Advertisement

Unfolding the direct and indirect effects of social class of origin on faculty income

  • Roxana Chiappa
  • Paulina Perez MejiasEmail author
Article

Abstract

Studies on faculty income have typically focused on disparities associated with gender and race. Surprisingly, much less attention has been paid to the social class background of university faculty and how it might affect their pathways to the professoriate and their opportunities to access high-paying positions. We attempted to address this gap in the literature by looking at a sample of faculty working at Chilean universities. We used a path analysis approach to estimate not only the direct effects of social class of origin on income but also the indirect mechanisms through which social class of origin influences faculty income. We posed two alternative conceptual perspectives with regard to the effects of social class on income—social reproduction and human capital. We found that faculty who come from the upper social class have access to higher-quality undergraduate education and to more prestigious PhD-granting universities and they report higher earnings as compared with those who come from a low social class. These findings resemble a dynamic of cumulative educational advantages that provides grounds to the theory of social reproduction. Although it could be argued that the positive effect of prestige of the PhD-granting university on income is in line with the human capital theory, we claim that such effect cannot be analyzed independently from the direct and indirect relationships that exist between social class of origin and the prestige of the university from which faculty obtained their doctorate degrees.

Keywords

Social class of origin Social reproduction Faculty income University prestige and rankings Social stratification of academia Path analysis 

Notes

References

  1. Alwin, D. (2007). Margins of error: a study of reliability in survey measurement. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alwin, D., Zeiser, K., & Gensimore, D. (2014). Reliability of self-reports of financial data in surveys: results from the health and retirement study. Sociological Methods and Research, 43(1), 98–136.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113507908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ARWU (2017). Academic ranking of world class universities 2017. Retrieved January 8, 2019 from http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2017.html.
  4. Auriol, L., Misu, M., & Freeman, R. A. (2013). Careers of doctorate holders. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers.  https://doi.org/10.1787/5k43nxgs289w-en.
  5. Barratt, W. (2011). Social class on campus: theories and manifestations. Sterling: Stylus Pub.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, G. S. (1967). Human capital and the personal distribution of income; an analytical approach. Ann Arbor: Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
  7. Bernasconi, A. (2010). La apoteosis del investigador y la institucionalización de la profesión académica en Chile. Estudios Sobre Educación, 19, 139–163.Google Scholar
  8. Berríos, P. (2014a). The academic life of part-time professors in Chile (dissertation). State University of New York, Albany, Albany. Retrieved from http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/1648172558.html?FMT=ABS.
  9. Berríos, P. (2014b). La Profesión Académica en Chile: Crecimiento y Profesionalización. In A. Bernasconi (Ed.), La Educación Superior en Chile: Transformación, Desarrollo y Crisis, (pp. 349-357). Santiago, Chile: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile y Ediciones UC.Google Scholar
  10. Bornmann, L., & Enders, J. (2004). Social origin and gender of doctoral degree holders. An International Journal for all Quantitative Aspects of the Science of Science, Communication in Science and Science Policy, 61(1), 19–41.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037360.59788.fb.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1987). What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32, 1–17.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Breen, R., & Johnson, J. (2005). Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology, 31(1), 223–243.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burris, V. (2004). The academic caste system: prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 239–264.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Canales, A. (2016). Diferencias Socioeconómicas en la Decisión de Postular a las Universidades Chilenas: El rol de las expectativas educativas, preparación académica y decisiones educativas de los postulantes. Revista Calidad en la Educación, 44, 129–157.  https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-45652016000100006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Caplow, T., & McGee, R. (1958). The academic marketplace. New York: Basic Books Inc..Google Scholar
  18. Celis, S., & Kim, J. (2018). The making of homophilic networks in international research collaborations: a global perspective from Chilean and Korean engineering. Research Policy, 47(3), 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chiappa, R., & Muñoz García, A. L. (2015). Equity and advanced human capital: an analysis of the doctoral formation policies in Chile. Psicoperspectivas, 14(3), 17–30. Retrieved January 8, 2019http://www.psicoperspectivas.cl/index.php/psicoperspectivas/article/view/621.
  20. Clauset, A., Arbesman, S., & Larremore, D. B. (2015). Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks. Science Advances, 1(1).  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400005.
  21. CNA Chile (n.d.). Búsqueda Avanzada de Acreditaciones. Retrieved January 8, 2019 from https://www.cnachile.cl/Paginas/buscador-avanzado.aspx.
  22. CNIC. (2006). Informe Final: Consejo Nacional de Innovación para la Competitividad. Santiago: Asesor del Presidente de la República. CNIC.Google Scholar
  23. PNUD (2017). Desiguales. Orígenes, cambios y desafíos de la brecha social en Chile. Santiago de Chile: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo. Retrived January 08, 2019 from http://www.cl.undp.org/content/dam/chile/docs/pobreza/undp_cl_pobreza-Libro-DESIGUALES-final.pdf.
  24. CONICYT (n.d.-a). Becas para Estudios de Postgrado en Chile y en el Extranjero: Estadísticas . Retrieved January 8, 2019 from https://www.conicyt.cl/becasconicyt/estadisticas/informacion-general/.
  25. CONICYT (n.d.-b) Becas de Doctorado en el Extranjero. Becas Chile 2014. Retrieved January 8, 2019 from http://www.conicyt.cl/becasconicyt/files/2014/02/Bases-Doctorado-en-el-Extranjero-BECAS-CHILE-Convoctoria-2014.pdf.
  26. Crane, D. (1969). Social class origin and academic success: the influence of two stratification systems on academic careers. Sociology of Education, 42(1), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2111805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Crane, D. (1970). The academic marketplace revisited: a study of faculty mobility using the Cartter ratings. American Journal of Sociology, 75(6), 953–964.  https://doi.org/10.1086/224848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dannefer, D. (2003). Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: cross-fertilizing age and social science theory. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58b(6), S327–S337.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.6.S327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eyzaguirre, N., Marcel, M., Rodriguez, J., & Tokman, M. (2005). Hacia la Economía del Conocimiento: El camino para crecer con equidad en el largo plazo. Estudios Públicos, 97, 5–52.Google Scholar
  30. Geiser, C. (2013). Data analysis with Mplus. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  31. González, S., Brunner, J. J., & Salmi, J. (2013). Comparación internacional de remuneraciones académicas: Un estudio exploratorio. Calidad en la Educación, (39), 21–42.  https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-45652013000200002.
  32. González-Canché, M. S. (2017). Community college scientists and salary gap: navigating socioeconomic and academic stratification in the U.S. higher education system. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(1), 1–32.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1243933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guzmán-Valenzuela, C., & Barnett, R. (2013). Academic fragilities in a marketised age: the case of Chile. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(2), 203–220.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2013.776006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hadani, M., Coombes, S., Das, D., & Jalajas, D. (2012). Finding a good job: academic network centrality and early occupational outcomes in management academia. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(5), 723–739.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hanushek, E. (2013). Economic growth in developing countries: the role of human capital. Economics of Education Review, 37(2), 204–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hartmann, M. (2010). Achievement or origin: social background and ascent to top management. Talent Development and Excellence, 2(1), 105–117.Google Scholar
  37. Headworth, H., & Freese, H. (2015). Credential privilege or cumulative advantage? Prestige, productivity, and placement in the academic sociology job market. Social Forces, 94(3), 1257–1282.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. INE (2017). ESI Encuesta Suplementaria de Ingresos 2016. Sintesis de Resultados. Retrieved January 8, 2019 from http://www.ine.cl/docs/default-source/ingresos-y-gastos/esi/ingreso-de-hogares-y-personas/resultados/2016/esi_sintesis_2016_nacional.pdf?sfvrsn=4.
  39. Jungbauer-Gans, M., & Gross, C. (2013). Determinants of success in university careers: findings from the German academic labor market. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 42(1), 74–92.  https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2013-0106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keeley, B. (2009). Human capital: how what you know shapes your life. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kniffin, K. (2007). Accessibility to the PhD and professoriate for first-generation college graduates: review and implications for students, faculty, and campus policies. American Academic, 3, 49–79.Google Scholar
  42. Lang, D. (1984). Education, stratification, and the academic hierarchy. Research in Higher Education, 21(3), 329–352.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lang, D. (1987). Equality, prestige, and controlled mobility in the academic hierarchy. American Journal of Education, 95(3), 441–467.  https://doi.org/10.1086/444314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Loehlin, J. (2004). Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis (4th ed.). Mahwah: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  45. Masyn, K. (2013). Latent class analysis & finite mixture modeling. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods, Vol. 2: statistical analysis (pp. 551–610). Online publication: Oxford.Google Scholar
  46. Matear, A. (2008). English language learning and education policy in Chile: can English really open doors for all? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(2), 131–147.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790802036679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McDonough, P. M. (1998). Choosing colleges. How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  48. McDonough, P. M., & Fann, A. J. (2007). The study of inequality. In P. J. Gumport (Ed.), Sociology of higher education. Contributions and their contexts (pp. 53–93). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Mincer, J. (1984). Human capital and economic growth. Economics of Education Review, 3(3), 195–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7757(84)90032-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. MINECON (2015). Principales resultados proyecto CDH 2011. Encuesta trayectoria de profesionales con grado de doctor residentes en Chile. Retrieved January 8, 2019 from http://www.economia.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Presentaci%C3%B3n-principales-resultados-CDH.pdf.
  51. MINEDUC (2015). Informe Nacional de Resultados SIMCE 2012. Retrieved January 8, 2019 from http://archivos.agenciaeducacion.cl/biblioteca_digital_historica/resultados/2012/result_2012.pdf.
  52. Mizala, A., & Torche, F. (2012). Bringing the schools back in: the stratification of educational achievement in the Chilean voucher system. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(1), 132–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Monks, J. (2000). The returns to individual and college characteristics: evidence from the national longitudinal survey of youth. Economics of Education Review, 19(3), 279–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(99)00023-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moore, J. C., & Welniak, E. J. (2000). Income measurement error in surveys: a review. Journal of Official Statistics, 16(4), 331.Google Scholar
  55. Morrison, E., Rudd, E., & Nerad, M. (2011). Onto, up, off the academic faculty ladder: the gendered effects of family on career transitions for a cohort of social science Ph.D.s. The Review of Higher Education, 34(4), 525–553.  https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2011.0017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mullen, A. L., Goyette, K. A., & Soares, J. A. (2003). Who goes to graduate school? Social and academic correlates of educational continuation after college. Sociology of Education, 76(2), 143–169.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3090274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nettles, M. T., Perna, L. W., & Bradburn, E. M. (2000). Salary, promotion, and tenure status of minority and women faculty in U.S. 1993 national study of postsecondary faculty (NSOPF-93). Washington, DC: NCES.Google Scholar
  58. Núñez, J., & Gutiérrez, R. (2004). Classism, discrimination and meritocracy in the labor market: the case of Chile. Retrieved January 8, 2019 from http://www2.facso.uchile.cl/sociologia/1060225/docs/chile/nunez.pdf.
  59. OECD (n.d.). Inequality. Retrieved January 8, 2019 from http://www.oecd.org/social/inequality.htm.
  60. OECD & World Bank. (2010). Chile’s international scholarship programme. Retrieved January 8, 2019 from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/chile-s-international-scholarship-programme_9789264086425-en.
  61. Oldfield, K. (2010). Our cutting edge isn’t cutting it: why public administration should be the first discipline to implement a social class-based affirmative action plan for hiring professors. Administration & Society, 41(8), 1016–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Oldfield, K., & Conant, R. (2001). Professors, social class, and affirmative action: a pilot study. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 7(3), 171–185. Retrieved January 8, 2019 fromwww.jstor.org/stable/40215529.
  63. Orellana, V. (2011). Nuevos estudiantes y tendencias emergentes en la educación superior. Una mirada al Chile del mañana. In M. Jiménez & F. Lagos (Eds.), Nueva Geografía del Sistema de Educación Superior (pp. 80–140). Santiago: USS.Google Scholar
  64. Ostrove, J., Stewart, A., & Curtin, N. (2011). Social class and belonging: implications for graduate students’ career aspirations. Journal of Higher Education, 82(6), 748–774.  https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2011.0039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Perez Mejias, P. (2012). School and individual factors that contribute to the achievement gap in college admissions tests in Chile (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 3517700.Google Scholar
  66. Perez Mejias, P., Chiappa, R., & Guzmán-Valenzuela, C. (2018). Privileging the privileged: The effects of international University rankings on a chilean fellowship program for graduate studies abroad. Social Sciences, 7(12), 243–264.  https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7120243.
  67. Perna, L. (2001). Sex differences in faculty salaries: a cohort analysis. The Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 283–307.  https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2001.0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Perna, L. (2005). Sex differences in faculty tenure and promotion: the contribution of family ties. Research in Higher Education, 46(3), 277–307.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1641-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Perna, L. W., Orosz, K., Gopaul, B., Jumakulov, Z., Ashirbekov, A., & Kishkentayeva, M. (2014). Promoting human capital development: a typology of international scholarship programs in higher education. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 63–73.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x14521863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pusser, B., & Marginson, S. (2013). University rankings in critical perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 544–568.  https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2013.0022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. QS (2018). QS world university rankings 2018. Retrieved January 8, 2019 from https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2018.
  72. RICYT (n.d.) Doctorates 2007-2016. Retrieved January 8, 2019 from http://dev.ricyt.org/ui/v3/comparative.html?indicator=CDOCTORADO
  73. Schultz, T. W. (1971). Investment in human capital: the role of education and of research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  74. Simburger, E., & Neary, M. (2016). Taxi professors: academic labour in Chile—a critical practical response to the politics of worker identity. Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labour, 28, 48–73.Google Scholar
  75. THE (2018). The Times Higher Education (THE) world university rankings 2018. Retrieved January 8, 2019 from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats.
  76. The World Bank (n.d.). LAC equity lab: poverty—poverty rate. Retrieved January 8, 2019 from http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/lac-equity-lab1/poverty/head-count.
  77. Toutkoushian, R. K., Bellas, M. L., & Moore, J. V. (2007). The interaction effects of gender, race, and marital status on faculty salaries. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 572–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Triventi, M. (2013). Stratification in higher education and its relationship with social inequality: a comparative study of 11 European countries. European Sociological Review, 29(3), 489–502.  https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcr092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Urzúa, S. (2012). The economic returns to higher education in Chile: revising the foundations of 30 years of public policies. Estudios Públicos, 125, 1–52.Google Scholar
  80. Valdivieso, P., Antivilo, A., & Barrios, J. (2006). Caracterización sociodemográfica de estudiantes que rinden la PSU, postulan y se matriculan en universidades del Consejo de Rectores. Calidad en la Educación, 24, 319–361.Google Scholar
  81. Walpole, M. (2003). Socioeconomic status and college: how SES affects college experiences and outcomes. The Review of Higher Education, 27(1), 45–73.  https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2003.0044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: methods and applications. Chichester: Wiley/Higher Education Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Webber, K. L., & González-Canché, M. G. (2015). Not equal for all: gender and race differences in salary for doctoral degree recipients. Research in Higher Education, 56(7), 645–672.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9369-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Welch, A. (1997). The peripatetic professor: the internationalization of the academic profession. Higher Education, 34, 323–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.CIAEUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations