Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 535–570

The Bee Battles: Karl von Frisch, Adrian Wenner and the Honey Bee Dance Language Controversy



In 1967, American biologist Adrian Wenner (1928–) launched an extensive challenge to Karl von Frisch’s (1886–1982) theory that bees communicate to each other the direction and distance of food sources by a symbolic dance language. Wenner and various collaborators argued that bees locate foods solely by odors. Although the dispute had largely run its course by 1973 – von Frisch was awarded a Nobel Prize, while Wenner withdrew from active bee research – it offers us a rare window into mid-twentieth century discussions about animals, language, and cognition. Historians, sociologists, and scientists have commented on the debate and its outcome, but none has seriously questioned why von Frisch and Wenner pursued such different explanations of the bees’ dances. In this paper, I explore von Frisch and Wenner’s differing visions of animals and their behaviors and show how these contributed to their respective positions. Von Frisch’s early-twentieth-century training in experimental physiology disposed him to focus on individual animals, their abilities, and their behaviors’ evolutionary significance. Wenner, by contrast, was trained in mathematics and statistics and the Schneirla school of behavior. He viewed the bees’ behaviors probabilistically with an eye toward the entire hive and its surroundings and ultimately explained them in terms of simple stimulus–response conditioning. Finally, while the debate was resolved in von Frisch’s favor, he neither waged nor won the battle by himself. Instead, I show that practitioners, whose agendas ranged from the nascent fields of sociobiology to cognitive ethology, took up the cause of the communicating bees.


Adrian Wenner animal behavior animal communication animal consciousness animal mind honeybee dance language Karl von Frisch 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


Unpublished sources

  1. Von Frisch, Karl. Personal Papers. Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Munich. Nachlaß ANA 540, Folders: BI, Gould, James; BI, Griffin, Donald; BII, Griffin, Donald; BI, Hediger, Heini; BI, Jander, Rudolf; BI, Koehler, Otto; BII, Koehler, Otto; BI, Lindauer, Martin; BII, Mayr, Ernst; BII, Wenner, Adrian; Wenner, Adrian. Personal email correspondence with author, July 10, 2003Google Scholar

Published sources

  1. Danielle, Allen 2004

    “Burning The Fable of the Bees: The Incendiary Authority of Nature.”

    Lorraine, DastonFernando, Vidal eds. The Moral Authority of NatureUniversity of Chicago PressChicago7499
    Google Scholar
  2. Altman, Stuart A. 1972“Without a Word’ Book Review of Non-Verbal Communication, Edited by Robert A. Hinde”Nature240361362Google Scholar
  3. Ankerl, Guy, Perebooom, Derk 1974“Scientific Methods in Ethology, Letters”Science185814Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous,  1993“Adrian Wenner Retirement Announcement”American Bee Journal133237238Google Scholar
  5. Aristotle,  1965Historia animaliumLoeb classical libraryHeinemannLondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnes, Barry, Bloor, David 1982

    “Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge.”

    Martin, HollinsSteven, Lukes eds. Rationality and RelativismBasil BlackwellOxford2147
    Google Scholar
  7. Barsky, Robert F 1997Noam Chomsky: A Life of DissentMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  8. Burkhardt, Richard,Jr. 1990“Karl von Frisch”Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Supplement II17312320Google Scholar
  9. Burkhardt, Richard,Jr. 2004Pattern of Behavior: Konrad Lorentz, Niko Tinbergen, and the Founding of EthologyUniversity of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Burnett, D. Graham. 2002. “Mind in the Waters: John C. Lilly and the Communications Research Institute.” Conference paper presented at “Man and Beast: A Symposium in Honor of Naomi Schor. Yale UniversityGoogle Scholar
  11. Buttel-Reepen, Hugo von. 1900. “Sind die Bienen Reiexmaschinen?” Biologisches Zentralblatt 20: 97–109, 130–144, 177–193, 209–224, 289–304.Google Scholar
  12. Buttel-Reepen, Hugo 1912“Entomolgischer Reisebrief aus Ceylon’s Bergen”Entomologische Mitteilungen197103Google Scholar
  13. Buttel-Reepen, Hugo 1915Leben und Wesen der BienenViewegBraunschweigGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, John 1998‘“The Complete Biography of Every Animal’: Ants, Bees, and Humanity in Nineteenth-Century England”Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences29249267Google Scholar
  15. Coen, Deborah R. 2004. A Scientific Dynasty: Probability, Liberalism, and the Exner Family in Imperial Austria. PhD Dissertation, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen-Cole, Jamie N. 2003. Thinking About Thinking in Cold War America. PhD Dissertation, Princeton UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Crist, Eileen 2004“Can an Insect Speak? The Case of the Honeybee Dance Language”Social Studies of Science34743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Darwin, Charles 1981 [1971]The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to SexPrinceton University PressPrincetonGoogle Scholar
  19. Davenport, Demorest 1974‘Bee Language’ LettersScience186975976Google Scholar
  20. Dawkins,  Richard 1969‘“Bees are Easily Distracted’ Letters.”Science165751Google Scholar
  21. Deichmann, Ute 1996Biologists under HitlerHarvard University PressCambridge, MATranslated by Thomas DunlapGoogle Scholar
  22. Dewsbury, Donald A 1984Comparative Psychology in the Twentieth Century.Hutchinson Ross Publishing CompanyStroudsburg, PAGoogle Scholar
  23. Drouin, Jean-Marc. 1992“L’image des sociétés d’insectes en France à l’époque de la Revolution”Revue de Synthèse4113144Google Scholar
  24. Esch, Harald. 1964“Beiträge zum Problem der Entfernungsweisung in den Schwänzeltänzen der Honigbienen”Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Physiologe48534546Google Scholar
  25. Falls, Bruce J. 1992

    “Playback: A Historical Perspective.”

    Peter, K. McGregor eds. Playback and Studies of Animal CommunicationPlenum PressNew York1133
    Google Scholar
  26. Feller, William 1968 [1950].An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications3WileyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Forel, Auguste 1910Das Sinnesleben der InsektenReinhardtMünchenGoogle Scholar
  28. Forel, Auguste 1924 [1874]Les Fourmis de la Suisse2Imprimerie CoopérativeLa Chaux-de FondsGoogle Scholar
  29. Fraenkel, Gottfried Samuel, Donald, L. Gunn 1961 [1940]The Orientation of Animals, Kineses, Taxes and Compass ReactionsDover PublicationsNew YorkRevised and Enlarged EditionGoogle Scholar
  30. Frisch, Karl 1923a“Ein Zwergwels kommt wenn man ihm pfeift”Biologisches Zentralblatt43439446Google Scholar
  31. Frisch, Karl 1923b“Über die Sprache der Bienen. Eine tierpsychologische Untersuchung”Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für allgemeine Zoologie und Physiologie40439446Google Scholar
  32. Frisch, Karl 1927Aus dem Leden der Bienen2springerBerlinGoogle Scholar
  33. Frisch, Karl 1948 [1927]Aus dem Leben der Bienen4SpringerWienGoogle Scholar
  34. Frisch, Karl 1953‘“Sprache’ oder ‘Kommunication’ der Bienen?Psychologische Rundschau4235236Google Scholar
  35. Frisch, Karl 1965Aus dem Leben der BienenSpringerBerlinSeventh revised and expanded editionGoogle Scholar
  36. Frisch, Karl 1965Tanzsprache und orientierung der BienenSpringerBerlinGoogle Scholar
  37. Frisch, Karl 1966 [1927]The Dancing Bees: An Account of the Life and Senses of the Honey Bee2MethuenLondonTrans. by Dora Isle and Norman WalkerGoogle Scholar
  38. Frisch, Karl 1973 [1957]Erinnerungen eines BiologenSpringerBerlinThird Expanded EditionGoogle Scholar
  39. Frisch, Karl, Wenner, Adrian M, Johnson, Dennis L. 1967“Honeybees: Do They Use Direction and Distance Information Provided by Their Dancers?”Science15810721077Google Scholar
  40. Glaser, Linda 2003Brilliant Bees. Illus. Gay HollandMillbrook PressBrookfield, CTGoogle Scholar
  41. Gould, James L. 1975a. Honey Bee Communication: The Dance-Language Controversy. PhD Dissertation, Rockefeller UniversityGoogle Scholar
  42. Glaser, Linda 1975b“Honey Bee Recruitment: The Dance-Language Controversy”Science189685693Google Scholar
  43. Gould, James L, Gould, Carol G 1988The Honey BeeScientific American Library, FreemanNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Gould, James, Michael, Henerey, Michael, MacLeod 1970“Communication of Direction by the Honey Bee”Science169544554Google Scholar
  45. Greenwood, John D. 1999“Understanding the ‘Cognitive Revolution’ in Psychology”Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences35122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Griffin, Donald R 1976The Question of Animal Awareness: Evolutionary Continuity of Mental Experience.Rockefeller University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Griffin, Donald R., Marler, Peter. 1974“‘Scientific Methods in Ethology,’ Letters”Science185814Google Scholar
  48. Haldane, John B. S., Spurway, Helen. 1954“A Statistical Analysis of Communication in ‘Apis Mellifera’ and a Comparison with Communication in Other Animalsa”Insectes Sociaux1247283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harris, Randy A 1993The Linguistics Wars.Oxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Hockett, Charles F 1958A Course in Modern LinguisticsMacmillanNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Hoptro Montgomery, Georgina. “Place, Practice and Primatology: Clarence Ray Carpentes, Primate Communication and the Development of Field Methodology, 1931–1945.” Journal of the History of Biology 38(3): 495–533.Google Scholar
  52. Johnson, Dennis L. 1967“Honey Bees: Do they use the Direction Information Contained in their Dance Maneuver?”Science155844847Google Scholar
  53. Johnson, Dennis L., Wenner, Adrian M. 1966“A Relationship Between Conditioning and Communication in Honey Bees”Animal Behavior14261265Google Scholar
  54. Kak, Subhash. 1991. “The Honey Bee Dance Language Controversy.” The Mankind Quarterly (Summer), 357–365.Google Scholar
  55. Krames, LesterPliner, PatriciaAlloway, Thomas eds. 1974Nonverbal CommunicationPlenum PressNew York133169Google Scholar
  56. Lehrman, Daniel 1953“A Critique of Konrad Lorenz’s Theory of Instinctive Behavior”Quarterly Review of Biology28337363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lilly, John C 1961Man and DolphinDoubleday and CompanyGarden City, NYGoogle Scholar
  58. Lindauer, Martin. 1955“Schwarmbienen auf Wohnungssuche”Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Physiologie37263324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lindauer, Martin. 1971 [1961]Communication Among Social BeesHarvard University PressCambridge, MAThird printing with appendicesGoogle Scholar
  60. Lindsten, Jan. eds. 1992“The Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine 1973 Presentation Speech.”Scientific Publishing CompanySingapore7173Nobel Lectures, Physiology or Medicine 1971–1980Google Scholar
  61. Lotz, John. 1950“Speech and Language”The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America22712717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lotz, John. 1951‘“Karl von Frisch: Bees; Their Vision, Chemical Senses, and Language,’ Book Review.”Word 776667Google Scholar
  63. Lovejoy, Arthur 1960 [1936]The Great Chain of Being; A Study of the History of an IdeaHarper & BrothersNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Lubbock, John 1883Ameisen, Bienen und Wespen.BrockhausLeipzigGoogle Scholar
  65. Lustig, Abigail J. 2004

    “Ants and the Nature of nature in Auguste Forel, Erich Wasmann, and William Morton Wheeler.”

    Lorraine, DastonFernando, Vidal eds. The Moral Authority of NatureUniversity of Chicago PressChicago
    Google Scholar
  66. Mandler, George. 2002“Origins of the Cognitive Revolution”Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences38339353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Manning, Aubrey 1979 [1967]An Introduction to Animal Behaviour3Addison-WesleyReading, MAGoogle Scholar
  68. Marler, Peter, Griffin, Donald. 1973“The 1973 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine”Science182464466Google Scholar
  69. Merrick, Jeffrey. 1988“Royal Bees: The Gender Politics of the Bee in Early Modern Europe”Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture18738Google Scholar
  70. Milne, Lorus, Milne, Margery 1962The Senses of Animals and Men.AtheneumNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Mitman, Gregg 1999Reel Nature: America’s Romance With Wildlife on Film.Harvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  72. Mitman, Gregg 2004

    “Pachyderm Personalities: The Media of Science, Politics, and Conservation.”

    Loraine, DastonGregg, Mitman eds. Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on AnthropomorphismColumbia University PressNew York
    Google Scholar
  73. Munz, Tania. “Of Birds and Bees: Karl von Frisch, Konrad Lorenz, and the Science of Animals.” PhD Dissertation. Princeton University. In preparationGoogle Scholar
  74. Nyhart, Lynn K 1995Biology Takes Form: Animal Morphology and the German Universities, 1800–1900.University of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  75. Pauly, Philip J 1987Controlling life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology.Oxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  76. Prete, Frederick R. 1991“Can Females Rule the Hive? The Controversy over Honey Bee Gender Roles in Beekeeping Texts of the Sixteenth-Eighteenth Centuries”Journal of the History of Biology24113144Google Scholar
  77. Radick, Gregory. 2000“Morgan’s Canon, Garner’s Phonograph, and the Evolutionary Origins of Language and Reason”The British Journal for the History of Science33323Google Scholar
  78. Radick, Gregory. 2003

    “R. L. Garner and the Rise of the Edison Phonograph in Evolutionary Philology.”

    Lisa, GitelmanGeoffrey, B. Pingree eds. New Media, 1740–1915MIT PressCambridge, MA175206
    Google Scholar
  79. Radick, Gregory. “Primate Language and the Playback Experiment, in 1890 and 1980.” Journal of the History of Biology 38(3): 461–493 (this issue).Google Scholar
  80. Révész, Géza. 1953“Der Kampf um die sogenannte Tiersprache”Psychologische Rundschau43134Google Scholar
  81. Richards, Robert J. 1987Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior.University of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  82. Schneirla, Theodore C. 1957

    “The Concept of Development in Comparative Psychology.”

    Dale, B. Harris eds. The Concept of Development; An Issue in the Study of Human BehaviorUniversity of Minnesota PressMinneapolis78108
    Google Scholar
  83. Schneirla, Theodore C. 1964 [1961]

    “Instinctive Behavior, Maturation-Experience and Development.”

    Norman , R.F. MaierTheodore, C. Schneirla eds. Principles of Animal Psychology 1964 [1935]Dover PublicationsNew York555579
    Google Scholar
  84. Schneirla, Theodore C. 1971Army Ants: A Study in Social OrganizationFreeman and CompanySan Francisco: W.HGoogle Scholar
  85. Schneirla, Theodore C.,  et al. 1972 [1953]

    “The Concept of Levels in the Study of Social Phenomena.”

    Lester, R. Aronson eds. Selected Writings of T.C. SchneirlaFreeman and CompanySan Francisco: W.H.238253
    Google Scholar
  86. Sebeok, Thomas A. 1963“Communication among Social Bees; Porpoises and Sonar; Man and Dolphin”Language39448466Google Scholar
  87. Sebeok, Thomas A. eds. 1968Animal Communication; Techniques of Study and Results of ResearchIndiana University PressBloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  88. Sebeok, Thomas A.Ramsay, Alexandra eds. 1969Approaches to Animal CommunicationMoutonThe HagueGoogle Scholar
  89. Shapin, Steven, Shaffer, Simon 1985Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental LifePrinceton University PressPrincetonGoogle Scholar
  90. Simpson George, Gaylord 1966“The Biological Nature of Man”Science152472478Google Scholar
  91. Sleigh, Charlotte. 2000. Six Legs Better: A Cultural History of Entomology in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century. PhD Dissertation, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  92. Smith, Roger 1997The Norton History of the Human Sciences.W.W. NortonNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  93. Steche, Wolfgang. 1957“Gelenkter Bienenflug durch ‘Attrappentänze’”Naturwissenschaften44598Google Scholar
  94. Steche, Wolfgang. 1959. “How to talk to a Bee” Time (February 9), p. 34Google Scholar
  95. Taschwer, Klaus, Benedikt, Föger. 2003Konrad LorenzPaul Zsolany VerlagWienGoogle Scholar
  96. Thomas, Keith 1983Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England 1500–1800.Allen LaneLondonGoogle Scholar
  97. Thomas, Marion. “Are Animals Just Noisy Machines?: Louis Boutan and the Co-invention of Animal and Child Psychology in the French Third Republic.” Journal of the History of Biology 38(3): 425–460 (this issue).Google Scholar
  98. Thorpe, William Homan 1979The Origins and Rise of Ethology: the Science of the Natural Behaviour of AnimalsPraegerNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  99. Todes, Daniel P. 2002Pavlov’s Physiology Factor: Experiment, Interpretation, Laboratory Enterprise.Johns Hopkins University PressBaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  100. Veldink, Connie J. 1976. Paradigm Challenges in Modern Science: the Bee Language Controversy. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  101. Todes, Daniel P. 1989“The Honey-Bee Language Controversy”Interdisciplinary Science Reviews14166175Google Scholar
  102. Waal, Frans B.M 2001The Ape and the Sushi Master: Cultural Reflections by a Primatologist.Basic BooksNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  103. Wasmann, Erich. 1909 [1899]Die Psychischen Fähigkeiten der Ameisen2SchweizerbartStuttgartGoogle Scholar
  104. Wells, Patrick H., Wenner, Adrian M. 1973“Do Honey Bees have a Language?”Nature241171175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wenner, Adrian M. 1961a“Division of Labor in a Honey Bee Colony – A Markov Process?”Journal of Theoretical Biology1324327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wenner, Adrian M. 1961b. Sound Production During the Waggle Dance of the Honey Bee. PhD Dissertation, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  107. Wenner, Adrian M. 1964“Sound Communication in Honeybees”Scientific American210116124Google Scholar
  108. Wenner, Adrian M. 1967“Honey Bees: Do they use the Distance Information Contained in their Dance Maneuver?”Science155847849Google Scholar
  109. Wenner, Adrian M. 1968

    “Honey Bees.”

    Thomas, Sebeok eds. Animal Communication: Techniques of Study and Methods of ResearchIndiana University PressBloomington217243
    Google Scholar
  110. Wenner, Adrian M. 1974

    “Information Transfer in Honey Bees: A Population Approach.”

    Lester, KramesPatricia, PlinerThomas, Alloway eds. Nonverbal CommunicationPlenum PressNew York133169
    Google Scholar
  111. Wenner, Adrian M. 1997

    “The Role of Controversy in Animal Behavior.”

    Gary, Greenberg eds. Comparative Psychology of Invertebrates: The Field and Laboratory Study of Insect BehaviorGarland PublishingNew York337
    Google Scholar
  112. Wenner, Adrian M. 1999–2003. 1A. Read Me First A Chronology. BeeSource.Com. (accessed January 19, 2005)Google Scholar
  113. Wenner, Adrian M., Dennis L., Johnson 1966“Simple Conditioning in Honey Bees”Animal Behavior14149155Google Scholar
  114. Wenner, Adrian M., Patrick, H. Wells 1990Anatomy of a Controversy: The Question of a Language Among BeesColumbia University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  115. Wenner, Adrian M., Wells, Patrick H., Dennis L., Johnson 1969“Honeybee Recruitment to Food Sources: Olfaction or Language?”Science1648486Google Scholar
  116. Wenner, Adrian M., James F., Rohif 1967“An Analysis of the Waggle Dance and Recruitment in Honey Bees”Physiological Zoölogy4031744Google Scholar
  117. Wilson, Edward O. 1971The Insect SocietiesBelknap Press of Harvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  118. Wilson, Edward O. 1972a“Animal Communication”Scientific American2275260Google Scholar
  119. Wilson, Edward O. 1972b“Letters”Scientific American227 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Wilson, Edward O. 1989 [1985]

    “In the Queendom of the Ants: A Brief AFutobiography.”

    Donald, A. Dewsbury eds. Studying Animal Behavior: Autobiographies of the FoundersUniversity of Chicago PressChicago
    Google Scholar
  121. Young, Robert M. 1967

    “Animal Soul.”

    Paul, Edwards eds. Encyclopedia of Philosophy Vol. 1.MacmillanNew York122127
    Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.History of SciencePrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations