Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 443–468 | Cite as

How Lysenkoism Became Pseudoscience: Dobzhansky to Velikovsky

Article

Abstract

At some point in America in the 1940s, T. D. Lysenko’s neo-Lamarckian hereditary theories transformed from a set of disputed doctrines into a prime exemplar of “pseudoscience.” This paper explores the context in which this theory acquired this pejorative status by examining American efforts to refute Lysenkoism both before and after the famous August 1948 endorsement of Lysenko’s doctrines by the Stalinist state, with particular attention to the translation efforts of Theodosius Dobzhansky. After enumerating numerous tactics for combating perceived pseudoscience, the Lysenko case is then juxtaposed with another American case of alleged pseudoscience: the notorious 1950 scandal surrounding Immanuel Velikovsky’s Worlds in Collision (1950, Worlds in Collision. New York: Macmillan). On several levels, the characterization of Lysenkoism as pseudoscientific served as a template for casting other rejected theories, including Velikovsky’s, in the same light.

Keywords

Theodosius Dobzhansky Lysenkoism pseudoscience Immanuel Velikovsky 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aleksandrov, V. Ia. 1992. Trudnye gody sovetskoi biologii: Zapiski sovremennika. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
  2. Bauer, Henry H. 1984. Beyond Velikovsky: The History of a Public Controversy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  3. Condon, Edward U. 1950. “Velikovsky’s Catastrophe.” New Republic 122(17) (24 April): 23–24.Google Scholar
  4. Degen, Ion. 1997. Immanuil Velikovskii: Rasskaz o zamechatel’nom cheloveke. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks.Google Scholar
  5. De Grazia, Alfred, et al. 1966. The Velikovsky Affair: The Warfare of Science and Scientism. New Hyde Park, NY: University Books.Google Scholar
  6. Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1946. “Lysenko’s ‘Genetics’.” Journal of Heredity 37: 5–9.Google Scholar
  7. Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1949a. “Marxist Biology, French Style.” Journal of Heredity 40: 78–79.Google Scholar
  8. Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1949b. “The Suppression of a Science.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 5(May): 144–146.Google Scholar
  9. Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1952a. “Lysenko’s ‘Michurinist’ Genetics.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 8(February): 40–44.Google Scholar
  10. Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1952b. “Two Recent Versions of Eugenics.” American Naturalist 86(January–February): 61–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1953. “Lysenko Progresses Backward.” Journal of Heredity 44: 20–22.Google Scholar
  12. Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1955. “The Crisis of Soviet Biology.” Ernest J Simmons (ed.), Continuity and Change in Russian and Soviet Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 329–346.Google Scholar
  13. Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1956. The Biological Basis of Human Freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1958. “Lysenko at Bay.” Journal of Heredity 49: 15–17.Google Scholar
  15. Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1962–1965. Reminiscences. Oral History Research Office, Butler Library, Columbia University, New York City, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1964. Heredity and the Nature of Man. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  17. Dunn, L.C. 1946. “Review of Lysenko’s Heredity and Its Variability.” Science 103(8): 180–181.Google Scholar
  18. Dunn, L.C. and Dobzhansky, Th. 1946. Heredity Race, and Society. New York: Penguin Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunn, L.C. and Dobzhansky, Th. 1952. Heredity, Race and Society, rev. ed. New York: Mentor.Google Scholar
  20. Ellenberger, Leroy. 1979. “A Point of View: The Cold War, McCarthy and Velikovsky.” S.I.S. Workshop 1(5): 5–6.Google Scholar
  21. Gaisinovich, A.E. 1988. Zarozhdenie i razvitie genetiki. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
  22. Gardner, Martin. 1950. “The Hermit Scientist.” Antioch Review 10(4): 447–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geison, Gerald L. 1995. The Private Science of Louis Pasteur. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Glass, Bentley. 1946. “Review of Lysenko’s Heredity and Its Variability.” Quarterly Review of Biology 21: 279.Google Scholar
  26. Goldschmidt, Richard B. 1946. “Review of Lysenko’s Heredity and Its Variability.” Physiological Zoology 19: 332–334.Google Scholar
  27. Goldschmidt, Richard B. 1949. “Research and Politics.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 5(May): 150–155.Google Scholar
  28. Gordon, Theodore J. 1966. Ideas in Conflict. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gormley, Melinda. 2006. Geneticist L. C. Dunn: Politics, Activism, and Community. Ph.D. Dissertation, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  30. Graham, Loren R. 1987. Science, Philosophy, and Human Behavior in the Soviet Union. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Haldane, J.B.S. 1950. “St. Quetzalcoatl and St. Fenris.” New Statesman and Nation 1(11 November): 432–433.Google Scholar
  32. Harman, Oren Solomon. 2003. “C. D. Darlington and the British and American Reaction to Lysenko and the Soviet Conception of Science.” Journal of the History of Biology 35: 309–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Herget, Paul. 1950. “It is Just as Barnum Said.” Cincinnati Enquirer (1 April): 7.Google Scholar
  34. Hudson, P.S. and Richens, R.H. 1946. The New Genetics in the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Imperial Bureau of Plant Breeding and Genetics.Google Scholar
  35. Joravsky, David. 1970. The Lysenko Affair. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kaftanov, S. 1949. “In Support of Michurin’s Biological Theory in Higher Institutions of Learning.” Science 109(28 January): 90–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kolchinskii, E.I. 2007. Biologiia Germanii i Rossii-SSSR v usloviiakh sotsial’no-politi- cheskikh krizisov pervoi poloviny XX veka (mezhdu liberalizmom, kommunizmom i natsional-sotsializmom). St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia.Google Scholar
  38. Krementsov, Nikolai. 1996. “A “Second Front” in Soviet Genetics: The International Dimension of the Lysenko Controversy.” Journal of the History of Biology 29: 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Krementsov, Nikolai. 1997. Stalinist Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Laptev, I. 1947. “Antipatrioticheskie postupki pod flagom ‘nauchnoi’ kritiki.” Pravda 230(10621): 2.Google Scholar
  41. Larrabee, Eric. 1950. “The Day the Sun Stood Still.” Harper’s Magazine (January): 19–26.Google Scholar
  42. Lash, Joseph P. 1949. “Russian Science and Heresy.” New Republic (3 January): 11–13.Google Scholar
  43. Laudan, Larry. 2009 [1983]. “The Demise of the Demarcation Problem.” Robert T. Pennock and Michael Ruse (eds.), But Is It Science?: The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy, updated edition. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, pp. 312–330.Google Scholar
  44. Lysenko, T.D. 1946. Heredity and Its Variability, trans. Theodosius Dobzhansky. New York: King’s Crown Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lysenko, T.D. 1951a. Heredity and Its Variability. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
  46. Lysenko, T.D. 1951b. New Developments in the Science of Biological Species. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
  47. McAulay, Robert E. 1975. Substantive and Ideological Aspects of Science: An Analysis of the Velikovsky Controversy. M.A. Thesis, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
  48. Medvedev, Zhores A. 1987. Soviet Agriculture. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  49. Medvedev, Zhores A. 1969. The Rise and Fall of T. D. Lysenko, trans. I. Michael Lerner. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Paul, Diane B. 1983. “A War on Two Fronts: J.B.S. Haldane and the Response to Lysenkoism in Britain.” Journal of the History of Biology 16: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Payne-Gaposchkin, Cecilia. 1950a. “Worlds in Collision.” Popular Astronomy 58(6): 278–286.Google Scholar
  52. Payne-Gaposchkin, Cecilia. 1950b. “Nonsense, Dr. Velikovsky!” The Reporter 2(6): 37–40.Google Scholar
  53. Pigliucci, Massimo. 2010. Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  54. Polanyi, Michael. 1967. “The Growth of Science in Society.” Minerva 5: 533–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roll-Hansen, Nils. 1985a. “A New Perspective on Lysenko?” Annals of Science 42: 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roll-Hansen, Nils. 1985b. “Genetics Under Stalin.” Science 227: 1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Roll-Hansen, Nils. 1989. “The Practice Criterion and the Rise of Lysenkoism.” Science Studies 1: 3–16.Google Scholar
  58. Sax, Karl. 1944. “Soviet Biology.” Science 99: 298–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schrecker, Ellen. 1998. Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Sharon, Ruth Velikovsky. 1995. Aba: The Glory and the Torment: The Life of Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky. Dubuque, IA: Times Mirror Higher Education Group.Google Scholar
  61. Simpson, Robert. 1946. Science, Totalitarian Model. Saturday Review of Literature (9 March): 28–32.Google Scholar
  62. Soyfer, Valery. 1994. Lysenko and the Tragedy of Soviet Science, trans. Leo Gruliow and Rebecca Gruliow. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Stern, Curt. 1946. “Review of Lysenko’s Heredity and Its Variability.” American Naturalist 80: 241–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Velikovsky, Immanuel. 1950. Worlds in Collision. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  65. Velikovsky, Immanuel. 1951. “Answer to My Critics.” Harper’s Magazine 202 (June): 51–57.Google Scholar
  66. Velikovsky, Immanuel. 1955. Earth in Upheaval. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  67. Velikovsky, Immanuel. 1982. Mankind in Amnesia. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  68. Voorhees, Duane Leroy. 1990. The “Jewish Science” of Immanuel Velikovsky: Culture and Biography as Ideational Determinants. Ph.D. Dissertation, Bowling Green State University.Google Scholar
  69. Wang, Jessica. 1999. American Science in an Age of Anxiety: Scientists, Anticommunism, and the Cold War. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  70. Zhebrak, Anton. 1945. “Soviet Biology.” Science 102(5 October): 357–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zirkle, Conway. 1947. “Review of Lysenko’s Heredity and Its Variability.” Isis 37: 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zirkle, Conway. 1949. Death of a Science in Russia: The Fate of Genetics as Described in Pravda and Elsewhere. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  73. Zirkle, Conway. 1959. Evolution, Marxian Biology, and the Social Scene. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HistoryPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations