Advertisement

Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 373–406 | Cite as

The Role of Microbes in Agriculture: Sergei Vinogradskii’s Discovery and Investigation of Chemosynthesis, 1880–1910

  • Lloyd T. AckertJr
Article

Abstract

In 1890, Sergei Nikolaevich Vinogradskii (Winogradsky) proposed a novel life process called chemosynthesis. His discovery that some microbes could live solely on inorganic matter emerged during his physiological research in 1880s in Strassburg and Zurich on sulfur, iron, and nitrogen bacteria. In his nitrification research, Vinogradskii first embraced the idea that microbiology could have great bearing on agricultural problems. His critique of agricultural chemists and Kochian-style bacteriologists brought this message to the broader agricultural community, resulting in an heightened interest in biological, rather than chemical methods to investigate soil processes. From 1891 to 1910, he directed the microbiological laboratory at the Imperial Institute of Experimental Medicine in St. Petersburg, Russia, where he expanded his chemosynthesis research to a broad investigation of the manifold significance of autotrophic organisms in soil processes. This work and that of his students attracted the serious attention of agricultural chemists and soil scientists in Russia and abroad, changing essentially the way they understood and investigated the role of microbes in the soil. His student, Vasilii Omelianskii, effectively integrated Vinogradskii’s approach into Russian and Soviet, and international agricultural microbiology. Vinogradskii’s activities in the late 19th century reflect the changes occurring more broadly in science. At that time, microbiologists such as Louis Pasteur, Eugenius Warming, and Martianus Beijerinck were contributing new laboratory methods and theoretical perspectives to incipient disciplines closely related to agriculture: ecology, soil science, and soil microbiology.

Keywords

agricultural chemistry autotrophism chemosynthesis microbiology nitrification soil science Sergei Vinogradskii Vasilii Omelianskii 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackert, L.T. 2004. From the Thermodynamics of Life to Ecological Microbiology: Sergei Vinogradskii and the ‘Cycle of Life,’ 1850–1950. Ph.D. Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins UniversityGoogle Scholar
  2. Amsterdamska, O. 1988Medical and Biological Constraints: Early Research on Variation in BacteriologySocial Studies of Science17657687Google Scholar
  3. Bailes, K.E. 1990Science and Russian Culture in an Age of Revolutions: V. I. Vernadsky and His Scientific School, 1863–1945Indiana University PressBloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. Beijerinck, M.W. 1888Die Bacterien der Papilionaceen KnollchenBotanische Zeitung48769771Google Scholar
  5. Cittadino, E. 1990Nature as the Laboratory: Darwinian Plant Ecology in the German Empire, 1880–1900CambridgeCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Doetsch, R.N. 1960Microbiology: Historical Contribution from 1776 to 1908 by Spallanzani, Schwann, Pasteur, Cohn, Tyndall, Koch, Lister, Schloesing, Burrill, Ehrlich, Winogradsky, Warington, Beijerinck, Smith, Orla-JensenNew Brunswick, NJRutgers University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Dokuchaev, V.V. 1895K voprosu ob otkrytii pri Imperatorskikh Russkikh Universitetakh kafedr’ Pochvovedeniia i Ucheniia o mikroorganismakh (v chastnosti, Bakteriologii)S.- PeterburgTipografiia E. EvdokimovaGoogle Scholar
  8. Famintsyn, A.S. 1883Obmen Veshchestvo i Prevrashchenie Ehnergii v RasteniiakhSankt- PeterburgImperatorskoi Akademii NaukGoogle Scholar
  9. Fribes, V.A., Winogradsky, S. 1895Sur le rouissage de lin et son agent microbienComptes Rendus de L’Academie des SciencesCXXI742Google Scholar
  10. Geison, G. 1995The Private Science of Louis PasteurPrincetonPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Hantzsch, A. 1890Bemerkungen über sterochemisch isomere StickstoffverbindungenBerlinA. W. Schade’s BuchdrGoogle Scholar
  12. Hereaus, A. 1886Sur les Bacteries des Eaux de Source et sur les Proprietes OxydantesZeitschrift für Hygiene1193234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ihde, A.J. 1964The Development of Modern ChemistryNew YorkHarper and RowGoogle Scholar
  14. IIEM. 1892. Delevoi otchet Otdela Obshchei Mikrobiologii. Tsentral’nyi Gosudarstvennyi Istoricheskii Archiv, St Peterburg. Fond 2282, opis’ 1, delo 87, fond 2282, opis’ 1, delo 31, listy 24 ob.-25 obGoogle Scholar
  15. Isachenko, B.L. 1941. “Otdel Obshchei Mikrobiologii,” Material k Istorii V.I.E.M. Moskva. pp. 87–103Google Scholar
  16. Ivanov, I.V. 2003Istoriia otechestvennogo pochvovedeniia: razvitie idei, differentsiatsiia, institutsializatsia. Kniga pervaia, 1870–1947MoskvaNaukaGoogle Scholar
  17. Kir’ianov, G.F. 1966Vasilii Vasil’evich Dokuchaev, 1846–1903MoskvaIzd-vo NaukaGoogle Scholar
  18. Koch, A. 1891. Review of “Serge Winogradsky, Researches sur les Organismes de la Nitrification,” Botanische Zeitung 49(40): 669–672, 680–685, 698–701Google Scholar
  19. Kossovich, I.S. 1949Kratkii ocherk rabot i vzgliadov P. A. Kostycheva v oblasti pochvovedenii i zemledeliiKostychev, P.A. eds. Pochvy chernozemnoi oblasti Rossii: Ikh proiskhozhdenie, sostav i svoistvaMoskvaGosudarstvennoe Izd-vo Sel’skokhoziaistvennoi Literatury198223Google Scholar
  20. Kostychev, P.A. 1951. ‘‘Sostav organicheskikh veshchestv poch (peregnoia) v sviazi s voprosom o poleznosti mikorits.’’ P.A. Kostychev (ed.), Izbrannye trudy, Tiurina,4nd ed. Moskva: Izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR, pp. 363–366.Google Scholar
  21. Krupenikov, I.A. 1981. Istoria pochvovedeniia: ot vremeni ego zarozhdeniia do nashikh dnei. Moskva: Nauka. This work was translated into English: as Krupenikov. I. A. 1993. History of Soil Science: From its Inception to the Present. Brookfield, VT: A. A. Balkema Publishers. A. K. Dhote. transGoogle Scholar
  22. Lafar, F. 1904Handbuch der Technischen mykologie für technische chemiker, nahrungsmittelchemiker, gärungstechniker, agriculturchemiker, landwirte, kulturingenieure, forstwirte und pharmazeuten; unter mitwirkung hervorragender fachgenossenJenaGustav FischerGoogle Scholar
  23. Mazing, I.A.Andriushkevich, T.V.Golikov, I.P. eds. 2002Rasskazi o velikom bakteriologe S. N VinogradskomSt. PetersburgRostokGoogle Scholar
  24. Mazumdar, P.M.H. 1995Species and Specificity: An Interpretation of the History of ImmunologyCambridge, EnglandCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Meyer, E. 1898A History of Chemistry from the Earliest Times to the Present Day, Being also an Introduction to the Study of the Science2LondonMacmillan and Co., LTD. George McGowan, transGoogle Scholar
  26. Miliukov, P. 1962Russian and Its CrisisLondonCollier BooksGoogle Scholar
  27. Nägeli von, K.W. 1879Theorie der GährungMünchenOldenbourgGoogle Scholar
  28. Omelianskii, V.L., Undated notebooks. St. Peterburgskii Archiv Russkoi Akademii Nauk. Fond 892, opis’ 1, delo 13, listy 1-62 obGoogle Scholar
  29. Omelianskii, V.L., Undated. “Zadachi pochvennoi mikrobiologii.” This is a draft of his monograph Mikrobiologiia Pochvy. Archiv Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, Peterburgskoi Filial. Fond 892, opis’ 1, delo 11, list 1Google Scholar
  30. Omelianskii, V.L. 1927Sergei Nikolaevich Vinogradskii: Po povodu 70-letiia so dnia rozhdeniiaArchiv Biologicheskikh Nauk281133Google Scholar
  31. Omeliansky, W. 1899a. Ueber die Nitrifikation des organischen Stickstoffes. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parisitenkunde und Infektionskrankheiten, zweite abteilung: Allegemeine, landwirschaftlich-technologischeBakerteriologie, Garungsphysiologie, Pflanzenpathologie und Pflanzenschutz 5(13): 473–490Google Scholar
  32. Omeliansky, W. 1899b“Ueber die Isolierung der Nitrifikationsmikroben aus dem Erdboden.”Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parisitenkunde und Infektionskrankheiten, zweite abteilung: Allegemeine, landwirschaftlich-technologische Bakerteriologie, Garungsphysiologie, Pflanzenpathologie und Pflanzenschutz5537549Google Scholar
  33. Penn, M., Dworkin, M. 1976Robert Koch and Two Visions of MicrobiologyBacteriological Reviews40276283.Google Scholar
  34. Pfeffer, W. 1897Pflanzenphysiologie: Ein Handbuch der Lehre vom Stoffwechsel und Kraftwechsel in der Pflanze2LeipzigVerlag von Wilhelm EngelmannGoogle Scholar
  35. Razumovskaia, Z.G. 1960. “Zhizn’ i nauchnaia deiatel’nost’ Vasiliia Leonaidovicha Omelianskogo.” Russkie Mikrobiologi S. N. Vinogradskii i V. L. Omelianskii. Moskva: Izadatel’stvo Ministerstva Sel’skogo Xoziaistva SSS, pp. 17–25Google Scholar
  36. Reikhberg, G.E. eds. 1931Bor’ba za Nauku v Tsarskoi RossiiMoskva and LeningradGosudarstvennoe Sotsial’no-Ehkonomicheskoe Izdatel’stvoGoogle Scholar
  37. Robbins, R.G. 1975. Famine in Russia, 1891–1892: The Imperial Government Responds to a Crisis. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Robinson, G. 1970Heinrich Anton De BaryDictionary of Scientific Biography1612613Google Scholar
  39. Schloesing, J. and Müntz, A. 1877–1879. “Sur la Nitrification par les Ferments Organises.” Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences 84(7): 301–303; 85(22): 1018–1020; 86(14): 892–895; 89 (21): 891–894; 89(25): 1074–1077Google Scholar
  40. Schulze, E. 1888Sur les matériaux de réserve et plus particulièrement sur les tannin des feuilles persistantesAnnales Agronomiques14525Google Scholar
  41. Schulze, E. 1895Les engrais verts en sols pauvresAnnales agronomiques21394396Google Scholar
  42. Senchenkova, E.M. 1981. “Issledovaniia A. S. Famintsyna po Fotosyntezu.” Kursanov et al. (eds), Andrei Sergeevich Famintsyn: Zhizn’ i nauchnaia deiatel’nost’. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 86–109Google Scholar
  43. Sibirtsev, N.M. 1949Pamiati P.A. Kostychev: K godovomu dniu konchiny Pavla Andreevicha KostychevaKostychev, P.A. eds. Pochvy chernozemnoi oblasti Rossii: Ikh proiskhozhdenie, sostav i svoistvaMoskvaGosudarstvennoe Izd-vo Sel’skokhoziaistvennoi Literatury193197Google Scholar
  44. Stocklöv, J. 1998. Arthur Rudolf Hantzsch im Briefwechsel mit Wilhelm Ostwald. Berliner Beiträge zur Geschihte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik, Vol. 21. Berlin: Ellen R. Swinne-Verl, pp. 18–52Google Scholar
  45. Strogonov, B.P. 1996Andrei Sergeevich Famintsyn, 1835–1918MoskvaNaukaGoogle Scholar
  46. St. Peterburgskogo Obshchestva Estestvoispitatelei. 1893. Obzor Deiiatel’nosti St Peterburgskogo Obshchestva Estestvoispitatelei, Vol. XXVGoogle Scholar
  47. Strick, J. 2000Sparks of Life: Darwinism and the Victorian Debates over Spontaneous GenerationCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  48. Todes, D.P. 2002Pavlov’s Physiology Factory: Experiment, Interpretation, Laboratory EnterpriseBaltimoreThe Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
  49. Trass, K. 1976Geobotanika: Istoriia i Sovremennye Tendentsii RazvitiiaLeningradIzd.- vo NaukaGoogle Scholar
  50. Vernadsky, V. 1930Zhivoe VechestvoMoskvaGosizdatGoogle Scholar
  51. Vernadsky V., 1994. A.A. Iaroshevskii (ed.), Trudy po Geoximii. Moskva: NaukaGoogle Scholar
  52. Vinogradskii, S.N. Undated (probably 1949). Itogi (In the End). Arkhiv Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, Moskovskii Filial. Fond 1601, opis’ 1, delo 13Google Scholar
  53. Winogradsky, S. 1887Ueber SchwefelbacterienBotanische Zeitung31489507Google Scholar
  54. Winogradsky, S. 1890–1891. “Researches sur les Organismes de la Nitrification.” Annales de l’Institut Pasteur. 4: 215–231, 257–275, 760–811; 5: 92–100, 577–616Google Scholar
  55. Winogradsky, S. 1890–1891. “Sur les Organismes de la Nitrification.” Comptes Rendus des Seances de l’Academie des Sciences 60(19): 1013–1016; 63(2): 89–92Google Scholar
  56. Winogradsky, S. 1893. “Sur l’assimilation de l’azote gaseaux de l’atmosphere par les microbes.” Comptes Rendus deSeances de l’Academie Sciences. 1er Semestre. 116(24):1385–1388; 118(7):353–355Google Scholar
  57. Winogradsky, S. 1895Ob usvoenii svobodnogo azota atmosfery mikrobamiArkhiv Biologicheskikh Nauk3293351Google Scholar
  58. Winogradsky, S. and Omeliansky, V. 1899. “Ueber den Einfluss der Organischen Substanzen auf die Arbeit der nitrifizierenden Mikroben.” Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parisitenkunde und Infektionskrankheiten, zweite abteilung: Allegemeine, landwirschaftlich-technologische Bakerteriologie, Garungsphysiologie, Pflanzenpathologie und Pflanzenschutz 5(10): 329–440Google Scholar
  59. Winogradsky, S. 1927. “Sur le Pouvoir Fixateur des Terres.” Extraite des Comptes Rendus du Septieme congress de Chimie IndustrialleGoogle Scholar
  60. Winogradsky, S. 1937The Doctrine of Pleomorphism in BacteriologySoil Science43327340Google Scholar
  61. Winogradsky S., 1951. A.A. Imshenetskii (ed.), Mikrobiologiia Pochvy: Problemy i Metody, Piat'desiat let issledovanii. Moskva: Akademiia Nauk. Originally published as Idem. 1949. Microbiologie du Sol: Problèmes et Méthods, Ciquante ans de Recherches. Paris: MassonGoogle Scholar
  62. Waksman, S.A. 1932Principles of Soil MicrobiologyBaltimoreThe Williams and Wilkins CompanyGoogle Scholar
  63. Waksman, S.A. 1953Sergei Winogradsky: His Life and Work, The Story of a Great BacteriologistNew BrunswickRutgers University PressGoogle Scholar
  64. Weiner, D.R. 1988Models of Nature: Ecology, Conservation and Cultural Revolution in Soviet RussiaPittsburgUniversity of Pittsburg PressGoogle Scholar
  65. Weiner, D.R. 1999A Little Corner of Freedom, Russian Nature Protection from Stalin to GorbachevBerkeleyUniversity of California PressGoogle Scholar
  66. Worster, D. 1994Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological IdeasCambridgeCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  67. Yaalon, D.Berkowitz, S. eds. 1997History of Soil Science: International PerspectivesReiskirchen, GermanyCatena VerlGoogle Scholar
  68. Zavarzin, G.A. 1989Sergei Nikolaevich Vinogradskii, 1856–1952Mishustin, E.N. eds. Khemosintez: K 100-letiiu otkrytiia S. N. VinogradskimNaukaMoskva521Google Scholar
  69. Zavarzin, G.A. 1989Sergei N. Winogradsky and the Discovery of ChemosynthesisSchlegel, H.G.Bowien, B. eds. Autotrophic BacteriaMadisonScience Tech Publishers1732Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lloyd T. AckertJr
    • 1
  1. 1.Postdoctoral Associate, History of Science and Medicine Whitney Humanities CenterYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations