hierarchy: Richard Goldschmidt and the Problem of the Gene.” P. Beurton, R. Falk, and H. Rheinberger (eds.), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution: Historical and Epistemological Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ——. 2000b. “From Hopeful Monsters to Homeotic Effects: Richard Goldschmidt’s Integration of Development, Evolution, and Genetics.” American Zoologist 40(5): 738–747. doi: 10.1093/icb/40.5.738.Google Scholar
  13. ——. 2008. “Striking the Hornet’s Nest: Richard Goldschmidt’s Rejection of the Particulate Gene.” O. Harman and M.R. Dietrich (eds.), Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in Biology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. ——. 2011. “Reinventing Richard Goldschmidt: Reputation, Memory, and Biography.” Journal of the History of Biology. doi: 10.1007/s10739-011-9271-y.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1932. “The Baroid Mutation in Drosophila Melanogaster.” Genetics 17(4): 369–392.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dobzhansky, Th. 1935. “The Y Chromosome of Drosophila Pseudoobscura.” Genetics 20(4): 366–76.Google Scholar
  17. ——. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. ——. 1939. “Genetics of Natural Populations IX. Temporal Changes in the Composition of Populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.” Genetics 28(2): 162.Google Scholar
  19. ——. 1950. “Genetics of Natural Populations XIX. Origin of Heterosis through Natural Selection in Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura to Natural Selection.” Genetics 35(3): 288PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. ——. 1951. Genetics and the Origin of Species, 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  21. ——. 1952. “Nature and Origin of Heterosis.” J. Gowen (ed.), Heterosis. Ames, IA: Iowa State College Press, pp. 218–223.Google Scholar
  22. ——. 1953. “Some New Trends in Population Genetics and in Evolutionary Studies.” A.A. Buzzati-Traverso (ed.), International Union of Biological Sciences Symposium on Genetics and Population Structure. Pavia: IUBS, pp. 95–97.Google Scholar
  23. ——. 1955. “A Review of Some Fundamental Concepts and Problems of Population Genetics.” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 20: 1–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. ——. 1962. Mankind Evolving. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Dobzhansky, Theodosius and Levene, Howard. 1955. “Genetics of Natural Populations. XXIV. Developmental Homeostasis in Natural Populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.” Genetics 40(6): 797–808.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dobzhansky, Theodosius and Sturtevant, Alfred H. 1938. “Inversions in the Chromosomes of Drosophila pseudoobscura.” Genetics 23(1): 28–64.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dubinin, Nikolai P. and Tiniakov, G.G. 1945. “Seasonal Cycles and the Concentration of Inversions in Populations of Drosophila funebris.” American Naturalist 79: 570–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ——. 1946a. “Inversion Gradients and Natural Selection in Ecological Races of Drosophila funebris.” Genetics 31(6): 537.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. ——. 1946b. “Natural Selection and Chromosomal Variability in Populations of Drosophila funebris.” Journal of Heredity 37(2): 39–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Felsenstein, Joseph. 1974. “The Evolutionary Advantage of Recombination.” Genetics 78(2): 737–756.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Fisher, Ronald A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gannett, Lisa. 2013. “Theodosius Dobzhansky and the Genetic Race Concept.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44(3): 250–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gibson, Abraham H. 2013. “Edward O. Wilson and the Organicist Tradition.” Journal of the History of Biology 46(4): 599–630.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gilbert, Scott F. 1978. “The Embryological Origins of the Gene Theory.” Journal of the History of Biology 11(2): 307–351. doi: 10.1007/BF00389303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Goldschmidt, Richard. 1933. “Some Aspects of Evolution.” Science 78(2033): 539–547.CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  36. ——. 1937a, “Spontaneous Chromatin Rearrangements and Theory of Gene,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 23: 621–623.Google Scholar
  37. ——. 1937b, “Spontaneous Chromatin Rearrangements in Drosophila,” Nature, 140(3548): 767.Google Scholar
  38. ——. 1940. The Material Basis of Evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  39. ——. 1938. Physiological Genetics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. ——. 1946. “An Empirical Evolutionary Generalization Viewed from the Standpoint of Phenogenetics.” American Naturalist 80(792): 305–317.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. ——. 1952. “Homoeotic Mutants and Evolution.” Acta Biotheoretica 10(1–2): 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. ——. 1954. “Different Philosophies of Genetics.” Science 119(3099): 703–710.CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  43. ——. 1955. Theoretical Genetics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ——. 1960. In and Out of the Ivory Tower: The Autobiography of Richard B. Goldschmidt. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  45. Hall, Brian K. 2005. “Fifty Years Later: I. Michael Lerner’s Genetic Homeostasis (1954)—A Valiant Attempt to Integrate Genes, Organisms and Environment.” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 304B(3): 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Harman, Oren S. 2004. The Man Who Invented the Chromosome: A Life of Cyril Darlington. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Huxley, Julian. 2010[1942]. Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  48. Ives, Philip Truman. 1947. “Second Chromosome Inversions in Wild Populations of Drosophila Melanogaster.” Evolution 1(1/2): 42–47. doi: 10.2307/2405402.
  49. Kohler, R.E. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Lamm, Ehud. 2014. “The Genome as a Developmental Organ.” The Journal of Physiology 592(11): 2283–2293.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Lerner, I. Michael. 1954. Genetic Homeostasis. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
  52. Lewontin, Richard C. 1981. “The Scientific Work of Th. Dobzhansky.” R.C. Lewontin, John A. Moore, William B. Provine, and Bruce Wallace (eds.), Dobzhansky’s Genetics of Natural Populations I–XLIII. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Lewontin, Richard C., Moore, John A., Provine, William B., and Wallace, B. (eds.). 1981. Dobzhansky’s Genetics of Natural Populations I–XLIII. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Mather, Kenneth. 1943. “Polygenic Inheritance and Natural Selection.” Biological Reviews 18(1): 32–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1943.tb00287.x.
  55. Mather, Kenneth. 1955. “Polymorphism as an Outcome of Disruptive Selection.” Evolution 9(1): 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mitman, Greg. 1992. Ecology, Community, and American Social Thought, 1900–1950. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  57. Muller, Herman J. 1932. “Some Genetic Aspects of Sex.” The American Naturalist 66(703): 118–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Provine, William B. 1981. “Origin of the GNP Series.” R.C. Lewontin, John A. Moore, William B. Provine, and Bruce Wallace (eds.), Dobzhansky’s Genetics of Natural Populations I–XLIII. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Painter, Theophilus S. 1934. “Salivary Chromosomes and the Attack on the Gene.” Journal of Heredity 25(12): 465–476.Google Scholar
  60. Richmond, Marsha L. 2007. “The Cell as the Basis for Heredity, Development, and Evolution: Richard Goldschmidt’s Program of Physiological Genetics.” M.D. Laubichler and J. Maienschein (eds.), From Embryology to Evo-Devo. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 169–212.Google Scholar
  61. Roll-Hansen, Nils. 2009. “Sources of Wilhelm Johannsen’s Genotype Theory.” Journal of the History of Biology 42(3): 457–493.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. ——. 2014a. “Commentary: Wilhelm Johannsen and the Problem of Heredity at the Turn of the 19th Century.” International Journal of Epidemiology 43(4): 1007–1013.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. ——. 2014b. “The Holist Tradition in Twentieth Century Genetics. Wilhelm Johannsen’s Genotype Concept.” The Journal of Physiology 592(11): 2431–2438.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sapp, Jan. 1987. Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Smocovitis, V.B. 1996. Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Sturtevant, Alfred H. 1917. “Genetic Factors Affecting the Strength of Linkage in Drosophila.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 3(9): 555.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  67. Sturtevant, Alfred H. and Mather, Kenneth. 1938. “The Interrelations of Inversions, Heterosis and Recombination.” The American Naturalist 72(742): 447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thoday, John M. 1955. “Balance, Heterozygosity and Developmental Stability.” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 20: 318–326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Vetukhiv, Mikhail. 1953. “Viability of Hybrids between Local Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 39(1): 30.Google Scholar
  70. Waddington, Conrad H. 1941. “Evolution of Developmental Systems.” Nature 147(3717): 108–110.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  71. ——. 1961. The Nature of Life. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  72. Wallace, Bruce. 1994. “Theodosius Dobzhansky Remembered: Genetic Coadaptation.” M Adams (ed.), The Evolution of Theodosius Dobzhansky. Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 155–162.Google Scholar
  73. Wright, Sewall. 1941. “The Material Basis of Evolution.” The Scientific Monthly 53(2): 165–170.ADSGoogle Scholar
  74. Wright, Sewall and Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1946. “Genetics of Natural Populations. XII. Experimental Reproduction of Some of the Changes Caused by Natural Selection in Certain Populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.” Genetics 31(2): 12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Sciences and IdeasTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations