Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 373–388 | Cite as

On Labels and Issues: The Lysenko Controversy and the Cold War

  • William deJong-Lambert
  • Nikolai Krementsov


  1. “Abstracts of Papers Presented Before the Physiological Section of the Botanical Society of America, Atlantic City, N.J. December 28, 1936 to January 2, 1937.” 1936. American Journal of Botany 23/10: 689.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, Mark B. 1990. “Lysenko, Trofim Denisovich.” Frederic L. Holmes (ed.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol. 18, Suppl. 2. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  3. “Brief Notices.” 1937. The Quarterly Review of Biology 12/2: 232.Google Scholar
  4. Buican, D. 1978. L’eternel Retour de Lyssenko. Paris: Copernic.Google Scholar
  5. Cassata, Francesco. 2008. Le due scienze. Il “caso Lysenko” in Italia. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
  6. Creager, A. N. H. 2006. “Nuclear Energy in the Service of Biomedicine: The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission’s Radioisotope Program, 1946–1950.” Journal of the History of Biology 39: 649–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. deJong-Lambert, William. 2005. The New Biology: Lysenkoism in Poland. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. deJong-Lambert, William. 2009. “From Eugenics to Lysenkoism: The Evolution of Stanisław Skowron.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 39(3): 269–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. deJong-Lambert, William. 2011. “Hermann J. Muller, Theodosius Dobzhansky, Leslie Clarence Dunn and the Reaction to Lysenkoism in the United States.” Journal of Cold War Studies (forthcoming, fall 2011).Google Scholar
  10. Deutsch, A. 1948. “The Degradation of Soviet Science.” New York Star, December 23.Google Scholar
  11. Dunn, L. C. 1946. “The New Genetics in the Soviet Union. P. S. Hudson and R. H. Richens. Cambridge, Engl.: Imperial Bureau of Plant Breeding and Genetics.” Science 104: 377–378.Google Scholar
  12. Fuller, G. D. 1936a. “The Theoretical Significance of Vernalization; Vernalization and the Phasic Development of Plants.” Botanical Gazette 97(4): 867–868.Google Scholar
  13. Fuller, Geo D. 1936b. “Vernalization.” Ecology 17(2): 298–299.Google Scholar
  14. Glass, Bentley. 1990. “The Grim Heritage of Lysenkoism: Foreword.” Quarterly Review of Biology 65(4): 413–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham, Loren R. 1974. Science and Philosophy in the Soviet Union. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  16. Hagemann, Rudolf. 2002. “How Did East German Genetics Avoid Lysenkoism?” Trends in Genetics 18: 320–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harman, O. S. 2003. “C. D. Darlington and the British and American Reaction to Lysenko and the Soviet Conception of Science.” Journal of the History of Biology 36: 309–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoxtermann, Ekkehard. 2000. “‘Klassenbiologen’ und ‘Formalgenetiker’. Zur Rezeption Lyssenkos unter den Biologen in der DDR.” Acta Historica Leopoldina 36: 273–300.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, Greta. 1979. “British Scientists, Lysenko and the Cold War.” Economy and Society 8: 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Joravsky, David. 1986. The Lysenko Affair. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kartman, Leo. 1945. “Soviet Genetics and the ‘Autonomy of Science’.” Scientific Monthly 61(1): 67–70.Google Scholar
  22. Krementsov, Nikolai. 1996. “A ‘Second Front’ in Soviet Genetics: the International Dimension of the Lysenko Controversy.” Journal of the History of Biology 29(2): 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krementsov, Nikolai. 1997. Stalinist Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Krementsov, Nikolai. 2000. “Lysenkoism in Europe: Export-Import of the Soviet Model.” Michael David-Fox and Gyorgy Peteri (eds.), Academia in Upheaval: Origins, Transfers, and Transformations of the Communist Academic Regime in Russia and East Central Europe. New York: Garland Publishing Group, pp. 179–202.Google Scholar
  25. Krementsov, Nikolai. 2005. International Science Between the World Wars: The Case of Genetics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Krementsov, Nikolai. 2007. “‘In the Shadow of the Bomb’: US–Soviet Biomedical Relations in the Early Cold War, 1944–1948.” Journal of Cold War Studies 9(4): 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krementsov, Nikolai. 2009. “Trypanosoma cruzi, Cancer and the Cold War.” História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos (Rio de Janeiro) 16/1: 75–94.Google Scholar
  28. Krementsov, Nikolai. 2010. “Marxism, Darwinism, and Genetics in the Soviet Union.” Denis Alexander and Ron Numbers (eds.), Biology and Ideology: From Descartes to Dawkins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 215–246.Google Scholar
  29. Krige, John. 2006. American Hegemony and the Post-War Reconstruction of Science in Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. “Lamarckism.” 1958. Encyclopedia Britannica 13: 607–610.Google Scholar
  31. “Lamarckism.” 1961. Encyclopedia Britannica 13: 607–609.Google Scholar
  32. Lecourt, Dominique. 1977. Proletarian Science? The Case of Lysenko. London: NLB.Google Scholar
  33. Lerner, Michael I. 1950. Genetics in the USSR: An Obituary. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  34. Loehwing, W. F. 1939. “Photoperiodic Aspects of Phasic Development.” Science 90(2346): 552–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. “Lysenko Crashes Genetics in Russia.” 1948. New York Times, August 19: 5.Google Scholar
  36. Lysenko, Trofim D. 1949. “Concluding Remarks,” The Situation in Biological Science. New York: International Publishers Co.Google Scholar
  37. Medvedev, Zhores. 1969. The Rise and Fall of T. D. Lysenko. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mellett, L. 1953. “‘Lysenkoism’ in Washington.” Journal of Heredity 44: 69.Google Scholar
  39. “Movie Review, Michurin. 1948. The Screen in Review; “Life in Bloom,” Film of Life of Russian Scientist, is New Picture at the Stanley Theater.” New York Times, 9 May 1949: 20.Google Scholar
  40. Murneek, A. E. 1937. “Recent Advances in Physiology of Reproduction of Plants.” Science 86(2220): 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Paul, Diane. 1983. “A War on Two Fronts: J. B. S. Haldane and the Response to Lysenkoism in Britain.” Journal of the History of Biology 16: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prezent, I. I. 1949. “Rech’.” The Situation in Biological Science 273.Google Scholar
  43. Rasmussen, Nicholas. 1997. “The Midcentury Biophysics Bubble: Hiroshima and the Biological Revolution in America, Revisited.” History of Science 35: 245–293.Google Scholar
  44. Rasmussen, Nicholas. 2002. “Of ‘Small Men’, Big Science and Bigger Business: The Second World War and Biomedical Research in the United States.” Minerva 40: 115–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Regelmann, Johann-Peter. 1980. Die Geschichte des Lyssenkoismus. Frankfurt auf Main: Fisher Verlag.Google Scholar
  46. Roll-Hunsen, Nils. 2005. The Lysenko Effect. The Politics of Science. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
  47. “Russian ‘Burbank’ Shuffles Seasons.” 1932. New York Times, November 21: 19.Google Scholar
  48. Schandevyl, Eva. 2003. “Soviet Biology, Scientific Ethos and Political Engagement: Belgian University Professors and the Lysenko Case.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 2: 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schneider, Laurence. 2003. Biology and Revolution in Twentieth Century China. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  50. Soyfer, Valery A. 1994. T. D. Lysenko and the Tragedy of Soviet Science. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  51. The Situation in Biological Science: Proceedings of the Lenin Academy of Agricultural Sciences of the U.S.S.R., Session: July 31–August 7, 1948, Verbatim Report. 1949. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
  52. Wolfe, Audra J. 2010. “What Does It Mean to Go Public? The American Response to Lysenkoism, Reconsidered.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 40: 48–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wort, D. J. 1939. “Vernalization of Marquis Wheat and Other Spring Cereals.” Botanical Gazette 101(2): 457–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zirkle, Conway. 1949. Death of a Science in Russia. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.City University of New YorkBronxUSA
  2. 2.Harriman Institute of Russian Eurasian and Eastern European Studies at Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations