Advertisement

Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 547–586 | Cite as

The Instinctual Nation-State: Non-Darwinian Theories, State Science and Ultra-Nationalism in Oka Asajirō’s Evolution and Human Life

  • Gregory SullivanEmail author
Article

Abstract

In his anthology of socio-political essays, Evolution and Human Life, Oka Asajirō (1868–1944), early twentieth century Japan’s foremost advocate of evolutionism, developed a biological vision of the nation-state as super-organism that reflected the concerns and aims of German-inspired Meiji statism and anticipated aspects of radical ultra-nationalism. Drawing on non-Darwinian doctrines, Oka attempted to realize such a fused or organic state by enhancing social instincts that would bind the minzoku (ethnic nation) and state into a single living entity. Though mobilization during the Russo-Japanese War seemed to evince this super-organism, the increasingly contentious and complex society that emerged in the war’s aftermath caused Oka to turn first to Lamarckism and eventually to orthogenesis in the hopes of preserving the instincts needed for a viable nation-state. It is especially in the state interventionist measures that Oka finally came to endorse in order to forestall orthogenetically-driven degeneration that the technocratic proclivities of his statist orientation become most apparent. The article concludes by suggesting that Oka’s emphasis on degeneration, autarkic expansion, and, most especially, totalitarian submersion of individuals into the statist collectivity indicates a complex relationship between his evolutionism and fascist ideology, what recent scholarship has dubbed radical Shinto ultra-nationalism.

Keywords

evolution Japan Darwinism fascism statism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abosch, David. 1965. Kato Hiroyuki and the Introduction of German Political Thought in Modern Japan. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  2. Akita, George. 1967. Foundations of Constitutional Government in Modern Japan, 1868–1900. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, Hannah. 2004. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bartholomew, James. 1989. The Formation of Science in Japan: Building a Research Tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beiser, Frederick. 2005. Hegel. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  6. Bix, Herbert. 2001. Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  7. Bowler, Peter. 1983. The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Theories in the Decades Around 1900. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bowler, Peter. 1988. The Non-Darwinian Revolution: Reinterpreting a Historical Myth. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bowler, Peter. 2003. Evolution: The History of an Idea, 3rd edn. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Coker, Francis William. 2002. Organismic Theories of the State: Nineteenth Century Interpretations of the State as Organism or Person. Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific (reprint of 1910 edition).Google Scholar
  11. Cumings, Bruce. 1999. “Webs with No Spiders: The Genealogy of the Developmental State.” Meredith Woo-Cumings (ed.), The Developmental State. Cornell: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, William. 1996. The Moral and Political Naturalism of Baron Katō Hiroyuki. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  13. Doak, Kevin. 2006. A History of Nationalism in Modern Japan: Placing the People (Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 5 Japan). Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  14. Dower, John (ed.). 1975. Origins of the Modern Japanese State: Selected Writings of E.H. Norman. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  15. Dower, John. 1986. War Without Mercy. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  16. Driscoll, Mark. 2005. “Seeds and (Nest) Eggs of Empire: Sexology Manuals/Manual Sexology.” Barbara Molony (ed.), Gendering Modern Japanese History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fridell, Wilbur. 1970. “Government Ethics Textbooks in Late Meiji Japan.” Journal of Asian Studies 29(4): 823–834.Google Scholar
  18. Fruhstuck, Sabine. 2003. Colonizing Sex: Sexology and Social Control in Modern Japan. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  19. Gluck, Carol. 1985. Japan’s Modern Myths: Ideology in the Late Meiji Period. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gould, Stephen Jay. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hardacre, Helen. 1989. Shintō and the State 1868–1988. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hayashi, Makoto. 1998. “Cell Theory in its Development and Inheritance in Meiji Japan.” Historia Scientiarum 8–2: 115–132.Google Scholar
  23. Ishida, Takeshi. 1983. Japanese Political Culture: Change and Continuity. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  24. Jukes, Geoffrey. 2002. The Russo-Japanese War 1904–1905. New York: Osprey Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 2001. “The Institutional Embedding of Market Economies: The German ‘Model’ and its Impact on Japan.” Kozo Yamamura (ed.), The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison. Ithica: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Martin, Bernd. 1995. Japan and Germany in the Modern World. Providence: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  27. Migita, Hiroki. 2003. “Meijiki Chishikijin ni okeru seibutsu shinkaron no hayari saikou – jinjuu dosousetsu no inpakuto wo megutte.” Kagakusi Kenkyu 42(225): 1–10.Google Scholar
  28. Migita, Hiroki. 2009. Tennosei to Shinkaron. Tokyo: Seikyusha.Google Scholar
  29. Miller, Frank. 1965. Minobe Tatsukichi: Interpreter of Constitutionalism in Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Minear, Richard. 1970. Japanese Tradition and Western Law: Emperor State and Law in the Thought of Hozumi Yatsuka. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Nihon Kagakushi Gakkai. 1972. Nihon kagaku gijutsushi taikei hen 15. Tokyo: Daiichi Hoki Shuppan.Google Scholar
  32. Nish, Ian. 1985. The Origins of the Russo-Japanese War. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  33. Nishida, Kitarō. 1990. An Inquiry in the Good. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Nyhart, Lynn. 1995. Biology Takes Form: Animal Morphology and the German Universities, 1800–1900. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Oda, Hidemi. 1994. “Oka Asajirō Sensei no ōmokage.” Seibutsu Kagaku 46(3).: 113–128Google Scholar
  36. Oka, Asajirō. 1968. Shinka to Jinsei [Evolution and Human Life]. Tokyo: Yuseido Shuppan.Google Scholar
  37. Oka, Asajirō. 1974. Oka Asajirō Shu. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.Google Scholar
  38. Oka, Yoshitake. 1982. “Generational Conflict after the Russo-Japanese War.” Tetsuo Najita (ed.), Conflict in Modern Japanese History: The Neglected Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Otsubo, Sumiko. 2005a. “Engendering Eugenics: Feminists and Marriage Restriction Legislation in the 1920s.” Barbara Molony (ed.), Gendering Modern Japanese History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sumiko, Otsubo. 2005b. “The Female Body and Eugenic Thought in Meiji Japan.” Morris Low (ed.), Building a Modern Japan: Science, Technology, and Medicine in the Meiji Era and Beyond. New York: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
  41. Pittau, Joseph. 1967. Political Thought in Early Meiji Japan 1868–1889. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Popper, Karl. 2002. The Poverty of Historicism. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  43. Pyle, Kenneth. 1974. “Advantages of Followership: German Economics and Japanese Bureaucrats, 1890–1925.” Journal of Japanese Studies 1(1): 127–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pyle, Kenneth. 1998. “Meiji Conservatism.” Bob Wakabayashi (ed.), Modern Japanese Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Richards, Robert. 2002. The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Richards, Robert. 2008. The Tragic Sense of Life: Ernst Haeckel and the Struggle over Evolutionary Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Ryland, J.S. 2001. “Moss Animals: Phylum Bryozoa,” Britannica Macropaedia, vol. 24. London: Encylopedia Britannica.Google Scholar
  48. Sanuki, Masakazu. 2009. “Kindai nihon ni okeru kyowashugi – 1920 nendai no Oka Asajirō wo tsuujite.” Sokendai Bunaka Kagaku Kenkyu 5: 29–68.Google Scholar
  49. Shimazu, Naoko. 2009. Japanese Society at War: Death Memory, and the Russo- Japanese War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Skya, Walter. 2009. Japan’s Holy War: The Ideology of Radical Shintō Ultranationalism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Taylor, Charles. 1975. Hegel. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Thomas, Julia. 2001. Reconfiguring Modernity: Concepts of Nature in Japanese Political Ideology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tsukuba, Hisaharu. 1974. “Kaisetsu [Commentary].” Asajirō Oka (ed.), Oka Asajirō Shu. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.Google Scholar
  54. Unoura, Hiroshi. 1999. “Samurai Darwinism: Hiroyuki Katō and the Reception of Darwin’s Theory in Modern Japan from the 1880s to the 1900s.” History and Anthropology 11(2–3): 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wartenberg, Thomas. 1993. “The Language of Conceptuality.” Frederick Beiser (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Watanabe, Masao. 1976. The Japanese and Western Science. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  57. Wells, David. 1999. “The Russo-Japanese War in Russian Literature.” David Wells, Sandra Wilson (eds.), The Russo-Japanese War in Cultural Perspective 1904–1905. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.United States Merchant Marine AcademyKings PointUSA

Personalised recommendations