Advertisement

My best writing space: understanding academics self-professed writing spaces

  • Angela R. Dobele
  • Ekant Veer
Article

Abstract

Research into academic writing has, in large part, focused on the fundamentals of how to write, and as a result, the understanding that writers require a space in which to concentrate on writing is not new. What is lacking, however, is detailed consideration of what influences writing practice and, specifically, an understanding of how scholarly writers construct their writing taskspaces. This paper explored how academic writers organised their best writing taskspaces. The notion of what constituted best was self-defined by informants. Informants submitted photographs of their best writing spaces, and these were analysed using a two-part methodology. First, the artistic and structural elements of the photographs were considered followed by analysis of the each photograph’s aesthetic qualities to determine the participants’ establishment and maintenance practices. The relationship between academic writers and their best writing spaces was categorised around construction and consumption themes. A typology of academic writers was developed from these findings. A four-part research agenda is proposed. This research extends understanding to include the informant’s role in creating writing spaces which may guide building and design, renovations and reallocation plans for departments and assist individual academics to improve writing productivity and effectiveness. The findings may also assist managers to ensure that employer-provided working habitats are conducive to effective writing.

Keywords

Academic infrastructure analyses Publishing Qualitative methods Promotion and tenure Higher education 

References

  1. Abrahamson, E., & Freedman, D. H. (2013). A perfect mess: the hidden benefits of disorder. UK: Hachette.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, T. (2002). From the Buerolandschaft to the cityscape in the office. A design manual: office buildings. Germany: Birkhaeuser.Google Scholar
  3. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes, T. J. (1997). Reading human geography: the poetics and politics of inquiry. In T. Barnes & D. Gregory (Eds.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  5. Belk, R. W., & Watson, J. C. (1998). Material culture and the extended or unextended self in our university offices. In ACR North American Advances.Google Scholar
  6. Belk, R. W., Yong Seo, J., & Li, E. (2007). Dirty little secret: home chaos and professional organizers. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 10(2), 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bitner, M. J. (1992). Servicescapes: the impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. The Journal of Marketing, 56, 57–71.Google Scholar
  8. Bohnsack, R. (2009). The interpretation of pictures and the documentary method. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 296–321.Google Scholar
  9. Boice, R., & Johnson, K. (1984). Perception and practice of writing for publication by faculty at a doctoral-granting university. Research in Higher Education, 21(1), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brand, J. L., & Smith, T. J. (2005). Effects of reducing enclosure on perceptions of occupancy quality, job satisfaction, and job performance in open-plan offices. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Sage CA.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, S. (2005). Writing marketing: literary lessons from academic authorities. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Carlin, L. & A. Forbes. (2017). How to create an inspirational workspace for writing. Write to Done: Unmissable Articles on Writing Retrieved May 4, 2017, from http://writetodone.com/create-inspirational-workspace-12-steps/.
  13. Chandrasekar, K. (2011). Workplace environment and its impact on organisational performance in public sector organisations. International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems, 1(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  14. Cloutier, C. (2015). How I write an inquiry into the writing practices of academics. Journal of Management Inquiry May, 14, 1–16.Google Scholar
  15. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (Original work published 1980).Google Scholar
  16. Duffy, F. (1992). The changing workplace. London: Phaidon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Duncan, N. (1996). BodySpace: destabilizing geographies of gender and sexuality. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  18. Elliott, D. B. (2014). The impact factor: a useful indicator of journal quality or fatally flawed? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 34(1), 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farinelli, F., Olsson, G., & Reichert, D. (1994). Limits of representation. Munich: Accedo.Google Scholar
  20. Grant, B., & Knowles, S. (2000). Flights of imagination: academic women be (com) ing writers. International Journal for Academic Development, 5(1), 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gregson, N. A., Simonsen, K., & Vaiou, D. (2003). Writing (across) Europe: on writing spaces and writing practices. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanson, S., & Pratt, G. (1995). Gender, work, and space. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  23. Harvey, D. C. (2001). Heritage pasts and heritage presents: temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 7(4), 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hedge, A. (1982). The open-plan office: a systematic investigation of employee reactions to their work environment. Environment and Behavior, 14(5), 519–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. 1927. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  26. Hjortshoj, K. (2001). From transition to college writing. Bedford: St. Martin's Press. Johnson, RB & Onwuegbuzie, AJ (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher 33(7): 14–26.Google Scholar
  27. Hongisto, V., Haapakangas, A., Varjo, J., Helenius, R., & Koskela, H. (2016). Refurbishment of an open-plan office–environmental and job satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 176–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hult, G. T. M., Neese, W. T., & Bashaw, R. E. (1997). Faculty perceptions of marketing journals. Journal of Marketing Education, 19(1), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hyland, K. (2011). Welcome to the machine: thoughts on writing for scholarly publication. Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research, 1(1), 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ingold, T. (1993). The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology, 25(2), 152–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  32. Kempenaar, L. E., & Murray, R. (2016). Writing by academics: a transactional and systems approach to academic writing behaviours. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 940–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim, J., & De Dear, R. (2013). Workspace satisfaction: the privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuntz, A. M. (2011). Reconsidering the workplace: faculty perceptions of their work and working environment. Studies in Higher Education, 37(7), 769–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kupritz, V. (2003). Accommodating privacy to facilitate new ways of working. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 20, 122–135.Google Scholar
  36. Laing, A. (2006). New patterns of work: the design of the office. Reinventing the workplace, 2, 29–49.Google Scholar
  37. Lea, M. R., & Stierer, B. (2000). Student writing in higher education: new contexts. Buckingham: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar
  38. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. MacLeod, I., Steckley, L., & Murray, R. (2012). Time is not enough: promoting strategic engagement with writing for publication. Studies in Higher Education, 37(6), 641–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Margolis, E., & Pauwels, L. (2011). The Sage handbook of visual research methods. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Mayrath, M. C. (2008). Attributions of productive authors in educational psychology journals. Educational Psychology Review, 20(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller, J. J. (2017). Publish or perish? (pp. 99–114). Critical Essays in Sport Management: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Moore, S. (2003). Writers’ retreats for academics: exploring and increasing the motivation to write. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(3), 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Murray, R. (2013). Writing for academic journals. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  45. Murray, R., & Newton, M. (2009). Writing retreat as structured intervention: margin or mainstream? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(5), 541–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Murray, R., Steckley, L., & MacLeod, I. (2012). Research leadership in writing for publication: a theoretical framework. British Educational Research Journal, 38(5), 765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Noe, R. A., & Barber, A. E. (1993). Willingness to accept mobility opportunities: destination makes a difference. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pöppel, E. (1978). Time perception. Perception (pp. 713–729). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13(3), 257–266.Google Scholar
  50. Roelofsen, P. (2002). The impact of office environments on employee performance: the design of the workplace as a strategy for productivity enhancement. Journal of Facilities Management, 1(3), 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Salinas, S., & Munch, S. B. (2015). Where should I send it? Optimizing the submission decision process. PLoS One, 10(1), e0115451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Samson, D. (2013). From the ivory tower to activity based workspaces. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(6), 624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Silvia, P. J. (2007). How to write a lot: a practical guide to productive academic writing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  54. Spain, D. (1993). Gendered spaces and women’s status. Sociological Theory, 11, 137–151.Google Scholar
  55. Starker, J. E. (1990). Psychosocial aspects of geographic relocation: the development of a new social network. American Journal of Health Promotion, 5(1), 52–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stokols, D., & Scharf, T. (1990). Developing standardized tools for assessing employees’ ratings of facility performance. Performance of buildings and serviceability of facilities. Philadelphia: ASTM International.Google Scholar
  57. Tang, R., & John, S. (1999). The ‘I’ in identity: exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18, S23–S39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thompson, G. A. (2016). Temporality, stance ownership, and the constitution of subjectivity. Language & Communication, 46, 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tian, K., & Belk, R. W. (2005). Extended self and possessions in the workplace. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Veitch, J. A., Charles, K. E., Farley, K. M., & Newsham, G. R. (2007). A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vischer, J. C. (2007). The effects of the physical environment on job performance: towards a theoretical model of workspace stress. Stress and Health, 23(3), 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wiedenbach, E., Dickoff, J., & James, P. (1968). Theory in a practice discipline. Part II. Nursing Research, 17(6), 545–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yadav, M., Kim, J., Cabrera, D., & De Dear, R. (2017). Auditory distraction in open-plan office environments: the effect of multi-talker acoustics. Applied Acoustics, 126, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ybema, S. (2010). Talk of change: temporal contrasts and collective identities. Organization Studies, 31(4), 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics, Finance and MarketingRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.College of Business and LawUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations