Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 571–599

Mutant Bacteriophages, Frank Macfarlane Burnet, and the Changing Nature of “Genespeak” in the 1930s

Article

Abstract

In 1936, Frank Macfarlane Burnet published a paper entitled “Induced lysogenicity and the mutation of bacteriophage within lysogenic bacteria,” in which he demonstrated that the introduction of a specific bacteriophage into a bacterial strain consistently and repeatedly imparted a specific property – namely the resistance to a different phage – to the bacterial strain that was originally susceptible to lysis by that second phage. Burnet’s explanation for this change was that the first phage was causing a mutation in the bacterium which rendered it and its successive generations of offspring resistant to lysogenicity. At the time, this idea was a novel one that needed compelling evidence to be accepted. While it is difficult for us today to conceive of mutations and genes outside the context of DNA as the physico-chemical basis of genes, in the mid 1930s, when this paper was published, DNA’s role as the carrier of hereditary information had not yet been discovered and genes and mutations were yet to acquire physical and chemical forms. Also, during that time genes were considered to exist only in organisms capable of sexual modes of replication and the status of bacteria and viruses as organisms capable of containing genes and manifesting mutations was still in question. Burnet’s paper counts among those pieces of work that helped dispel the notion that genes, inheritance and mutations were tied to an organism’s sexual status. In this paper, I analyze the implications of Burnet’s paper for the understanding of various concepts – such as “mutation,” and “gene,” – at the time it was published, and how those understandings shaped the development of the meanings of these terms and our modern conceptions thereof.

Keywords

Bacteriophage Virus Lysogeny Mutations Bacterial mutation Gene concept 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abir-Am, Pnina. 1999. ‹The First American and French Commemorations in Molecular Biology: From Collective Memory to Comparative History.’ Osiris 14: 324–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arkwright, J. A. 1930. “Variation.” Medical Research Council (ed.), A System of Bacteriology in Relation to Medicine, Vol. 1. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, pp. 311–374.Google Scholar
  3. Avery, OT, MacLeod, C, McCarty, M. 1944. ‹Studies on the Chemical Transformation of Pneumococcal Types.’ Journal of Experimental Medicine 79: 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beadle, GW. 1945. ‹Biochemical Genetics.’ Chemical Reviews 37: 15–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bordet, J. 1922. “Concerning the Theories of the So-Called Bacteriophage.” British Medical Journal 296.Google Scholar
  6. Bordet, J, Ciuca, M. 1921. ‹Remarques sur l’historique des recherches concernant la lyse microbienne transmissible.’ Comptes rendus des séances de la Société de Biologie et de ses filiales Paris 84: 745–747.Google Scholar
  7. Boveri, T. 1903. “Über die Konstitution der chromatischen Kernsubstanz.” Verh. D. Zool. Ges. 13.Google Scholar
  8. Burnet, FM. 1925. ‹The Nature of the Acquired Resistance to Bacteriophage Action.’ Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 28: 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnet, FM. 1927a. ‹The Relationships Between Heat-Stable Agglutinogens and Sensitivity to Bacteriophage in the Salmonella Group.’ British Journal of Experimental Medicine 8: 121–129.Google Scholar
  10. Burnet, F. M. 1927b. Letter to Linda Druce dated November, 1927, Burnet Collection, University of Melbourne Archives, Series 2, file 10.Google Scholar
  11. Burnet, F. M. 1928. Bacteriophage Phenomena in Their Relation to the Antigenic Structure of Bacteria. Ph.D. Thesis, London University.Google Scholar
  12. Burnet, FM. 1929. ‹A Method for Studying Bacteriophage Multiplication in Broth.’ The British Journal of Experimental Pathology 10: 109–115.Google Scholar
  13. Burnet, F. M. 1930. “Bacteriophage and Cognate Phenomena.” In A System of Bacteriology in Relation to Medicine. London: His Majesty’s Stationery office. pp. 463–509.Google Scholar
  14. Burnet, F. M. 1934. “The bacteriophages.” Biological Reviews and Biological Proceedings (of the Cambridge Philosophical Society), pp. 332–350.Google Scholar
  15. Burnet, FM. 1945. Virus as Organism: Evolutionary and Ecological Aspects of Some Human Virus Diseases. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Burnet, FM. 1968. Changing Patterns: An Atypical Autobiography. Melbourne, Australia:Heinemann.Google Scholar
  17. Burnet, FM, Lush, D. 1935. ‹The Staphylococcal Bacteriophages.’ Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 40: 455–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burnet, FM, Lush, D. 1936. ‹Induced Lysogenicity and Mutation of Bacteriophage within Lysogenic Bacteria.’ Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science 14: 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burnet, FM, McKie, M. 1929a. ‹Type Differences among Staphylococcal Bacteriophages.’ Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science 6: 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Burnet, FM, McKie, M. 1929b. ‹Observations on a Permanently Lysogenic Strain of B. enteritidis gaertner.’ Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science 6: 277–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cairns, John, Stent, Gunther S, Watson, James D (eds.). 1968. Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology. Cold Spring Harbor:CSHL Press.Google Scholar
  22. Cohn, Melvin. 1979. “Burnet, Lysogeny and Creativity.” The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Annual Review, 1978–79, pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
  23. Creager, Angela. 2002. The Life of a Virus: Tobacco Mosaic Virus as an Experimental Model, 1930–1965. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Creager, Angela. 2007. ‹Adaptation or Selection? Old Issues and New Stakes in the Postwar Debates over Bacterial Drug Resistance.’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38: 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dobell, C. 1913a. ‹Some Recent Work on Mutation in Micro-Organisms (I).’ Journal of Genetics 2: 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dobell, C. 1913b. ‹Some Recent Work on Mutation in Micro-Organisms: II. Mutations in Bacteria.’ Journal of Genetics 2: 325–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Falk, Raphael. 1986. ‹What is a Gene?’ Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 17: 133–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fenner, Frank and Ada, Gordon. 2003. Personal CommunicationGoogle Scholar
  29. Galperin, Charles. 1987. ‹Le bactériophage, la lysogénie, et son déterminisme génétique.’ History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 9: 175–224.Google Scholar
  30. Gratia, André. 1936. ‹Mutation d’un bacteriophage du Bacillus megatherium.’ Comptes rendus des séances de la Société de Biologie et de ses filiales Paris 123: 1253–1255.Google Scholar
  31. Gratia, Jean-Pierre. 2000. ‹André Gratia: A Forerunner in Microbial and Viral Genetics.’ Genetics 156: 471–476.Google Scholar
  32. Griffiths, Paul E. 2002. ‹Lost: One Gene Concept. Reward to Finder.’ Biology and Philosophy 17: 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. D’Herelle, F. 1917. ‹Sur un microbe invisible antagoniste des bacilles dysentériques.’ Comptes rendus de l’Académie des sciences Paris 165: 373–375.Google Scholar
  34. D’Herelle, F. 1928/29. “The Nature of the Ultra Filterable Viruses.” Harvey Lectures Series 24, 45–71.Google Scholar
  35. D’Herelle, F, Rakieten, TL. 1934. ‹Mutations as Governing Bacterial Characters and Serologic Reactions.’ Journal of Infectious Disease 54: 313–338.Google Scholar
  36. Hughes, Sally Smith. 1977. The Virus: A History of the Concept. New York:Science History Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Johannsen, W. 1909. Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre. Jena:G. Fischer.Google Scholar
  38. Lederberg, J (ed.). 1952. Papers in Microbial Genetics: Bacteria and Bacterial Viruses. Wisconsin:University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lederberg, J. (ed.). 1992. “Rummaging in the Attic: Antiquarian Ideas of Transmissible Heredity, 1880–1940.” ASM News 58(5): 261–265.Google Scholar
  40. Lederberg, Joshua, Tatum, Edward L. 1946. ‹Gene Recombination Escherichia coli.’ Nature 158: 558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Luria, S.E. 1946. “Spontaneous Bacterial Mutations to Resistance to Antibacterial Agents.” Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 11: 130–138.Google Scholar
  42. Luria, SE, Delbrück, M. 1943. ‹Mutations of Bacteria from Virus Sensitivity to Virus Resistance.’ Genetics 28: 491–511.Google Scholar
  43. Lwoff, André, Siminovitch, Louis, Kjeldgaard, Niels. 1950. ‹Induction de la production de bactériophages chez une bactérie lysogène.’ Annales de l’Institut Pasteur 79: 815–859.Google Scholar
  44. Morgan, Thomas Hunt, Sturtevant, Alfred H, Muller, HJ, Bridges, CB. 1915. The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity. New York:Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  45. Northrop, JH. 1937. ‹Chemical Nature and Mode of Formation of Pepsin, Trypsin and Bacteriophage.’ Science 86: 479–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Portin, Petter. 1993. ‹The Concept of the Gene: Short History and Present Status.’ Quarterly Review of Biology 68: 173–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Portin, Petter. 2002. ‹Historical Development of the Concept of the Gene.’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27: 257–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raettig, Hansjürgen. 1958. Bakteriophagie, 1917 bis 1956; zugleich ein Vorschlag zur Dokumentation wissenschaftlicher Literatur. Stuttgart: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
  49. Raffel, D, Muller, HJ. 1940. ‹Position Effect and Gene Divisibility Considered in Connection with Three Strikingly Similar Scute Mutations.’ Genetics 25: 541–583.Google Scholar
  50. Rheinberger, H-J. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in a Test Tube. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Rutherford, E., et al. 1929. “Discussion on Ultra-Microscopic Viruses Infecting Animals and Plants.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character 104: 537–560.Google Scholar
  52. Sankaran, N. 2006. Frank Macfarlane Burnet and the Nature of the Bacteriophage, 1925–1937. Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
  53. Sankaran, N. 2008. ‹Stepping-Stones to One-Step Growth: Frank Macfarlane Burnet’s Role in Elucidating the Viral Nature of the Bacteriophages.’ Historical Records of Australian Science 19: 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schultz, EW. 1930. ‹The Ultrascopic Viruses from the Biological Standpoint.’ The Scientific Monthly 31: 422–433.Google Scholar
  55. Summers, WC. 1991. ‹From Culture as Organism to Organism as Cell: Historical Origins of Bacterial Genetics.’ Journal of the History of Biology 24: 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sutton, Walter. 1903. ‹The Chromosomes in Heredity.’ The Biological Bulletin 4: 231–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Timoféeff-Ressovsky, NW, Zimmer, KG, Delbrück, M. 1935. ‹über die Natur der Genmutation und der Genstruktur.’ Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen (Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse) 1: 189–245.Google Scholar
  58. Twort, FW. 1915. ‹An Investigation on the Nature of Ultra-Microscopic Viruses.’ The Lancet ii: 1241–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. van Helvoort, T. 1992. ‹The Controversy Between John H. Northrop and Max Delbrück on the Formation of Bacteriophage: Bacterial Synthesis or Autonomous Multiplication?’ Annals of Science 49: 545–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. van Helvoort, T. 1994a. ‹History of Virus Research in the Twentieth Century: the Problem of Conceptual Continuity.’ History of Science 32: 185–235.Google Scholar
  61. van Helvoort, T. 1994b. ‹The Construction of Bacteriophage as Bacterial Virus: Linking Endogenous and Exogenous Thought Styles.’ Journal of the History of Biology 27: 91–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Varley, A. W. 1981. Early Bacteriophage Research: The Contribution of Frank Macfarlane Burnet. Master’s Thesis, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  63. Varley, A. W. 1986. Living Molecules or Autocatalytic Enzymes? The Controversy of the Nature of the Bacteriophage, 1915–1925. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  64. Waterson, AP, Wilkinson, L. 1978. An Introduction to the History of Virology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Watson, J. 1968. The Double Helix; a Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. New York:Atheneum.Google Scholar
  66. Wollman, Eugene. 1935. “The Phenomenon of Twort-d’Herelle and Its Significance.” Lancet 226: 1312–1314.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Sciences and EngineeringThe American University in CairoCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations