Advertisement

Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 649–684 | Cite as

Nuclear Energy in the Service of Biomedicine: The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission’s Radioisotope Program, 1946–1950

  • Angela N. H. Creager
Article

Abstract

The widespread adoption of radioisotopes as tools in biomedical research and therapy became one of the major consequences of the “physicists’ war” for postwar life science. Scientists in the Manhattan Project, as part of their efforts to advocate for civilian uses of atomic energy after the war, proposed using infrastructure from the wartime bomb project to develop a government-run radioisotope distribution program. After the Atomic Energy Bill was passed and before the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) was formally established, the Manhattan Project began shipping isotopes from Oak Ridge. Scientists and physicians put these reactor-produced isotopes to many of the same uses that had been pioneered with cyclotron-generated radioisotopes in the 1930s and early 1940s. The majority of early AEC shipments were radioiodine and radiophosphorus, employed to evaluate thyroid function, diagnose medical disorders, and irradiate tumors. Both researchers and politicians lauded radioisotopes publicly for their potential in curing diseases, particularly cancer. However, isotopes proved less successful than anticipated in treating cancer and more successful in medical diagnostics. On the research side, reactor-generated radioisotopes equipped biologists with new tools to trace molecular transformations from metabolic pathways to ecosystems. The U.S. government’s production and promotion of isotopes stimulated their consumption by scientists and physicians (both domestic and abroad), such that in the postwar period isotopes became routine elements of laboratory and clinical use. In the early postwar years, radioisotopes signified the government’s commitment to harness the␣atom for peace, particularly through contributions to biology, medicine, and agriculture.

Keywords

biochemistry cyclotrons ecology Manhattan Project medical diagnostics metabolism Oak Ridge radioisotopes U.S. Atomic Energy Commission 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Research on this project was supported by the author’s NSF CAREER grant, “Life Science in the Atomic Age,” SBE 98-75012. I wish to thank Graham Burnett, Michael Gordin, Alison Kraft, John Krige, María Jesús Santesmases, and two anonymous referees for their insightful comments and suggestions. I am grateful to Sultana Banulescu and Doogab Yi for research assistance, and to Jennifer Weber for her editing and encouragement.

References

  1. Aebersold Paul C. 1948 Isotopes and their Application to Peacetime use of Atomic Energy Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 4 (5 May): 151–154Google Scholar
  2. American Cancer Society. 1946. “Foreward.” The Research Attack on Cancer, 1946. A Report on the American Cancer Society Research Program by The Committee on Growth of the National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Research CouncilGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronoff S., Benson A., Hassid W.Z., Calvin M. 1947 Distribution of C14 in Photosynthetic Barley Seedlings Science 105: 664–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. “The Atomic Energy Act of 1946.” 1946. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 2(3-4), 19–25Google Scholar
  5. “Availability of Radioactive Isotopes; Announcement From Headquarters, Manhattan Project, Washington, D.C.” 1946. Science 103: 697–705Google Scholar
  6. Barker H.A., Kamen M.D. 1945 Carbon Dioxide Utilization in the Synthesis of Acetic Acid by Clostridium thermoaceticum Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 31: 219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beatty John. 1991 Genetics in the Atomic Age: The Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission, 1947–1956 Keith R. Benson, Jane Maienschein, Ronald Rainger (eds), The Expansion of American Biology. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 284–324Google Scholar
  8. Bocking Stephen. 1995 Ecosystems, Ecologists, and the Atom: Environmental Research at Oak Ridge National Laboratory Journal of the History of Biology 28: 1–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ——. 1997. Ecologists and Environmental Politics: A History of Contemporary Ecology. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Broda, Engelbert. 1960 (1958). Radioactive Isotopes in Biochemistry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Company. Originally published as Radioaktive Isotope in der Biochemie. Wien: Verlag Franz DeutickeGoogle Scholar
  11. Calvin Melvin. 1958 Photosynthesis Walter D. Claus (ed), Radiation Biology and Medicine: Selected Reviews in the Life Sciences. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp. 826–848Google Scholar
  12. Calvin Melvin. 1992 Following the Trail of Light. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiewitz O., Hevesy G. 1935 Radioactive Indicators in the Study of Phosphorus Metabolism in Rats Nature 136: 754–755Google Scholar
  14. Cohn, Waldo E. 1968. “Introductory Remarks by Chairman.” Seymour Rothchild (ed.), Advances in Tracer Methodology, Vol. 4. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 1–10Google Scholar
  15. Cohn Mildred. 1995 Some Early Tracer Experiments with Stable Isotopes Protein Science 4: 2444–2447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Creager Angela N.H. 2002. Tracing the Politics of Changing Postwar Research Practices: The Export of ‚American’ Radioisotopes to European Biologists Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33C: 367–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Creager Angela N.H. 2004 The Industrialization of Radioisotopes by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Karl Garndin, Nina Wormbs, Sven Widmalm (eds), The Science-Industry Nexus: History, Policy, Implications. Science History Publications, Sagamore Beach, MA, pp. 143–167Google Scholar
  18. Creager Angela N.H., Gaudillière Jean-Paul. 1996. Meanings in Search of Experiments and Vice-Versa: The Invention of Allosteric Regulation in Paris and Berkeley, 1959–1968 Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 27: 1–89Google Scholar
  19. Early Paul J., Landa Edward R. 1995 Use of Therapeutic Radionuclides in Medicine Health Physics 69: 677–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans Robley D. 1946. The Medical Uses of Atomic Energy Atlantic 177: 68–73Google Scholar
  21. Feffer Stuart M. 1992. Atoms, Cancer, and Politics: Supporting Atomic Science at the University of Chicago Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 22: 233–261Google Scholar
  22. Forman Paul. 1987 Behind Quantum Electronics: National Security as Basis for Physical Research in the United States, 1940–1960 Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 18: 149–229Google Scholar
  23. Fruton Joseph S. 1972 Molecules and Life: Historical Essays on the Interplay of Chemistry and Biology. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaudillière Jean-Paul. 1998 The Molecularization of Cancer Etiology in the Postwar United States: Instruments, Politics, and Management Soraya de Chadarevian, Harmke Kamminga (eds), Molecularizing Biology and Medicine: New Practices and Alliances, 1910s–1970s. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 139–170Google Scholar
  25. Greenberg, Daniel S. 1999 (1967). The Politics of Pure Science. 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Hagen Joel B. 1992 An Entangled Bank: The Origins of Ecosystem Ecology. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
  27. Hales Peter Bacon. 1997 Atomic Spaces: Living on the Manhattan Project. University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamilton Joseph G., Soley Mayo H. 1939 Studies in Iodine Metabolism by the Use of a New Radioactive Isotope of Iodine American Journal of Physiology 127: 557–572Google Scholar
  29. Hamilton, Joseph G., Soley, Mayo H. 1940 Studies in Iodine Metabolism of the Thyroid Gland in Situ by the Use of Radio-Iodine in Normal Subjects and Patients with Various Types of Goiter American Journal of Physiology 131: 135–143Google Scholar
  30. Heilbron J.L., Seidel Robert W. 1989 Lawrence and His Laboratory: A History of the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  31. Hertz S., Roberts A., Evans Robley D. 1938 Radioactive Iodine as an Indicator in the Study of Thyroid Physiology Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 38: 510–513Google Scholar
  32. Hewlett, Richard G. and Anderson, Oscar E., Jr. 1990 (1962). The New World: A History of the Atomic Energy Commission, Volume 1 1939–1946. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; originally published: University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  33. Hewlett, Richard G. and Duncan, Francis. 1990 (1969). Atomic Shield: A History of the Atomic Energy Commission, Volume II 1947–1952. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; originally published: University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  34. Hollaender, Alexander. 1963. “Acceptance Speech.” Michael Ebert and Alma Howard (eds.), Radiation Effects in Physics, Chemistry and Biology. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, pp. vii–xGoogle Scholar
  35. Holmes Frederic Lawrence. 1992a Manometers, Tissue Slices, and Intermediary Metabolism Adele E. Clarke, Joan Fujimura (eds), The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 151–171Google Scholar
  36. —— 1992b. Between Biology and Medicine: The Formation of Intermediary Metabolism. Berkeley, CA: Office for History of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  37. Hughes, Thomas P. 1989. “Tennessee Valley and Manhattan Engineer District.” American Genesis: A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm. New York: Viking, pp. 353–442Google Scholar
  38. Hutchinson G.E. 1940 Bio-Ecology Ecology 21: 267–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hutchinson G.E. 1948 Circular Causal Systems in Ecology Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 50: 221–246Google Scholar
  40. Hutchinson G. Evelyn, Brown Vaughan T. 1947 A Direct Demonstration of the Phosphorus Cycle in a Small Lake Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 33: 148–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hutchinson G. Evelyn, Brown Vaughan T. 1950 Limnological Studies in Connecticut. IX. A Quantitative Radiochemical Study of the Phosphorus Cycle in Linsley Pond Ecology 31: 194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson Charles W., Jackson Charles O. 1981 City Behind a Fence: Oak Ridge, Tennessee 1942–1946. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TNGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnson Leland, Schaffer Daniel. 1994 Oak Ridge National Laboratory: The First Fifty Years. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TNGoogle Scholar
  44. Kamen Martin. 1951 Radioactive Tracers in Biology: An Introduction to Tracer Methodology. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Kamen Martin D. 1963 Early History of Carbon-14 Science 140: 584–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kamen Martin D. 1985 Radiant Science, Dark Politics: A Memoir of the Nuclear Age. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  47. Kamen Martin D. 1986 A Cupful of Luck, a Pinch of Sagacity Annual Review of Biochemistry 55: 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kevles Daniel J. 1977a The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Kevles Daniel J. 1977b The National Science Foundation and the Debate over Postwar Research Policy, 1942–1945: A Political Interpretation of Sciencethe Endless Frontier. Isis 68: 5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kevles Daniel J. 1990 Cold War and Hot Physics: Science, Security, and the American State, 1945–56 Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 20: 239–264Google Scholar
  51. Kohler Robert E. 1977 Rudolph Schoenheimer, Isotopic Tracers, and Biochemistry in the 1930’s Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 8: 257–298Google Scholar
  52. Kohler Robert E. 1991 Partners in Science: Foundations and Natural Scientists, 1900–1945. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  53. Kraft Alison. 2006 Between Medicine and Industry: Medical Physics and the Rise of the Radioisotope 1945–65 Contemporary British History 20: 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. ——. Unpublished. “Between Clinic, Commerce: Medical Physics and the Rise of the Radioisotope 1945–65,” paper presented at “Isotopes: Science, Medicine and Industry in the 20th Century,” Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 1–3 Dec 2005Google Scholar
  55. Krige John. 2006 Atoms for Peace, Scientific Internationalism, and Scientific Intelligence Osiris 21: 161–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lenoir Timothy, Hays Marguerite. 2000 The Manhattan Project for Biomedicine. Philip R. Sloan (ed.), Controlling Our Destinies: Historical, Philosophical, Ethical, and Theological Perspectives on the Human Genome Project. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN, pp. 29–62Google Scholar
  57. Libby W.F. 1948 The Radiocarbon Story Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 4 (9) 263–266Google Scholar
  58. Lindee M. Susan. 1994 Suffering Made Real: American Science and the Survivors at Hiroshima. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  59. Livingood J.J., Seaborg G.T. 1938. Radioactive Isotopes of Iodine Physical Review 54: 775–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Maisel, Albert Q. 1947. “Medical Dividend.” Collier’s 119 (3 May): 14, 43–44Google Scholar
  61. Nickson James J. 1952 Symposium on Radiobiology: The Basic Aspects of Radiation Effects on Living Systems. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Pallo Gabor. 2002 Scientific Recency: George de Hevesy’s Nobel Prize Elisabeth Crawford (ed.), Historical Studies in the Nobel Archives: The Prizes in Science and Medicine. University Academy Press, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 65–78Google Scholar
  63. Pasveer Bernike. 1989. Knowledge of Shadows: The Introduction of X-ray Images in Medicine Sociology of Health & Illness 11 (4): 360–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rader Karen A. 2004 Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900–1955. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  65. Rasmussen Nicolas. 1997 The Mid-Century Biophysics Bubble: Hiroshima and the Biological Revolution in America, Revisited History of Science 35: 245–293Google Scholar
  66. Rheinberger Hans-Jörg. 2001 Putting Isotopes to Work: Liquid Scintillation Counters, 1950–1970 Bernward Joerges, Terry Shinn (eds), Instrumentation: Between Science, State and Industry. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht, pp. 143–174Google Scholar
  67. Rhoads C.P. 1946 The Medical Uses of Atomic Energy Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 2 (7): 22–24Google Scholar
  68. Ruben S., Kamen M.D. 1940 Radioactive Carbon in the Study of Respiration in Heterotrophic Systems Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 26: 418–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ruben S., Hassid W.Z., Kamen M.D. 1939 Radioactive Carbon in the Study of Photosynthesis Journal of the American Chemical Society 61: 661–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schoenheimer Rudolph, Rittenberg D. 1938 The Application of Isotopes to the Study of Intermediary Metabolism Science 87: 221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schwartz Rebecca Press. 2004 Why did Physicists Get All the Credit: The Smyth Report as Authorized History of the Atomic Bomb Chemical Heritage 22 (3): 32–33Google Scholar
  72. —— “The Making of the History of the Atomic Bomb: The Smyth Report and the Historiography of the Manhattan Project.” Ph.D. dissertation. Princeton University (in preparation)Google Scholar
  73. Seaborg Glenn T., Benson Andrew A. 1998 Melvin Calvin, April 8, 1911-January 8, 1997 Biographical Memoirs, National Academy of Sciences 75: 3–21Google Scholar
  74. Smith Alice Kimball. 1958 Behind the Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb: Chicago, 1944–1945 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 14: 288–312Google Scholar
  75. Smith Alice Kimball. 1965 A Peril and a Hope: The Scientists’ Movement in America, 1945–47. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  76. Smyth Henry DeWolf. 1945 Atomic Energy for Military Purposes: The Official Report on the Development of the Atomic Bomb Under the Auspices of the United States Government, 1940–1945. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  77. Tansley A.G. 1935 The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms Ecology 16: 284–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. U.S. Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. 1996. “The AEC Program of Radioisotope Distribution.” The Human Radiation Experiments. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 172–195Google Scholar
  79. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1976 Manhattan Engineer District History. Microfilm edition. National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  80. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. 1948 Fourth Semiannual Report to Congress. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  81. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. 1949 Isotopes: A Three-Year Summary of Distribution with Extensive Bibliography. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  82. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. 1952 Some Applications of Atomic Energy in Plant Science. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  83. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. 1955 Eight-Year Isotope Summary, vol. 7 of Selected Reference Material, United States Energy Program. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  84. Welsome Eileen. 1999 The Plutonium Files: America’s Secret Medical Experiments in the Cold War. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  85. Westwick Peter J. 1996 Abraded From Several Corners: Medical Physics and Biophysics at Berkeley Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 27: 131–162Google Scholar
  86. Westwick Peter J. 2003. The National Labs: Science in an American System, 1947–1974. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  87. Zallen Doris T. 1993 Redrawing the Boundaries of Molecular Biology: The Case of Photosynthesis Journal of the History of Biology 26: 65–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History and Program in History of SciencePrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations