Attractiveness of jobs in academia: a cross-country perspective
Asymmetric international mobility of highly talented scientists is well documented. We contribute to the explanation of this phenomenon, looking at the “competitiveness” of research universities in terms of being able to attract talented early stage researchers. We propose a new hybrid quantitative-qualitative methodology for comparing the top tier of national higher education systems: We characterise a country’s capability to offer attractive entry positions into academic careers building upon the results of a large scale experiment on the determinants of job choice in academia, using a mix of data and expert-based assessment. We examine salary level, quality of life, career perspectives, research organisation, balance between teaching and research, funding and the probability of working with high quality peers. Our results in the form of a job attractiveness index indicate that overall, the US research universities offer the most attractive jobs for early stage researchers, consistent with the asymmetric flow of talented scientists to the US. By comparison with rankings that use survey results or bibliometric data, our methodology offers the advantage of comparing structures and factors shaping the process of research rather than results of research. The findings are hence directly relevant for policies aiming at improving the attractiveness of research universities.
KeywordsBrain drain Competitiveness in science Comparative higher education Academic labour market Job attractiveness index
We are very grateful to the country experts who have reviewed our classification of countries, as well as to Hans Pechar and Falk Reckling for valuable comments and advice. Kathrin Hranyai performed excellent research assistance. Any mistakes and errors are our responsibility.
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007–2013 under grant agreement no. 290647.
- Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Hoxby, C. M., Mas-Colell, A., Sapir, A. (2008). Higher aspirations: An agenda for reforming European universities, 5, Bruegel.Google Scholar
- Clark, B. R. (1983). The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective (p. 94720). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2009). Documenting the Brain Drain of" La crème de la Crème". Three Case-Studies on International Migration at the Upper Tail of the Education Distribution. Jahrbucher Natl. Stat., 229(6), 679–705.Google Scholar
- Enders, J., & Musselin, C. (2008). Back to the future? The academic professions in the 21st century. High. Educ. 2030, Demography, 1, 125–150.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2011). Green Paper. From Challenges to Opportunities: Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation funding, COM (2011) 48.Google Scholar
- Finkelstein, M. J., Iglesias, K. W., Panova, A., & Yudkevich, M. (2015). Future Prospects for Young Faculty Across the Academic World. A Global Comparison and Assessment. In M. Yudkevich, P. G. Altbach, & L. E. Rumbley (Eds.), Young Fac. Twenty-First Century Int. Perspect (pp. 334–363). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Geuna, A. (2015). Global Mobility of Research Scientists: The Economics of Who Goes Where and Why. Amsterdam: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Höhle, E. (2015). Hierarchie in Lehrstuhl und Department. In U. Banscherus, O. Engel, A. Mindt, A. Spexard, & A. Wolter (Eds.), Differenzierung im Hochschulsystem: Nationale und internationale Entwicklungen und Herausforderungen (pp. 199–220). Münster: Waxmann Verlag.Google Scholar
- Hollanders, H., & Es-Sadki, N. (2018). European innovation scoreboard 2018. Luxembourg: European Union.Google Scholar
- Hunter, R. S., Oswald, A. J., & Charlton, B. G. (2009). The Elite Brain Drain*. The Econometrics Journal, 119(538), F231–F251.Google Scholar
- IDEA Consult. (2013a). Mobility of Researchers 2. Brussels: Report on survey of researchers in EU HEI.Google Scholar
- IDEA Consult. (2013b). Mobility of Researchers 2. Brussels: Report on survey of researchers outside EU.Google Scholar
- Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. The American Economic Review, 81(1), 114–132.Google Scholar
- Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2005). Universities in national innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Oxf. Handb. Innov (pp. 209–239). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Stephan, P. (2012). How Economics Shapes Science. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Whitley, R. (2007). Changing governance of the public sciences. In J. Gläser & R. Whitley (Eds.), Chang. Gov. Sci. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Whitley, R., Gläser, J., & Engwall, L. (Eds.). (2010). Reconfiguring knowledge production: changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar