Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 33–63 | Cite as

Watching the ‘Eugenic Experiment’ Unfold: The Mixed Views of British Eugenicists Toward Nazi Germany in the Early 1930s



Historians of the eugenics movement have long been ambivalent in their examination of the links between British hereditary researchers and Nazi Germany. While there is now a clear consensus that American eugenics provided significant material and ideological support for the Germans, the evidence remains less clear in the British case where comparatively few figures openly supported the Nazi regime and the left-wing critique of eugenics remained particularly strong. After the Second World War British eugenicists had to push back against the accusation that their science was intrinsically dictatorial or totalitarian and, as a result, many of their early perceptions of the Nazis were ignored or rationalised away. Further, historians in recent years have focused more directly on the social reformist elements of eugenics, discussing the links between hereditary science and the birth control and feminist movements in addition to others. While undoubtedly making valuable contributions to the scholarly understanding of the eugenic milieu in the interwar years, these studies have neglected to recontextualize the sentiments of British eugenicists who did indeed view the Nazi government positively in the early years of the 1930s. This article argues that there was a significant, though not numerically sizable, faction in the British eugenics movement, though mostly outside the Eugenics Society itself, in the early 1930s that viewed the Nazi Germany as an admirable state for its implementation of eugenic principles. One of these figures was later interned by his own government for being too closely aligned with the German regime, though he argued that this affinity was driven by the quest for scientific truth rather than politics. Eugenics in Britain thus contained a greater diversity of views toward Germany than scholars have previously assumed, warranting more research into the individuals and organizations harbouring these views.


eugenics nazism sterilization Eugenics Society George Pitt-Rivers C.P. Blacker International Federation of Eugenic Organizations 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, Mark B. 1990. The Wellborn Science: Eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, Mark B., Allen, Garland E., and Weiss, Sheila Faith. 2005. “Human Heredity and Politics: A Comparative Institutional Study of the Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor (United States), the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics (Germany), and the Maxim Gorky Medical Genetics Institute (USSR).” Osiris (2nd Series) 20: 232–262.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous. 1930. “Membership and Organization of the International Federation of Eugenic Organizations.” Eugenical News XV(12): 167–169.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous. 1933–1934. “Notes of the Quarter.” The Eugenics Review XXV: 75–78.Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous. 1934–1935. “The German Sterilization Law: Discussion on Professor Muckermann’s Lecture.” The Eugenics Review XXVI: 267–271.Google Scholar
  6. Barkan, Elazar. 1992. The Retreat of Scientific Racism: Changing Concepts of Race in Britain and the United States Between the World Wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Black, Edwin. 2003. War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race. New York, London: Four Walls Eight Windows.Google Scholar
  8. Blacker, C.P. 1952. Eugenics: Galton and After. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  9. Blacker, C.P. and Duff, Ursula Grant. 1953. “Obituary: Mrs. C.B.S. Hodson.” The Eugenics Review 45(2): 78–79.Google Scholar
  10. Bowler, Peter. 1984. “E. W. MacBride’s Lamarckian Eugenics and Its Implications for the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge.” Annals of Science 41: 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chitty, Clyde. 2007. Eugenics, Race and Intelligence in Education. London: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
  12. Connelly, Matthew James. 2008. Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population. Cambridge, MA, London: Belknap.Google Scholar
  13. Cooper, John W. 1928. “The Preservation of Native Races.” Journal of Heredity 19(5): 234.Google Scholar
  14. Dowbiggin, Ian Robert. 2008. The Sterilization Movement and Global Fertility in the Twentieth Century. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Farmer, Ann. 2008. By Their Fruits: Eugenics, Population Control, and the Abortion Campaign. Washington DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  16. Firth, Raymond. 1929. Primitive Economics of the New Zealand Maori. London: G. Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Galton, Francis. 1909. Essays in Eugenics. London: Eugenics Education Society.Google Scholar
  18. Galton, Francis. 1914. “Francis Galton’s Utopia: The Eugenic College of Kantsaywhere.” Karl Pearson (ed.), The Life, Letters and Labours of Francis Galton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 411–425.Google Scholar
  19. Harmsen, Hans and Lohse, Franz. 1936. Bevölkerungsfragen: Bericht des Internationalen Kongresses für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, Berlin, 26. August-1, September 1935. München: J. F. Lehmann.Google Scholar
  20. Harten, Hans-Christian, Neirich, Uwe, and Schwerendt, Matthias. 2006. Rassenhygiene als Erziehungsideologie des Dritten Reichs: bio-bibliographisches Handbuch. Berlin: Akademie.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hodson, Cora B.S. 1934. Human Sterilization Today: A Survey of the Present Position. London: Watts & Co.Google Scholar
  22. Hoffmann, Géza von. 1913. Die Rassenhygiene in den Vereinigten Staaten von Nordamerika. München: J. F. Lehmann.Google Scholar
  23. Huxley, Aldous. 1969. Brave New World. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  24. Jones, Greta. 1980. Social Darwinism and English Thought: The Interaction Between Biological and Social Theory. Brighton/Atlantic Highlands: Harvester Press/Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  25. Jones, Greta. 1982. “Eugenics and Social Policy Between the Wars.” The Historical Journal 25(3): 717–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, Greta. 1986. Social Hygiene in Twentieth Century Britain. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  27. Keith, Arthur. 1946. Essays on Human Evolution. London: Watts & Co.Google Scholar
  28. Keith, Arthur. 1950. An Autobiography. London: Watts & Co.Google Scholar
  29. Kevles, Daniel J. 1995. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Keynes, Margaret. 1943. Leonard Darwin, 1850–1943. Cambridge: Privately Printed at the University Press.Google Scholar
  31. King, Desmond and Hansen, Randall. 1999. “Experts at Work: State Autonomy, Social Learning and Eugenic Sterilization in 1930s Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 29(1): 77–107. doi: 10.1017/S0007123499000046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kühl, Stefan. 1994. The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kühl, Stefan. 1997. Die Internationale der Rassisten: Aufstieg und Niedergang der internationalen Bewegung für Eugenik und Rassenhygiene im 20. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  34. Laughlin, Harry H. 1934. “Historical Background of the Third International Congress of Eugenics.” Harry F. Perkins, Charles B. Davenport, Clarence G. Campbell, Madison Grant, Harrison R. Hunt, Frederick Osborn, Paul Popenoe, Laurence H. Snyder, and Harry H. Laughlin (eds.), A Decade of Progress in Eugenics: Scientific Papers of the Third International Congress of Eugenics. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co., pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  35. Macnicol, John. 1989. “Eugenics and the Campaign for Voluntary Sterilization in Britain Between the Wars.” Social History of Medicine 2(2): 147–169. doi: 10.1093/shm/2.2.147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Müller-Hill, Benno. 1988. Murderous Science: Elimination by Scientific Selection of Jews, Gypsies, and Others, Germany, 1933–1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Overy, Richard. 2009. The Morbid Age: Britain Between the Wars. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  38. Pearson, Karl. 1934. “Prof. Karl Pearson’s Reply.” Speeches Delivered at a Dinner Held in University College, London in Honour of Professor Karl Pearson, 23 April 1934. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pitt-Rivers, George. 1920. The World Significance of the Russian Revolution. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Pitt-Rivers, George Henry Lane Fox. 1927. The Clash of Culture and the Contact of Races. London: George Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Pitt-Rivers, George Henry Lane Fox. 1931. Weeds in the Garden of Marriage. London: N. Douglas.Google Scholar
  42. Pitt-Rivers, George Henry Lane Fox. 1971. “Editor’s Preface.” George Henry Lane Fox Pitt-Rivers (ed.), Problems of Population. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 7–9.Google Scholar
  43. Porter, Theodore M. 2004. Karl Pearson: The Scientific Life in a Statistical Age. Princeton, NJ, Woodstock: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Report of the Ninth Conference of the International Federation of Eugenic Organizations. 1930. Ninth Conference of the International Federation of Eugenic Organizations. Farnham, Dorset: I.F.E.O.Google Scholar
  45. Ryback, Timothy W. 2010. Hitler’s Private Library: The Books that Shaped his Life. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  46. Sawday, Jonathan. 1999. “‘New Men, Strange Faces, Other Minds’: Arthur Keith, Race and the Piltdown Affair (1912–53).” Waltraud Ernst and Bernard Harris (eds.), Race, Science and Medicine, 1700–1960. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Schaffer, Gavin. 2005. “‘Like a Baby with a Box of Matches’: British Scientists and the Concept of ‘Race’ in the Inter-War Period.” The British Journal for the History of Science 38(3): 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Searle, G.R. 1979. “Eugenics and Politics in Britain in the 1930s.” Annals of Science 36(2): 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Searle, G.R. 1981. “Eugenics and Class.” Charles Webster (ed.), Biology, Medicine and Society, 1840–1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Slater, Eliot. 1935–1936. “German Eugenics in Practice.” The Eugenics Review XXVII(4): 285–295.Google Scholar
  51. Soloway, Richard A. 1990. Demography and Degeneration: Eugenics and the Declining Birthrate in Twentieth-Century Britain. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  52. Spektorowski, Alberto. 2004. “The Eugenic Temptation in Socialism: Sweden, Germany, and the Soviet Union.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 46(1): 84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Spiro, Jonathan Peter. 2009. Defending the Master Race: Conservation, Eugenics, and the Legacy of Madison Grant. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Press.Google Scholar
  54. Stone, Dan. 2001. “Race in British Eugenics.” European History Quarterly 31(3): 397–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stone, Dan. 2002. Breeding Superman: Nietzsche, Race and Eugenics in Edwardian and Interwar Britain. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
  56. “T.” 1934–1935. “Rüdin, Professor Dr. Ernst: Rassenhygiene im völkischen Staat. Munich, 1934. J.F. Lehmanns Verlag. Pp. 122. Price Mk. 4.” The Eugenics Review XXVI: 233–234.Google Scholar
  57. The Times. 1936. “Professor Karl Pearson: Eugenics and Statistics.” 28 April.Google Scholar
  58. The Times. 1937. “Obituary: Dr. F. C. S. Schiller: Philosophy and Social Science.” 9 August.Google Scholar
  59. Thompson, Norman A. 1933–1934. “Sterilization: Voluntary or Compulsory?” The Eugenics Review XXV(4): 289.Google Scholar
  60. Thompson, Norman A. 1936–1937. “Nordics and Jews.” The Eugenics Review XXVIII(2): 164–165.Google Scholar
  61. Thomson, Mathew. 1998. The Problem of Mental Deficiency: Eugenics, Democracy, and Social Policy in Britain c. 1870–1959. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  62. Trombley, Stephen. 1988. The Right to Reproduce: A History of Coercive Sterilization. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  63. Turda, Marius and Weindling, Paul. 2007. “Blood and Homeland”: Eugenics and Racial Nationalism in Central and Southeast Europe, 1900–1940. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Weindling, Paul. 1985. “Weimar Eugenics: The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics in Social Context.” Annals of Science 42(3): 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Weindling, Paul. 1989. Health, Race and German Politics Between National Unification and Nazism, 1870–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Weiss, Sheila Faith. 1986. “Wilhelm Schallmayer and the Logic of German Eugenics.” Isis 77(1): 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weiss, Sheila Faith. 1987. Race Hygiene and National Efficiency: The Eugenics of Wilhelm Schallmayer. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  68. Weiss, Sheila Faith. 2005. “‘The Sword of Our Science’ as a Foreign Policy Weapon: The Political Function of German Human Geneticists in the International Arena During the Third Reich.” Ergebnisse, Vorabdrucke aus dem Forschungsprogramm ‘Geschichte der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft im Nationalsozialismus’ der Präsidentenkommision der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. Berlin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Churchill CollegeCambridge UniversityCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations