Advertisement

Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 15–41 | Cite as

Translocal Ecologies: The Norfolk Broads, the “Natural,” and the International Phytogeographical Excursion, 1911

  • Laura Cameron
  • David Matless
Special issue: Environmental History

Abstract

What we consider “nature” is always historical and relational, shaped in contingent configurations of representational and social practices. In the early twentieth century, the English ecologist A.G. Tansley lamented the pervasive problem of international misunderstandings concerning the nature of “nature.” In order to create some consensus on the concepts and language of ecological plant geography, Tansley founded the International Phytogeographical Excursion, which brought together leading plant geographers and botanists from North America and Europe. The first IPE in August 1911 started with the Norfolk Broads. It was led by Marietta Pallis, Tansley’s former student at Cambridge. This trip and the work of Pallis, neglected in other accounts of this early period of the history of ecology, influenced the relations between Tansley and important American ecologists H.C. Cowles and F.E. Clements. Understanding “place” as a network of relations, our regional focus shows how taking international dialogue, travel and interchange into account enriches understanding of ecological practice.

Keywords

place “nature” translocality ecological practice social relations of science Norfolk Broads International Phytogeographical Excursion Marietta Pallis  A.G. Tansley Edith Clements F.E. Clements H.C. Cowles England twentieth-century 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Braun, Bruce. 2000. “Producing Vertical Territory: Geology and Governmentality in Late Victorian Canada.” Ecumene 7: 7–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cameron, Laura. 2004. “Ecosystems”. Stephan Harrison, Steve Pile and Nigel Thrift (eds.), Patterned Ground: Ecologies of Nature and Culture. London: Reaktion Press, pp. 55–57.Google Scholar
  3. Cameron, Laura. 2008. “Sir Arthur George Tansley.” Noretta Koertge (ed.), New Dictionary of Scientific Biography. Detroit: Charles Scribner’s Sons, Volume 7, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, Laura and Matless, David. 2003. “Benign Ecology: Marietta Pallis and the Floating Fen of the Delta of the Danube, 1912–1916.” Cultural Geographies 10: 253–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cassidy, Victor. 2007. Henry Chandler Cowles: Pioneer Ecologist. Chicago, Illinois: Kedzie Sigel Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clements, Frederic Edward. 1912. “The International Phytogeographical Excursion in the British Isles. VIII. Some Impressions and Reflections”. New Phytologist 11: 177–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clements, Frederic Edward. 1916. Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
  8. Cowles, Henry Chandler. 1912. “Review: British Vegetation.” Botanical Gazette 53: 348–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cowles, Henry Chandler, Massart, Jean and Lindman, Carl Axel Magnus. 1912. “The International Phytogeographical Excursion in the British Isles. IV. Impressions of the Foreign Members of the Party.” New Phytologist 11: 25–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drude, Oscar. 1912. “The International Phytogeographical Excursion in the British Isles. IX. The Flora of Great Britain Compared with that of Central Europe.” New Phytologist 11: 236–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dutt, William A. 1903. The Norfolk Broads. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  12. George, Martin. 1992. The Land Use, Ecology and Conservation of Broadland. Chichester: Packham.Google Scholar
  13. Golley, Frank. 1996. A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology: More Than the Sum of the Parts. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gurney, Eustace and Gurney, Robert. 1908. The Sutton Broad Fresh-Water Laboratory. Sutton.Google Scholar
  15. Hagen, Joel. 1992. An Entangled Bank: The Origins of Ecosystem Ecology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kingsland, Sharon. 2005. The Evolution of American Ecology, 1890–2000. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kohler, Robert E. 2002. Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Matless, David. 2003. “Original Theories: Science and the Currency of the Local.” Cultural Geographies 10: 354–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matless, David and Cameron, Laura. 2006. “Experiment in Landscape: The Norfolk Excavations of Marietta Pallis.” Journal of Historical Geography 32: 96–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matless, David and Cameron, Laura. 2007a. “Geographies of Local Life: Marietta Pallis and Friends, Long Gores, Hickling, Norfolk.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25: 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Matless, David and Cameron, Laura. 2007b. “Devotional Landscape: Ecology and Orthodoxy in the Work of Marietta Pallis.” M. Conan (ed.), Sacred Gardens and Landscapes: Ritual and Agency. Washington: Dumbarton Oaks, pp. 263–296.Google Scholar
  23. McWilliam, Neil and Sekules, Veronica. (eds.). 1986. Life and Landscape: P.H. Emerson, Art and Photography in East Anglia 1885–1900. Norwich: Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts.Google Scholar
  24. Mortimer-Sandilands, Catriona. forthcoming. “Cap Rouge Remembered: Whiteness, Scenery and Memory in Cape Breton Highlands National Park.” Andrew Baldwin, Laura Cameron and Audrey Kobayshi (eds.), Rethinking the Great White North: Race, Nature and Historical Geography of Whiteness. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  25. Moss, Charles E. 1910. “Fundamental Units of Vegetation.” New Phytologist 9: 18–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nilsen, Erik. 1998. “A Survey of Ecological Physiology and Forest Biology Research in Japan.” Special Scientific Report no. 98. National Science Foundation, Tokyo Regional Office.Google Scholar
  27. Pallis, Marietta. 1911a. “The River Valleys of East Norfolk: Their Aquatic and Fen Formations.” Chapter X. A.G. Tansley (ed.), Types of British Vegetation: By Members of the Central Committee for the Survey and Study of British Vegetation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 214–245.Google Scholar
  28. Pallis, Marietta. 1911b. “On the Cause of the Salinity of the Broads of the River Thurne.” Geographical Journal 37: 284–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raffles, Hugh. 2002. In Amazonia: A Natural History. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Richmond, Martha L. 1997. “‘A Lab of One’s Own’: The Balfour Biological Laboratory for Women at Cambridge University, 1884–1914.” Isis 88: 422–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Richmond, Martha L. 2001. “Women in the Early History of Genetics: William Bateson and the Newnham College Mendelians, 1900–1910.” Isis 92: 55–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rubel, Eduard A. 1912. “The International Phytogeographical Excursion in the British Isles. V. The Killarney Woods.” New Phytologist 11: 54–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schröter, Carl. 1912. “Einige Vergleiche Zwischen Britischer und Schweizerischer Vegetation.” New Phytologist 11: 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schulte Fischedick, Kaat and Shinn, Terry. 1993. “International Phytogeographical Excursions, 1911–1923.” E. Crawford, T. Shinn and Sverker Sörlin (eds.), Denationalizing Science: The Contexts of International Scientific Practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sheail, John. “A.G. Tansley – The Founding Figure of British Ecology.” http://www.newphytologist.org/tansley/ecology.htm.
  37. Smith, William G. 1912. “The British Vegetation Committee.” New Phytologist 11: 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stoler, Ann Laura. 2008. Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tansley, Arthur George. 1910. “The Brussels Congress of Botanists.” New Phytologist, 9: 6/7, 259–264.Google Scholar
  40. Tansley, Arthur George (ed.). 1911a. Types of British Vegetation: By Members of the Central Committee for the Survey and Study of British Vegetation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Tansley, Arthur George. 1911b. “The International Phytogeographical Excursion in the British Isles. I The Inception, and II Details of the Excursion.” New Phytologist 10: 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tansley, Arthur George. 1913. “Review: A Universal Classification of Plant-Communities: Brockmann-Jerosch, H., and Rubel, E. “Die Einteilung der Plfanzen-gesellschaften nach okologisch-physiognomischen Gesichtspunkten.” The Journal of Ecology 1: 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tansley, Arthur George. 1920. “The Classification of Vegetation and the Concept of Development.” Journal of Ecology 8: 118–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tansley, Arthur George. 1925. “The Vegetation of the Southern English Chalk (Obere Kreide Formation).” Festschrift Carl Schröter. Verüffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes Rübel in Zürich 3: 406–430.Google Scholar
  45. Tansley, Arthur George. 1935. “The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms.” Ecology 16: 284–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tansley, Arthur George. 1939. The British Isles and Their Vegetation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Taylor, John. 1994. A Dream of England: Landscape, Photography and the Tourist’s Imagination. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Tobey, Ronald. 1981. Saving the Prairies: The Life Cycle of the Founding School of American Plant Ecology, 1895–1955. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  49. Waterton, Claire. 2003. “Performing the Classification of Nature.” Sociological Review 11: 111–129.Google Scholar
  50. Weiss, Frederick Ernest. 1911. “The British Association at Portsmouth: Section K. Botany.” Nature 87: 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Worster, Donald. 1994. Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  2. 2.School of GeographyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations